1887
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-3770
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3789
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Changes to marriage legislation across the globe have received much academic and public attention. However, the labels used to categorise different marital configurations are somewhat under researched. In this paper we analyse the premodification of in a corpus of UK newspaper articles (2000–2018) to establish which labels are most commonly used in reference to same-sex marriage. These are , and . Drawing on the notion of category construction, we emphasise the fact that these labels are not neutral synonyms, as each encodes a particular understanding of same-sex marriage. Some labels even linguistically exclude certain groups, such as those who are bisexual or transgender. We use the tools of corpus-based discourse analysis to consider the nuanced differences between the category labels and consider whether the limitations of the labels are ever directly challenged.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jls.00034.pat
2024-07-12
2025-02-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bachmann, Ingo
    2011 Civil partnership – ‘gay marriage in all but name’: A corpus-driven analysis of discourses of same-sex relationships in the UK parliament. Corpora6(1): 77–105. 10.3366/cor.2011.0005
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2011.0005 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Paul
    2005Public Discourses of Gay Men. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowker, Geoffrey & Star, Susan
    2000 Invisible mediators of action: Classification and the ubiquity of standards. Mind, Culture, and Activity7(1–2): 147–163. 10.1080/10749039.2000.9677652
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2000.9677652 [Google Scholar]
  4. Breit, Eric
    2010 On the (re)construction of corruption in the media: A critical discursive approach. Journal of Business Ethics92(4): 619–635. 10.1007/s10551‑009‑0177‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0177-y [Google Scholar]
  5. Duggan, Lisa
    2002 The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. InMaterializing Democracy, Russ Castronovo & Dana D. Nelson (eds), 175–193. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fairclough, Norman
    2001Language and Power (2nd edition). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Findlay, Jamie
    2017 Unnatural acts lead to unconsummated marriages: Discourses of homosexuality in the House of Lords revisited. Journal of Language and Sexuality6(1): 30–60. 10.1075/jls.6.1.02fin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.6.1.02fin [Google Scholar]
  8. Government Equality Office
    Government Equality Office 2019 Marriage and civil partnership in England and Wales. Gov.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/marriage-and-civil-partnership-in-england-and-wales (July 6, 2021)
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gupta, Kat
    2015 Five thoughts (plus one) on same sex marriage. Kat Gupta’s Research Blog. mixosaurus.co.uk/2015/06/five-thoughts-plus-one-on-same-sex-marriage/ (July 6, 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gustara, Restu Anggi
    2019 A critical discourse analysis: The representation of ‘homosexual’, ‘lesbian’, and ‘gay’ collocate words in Cola (sic) and BNC Corpus. Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities21: 123–130. 10.29037/digitalpress.42269
    https://doi.org/10.29037/digitalpress.42269 [Google Scholar]
  11. HM Courts & Tribunal Services
    HM Courts & Tribunal Services 2022 Apply for a divorce or to dissolve a civil partnership: Form D8. Gov.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-d8-application-for-a-divorce-dissolution-or-to-apply-for-a-judicial-separation-order (November 4, 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones, Lucy
    2018 ‘I’m not proud, I’m just gay’: Lesbian and gay youths’ discursive negotiation of otherness. Journal of Sociolinguistics22(1): 55–76. 10.1111/josl.12271
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12271 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kania, Ursula
    2020 Marriage for all (‘Ehe fuer alle’)?! A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the marriage equality debate in Germany. Critical Discourse Studies17(2): 138–155. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1656656
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1656656 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa, Vít, Bušta, Jan, Jakubíček, Miloš, Kovář, Vojtěch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vít
    2014 The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography11: 7–36. 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ku, Eric K.
