1887
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-3770
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3789
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The paradigmatic transgender woman is often negatively oversexualised, pornographised and fetishised in mainstream conceptualisations and discourses. However, self-sexualisation by transgender individuals is often portrayed as a (sex-)positive social phenomenon. Little research has been conducted that analyses the self-sexualisation strategies of the multiple instantiations of gender-variant identity, including transmasculine and non-binary social actors. This paper uses a corpus-informed socio-cognitive approach to critical discourse studies to identify differences between the self-sexualisation strategies and underpinning cognitive models of different gender-variant user-groups on Twitter. 2,565 users are coded into five categories: (1) transfeminine; (2) transmasculine; (3) transsexual; (4) transvestite; (5) non-binary. Findings show that transvestite- and transsexual-identifying users most closely fit the pornographised and fetishised conceptualisation, whilst non-binary users are the least self-sexualising user-group.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jls.17016.web
2018-08-27
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. American Psychological Association (APA)
    American Psychological Association (APA) 2007Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report-full.pdf (March 11, 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Archer, Margaret
    1998 Introduction: Realism in the social sciences. InCritical Realism: Essential Readings, Margaret Archer , Roy Bhaskar , Andrew Collier , Tony Lawson & Alan Norrie (eds), 189–205. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Attwood, Feona
    2006 Sexed up: Theorizing the sexualization of culture. Sexualities9(1): 77–94. doi: 10.1177/1363460706053336
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706053336 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Paul
    2005Public Discourses of Gay Men. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2014Using Corpora to Analyze Gender. London: Bloomsbury
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, Paul , Gabrielatos, Costas , KhosraviNik, Majid , Krzyżanowski, Michał , McEnery, Tony & Wodak, Ruth
    2008 A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society19(3): 273–306. doi: 10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker, Paul & Levon, Erez
    2015 Picking the right cherries? A comparison of corpus-based and qualitative analyses of news articles about masculinity. Discourse & Communication9(2): 221–236. doi: 10.1177/1750481314568542
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481314568542 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beek, Titia F. , Cohen-Kettenis, Peggy T. , Bouman, Walter P. , de Vries, Annelou L. C. , Steensma, Thomas D. , Witcomb, Gemma L. , Arcelus, Jon , Richards, Christina , de Cuypere, Griet & Kreukels, Baudewijntje P. C.
    2017 Gender incongruence of childhood: Clinical utility and stakeholder agreement with the World Health Organization’s proposed ICD-11 criteria. PLoS ONE12(1): 1–20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168522
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168522 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang, Tiffany K. & Chung, Y. Barry
    2015 Transgender microaggressions: Complexity of heterogeneity of transgender identities. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling9(3): 217–234. doi: 10.1080/15538605.2015.1068146
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15538605.2015.1068146 [Google Scholar]
  10. Coy, Maddy
    2009 Milkshakes, lady lumps and growing up to want boobies: How the sexualisation of popular culture limits girls’ horizons. Child Abuse Review18(6): 372–383. doi: 10.1002/car.1094
    https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1094 [Google Scholar]
  11. Coy, Maddy & Garner, Maria
    2010 Glamour modelling and the marketing of self-sexualization: Critical reflections. International Journal of Cultural Studies13(6): 657–675. doi: 10.1177/1367877910376576
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877910376576 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2012 Definitions, discourses and dilemmas: Policy and academic engagement with the sexualisation of popular culture. Gender and Education24(3): 285–301. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2012.667793
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2012.667793 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dangerfield, Derek T. , Smith, Laramie R. , Williams, Jeffery , Unger, Jennifer & Bluthenthal, Ricky
    2017 Sexual positioning among men who have sex with men: A narrative review. Archives of Sexual Behaviour46(4): 869–884. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2017.1295868
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1295868 [Google Scholar]
  14. DePalma, Renée & Atkinson, Elizabeth
