1887
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-3770
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3789

Abstract

Abstract

It is well documented that gay people adopt behavioural strategies to navigate the heteronormative expectations and norms of social space. These practices are likely to be particularly pronounced in socially conservative countries which have seen less progress for LGBTQ+ rights. This study examines how two gay men (Rui and Kenni) stylistically negotiate their sexual identities in a socially conservative country – Singapore – by analyzing the variation in two phonetic variables that have been linked to gender and sexuality: Pitch and /s/. We show that both speakers style-shift across queer-friendly and heteronormative environments though the rate and degree of shifting is influenced both by the situated social meanings of the features and the interactional context. Concluding, we argue that research should consider how minoritised individuals are to style-shift in order to adhere to the hegemonic norms and expectations of society.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jls.00036.kho
2024-07-12
2025-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jls.00036.kho.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jls.00036.kho&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Agha, Asif
    2007Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrett, Rusty
    1999 Indexing polyphonous identity in the speech of African American drag queens. InReinventing Identities: The Gendered Self in Discourse, Mary Bucholtz, Anita C. Liang & Laurel A. Sutton (eds), 313–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195126297.003.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195126297.003.0017 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauman, Richard & Briggs, Charles L.
    1990 Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology191: 59–88. 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell, David & Valentine, Gill
    1995Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Binnie, Jon
    1997 Coming out of geography: Towards a queer epistemology?Environment and Planning D: Society and Space15(2): 223–237. 10.1068/d150223
    https://doi.org/10.1068/d150223 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
    2022Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 6.2.17 www.praat.org/ (September 26, 2023)
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1991Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Boyd, Zac, Fruehwald, Josef & Hall-Lew, Lauren
    2021 Cross-linguistic perception of /s/ among French, German, and English listeners. Language Variation and Change331: 165–191. 10.1017/S0954394521000089
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394521000089 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira
    2005 Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies7(4–5): 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  10. Butler, Judith
    1990Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Calder, Jeremy
    2019 From sissy to sickening: The indexical landscape of /s/ in SoMa, San Francisco. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology29(3): 332–358. 10.1111/jola.12218
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12218 [Google Scholar]
  12. Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
    2011 Intersecting variables and perceived sexual orientation in men. American Speech86(1): 52–68. 10.1215/00031283‑1277510
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-1277510 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chan, Phil C. W.
    2009 Shared values of Singapore: Sexual minority rights as Singaporean value. International Journal of Human Rights13(2–3): 279–305. 10.1080/13642980902758150
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13642980902758150 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cowie, Roddy, Douglas-Cowie, Ellen & Wichmann, Anne
    2002 Prosodic characteristics of skilled reading: Fluency and expressiveness in 8–10-year-old readers. Language and Speech45(1): 47–82. 10.1177/00238309020450010301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309020450010301 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cuddy, Salina
    2019 Can Women ‘Sound Gay’? A Sociophonetic Study of /s /and Pitch of Gay and Straight British-English Speaking Women. (Unpublished) Doctoral dissertation, University of York.
  16. Eckert, Penelope
    2008 Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics12(4): 453–476. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00374.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Fecher, Natalie
    2011 ‘MeasureSpectralMomentsCreateTableExcel_Nat2’. Department of Language and Linguistics, University of York.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gratton, Chantal
    2016 Resisting the gender binary: The use of (ING) in the construction of non-binary transgender identities. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics22(2): 51–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hazenberg, Evan N. L.
    2012 Language and Identity Practice: A Sociolinguistic Study of Gender in Ottawa, Ontario. (Unpublished) Doctoral dissertation, Memorial University of Newfoundland.
  20. Hebdige, Dick
    1984Subculture: The Meaning of Style. New York: Metheun.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hirschberg, Julia
    2002 The pragmatics of intonational meaning. Speech Prosody 2002, International Conference. www.cs.columbia.edu/~julia/papers/pragmatics_sp02_065.pdf (September 26, 2023) 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2002‑9
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2002-9 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hollien, Harry & Michel, John F.
