1887
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-3770
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3789
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article investigates the construction of sex advice for queer women as it features on the world’s most popular lesbian website, Autostraddle. Based in the United States, the website is a “progressively feminist” online community for lesbian, bisexual and other queer women. Using multimodal critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics, this article explores how representations of sexual and gender identity facilitate the construction of homonormativity on the website. It argues that these representations involve a tension between exclusivity and inclusivity. On the one hand, Autostraddle wants to construct an exclusive markedly lesbian subjectivity and a subcultural model of lesbian sex, which is lacking in mainstream culture. On the other hand, it aims to be inclusive of transgender and bisexual women, and to deconstruct the idea of sexual homogeneity. Findings show that Autostraddle discursively negotiates these competing goals to construct a distinctly “queer female” normativity centred on young cisgender feminine lesbians.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jls.18013.bai
2019-08-20
2019-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Autostraddle
    Autostraddle 2018a About. https://www.autostraddle.com/about/ (August10 2018)
  2. Autostraddle
    Autostraddle 2018b Advertise. https://www.autostraddle.com/advertise/ (August10 2018)
  3. Baker, Paul
    2004 “Unnatural acts”: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics8(1): 88–106. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2004.00252.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00252.x [Google Scholar]
  4. 2014 Bad wigs and screaming Mimis: Using corpus-assisted techniques to carry out critical discourse analysis of the representation of trans people in the British press. InContemporary Critical Discourse Studies, Piotr Cap & Christopher Hart (eds), 211–236. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2018 Language, sexuality and corpus linguistics: Concerns and future directions. Journal of Language and Sexuality7(2): 263–279. 10.1075/jls.17018.bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17018.bak [Google Scholar]
  6. Barker, Meg-John, Gill, Rosalind & Harvey, Laura
    2018Mediating Intimacy: Sex Advice in Media Culture. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Billig, Michael
    1995Banal Nationalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Braun, Virginia & Kitzinger, Celia
    2001 Telling it straight? Dictionary definitions of women’s genitals. Journal of Sociolinguistics5(2): 214–232. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00148
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00148 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brookes, Gavin, Harvey, Kevin & Mullany, Louise
    2016 “Off to the best start”? A multimodal critique of breast and formula feeding health promotional discourse. Gender and Language10(3): 340–363. 10.1558/genl.v10i3.32035
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v10i3.32035 [Google Scholar]
  10. Butler, Judith
    1990Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don
    2003Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791178 [Google Scholar]
  12. CBS News
    CBS News 2010 How Americans view gays and lesbians. https://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/poll_gays_lesbians_060910.pdf (October17 2018)
  13. Chirrey, Deborah
    2007 Women like us: Mediating and contesting identity in lesbian advice literature. InLanguage, Sexualities and Desires: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Sakis Kyratzis & Helen Sauntson (eds), 223–244. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230625136_11
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625136_11 [Google Scholar]
  14. Duggan, Lisa
    2003The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics and the Attack on Democracy. Boston: Beacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gill, Rosalind
    2007Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. GLAAD
    GLAAD 2017 Accelerating acceptance www.glaad.org/files/aa/2017_GLAAD_Accelerating_Acceptance.pdf (October17 2018)
  17. Hall, Kira
    2013 “It’s a hijra!”: Queer linguistics revisited. Discourse & Society24(5): 634–642. 10.1177/0957926513490321
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513490321 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hegarty, Peter & Buechel, Carmen
    2011 “What blokes want lesbians to be”: On FHM and the socialization of pro-lesbian attitudes among heterosexual-identified men. Feminism & Psychology21: 240–247. 10.1177/0959353510370184
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353510370184 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jagose, Annamarie
    1996Queer Theory: An Introduction. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jones, Lucy
    2012Dyke/Girl: Language and Identities in a Lesbian Group. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137271341
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137271341 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2014 “Dolls or teddies?” Constructing lesbian identity through community-specific practice. Journal of Language and Sexuality3(2): 161–190. 10.1075/jls.3.2.01jon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.3.2.01jon [Google Scholar]
  22. Kangasvuo, Jenny
    2007 Insatiable sluts and almost gay guys: Bisexuality in porn magazines. InPornification: Sex and Sexuality in Media Culture, Kaarina Nikunen, Susanna Paasonen & Laura Saarenmaa (eds), 139–150. Oxford: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa, Vít, Bušta, Jan, Jakubíček, Miloš, Kovář, Vojtěch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vít
