Redefining realness

References

1. American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language
   American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 2019 Retrieved fromhttps://ahdictionary.com/on11 June 2019.
2. Atkins, B. T. Sue & Rundell, Michael
   2008 The Oxford Guide to Practical Lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Awan, Imran
   2014 Islamophobia and Twitter: A typology of online hate against Muslims on social media. Policy and Internet6(2): 133–150. 10.1002/1944‑2866.POI364
   https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI364 [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, Paul
   2004 “Unnatural acts”: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics8(1): 88–106. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2004.00252.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00252.x [Google Scholar]
5. Baker, Paul
   2005 Public Discourses of Gay Men. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baker, Paul
   2013 From gay language to normative discourse: A diachronic analysis of Lavender Linguistics conference abstracts 1994–2012. Journal of Language and Sexuality2(2): 179–205. 10.1075/jls.2.2.01bak
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.2.2.01bak [Google Scholar]
7. Baker, Paul
   2017 American and British English: Divided by a Common Language?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316105313
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316105313 [Google Scholar]
8. Barrett, Rusty
   2002 Is queer theory important for sociolinguistic theory?InLanguage and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 25–43. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Barrett, Rusty
   2014 The emergence of the unmarked: Queer theory, language ideology, and formal linguistics. InLal Zimman, Jenny L. Davis & Joshua Raclaw (eds), Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 195–224. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.003.0010
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
10. Barrett, Rusty
    2017 From Drag Queens to Leathermen: Language, Gender, and Gay Male Subcultures. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Béjoint, Henri
    2010 The Lexicography of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Béjoint, Henri
    2016 Dictionaries for general users: History and development: Current issues. InThe Oxford Handbook of Lexicography, Philip Durkin (ed), 7–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Benson, Phil
    2001 Ethnocentrism and the English Dictionary. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Blank, Paula
    2011 The proverbial ‘lesbian’: Queering etymology in contemporary critical practice. Modern Philology109(1): 108–134. 10.1086/661977
    https://doi.org/10.1086/661977 [Google Scholar]
15. Bonnet, Marie-Jo
    1997 Sappho, or the importance of culture in the language of love: Tribade, lesbienne, homosexuelle. InQueerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Anna Livia & Kira Hall (eds), 147–166. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Braun, Virginia & Kitzinger, Celia
    2001 Telling it straight? Dictionary definitions of women’s genitals. Journal of Sociolinguistics5(2): 214–232. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00148
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00148 [Google Scholar]
17. Brewer, Charlotte
    2010 Prescriptivism and descriptivism in the first, second and third editions of OED. English Today26(2): 24–33. 10.1017/S0266078410000064
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078410000064 [Google Scholar]
18. Brewer, Charlotte
    2016 Labelling and metalanguage. InThe Oxford Handbook of Lexicography, Philip Durkin (ed), 488–500. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Brunskill, Ian
    2017 The Times Style Guide, 2nd edn.Glasgow: Harper Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira
    2005 Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies7(4–5): 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
21. Butler, Judith
    1999 [1990] Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Butler, Judith
    2011 [1993] Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203828274
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203828274 [Google Scholar]
23. Butterfield, Jeremy
    2015 Fowler’s Dictionary of Modern English Usage, 4th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acref/9780199661350.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199661350.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
24. Cage, Ken
    2003 Gayle: The Language of Kinks and Queens: A History and Dictionary of Gay Language in South Africa. Houghton: Lacana Media.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Cameron, Deborah
    1995 Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don
    2003 Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791178 [Google Scholar]
27. Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn, Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sarah J. & Wong, Andrew
    (eds) 2002 Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Chen, Wenge
    2019 Towards a discourse approach to critical lexicography. International Journal of Lexicography32(3): 362–388. 10.1093/ijl/ecz003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecz003 [Google Scholar]
29. ‘Cisgender’ and ‘genderqueer’ added to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary
    ‘Cisgender’ and ‘genderqueer’ added to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary 2016 April21. Human Rights Campaign. Retrieved fromwww.hrc.org/blog/cisgender-and-genderqueer-added-to-merriam-websters-dictionaryon26 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Clayton, Susan
    1991 A word defined speaks a mind: Social images of male homosexuality in dictionaries. Franco-British Studies: Journal of the British Institute in Paris12: 55–75.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Collins Dictionary
    Collins Dictionary 2019 Retrieved fromhttps://www.collinsdictionary.com/on11 June 2019.