    2006 The sound of silence: Talking about sexual orientation and schooling. Sex Education6(4): 333–349. doi: 10.1080/14681810600981848
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14681810600981848 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ding, Ying & Jiang, Jing
    2014 Extracting interest tags from Twitter user biographies. InInformation Retrieval Technology: Proceedings from the 10th Annual Information Retrieval Societies Conference, Azizah Jaafar , Nazlena Mohamad Ali , Shahrul Azman Mohd Noah , Alan F. Smeaton , Peter Bruza , Zainab Abu Bakar , Nursuriati Jamil & Tengku Mohd Tengku Sembok (eds), 268–279. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑12844‑3_23
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12844-3_23 [Google Scholar]
  16. Edelman, Elijah A. & Zimman, Lal
    2014 Boycunts and bonus holes: Trans men’s bodies, neoliberalism, and the sexual productivity of genitals. Journal of Homosexuality61(5): 673–690. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2014.870438
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2014.870438 [Google Scholar]
  17. Espineira, Karine
    2016 Transgender and transsexual people’s sexuality in the media. Parallax22(3): 323–329.10.1080/13534645.2016.1201922
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2016.1201922 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gabrielatos, Costas & Baker, Paul
    2008 Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics36(1): 5–38. doi: 10.1177/0075424207311247
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424207311247 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gill, Rosalind
    2007 Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies10(2): 147–166. doi: 10.1177/1367549407075898
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075898 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2012 The sexualisation of culture?Social and Personality Psychology Compass6/7: 483–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1751‑9004.2012.00433
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00433 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gill, Rosalind & Donaghue, Ngaire
    2013 As if postfeminism had come true: The turn to agency in cultural studies of ‘sexualisation’. InGender, Agency, and Coercion. Thinking Gender in Transnational Times, Sumi Madhok , Anne Phillips & Kalpana Wilson (eds), 240–258. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137295613_14
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295613_14 [Google Scholar]
  22. GLAAD
    GLAAD 2017GLAAD Media Reference Guide – Transgender. https://www.glaad.org/reference/transgender (November 14, 2017)
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Glynn, Tiffany R. & van den Berg, Jacob J.
    2017 A systematic review of interventions to reduce problematic substance use among transgender individuals: A call to action. Transgender Health2(1): 45–59. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2016.0037
    https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2016.0037 [Google Scholar]
  24. Graff, Kaitlin A. , Murnen, Sarah K. & Krause, Anna K.
    2013 Low-cut shirts and high-heeled shoes: Increased sexualisation across time in magazine depictions of girls. Sex Roles69(11/12): 571–582. doi: 10.1007/s11199‑013‑0321‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0321-0 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jordan, Fiona & Aitchison, Cara
    2008 Tourism and the sexualisation of the gaze: Solo female tourists’ experiences of gendered power, surveillance and embodiment. Leisure Studies27(3): 329–349. doi: 10.1080/02614360802125080
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360802125080 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kehily, Mary Jane
    2012 Contextualising the sexualisation of girls debate: Innocence, experience and young female sexuality. Gender and Education24(3): 355–368. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2012.670391
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2012.670391 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kelly, Liz
    2007 A conducive context: Trafficking of persons in Central Asia. InHuman Trafficking, Maggy Lee (ed), 73–91. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Khamis, Susie , Ang, Lawrence & Welling, Raymond
    2016 Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies8(2): 191–208. doi: 10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lakoff, George
    1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lloyd, Christopher E. M. & Finn, Mark D.
    2017 Authenticity, validation and sexualisation on Grindr: An analysis of trans women’s accounts. Psychology & Sexuality8(1–2): 158–169.10.1080/19419899.2017.1316769
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2017.1316769 [Google Scholar]
  31. McNair, Brian
    2002Striptease Culture: Sex, Media, and the Democratization of Desire. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203469378
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203469378 [Google Scholar]
