Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-3770
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3789
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper aims at investigating (1) whether young Thai adults can distinguish between straight male and gay-sounding speech and (2) how listeners feel about speech sounds performed by Thai straight and gay speakers in varying situations in terms of likeability and annoyance. Two experiments were conducted: first, straight males, gay males and females listened to voice stimuli of self-identified straight males and gay males and were asked to identify the sexual orientation of the speakers; second, another three groups of listeners were asked to rate the speakers’ levels of likeability and annoyance using a 5-point Likert scale. The findings indicate that there exist voice characteristics of gay- as opposed to straight-male sounding speech. Regarding the listeners’ perception in relation to speech style in four varying situations, the results indicate that listeners’ perception is not affected by situations in which the speech is delivered.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Butler, Judith
    1993Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Callier, Patrick
    2011 Social meaning in prosodic variability. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics17(1): 39–50. repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol17/iss1/6/ (July13 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carahaly, Lynn N.
    2000 Listener Accuracy in Identifying the Sexual Orientation of Male and Female Speakers. (Unpublished) MA thesis, The Ohio State University.
  4. Fasoli, Fabio, Maass, Anne, Paladino, Maria Paola & Sulpizio, Simone
    2017 Gay- and lesbian-sounding auditory cues elicit stereotyping and discrimination. Archives of Sexual Behavior46(5): 1261–1277. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5487912/ (July13 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Foucault, Michel
    1981 The order of discourse. InUntying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader, Robert Young (ed), 48–78. Boston: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gaudio, Rudolf P.
    1994 Sounding gay: Pitch properties in the speech of gay and straight men. American Speech69(1): 30–57. 10.2307/455948
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455948 [Google Scholar]
  7. Hau, Chi-Kuk
    2007 A Study on Acoustic Characteristics of Cantonese Gay Speech and Perceived Sexual Orientation. (Unpublished) MA thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  8. Henton, Caroline G.
    1989 Fact and fiction in the description of female and male pitch. Language & Communication9(4): 299–311. 10.1016/0271‑5309(89)90026‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(89)90026-8 [Google Scholar]
  9. Jackson, Peter A.
    1998 Male homosexuality and transgenderism in the Thai Buddhist tradition. InQueer Dharma: Voices of Gay Buddhists, Winston Leyland (ed), 55–89. San Francisco: Gay Sunshine Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2000 An explosion of Thai identities: Global queering and reimagining queer theory. Culture, Health and Sexuality2(4): 405–424. 10.1080/13691050050174422
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050050174422 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2001 Pre-gay, post-queer: Thai perspectives on proliferating gender/sex diversity in Asia. Journal of Homosexuality40(3–4): 1–25. 10.1300/J082v40n03_01
    https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v40n03_01 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2009 Global queering and global queer theory: Thai [trans]genders and [homo]sexualities in world history. Autrepart1(49): 15–30. 10.3917/autr.049.0015
    https://doi.org/10.3917/autr.049.0015 [Google Scholar]
  13. Jackson, Peter A. & Sullivan, Gerard
    1999Lady Boys, Tom Boys, Rent Boys: Male and Female Homosexualities in Contemporary Thailand. New York: Hawarth Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jacobs, Greg, Smyth, Ron & Rogers, Henry
    2000 Language and sexuality: Searching for the phonetic correlates of gay- and straight-sounding male voices. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics18(1): 46–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kajino, Sakiko
    2010 Coexistence of contradictory meanings of a variable: Phrasal final lengthening in speech of a Japanese pop star Ayumi Hamasaki. (Paper presented at TheNew Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV39) Conference, University of Texas, San Antonio).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lambert, Wallace E., Hodgson, Robert Charles, Gardner, C. Robert & Fillenbaum, Samuel
    1960 Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology60(1): 44–51. 10.1037/h0044430
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044430 [Google Scholar]
  17. Levon, Erez
    2006 Hearing “gay”: Prosody, interpretation, and the affective judgments of men’s speech. American Speech81(1): 56–78. 10.1215/00031283‑2006‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2006-003 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2007 Sexuality in context: Variation and the sociolinguistic perception of identity. Language in Society36(4): 533–554. 10.1017/S0047404507070431