32. Craigie, William A.
    1934 Sir William Craigie’s response. The Periodical19(173): 24–26.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Eckert, Penny & McConnell-Ginet, Sally
    1995 Constructing meaning, constructing selves: Snapshots of language, gender, and class from Belten High. InGender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, Kira Hall & Mary Bucholtz (eds), 469–507. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Fairclough, Norman
    2003 Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
35. Findlay, Jamie. Y.
    2017 Unnatural acts lead to unconsummated marriages: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debate on same-sex marriage. Journal of Language and Sexuality6(1): 30–60. 10.1075/jls.6.1.02fin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.6.1.02fin [Google Scholar]
36. Frege, Gottlob
    1948 [1892] On sense and reference. Philosophical Review57(3): 209–230. 10.2307/2181485
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2181485 [Google Scholar]
37. Genderqueer. n.d.
    Genderqueer. n.d.Merriam-Webster. [Internet Archive]. Retrieved fromhttps://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/genderqueeron6 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
38. George, Gloria
    1999 Sexual orientation and the Oxford Dictionary of Slang. English Today15(3): 52–57. 10.1017/S0266078400011123
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400011123 [Google Scholar]
39. GLAAD media reference guide – lesbian/gay/bisexual glossary of terms. n.d.
    GLAAD media reference guide – lesbian/gay/bisexual glossary of terms. n.d.GLAAD. Retrieved fromwww.glaad.org/reference/lgbtqon10 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Glossary of terms
    Glossary of terms 2017 Stonewall. Retrieved fromhttps://www.stonewall.org.uk/help-advice/glossary-termson10 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Goldstein, Norm
    2006 Associated Press Stylebook, 41st edn.New York: Associated Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Green, Emma
    2016, April25. Does adding ‘genderqueer’ to the dictionary make it ‘real’?Atlantic. Retrieved fromhttps://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/04/genderqueer-cisgender-transphobia-merriam-webster/479406/on21 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hall, Kira & Barrett, Rusty
    eds forthcoming. The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
44. Hall, Kira, Levon, Erez & Milani, Tommaso M.
    2019 Navigating normativities: Gender and sexuality in text and talk. Language in Society48(4): 481–489. 10.1017/S0047404519000447
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000447 [Google Scholar]
45. Hanks, Patrick
    2000 Contributions of lexicography and corpus linguistics to a theory of language performance. InProceedings of the Ninth EURALEX International Congress, Ulrich Heid, Stefan Evert, Egbert Lehmann & Christian Rohrer (eds), 3–135. Bolzano: Institute for Specialised Communication and Multilingualism.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Heffer, Simon
    (ed) 2010 The Telegraph Style Guide. London: Aurum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Heller, Monica
    2010 Media, the state and linguistic authority. InLanguage Ideologies and Media Discourse: Texts, Practices, Politics, Sally Johnson & Tommaso M. Milani (eds), 277–282. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Hornscheidt, Antje
    2008 A concrete research agenda for critical lexicographic research within critical discourse studies: An investigation into racism/colonialism in monolingual Danish, German, and Swedish dictionaries. Critical Discourse Studies5(2): 107–132. 10.1080/17405900801990066
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900801990066 [Google Scholar]
49. Iedema, Rick
    2003 Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication2(1): 29–57. 10.1177/1470357203002001751
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751 [Google Scholar]
50. Irvine, Judith T. & Gal, Susan
    2000 Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. InRegimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, Identities, Paul V. Kroskrity (ed), 35–83. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Jagose, Annamarie
    1996 Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Jagose, Annamarie
    2015 The trouble with antinormativity. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies26(1): 26–47. 10.1215/10407391‑2880591
    https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2880591 [Google Scholar]
53. Johnson, Sally
    2001 Who’s misunderstanding whom? Sociolinguistics, public debate and the media. Journal of Sociolinguistics5(4): 591–610. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00168
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00168 [Google Scholar]
54. Kramarae, Cheris
    1992 Punctuating the dictionary. International Journal of the Sociology of Language94: 135–154. 10.1515/ijsl.1992.94.135
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1992.94.135 [Google Scholar]
55. Kulick, Don
    2000 Gay and lesbian language. Annual Review of Anthropology29: 243–285. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.243
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.243 [Google Scholar]
56. Kulick, Don
    2014 Language and desire. InThe Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 2nd edn, Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes (eds), 68–84. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118584248.ch3
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248.ch3 [Google Scholar]
57. Leap, William L.
    2012 Queer linguistics, sexuality, and discourse analysis. InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, James Paul Gee & Michael Handford (eds), 558–572. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Leap, William L.
    2020 Language Before Stonewall: Language, Sexuality, History. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑33516‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33516-8 [Google Scholar]
59. Leap, William L. & Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2012 Launching a new phase in language and sexuality studies. Journal of Language and Sexuality1(1): 1–14. 10.1075/jls.1.1.01lea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.1.1.01lea [Google Scholar]
60. Lexico
    Lexico 2019 Retrieved fromhttps://www.lexico.com/enon9 June 2019.
