1887
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-3770
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3789
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The papers in this special issue examine the relationships between language, sexuality and affect. Using examples of language use from Argentine cinema, bounce music performance, a university classroom, a BDSM community, and Black women’s urban queer space, the papers show how various forms of linguistic practice allow affect to remain comfortably nested on “the cusp of semantic availability” ( Williams 1977 : 134), rather than being reduced to tightly defined categories or messages. The discussions of these examples also show how various forms of linguistic practice allow sexuality to unfold as a messy formation ( Giffney 2009 , Manalansan 2014 ), thereby remaining resistant to boundaries and precise definitions. The basis for these parallels between affect and sexuality are explored in these papers, as are their implications for future studies of language, affect, and sexuality.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jls.00002.lea
2018-02-22
2019-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmed, Sarah
    2004 Affective economies. Social Text22(2): 117–139. doi: 10.1215/01642472‑22‑2_79‑117
    https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117 [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackman, Lisa & Venn, Couze
    2010 Affect. Body and Society16(1): 7–28. doi: 10.1177/1357034X09354769
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X09354769 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, Mel Y.
    2012Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Durham: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822395447
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395447 [Google Scholar]
  4. Giffney, Noreen
    2009 Introduction: The “q” word. InThe Ashgate Companion to Queer Theory, Noreen Giffney & Michael O’Rourke (eds), 1–13. Farnham: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Leap, William L.
    forthcoming Queer refusal. GLAD! Revue sur le langage, le genre, les sexualités.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Manalansan, Martin
    2014 The “stuff” of archives: Mess, migration and queer lives. Radical History Review120: 94–107. doi: 10.1215/01636545‑2703742
    https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-2703742 [Google Scholar]
  7. Massumi, Brian
    2002Parables for the Virtual: Movements, Affects, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822383574
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383574 [Google Scholar]
  8. Muñoz, José Esteban
    1999Disidentifications: Queers of Color and the Performance of Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky
    2003Tendencies. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Seigworth, Gregory J. & Gregg, Melissa
    2010 An inventory of shimmersInThe Affect Theory Reader, Melissa Gregg & Gregory J. Seigworth (eds), 1–27. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Thrift, Nigel
    2004 Intensities of feeling: Toward a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler86B(1): 57–78. doi: 10.1111/j.0435‑3684.2004.00154.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Wetherell, Margaret
    2013 Affect and discourse – What’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity6(4): 349–368. doi: 10.1057/sub.2013.13
    https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2013.13 [Google Scholar]
  13. Williams, Raymond
    1977Marxism and Literature. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jls.00002.lea
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error