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070431 [Google Scholar]
  19. Linville, Sue Ellen
    1998 Acoustic correlates of perceived versus actual sexual orientation in men’s speech. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica50(1): 35–48. 10.1159/000021447
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000021447 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lowry, Orla
    2002 The stylistic variation of nuclear pattern in Belfast English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association32(1): 33–42. 10.1017/S0025100302000130
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100302000130 [Google Scholar]
  21. McElhinny, Bonnie
    2014 Theorizing gender in sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology toward effective interventions in gender inequity. InThe Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes (eds), 48–67. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584248.ch2
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248.ch2 [Google Scholar]
  22. Mendoza-Denton, Norma
    1995 Pregnant pauses: Silence and authority in the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas hearings. InGender Articulated: Language and the Culturally Constructed Self, Kira Hall & Mary Bucholtz (eds), 51–66. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Munson, Benjamin
    2010 The influence of actual and perceived sexual orientation on diadochokinetic rate in women and men. InProceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH11: 1525–1528.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Piccolo, Fabiana
    2008 Perceived sexual orientation and attitudes towards sounding gay or straight. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics14(2): 130–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pierrehumbert, Janet B., Bent, Tessa, Munson, Benjamin, Bradlow, Ann R. & Bailey, J. Michael
    2004 The influence of sexual orientation on vowel production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America116(4): 1905–1908. 10.1121/1.1788729
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1788729 [Google Scholar]
  26. Rogers, Henry & Smyth, Ron
    2003 Phonetic differences between gay- and straight-sounding male speakers of North American English. (Paper presented at the15th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain)
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Saisuwan, Pavadee
    2011 Kathoeys’ and Women’s Use of First-Person Personal Reference Terms in Thai. (Unpublished) MSc thesis, University of Edinburgh.
  28. 2016 Male Femininity in Thai Among Men who Identify with Non-Normative Male Roles. (Unpublished) PhD dissertation, Queen Mary University of London.
  29. Scheffe, Henry
    1959The Analysis of Variance. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Shapiro, Judith
    1981 Anthropology and the study of gender. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal64(4): 446–465.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Smyth, Ron, Jacobs, Greg & Rogers, Henry
    2003 Male voices and perceived sexual orientation: An experimental and theoretical approach. Language in Society32(3): 329–350. 10.1017/S0047404503323024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404503323024 [Google Scholar]
  32. Stern, Chadly, West, Tessa V., Jost, John T. & Rule, Nicholas O.
    2013 The politics of gaydar: Ideological differences in the use of gendered cues in categorizing sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology104(3): 520–541. 10.1037/a0031187
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031187 [Google Scholar]
  33. Suchip, C. Panyanuphab
    1982Phra Traipidok Samrap Prachachon [“The Tipitaka for the People”]. Bangkok: Mahamakut Ratchawitthayalai.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sulpizio, Simone, Fasoli, Fabio, Maass, Anne, Paladino, Maria Paola, Vespignani, Francesco, Eyssel, Friederike & Bentler, Dominik
    2015 The sound of voice: Voice-based categorization of speakers’ sexual orientation within and across languages. PLoS One10(7). e0128882. 10.1371/journal.pone.0128882
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128882 [Google Scholar]
  35. Valentova, Jaroslava Varella & Havliček, Jan
    2013 Perceived sexual orientation based on vocal and facial stimuli is linked to self-rated sexual orientation in Czech men. PLoS One8(12): e82417. 10.1371/journal.pone.0082417
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082417 [Google Scholar]
  36. Winter, Sam
    2006 Thai transgenders in focus: Their beliefs about attitudes towards and origins of transgender. International Journal of Transgenderism9(2): 47–62. 10.1300/J485v09n02_06
    https://doi.org/10.1300/J485v09n02_06 [Google Scholar]
  37. Zimman, Lal
    2013 Hegemonic masculinity and the variability of gay-sounding speech: The perceived sexuality of transgender men. Journal of Language and Sexuality2(1): 1–39. 10.1075/jls.2.1.01zim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.2.1.01zim [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error