    1968 Vocal fry as a phonational register. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research11(3): 600–604. 10.1044/jshr.1103.600
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1103.600 [Google Scholar]
  23. ICJ
    ICJ 2023 Singapore: Long overdue decriminalization of consensual same-sex relations between men overshadowed by discriminatory constitutional amendment purporting to “protect” definition of marriage. International Commission of Jurists. https://www.icj.org/singapore-long-overdue-decriminalization-of-consensual-same-sex-relations-between-men-overshadowed-by-discriminatory-constitutional-amendment-purporting-to-protect-definition-of-mar/ (September 26, 2023)
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ilbury, Christian
    2019 ‘Sassy queens’: Stylistic orthographic variation in Twitter and the enregisterment of AAVE. Journal of Sociolinguistics241: 245–264. 10.1111/josl.12366
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12366 [Google Scholar]
  25. Irvine, Judith
    2001 ‘Style’ as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. InStyle and Sociolinguistic Variation, Penelope Eckert & John R. Rickford (eds), 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jaffe, Alexandra
    2009Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Keating, Patricia, Garellek, Marc & Kreiman, Jody
    2015 Acoustic properties of different kinds of creaky voice. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences181: 2–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kiesling, Scott F.
    2019 The ‘gay voice’ and ‘brospeak’: Towards a systematic model of stance. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.013.11
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.013.11 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuah, Khun-Eng
    1990 Confucian ideology and social engineering in Singapore. Journal of Contemporary Asia20(3): 371–383. 10.1080/00472339080000381
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00472339080000381 [Google Scholar]
  30. Labov, William
    1966The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 1972Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Le Page, Robert B. & Tabouret-Keller, Andrée
    1985Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Leong, Laurence W. T.
    1995 Walking the tightrope: The role of action for AIDS in the provision of social services in Singapore. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services3(3): 11–30. 10.1300/J041v03n03_02
    https://doi.org/10.1300/J041v03n03_02 [Google Scholar]
  34. Levon, Erez, Pharao, Nicolai & Maegaard, Marie
    (eds) 2017The Sociophonetics of /s/ (special issue: Linguistics 55.5). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Maegaard, Marie & Pharao, Nicolai
    2015 /s/ variation and perceptions of male sexuality in Denmark. InLanguage, Sexuality, and Power: Studies in Intersectional Sociolinguistics, Erez Levon & Ronald Beline Mendes (eds), 88–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210366.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210366.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  36. Morrish, Liz & Sauntson, Helen
    2007New Perspectives on Language and Sexual Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230599406
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599406 [Google Scholar]
  37. Munson, Ben
    2007 The acoustic correlates of perceived masculinity, perceived femininity, and perceived sexual orientation. Language and Speech50(1): 125–142. 10.1177/00238309070500010601
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309070500010601 [Google Scholar]
  38. Munson, Ben & Babel, Molly
    2007 Loose lips and silver tongues, or, projecting sexual orientation through speech. Language and Linguistics Compass1(5): 416–449. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00028.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00028.x [Google Scholar]
  39. OED, The Oxford English Dictionary Online
    OED, The Oxford English Dictionary Online 2023 Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  40. Offord, Baden
    1999 The burden of (homo)sexual identity in Singapore. Social Semiotics9(3): 301–316. 10.1080/10350339909360441
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350339909360441 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pak, Vincent
    2021 Coming out ‘softly’: Metapragmatic reflections of gay men in illiberal pragmatic Singapore. Gender & Language15(3): 301–323. 10.1558/genl.20008
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.20008 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2023 Lighting, signing, showing: The circulability of Pink Dot’s counterpublic discourse in Singapore. Journal of Sociolinguistics27(1): 24–41. 10.1111/josl.12568
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12568 [Google Scholar]
  43. Pak, Vincent & Hiramoto, Mie
    2021 For family, for friends, for (true) love: Negotiating discourses of love within the LGBTQ community in Singapore. Journal of Language and Sexuality10(2): 105–128. 10.1075/jls.20009.hir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20009.hir [Google Scholar]