61. Livia, Anna & Hall, Kira
    (eds) 1997 Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
62. McCormick, Tracey Lee
    2009 A Queer analysis of the discursive construction of gay identity in Gayle: The Language of Kinks and Queens: A History and Dictionary of Gay Language in South Africa (2003) Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies27(2): 149–161. 10.2989/SALALS.2009.27.2.3.866
    https://doi.org/10.2989/SALALS.2009.27.2.3.866 [Google Scholar]
63. McCracken, Allison
    2017 Tumblr youth subcultures and media engagement. Cinema Journal57(1): 151–161. 10.1353/cj.2017.0061
    https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2017.0061 [Google Scholar]
64. Merriam-Webster. [@MerriamWebster]
    Merriam-Webster. [@MerriamWebster] 2016a April25. People keep 1) saying they don’t know what ‘genderqueer’ means then 2) asking why we added it to the dictionary. Retrieved fromhttps://twitter.com/MerriamWebster/status/724645568014868480on26 May 2019.
65. Merriam-Webster. [@MerriamWebster]
    Merriam-Webster. [@MerriamWebster] 2016b April25. Nomophobia: fear of being without access to a working cell phoneow.ly/4n2K4D. Retrieved fromhttps://twitter.com/MerriamWebster/status/724524665788616705on26 May 2019.
66. Merriam-Webster
    Merriam-Webster 2019 Retrieved fromhttps://www.merriam-webster.com/on11 June 2019.
67. Milani, Tommaso M.
    forthcoming. Queer performativity. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett eds New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley
    1985 Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics21(2): 339–384. 10.1017/S0022226700010306
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010306 [Google Scholar]
69. Mock, Janet
    2014 Redefining Realness: My Path to Womanhood, Identity, Love & So Much More. New York: Atria.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Moon, Rosamund
    1989 Objective or objectionable? Ideological aspects of dictionaries. ELR Journal3: 59–94.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Moon, Rosamund
    2014 Meanings, ideologies, and learners’ dictionaries. InProceedings of the XVI EURALEX International Congress: The User in Focus, 15–19 July 2014, Andrea Abel, Chiara Vettori & Natascia Ralli (eds), 85–105. Bolzano: Institute for Specialised Communication and Multilingualism.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2010 Language, Gender and Sexual Identity: Poststructuralist Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.29
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.29 [Google Scholar]
73. Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2011 Taking Queer Linguistics further: Sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research. International Journal of the Sociology of Language212: 149–179.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Motschenbacher, Heiko
    . forthcoming. Language and sexual normativity. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett eds New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Mugglestone, Lynda
    2016 Description and prescription in dictionaries. InThe Oxford Handbook of Lexicography, Philip Durkin (ed), 546–560. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Nossem, Eva
    2018 Queering lexicography: Balancing power relations in dictionaries. InQueering Translation, Translating the Queer: Theory, Practice, Activism, Brian James Baer & Klaus Kaindl (eds), 172–187. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Nunn, Gary
    2015 February 23. Clarity about ‘the gay thing’. Oxford Dictionaries Online. [Internet Archive]. Retrieved fromhttps://web.archive.org/web/*/blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2015/02/clarity-gay-thing/on6 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Oxford Dictionaries Online. [@OxfordWords]
    Oxford Dictionaries Online. [@OxfordWords] 2016 March19. @garynunn1 on why it’s so important to use neutral language when writing about gay people: oxford.ly/1BFDCkq. Retrieved fromhttps://twitter.com/OxfordWords/status/711266363952787458on12 June 2019.
79. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky
    1990 Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Siegal, Allan M., Connolly, William G., Corbett, Philip B., Taylor, Jill, LaForge, Patrick & Wessling, Susan
    2015 The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage, 5th edn.New York: Three Rivers Press.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Simpson, John
    2000 Preface to the Third Edition of the OED. Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved frompublic.oed.com/the-oed-today/preface-to-the-third-edition-of-the-oed/on21 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Taylor, Talbot J.
    1990 Which is to be master? The institutionalization of authority in the science of language. InIdeologies of Language, John E. Joseph & Talbot J. Taylor (eds), 9–26. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Turton, Stephen
    2019a “Improper words”: Silencing same-sex desire in eighteenth-century general English dictionaries. Oxford Research in English8: 9–36.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Turton, Stephen
    2019b Unlawful entries: Buggery, sodomy, and the construction of sexual normativity in early English dictionaries. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America40(1): 81–112. 10.1353/dic.2019.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1353/dic.2019.0009 [Google Scholar]
85. Turton, Stephen
    . forthcoming. Deadnaming as disformative utterance: The redefinition of trans womanhood on Urban Dictionary. Gender and Language14(4).
    [Google Scholar]
86. Zimman, Lal, Davis, Jenny L. & Raclaw, Joshua
    (eds) 2014 Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender, and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
87. Zimman, Lal
    2015 Transmasculinity and the voice: Gender assignment, identity, and presentation. InLanguage and Masculinities: Performance, Intersections, Dislocations, Tommaso M. Milani (ed), 197–219. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]