1887
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-3770
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3789
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper furthers the goal of “queering lexicography” (Nossem 2018) by proposing a theoretical approach to analysing dictionary definitions that replaces the traditional descriptive/prescriptive binary with a model of normativity influenced by performativity theory. This is demonstrated by a critical discourse analysis of how entries for , and in four contemporary English dictionaries tacitly position as a neutral term against which and are sociolinguistically marked. The paper also stresses the need for researchers not only to analyse how normativity is embedded in dictionaries, but to recognize the extent to which lay dictionary-users are already aware of the normative potential of lexicography, whether they embrace it or condemn it. This is explored through an incident in which addition of the word to its online dictionary in 2016 became the subject of public scrutiny and contestation on social media.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jls.19012.tur
2020-09-07
2020-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language
    American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 2019 Retrieved fromhttps://ahdictionary.com/on11 June 2019.
  2. Atkins, B. T. Sue & Rundell, Michael
    2008The Oxford Guide to Practical Lexicography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Awan, Imran
    2014 Islamophobia and Twitter: A typology of online hate against Muslims on social media. Policy and Internet6(2): 133–150. 10.1002/1944‑2866.POI364
    https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI364 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Paul
    2004 “Unnatural acts”: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics8(1): 88–106. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2004.00252.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00252.x [Google Scholar]
  5. 2005Public Discourses of Gay Men. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2013 From gay language to normative discourse: A diachronic analysis of Lavender Linguistics conference abstracts 1994–2012. Journal of Language and Sexuality2(2): 179–205. 10.1075/jls.2.2.01bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.2.2.01bak [Google Scholar]
  7. 2017American and British English: Divided by a Common Language?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316105313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316105313 [Google Scholar]
  8. Barrett, Rusty
    2002 Is queer theory important for sociolinguistic theory?InLanguage and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 25–43. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2014 The emergence of the unmarked: Queer theory, language ideology, and formal linguistics. InLal Zimman, Jenny L. Davis & Joshua Raclaw (eds), Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 195–224. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2017From Drag Queens to Leathermen: Language, Gender, and Gay Male Subcultures. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Béjoint, Henri
    2010The Lexicography of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2016 Dictionaries for general users: History and development: Current issues. InThe Oxford Handbook of Lexicography, Philip Durkin (ed), 7–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Benson, Phil
    2001Ethnocentrism and the English Dictionary. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Blank, Paula
    2011 The proverbial ‘lesbian’: Queering etymology in contemporary critical practice. Modern Philology109(1): 108–134. 10.1086/661977
    https://doi.org/10.1086/661977 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bonnet, Marie-Jo
    1997 Sappho, or the importance of culture in the language of love: Tribade, lesbienne, homosexuelle. InQueerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Anna Livia & Kira Hall (eds), 147–166. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Braun, Virginia & Kitzinger, Celia
    2001 Telling it straight? Dictionary definitions of women’s genitals. Journal of Sociolinguistics5(2): 214–232. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00148
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00148 [Google Scholar]
  17. Brewer, Charlotte
    2010 Prescriptivism and descriptivism in the first, second and third editions of OED. English Today26(2): 24–33. 10.1017/S0266078410000064
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078410000064 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2016 Labelling and metalanguage. InThe Oxford Handbook of Lexicography, Philip Durkin (ed), 488–500. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Brunskill, Ian
    2017The Times Style Guide, 2nd edn.Glasgow: Harper Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira
    2005 Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies7(4–5): 585–614. 10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  21. Butler, Judith
    1999 [1990]Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2011 [1993]Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203828274
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203828274 [Google Scholar]
  23. Butterfield, Jeremy
    2015Fowler’s Dictionary of Modern English Usage, 4th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acref/9780199661350.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199661350.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Cage, Ken
    2003Gayle: The Language of Kinks and Queens: A History and Dictionary of Gay Language in South Africa. Houghton: Lacana Media.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Cameron, Deborah
    1995Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don
    2003Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791178 [Google Scholar]
  27. Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn, Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sarah J. & Wong, Andrew
    (eds) 2002Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen, Wenge
    2019 Towards a discourse approach to critical lexicography. International Journal of Lexicography32(3): 362–388. 10.1093/ijl/ecz003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecz003 [Google Scholar]
  29. ‘Cisgender’ and ‘genderqueer’ added to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary
    ‘Cisgender’ and ‘genderqueer’ added to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary 2016 April21. Human Rights Campaign. Retrieved fromwww.hrc.org/blog/cisgender-and-genderqueer-added-to-merriam-websters-dictionaryon26 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Clayton, Susan
    1991 A word defined speaks a mind: Social images of male homosexuality in dictionaries. Franco-British Studies: Journal of the British Institute in Paris12: 55–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Collins Dictionary
    Collins Dictionary 2019 Retrieved fromhttps://www.collinsdictionary.com/on11 June 2019.