  44. Podesva, Robert J.
    2007 Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics11(4): 478–504. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00334.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00334.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sarah J. & Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
    2002 Sharing resources and indexing meanings in the production of gay styles. InLanguage and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 175–189. Stanford, CA: CSLI Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Podesva, Robert J. & Van Hofwegen, Janneke
    2016 /s/exuality in Smalltown California: Gender normativity and the acoustic realization of /s/. InLanguage, Sexuality, and Power: Studies in Intersectional Sociolinguistics, Erez Levon & Ronald B. Mendes (eds) 169–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Rowan, Diana, Long, Dennis D. & Johnson, Darrin
    2013 Identity and self-presentation in the House/Ball culture: A primer for social workers. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services25(2): 178–196. 10.1080/10538720.2013.782457
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2013.782457 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sharma, Devyani
    2011 Style repertoire and social change in British Asian English. Journal of Sociolinguistics15(4): 464–492. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2011.00503.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00503.x [Google Scholar]
  49. Silverstein, Michael
    2003 Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication23(3–4): 193–229. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
  50. Smyth, Ron, Jacobs, Greg & Rogers, Henry
    2003 Male voices and perceived sexual orientation: An experimental and theoretical approach. Language in Society32(3): 329–350. 10.1017/S0047404503323024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404503323024 [Google Scholar]
  51. Snell, Julia
    2010 From sociolinguistic variation to socially strategic stylisation. Journal of Sociolinguistics14(5): 630–656. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2010.00457.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00457.x [Google Scholar]
  52. Strand, Elizabeth A.
    1999 Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology18(1): 86–100. 10.1177/0261927X99018001006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X99018001006 [Google Scholar]
  53. Suire, Alexandre, Tognetti, Arnaud, Durand, Valérie, Raymond, Michael & Barkat-Defradas, Melissa
    2020 Speech acoustic features: A comparison of gay men, heterosexual men, and heterosexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior49(7): 2575–2583. 10.1007/s10508‑020‑01665‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01665-3 [Google Scholar]
  54. Švec, Jan G., Schutte, Harm K. & Miller, Donald G.
    1999 On pitch jumps between chest and falsetto registers in voice: Data from living and excised human larynges. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America106(3): 1523–1531. 10.1121/1.427149
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.427149 [Google Scholar]
  55. Urban Dictionary
    Urban Dictionary 2023 <www.urbandictionary.com (September 26, 2023).
  56. Valentine, Gill
    2002 Queer bodies and the production of space. InHandbook of Lesbian and Gay Studies, Diane Richardson & Steven Siedman (eds), 145–160. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781848608269.n10
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608269.n10 [Google Scholar]
  57. van der Toorn, Jojanneke, Pliskin, Ruthie & Morgenroth, Thekla
    2020 Not quite over the rainbow: The unrelenting and insidious nature of heteronormative ideology. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences341: 160–165. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  58. Waksler, Rachelle
    2001 Pitch range and women’s sexual orientation. Word52(1): 69–77. 10.1080/00437956.2001.11432508
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2001.11432508 [Google Scholar]
  59. Walls, N. Eugene
    2008 Toward a multidimensional understanding of heterosexism: The changing nature of prejudice. Journal of Homosexuality55(1): 20–70. 10.1080/00918360802129287
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360802129287 [Google Scholar]
  60. Yap, Ariel & Tan, Shih J.
    2020 Capital punishment in Singapore: A critical analysis of state justifications from 2004 to 2018. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy9(2): 133–151. 10.5204/ijcjsd.v9i2.1056
    https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v9i2.1056 [Google Scholar]
  61. Yulius, Hendri, Tang, Shawna & Offord, Baden
    2018 The globalization of LGBT identity and same-sex marriage as a catalyst of neo-institutional values: Singapore and Indonesia in focus. InGlobal Perspectives on Same-Sex Marriage, Bronwyn Winter, Maxime Forest & Réjane Sénac (eds), 171–196. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑62764‑9_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62764-9_9 [Google Scholar]
  62. Zimman, Lal
    2013 Hegemonic masculinity and the variability of gay-sounding speech: The perceived sexuality of transgender men. Journal of Language and Sexuality2(1): 1–39. 10.1075/jls.2.1.01zim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.2.1.01zim [Google Scholar]
  63. 2016 Sociolinguistic agency and the gendered voice: Metalinguistic negotiations of vocal masculinization among female-to-male transgender speakers. InAwareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research, Anna M. Babel (ed), 253–272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139680448.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139680448.013 [Google Scholar]
  64. 2017 Gender as stylistic bricolage: Transmasculine voices and the relationship between fundamental frequency and /s/. Language in Society46(3): 339–370.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jls.00036.kho
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jls.00036.kho
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): gayness; identity; sexuality; Singapore; style; style-shifting
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error