    2014 The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography1: 7–36. 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  24. Koller, Veronika
    2008Lesbian Discourses: Images of a Community. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203928691
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203928691 [Google Scholar]
  25. Leap, William
    2012 Queer linguistics, sexuality and discourse analysis. InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, James Gee & Michael Handford (eds), 558–571. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Livia, Anna
    2002Camionneuses s’abstenir: Lesbian community creation through the personals. InLanguage and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 191–206. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Machin, David
    2004 Building the world’s visual language: The increasing global importance of image banks in corporate media. Visual Communication3(3): 316–336. 10.1177/1470357204045785
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357204045785 [Google Scholar]
  28. Machin, David & Mayr, Andrea
    2012How To Do Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Milani, Tommaso
    2013 Expanding the Queer Linguistic scene: Multimodality, space and sexuality at a South African university. Journal of Language and Sexuality2(2): 206–234. 10.1075/jls.2.2.02mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.2.2.02mil [Google Scholar]
  30. Milani, Tommaso & Kapa, Koki
    2015 Ready-to-wear sexual politics: The semiotics of visibility on Wits Pride T-shirts. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus46: 79–103. 10.5842/46‑0‑671
    https://doi.org/10.5842/46-0-671 [Google Scholar]
  31. Milani, Tommaso & Levon, Erez
    2016 Sexing diversity: Linguistic landscapes of homonationalism. Language & Communication51: 69–86. 10.1016/j.langcom.2016.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  32. Morrish, Liz & Sauntson, Helen
    2011 Discourse and identity in a corpus of lesbian erotica. Journal of Lesbian Studies15(1): 122–139. 10.1080/10894160.2010.490519
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2010.490519 [Google Scholar]
  33. Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2018 Corpus linguistics in language and sexuality studies. Journal of Language and Sexuality7(2): 145–174. 10.1075/jls.17019.mot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17019.mot [Google Scholar]
  34. . forthcoming. Language and sexual normativity. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Rusty Barrett & Kira Hall eds Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Motschenbacher, Heiko & Stegu, Martin
    2013 Queer Linguistic approaches to discourse. Discourse & Society24(5): 519–535. 10.1177/0957926513486069
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486069 [Google Scholar]
  36. Paasonen, Susanna, Nikunen, Kaarina & Saarenmaa, Laura
    2007Pornification: Sex and Sexuality in Media Culture. Oxford: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Pornhub
    Pornhub 2018 2017 year in review. https://www.pornhub.com/insights/2017-year-in-review (June3 2018)
  38. Potts, Amanda
    2015 “Love you guys (no homo)”: How gamers and fans play with sexuality, gender, and Minecraft on YouTube. Critical Discourse Studies12(2): 163–186. 10.1080/17405904.2014.974635
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2014.974635 [Google Scholar]
  39. Richardson, Diane
    1992 Constructing lesbian sexualities. InModern Homosexualities: Fragments of Gay and Lesbian Experience, Ken Plummer (ed), 187–199. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sender, Katherine
    2003 Sex sells: Sex, class and taste in commercial gay and lesbian media. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies9(3): 331–365. 10.1215/10642684‑9‑3‑331
    https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-9-3-331 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sunderland, Jane & McGlashan, Mark
    2012 The linguistic, visual and multimodal representation of two-Mum and two-Dad families in children’s picturebooks. Language and Literature21: 189–210. 10.1177/0963947011435863
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947011435863 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2013 Looking at picturebook covers multimodally: The case of two-Mum and two-Dad picturebooks. Visual Communication12(4): 473–496. 10.1177/1470357212471474
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357212471474 [Google Scholar]
  43. Talbot, Mary
    1995 A synthetic sisterhood: False friends in a teenage magazine. InGender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, Mary Bucholtz & Kira Hall (eds), 143–165. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Turner, Georgina
    2008 “The road to the lesbian nation is not an easy one”: “Us” and “them”inDiva magazine. Social Semiotics18(3): 377–388. 10.1080/10350330802217147
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330802217147 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2014 “A real lesbian wouldn’t touch a bisexual with a bargepole”: Contesting boundaries in the construction of collective identity. Critical Discourse Studies12(2): 139–162. 10.1080/17405904.2014.974634
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2014.974634 [Google Scholar]
  46. Zimman, Lal
    2014 The discursive construction of sex: Remaking and reclaiming the gendered body in talk about genitals among trans men. InQueer Excursions: Retheorising Binaries in Language, Gender and Sexuality, Jenny Davis, Joshua Raclaw & Lal Zimman (eds), 13–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jls.18013.bai
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jls.18013.bai
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error