  32. Meier, Stacey Colton & Labuski, Christine M.
    2013 The demographics of the transgender population. InInternational Handbook on the Demography of Sexuality, Amanda K. Baumle (ed), 289–327. New York: Springer.10.1007/978‑94‑007‑5512‑3_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5512-3_16 [Google Scholar]
  33. Papadopoulos, Linda
    2010Sexualisation of Young People: Review. Home Office. dera.ioe.ac.uk/10738/1/sexualisation-young-people.pdf (August 15, 2017)
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Raddon, Arwen
    2002 Mothers in the Academy: Positioned and positioning within discourses of the ‘successful academic’ and the ‘good mother’. Studies in Higher Education27(4): 387–403. doi: 10.1080/0307507022000011516
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507022000011516 [Google Scholar]
  35. Riggs, Damien W. & Bartholomaeus, Clare
    2017 Transgender young people’s narratives of intimacy and sexual health: implications for sexuality education. Sex Education. doi: 10.1080/14681811.2017.1355299
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2017.1355299 [Google Scholar]
  36. Salama, Amir H. Y.
    2011 Ideological collocation and the recontextualization of Wahhabi-Saudi Islam post-9/11: A synergy of corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society22(3): 315–342. doi: 10.1177/0957926510395445
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395445 [Google Scholar]
  37. Scandurra, Cristiano , Amodeo, Anna Lisa , Bochicchio, Vincenzo , Valerio, Paolo & Frost, David M.
    2017 Psychometric characteristics of the Transgender Identity Survey in an Italian sample: A measure to assess positive and negative feelings towards transgender identity. International Journal of Transgenderism18(1): 53–65. doi: 10.1080/15532739.2016.1241975
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2016.1241975 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sears, James T.
    1999 Teaching queerly: Some elementary propositions. InQueering Elementary Education: Advancing the Dialogue about Sexualities and Schooling, William J. Letts & James T. Sears (eds), 3–14. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith, Angela
    2018 Bulging biceps and tender kisses: The sexualisation of fatherhood. Social Semiotics28(3): 315–329. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2017.1295868
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1295868 [Google Scholar]
  40. Thomas, Jenny
    2013Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Thompson, Laura & Donaghue, Ngaire
    2014 The confidence trick: Competing constructions of confidence and self-esteem in young Australian women’s discussions of the sexualisation of culture. Women’s Studies International Forum47(A): 23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2014.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  42. Turner, John C.
    [1982] 2010 Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. InSocial Identity and Intergroup Relations, Henri Tajfel (ed), 15–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1977 Semantic macro-structures and knowledge frames in discourse comprehension. InCognitive Processes in Comprehension, Marcel A. Just & Patricia A. Carpenter (eds), 3–32. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 1995 Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. InLanguage & Peace, Christina Schäffner & Anita L. Wenden (eds), 17–33. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2009 Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. InMethods for Critical Discourse Analysis, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds), 62–86. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2015 Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. InMethods for Critical Discourse Analysis, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds), 62–85. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2017 Socio-cognitive discourse studies. InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, John Flowerdew (ed), 26–43. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. van Leeuwen, Theo
    1995 Representing social action. Discourse & Society6(1): 81–106. doi: 10.1177/0957926595006001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006001005 [Google Scholar]
  49. 1996 The representation of social actors. InTexts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard (eds), 32–70. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Volkova, Svitlana , Backrach, Yoram , Armstrong, Michael & Sharma, Vijay
    2015 Inferring latent user properties from texts published in social media. InProceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2015), 4296–4297. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI15/paper/view/9358/9858 (March 11, 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Walton, S. Courtney & Rice, Ronald E.
    2013 Mediated disclosure on Twitter: The roles of gender and identity in boundary impermeability, valence, disclosure, and stage. Computers in Human Behaviour29(3): 1465–1474. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.033
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.033 [Google Scholar]
  52. Webster, Lexi
    . forthcoming. ‘I am I’: Self-constructed transgender identities in internet-mediated forum communication. International Journal of Sociology of Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Zimman, Lal
    2009 ‘The other kind of coming out’: Transgender people and the coming out narrative genre. Gender & Language3(1): 53–80. doi: 10.1558/genl.v3i1.53
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v3i1.53 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2014 The discursive construction of sex: Remaking and reclaiming the gendered body in talk about genitals among trans men. InQueer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Lal Zimman , Jenny Davis & Joshua Raclaw (eds), 13–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jls.17016.web
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jls.17016.web
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): corpus linguistics , gender-variant , sexualisation , socio-cognitive , transgender and Twitter
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error