1887
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-3770
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3789
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper will analyze a series of qualitative interviews to better understand the selection and significance of gender identity-based terminology used by trans persons in the United Kingdom. An analysis of factors such as the perceived understanding of terminology available at a given historical moment (i.e. transgender, transman, trans, etc.), identity of interactors (i.e. trans or cis identified), and purpose of interaction (i.e. legal, medical) will be considered to better understand the terminology chosen by individuals to construct and communicate their gender identity in a way that has meaning both to themselves as well as to those with whom they are communicating. Analysis will help to develop a deeper understanding of the importance of terminology in how trans persons understand and communicate their gender identity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jls.19001.rya
2019-08-20
2019-09-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bono, Chaz & Fitzpatrick, Billie
    2011Transition: The Story of How I Became a Man. New York: Dutton.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouman, Walter Pierre, Schwend, Amets Suess, Motmans, Joz, Smiley, Adam, Safer, Joshua D., Deutsch, Madeline B., Adams, Noah J. & Winter, Sam
    2017 Language and trans health. International Journal of Transgenderism18(1): 1–6. doi:  10.1080/15532739.2016.1262127
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2016.1262127 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brontsema, Robin
    2004 A queer revolution: Reconceptualizing the debate over linguistic reclamation. Colorado Research in Linguistics17(1): 1–17. doi:  10.25810/dky3‑zq57
    https://doi.org/10.25810/dky3-zq57 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bucholtz, Mary
    2004 Language, gender, and sexuality. InLanguage in the USA: Themes for the Twenty-First Century, Edward Finegan & John R. Rickford (eds), 410–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511809880.024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809880.024 [Google Scholar]
  5. Creswell, John W.
    1998Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis, Erin Calhoun
    2009 Situating “fluidity”: (Trans) Gender identification and the regulation of gender diversity. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies15(1): 97–130. 10.1215/10642684‑2008‑020
    https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-2008-020 [Google Scholar]
  7. Edelman, Elijah Adiv & Zimman, Lal
    2014 Boycunts and bonus holes: Trans men’s bodies, neoliberalism, and the sexual productivity of genitals. Journal of Homosexuality61(5): 673–690. doi:  10.1080/00918369.2014.870438
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2014.870438 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferris, Joshua L.
    2006 The nomenclature of the community: An activist’s perspective. InThe Handbook of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Public Health: A Practitioner’s Guide to Service, Michael D. Shankle (ed), 3–10. Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gagne, Patricia, Tewksbury, Richard & McGaughey, Deanna
    1997 Coming out and crossing over: Identity formation and proclamation in a transgender community. Gender & Society11(4): 478–508. 10.1177/089124397011004006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/089124397011004006 [Google Scholar]
  10. Glaser, Barney & Strauss, Anselm
    1967The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Green, James & Sharp, Nancy
    1997 Transgender dialogue. FTM Newsletter (36): 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Green, Jamison
    2004Becoming a Visible Man. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Harrison, Jack, Grant, Jaime & Herman, Jody L.
    2012 A gender not listed here: Genderqueers, gender rebels, and otherwise in the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. LGBTQ Policy Journal at Harvard Kennedy School2: 13–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hazenberg, Evan
    2016 Walking the straight and narrow: Linguistic choice and gendered presentation. Gender and Language10(2): 270–294. doi:  10.1558/genl.v10i2.19812
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v10i2.19812 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hicks, Amanda, Rutherford, Michael W., Fellbaum, Christiane & Bian, Jiang
    2016 An analysis of WordNet’s coverage of gender identity using Twitter and the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. Proceedings of the Global WordNet Conference (GWC)8: 122–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jones, Lucy
    2019 Discourses of transnormativity in vloggers’ identity construction. International Journal of the Sociology of Language256: 85–101. doi:  10.1515/ijsl‑2018‑2013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-2013 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kulick, Don
    1999 Transgender and language: A review of the literature and suggestions for the future. GLQ: A Journal of Gay and Lesbian Studies5(4): 605–622. doi:  10.1215/10642684‑5‑4‑605
    https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-5-4-605 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuper, Laura E., Nussbaum, Robin & Mustanski, Brian
    2012 Exploring the diversity of gender and sexual orientation identities in an online sample of transgender individuals. Journal of Sex Research49(2–3): 244–254. 10.1080/00224499.2011.596954
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.596954 [Google Scholar]
  19. Laing, Alison
    1995 A label by any other name might stick. Transgender Tapestry74: 48.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Leap, William L.
    (ed) 1995Beyond the Lavender Lexicon: Authenticity, Imagination, and Appropriation in Lesbian and Gay Languages. Luxembourg: Gordon and Breach.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 1996Word’s Out: Gay Men’s English. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2004 Language, belonging and (homo)sexual citizenship in Cape Town, South Africa. InSpeaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language, Tom Boellstorff & William L. Leap (eds), 134–162. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Levitt, Heidi M. & Ippolito, Maria R.
    2014 Being transgender: The experience of transgender identity development. Journal of Homosexuality61(12): 1727–1758. doi:  10.1080/00918369.2014.951262
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2014.951262 [Google Scholar]
  24. McConnell-Ginet, Sally
    2002 “Queering” semantics: Definitional struggles. InLanguage and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 137–160. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Miller, Kristen & Ryan, J. Michael
    2014 Evaluation of a sexual identity question. InCognitive Interviewing Methodology, Valerie Chepp, Kristen Miller, Jose L. Padilla & Stephanie Willson (eds), 85–106. London: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Miller, Kristen, Willson, Stephanie, Chepp, Valerie & Ryan, J. Michael
    2014 Analysis. InCognitive Interviewing Methodology, Valerie Chepp, Kristen Miller, Jose L. Padilla & Stephanie Willson (eds), 35–50. London: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Plummer, Kenneth
    1981 Homosexual categories: Some research problems in the labeling perspective of homosexuality. InThe Making of the Modern Homosexual, Kenneth Plummer (ed), 53–75. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Roen, Katrina
    2002 “Either/or” and “both/neither”: Discursive tensions in transgender politics. Signs27(2): 501–522. 10.1086/495695
    https://doi.org/10.1086/495695 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ryan, J. Michael
    2013 Improving Survey Measurement Questions for Sexual Minorities and the Trans Population: Toward an Understanding of the Socially Constructed Nature of the Trans Life Course. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland.
  30. 2019 Expressing identity: Toward an understanding of how trans individuals navigate the barriers and opportunities of official identity. Journal of Gender Studies28: in print. doi:  10.1080/09589236.2019.1570841
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1570841 [Google Scholar]
  31. Schilt, Kristen & Lagos, Danya
    2017 The development of transgender studies in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology (42): 425–443. doi:  10.1146/annurev‑soc‑060116‑053348
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053348 [Google Scholar]
  32. Strauss, Anselm & Corgin, Juliet
    1990Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Stryker, Susan
    2008Transgender History. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Valentine, David
    2007Imagining Transgender: An Ethnography of a Category. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822390213
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822390213 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wilchins, Riki Anne
    1995 What’s in a name: The politics of gender speak. Transgender Tapestry74: 46–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Zimman, Lal
    2014 The discursive construction of sex: Remaking and reclaiming the gendered body in talk about genitals among trans men. InQueer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Jenny L. Davis, Joshua Raclaw & Lal Zimman (eds), 13–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2017 Transgender language reform: Some challenges and strategies for promoting trans-affirming, gender-inclusive language. Journal of Language and Discrimination1(1): 84–105. doi:  10.1558/jld.33139
    https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.33139 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jls.19001.rya
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error