Introduction

References

1. Boellstorff, Tom
   2004a ‘Authentic, of course’: Gay language in Indonesia and cultures of belonging. InSpeaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language, William Leap & Tom Boellstorff (eds), 181–201. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Boellstorff, Tom
   2004b Playing back the nation: Waria, Indonesian transvestites. Cultural Anthropology19(2): 159–195. 10.1525/can.2004.19.2.159
   https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2004.19.2.159 [Google Scholar]
3. Boellstorff, Tom
   2005 The Gay Archipelago: Sexuality and Nation in Indonesia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Heng, Geraldine & Devan, Janadas
   1995 The politics of nationalism, sexuality, and race in Singapore. InBewitching Women, Pious Men: Gender and Body Politics in Southeast Asia, Aihwa Ong & Michael Peletz (eds), 195–215. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. The Independent
   The Independent 2019 PM Lee: Whatever your sexual orientation, you’re welcome to work in Singapore. https://theindependent.sg/pm-lee-whatever-your-sexual-orientation-youre-welcome-to-work-in-singapore (October19 2020)
6. Lazar, Michelle M.
   2017 Homonationalist discourse as a politics of pragmatic resistance in Singapore’s Pink Dot movement: Towards a southern praxis. Journal of Sociolinguistics21(3): 420–441. 10.1111/josl.12239
   https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12239 [Google Scholar]
7. Lazar, Michelle M.
   2020 Linguistic (homo)nationalism, legitimacies, and authenticities in Singapore’s Pink Dot discourse. World Englishes39(4): 653–666. 10.1111/weng.12497
   https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12497 [Google Scholar]
8. Offord, Baden
   1999 The burden of (homo)sexual identity in Singapore. Social Semiotics9(3): 301–316. 10.1080/10350339909360441
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10350339909360441 [Google Scholar]
9. Ng, Yi-Sheng
   2017 Pride versus prudence: The precarious queer politics of Pink Dot. Inter- Asia Cultural Studies18(2): 238–250. 10.1080/14649373.2017.1313542
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2017.1313542 [Google Scholar]
10. Oswin, Natalie
    2010 Sexual tensions in modernizing Singapore: The postcolonial and the intimate. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28(1): 128–141. 10.1068/d15308
    https://doi.org/10.1068/d15308 [Google Scholar]
11. Oswin, Natalie
    2014 Queer time in global city Singapore: Neoliberal futures and the ‘freedom to love’. Sexualities17(4): 412–433. 10.1177/1363460714524765
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460714524765 [Google Scholar]
12. Peterson, David
    2016 Homophobic grammar: The role of transitivity and phoricity in homophobic formation. Journal of Language and Sexuality5(1): 61–93. 10.1075/jls.5.1.03pet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.5.1.03pet [Google Scholar]
13. Phillips, Robert
    2012 “Singaporean by birth, Singaporean by faith”: Queer Indians, internet technology, and the reconfiguration of sexual and national identity. InQueer Singapore: Illiberal Citizenship and Mediated Cultures, Audrey Yue & Jun Zubillaga-Pow (eds), 187–196. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. 10.5790/hongkong/9789888139330.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789888139330.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
14. Phillips, Robert
    2013 “We aren’t really that different”: Globe-hopping discourse and queer rights in Singapore. Journal of Language and Sexuality2(1): 122–144. 10.1075/jls.2.1.05phi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.2.1.05phi [Google Scholar]
15. Phillips, Robert
    2014 “And I am also gay”: Illiberal pragmatics, neoliberal homonormativity and LGBT activism in Singapore. Anthropologica56(1): 45–54.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Phillips, Robert
    2020 Virtual Activism: Sexuality, the Internet, and a Social Movement in Singapore. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 10.3138/9781487536275
    https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487536275 [Google Scholar]
17. Prankumar, Sujith Kumar, Aggleton, Peter & Bryant, Joanne
    2021 Belonging, citizenship and ambivalence among young gay, bisexual and queer Indian Singaporean men. Asian Studies Review45(1): 1–20. 10.1080/10357823.2020.1773762
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2020.1773762 [Google Scholar]
18. Rowlett, Benedict
    2018 Affect as narrative action in the Global South: An analysis of small stories about transnational same-sex relationships in Cambodia. Narrative Inquiry28(2): 237–256. 10.1075/ni.17062.row
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17062.row [Google Scholar]
19. Rowlett, Benedict
    2019 Mobility, immobility, and sexual transaction: Dirty socio-pragmatics in Cambodia. The 16th International Pragmatics Conference. Retrieved fromhttps://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/hkbu_staff_publication/6921
    [Google Scholar]
20. Tan, Chris K. K.
    2015 Pink Dot: Cultural and sexual citizenship in gay Singapore. Anthropological Quarterly88(4): 969–996. 10.1353/anq.2015.0058
    https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2015.0058 [Google Scholar]
21. Tan, Chris K. K.
    2016 A ‘great affective divide’: How gay Singaporeans overcome their double alienation. Anthropological Forum26(1): 17–36. 10.1080/00664677.2015.1102705
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2015.1102705 [Google Scholar]
22. Tang, Shawna
    2012 Transnational lesbian identities: Lessons from Singapore?InQueer Singapore: Illiberal Citizenship and Mediated Cultures, Audrey Yue & Jun Zubillaga-Pow (eds), 83–96. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. 10.5790/hongkong/9789888139330.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789888139330.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
23. Tang, Shawna
    2016 Postcolonial Lesbian Identities in Singapore: Re-thinking Global Sexualities. New York: Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781315720500
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315720500 [Google Scholar]
24. Tang, Shawna & Quah, Sharon E. L.
    2018 Heteronormativity and sexuality politics in Singapore: The female-headed households of divorced and lesbian mothers. Journal of Sociology54(4): 647–664. 10.1177/1440783317742530
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783317742530 [Google Scholar]
25. Yue, Audrey
    2007 Creative queer Singapore: The illiberal pragmatics of cultural production. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review3(3): 149–160.
    [Google Scholar]