    2020 ‘Waiting for my red envelope’: Discourses of sameness in the linguistic landscape of a marriage equality demonstration in Taiwan. Critical Discourse Studies17(2): 156–174. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1656655
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1656655 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lazar, Michelle
    2002 Consuming personal relationships: The achievement of feminine self-identity through other-centeredness. InGender Identity and Discourse, Lia Litosseliti & Jane Sunderland (eds), 111–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.2.07laz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.2.07laz [Google Scholar]
  17. Love, Robbie & Baker, Paul
    2015 The hate that dare not speak its name?Journal of Language, Aggression & Conflict3(1): 57–86. 10.1075/jlac.3.1.03lov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.03lov [Google Scholar]
  18. MacCulloch, Diarmaid
    2018 From ‘same-sex marriage’ to ‘equal marriage’. British Academy Blog. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/blog/same-sex-marriage-equal-marriage (July 17, 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  19. McCormick, Tracey L.
    2015 A critical engagement? Analysing same-sex marriage discourses in To Have and To Hold: The making of same-sex marriage in South Africa (2008) – A queer perspective. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus461: 105–126. 10.5842/46‑0‑656
    https://doi.org/10.5842/46-0-656 [Google Scholar]
  20. Paterson, Laura L. & Gregory, Ian
    2019Representations of Poverty and Place: Using Geographical Text Analysis to Understand Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑93503‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93503-4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Paterson, Laura L. & Coffey-Glover, Laura
    2018 Discourses of marriage in same-sex marriage debates in the UK press 2011–2014. Journal of Language and Sexuality7(2): 175–204. 10.1075/jls.17022.pat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17022.pat [Google Scholar]
  22. Poulos, Elenie
    2020 The power of belief: Religious freedom in Australian parliamentary debates on same-sex marriage. Australian Journal of Political Science55(1): 1–19. 10.1080/10361146.2019.1706719
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2019.1706719 [Google Scholar]
  23. Santonocito, Carmen S.
    2018 Institutional discourse on same-sex marriage: A contrastive analysis between the US and the UK. (Paper presented atCorpora and Discourse International Conference, Lancaster University, United Kingdom)
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Scott, Michael
    2019Wordsmith Tools (Version 7.0) [Computer Software], Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software. Available online: https://www.lexically.net/wordsmith/downloads/
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Swales, Kirby & Attar Taylor, Eleanor
    2017 Moral attitudes: Sex, gender identity and euthanasia. InBritish Social Attitudes: The 34th Report, Elizabeth Clery, John Curtice, & Roger Harding (eds), 1–42. London: The National Centre for Social Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Turner, Georgina, Mills, Sara, van der Bom, Isabelle, Coffey-Glover, Laura, Paterson, Laura L. & Jones, Lucy
    2018 Opposition as victimhood in newspaper debates about same-sex marriage. Discourse & Society29(2): 180–197. 10.1177/0957926517734422
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734422 [Google Scholar]
  27. van der Bom, Isabelle, Coffey-Glover, Laura, Jones, Lucy, Mills, Sara & Paterson, Laura L.
    2015 Implicit homophobic argument structure: Equal marriage discourse in The Moral Maze. Journal of Language and Sexuality4(1): 102–137. 10.1075/jls.4.1.04mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.4.1.04mil [Google Scholar]
  28. Vandenbroucke, Mieke
    2020 Legal-discursive constructions of genuine cross-border love in Belgian marriage fraud investigations. Critical Discourse Studies17(2): 175–192. 10.1080/17405904.2020.1715233
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1715233 [Google Scholar]
  29. Violet, Mia
    2020 The fact I can’t marry as a bride is another reminder of how unequal trans rights still are. i. https://inews.co.uk/opinion/marry-bride-reminder-unequal-trans-rights-still-are-400587 (July 6, 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wilkinson, Mark
    2019 ‘Bisexual oysters’: A diachronic corpus-based critical discourse analysis of bisexual representation in The Times between 1957 and 2017. Discourse & Communication13(2): 249–267. 10.1177/1750481318817624
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318817624 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jls.00034.pat
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jls.00034.pat
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error