  32. Craigie, William A.
    1934 Sir William Craigie’s response. The Periodical19(173): 24–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Eckert, Penny & McConnell-Ginet, Sally
    1995 Constructing meaning, constructing selves: Snapshots of language, gender, and class from Belten High. InGender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, Kira Hall & Mary Bucholtz (eds), 469–507. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Fairclough, Norman
    2003Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
  35. Findlay, Jamie. Y.
    2017 Unnatural acts lead to unconsummated marriages: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debate on same-sex marriage. Journal of Language and Sexuality6(1): 30–60. 10.1075/jls.6.1.02fin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.6.1.02fin [Google Scholar]
  36. Frege, Gottlob
    1948 [1892] On sense and reference. Philosophical Review57(3): 209–230. 10.2307/2181485
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2181485 [Google Scholar]
  37. Genderqueer. n.d.
    Genderqueer. n.d.Merriam-Webster. [Internet Archive]. Retrieved fromhttps://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/genderqueeron6 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. George, Gloria
    1999 Sexual orientation and the Oxford Dictionary of Slang. English Today15(3): 52–57. 10.1017/S0266078400011123
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400011123 [Google Scholar]
  39. GLAAD media reference guide – lesbian/gay/bisexual glossary of terms. n.d.
    GLAAD media reference guide – lesbian/gay/bisexual glossary of terms. n.d.GLAAD. Retrieved fromwww.glaad.org/reference/lgbtqon10 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Glossary of terms
    Glossary of terms 2017Stonewall. Retrieved fromhttps://www.stonewall.org.uk/help-advice/glossary-termson10 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Goldstein, Norm
    2006Associated Press Stylebook, 41st edn.New York: Associated Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Green, Emma
    2016, April25. Does adding ‘genderqueer’ to the dictionary make it ‘real’?Atlantic. Retrieved fromhttps://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/04/genderqueer-cisgender-transphobia-merriam-webster/479406/on21 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Hall, Kira & Barrett, Rusty
    eds forthcoming. The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hall, Kira, Levon, Erez & Milani, Tommaso M.
    2019 Navigating normativities: Gender and sexuality in text and talk. Language in Society48(4): 481–489. 10.1017/S0047404519000447
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000447 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hanks, Patrick
    2000 Contributions of lexicography and corpus linguistics to a theory of language performance. InProceedings of the Ninth EURALEX International Congress, Ulrich Heid, Stefan Evert, Egbert Lehmann & Christian Rohrer (eds), 3–135. Bolzano: Institute for Specialised Communication and Multilingualism.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Heffer, Simon
    (ed) 2010The Telegraph Style Guide. London: Aurum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Heller, Monica
    2010 Media, the state and linguistic authority. InLanguage Ideologies and Media Discourse: Texts, Practices, Politics, Sally Johnson & Tommaso M. Milani (eds), 277–282. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Hornscheidt, Antje
    2008 A concrete research agenda for critical lexicographic research within critical discourse studies: An investigation into racism/colonialism in monolingual Danish, German, and Swedish dictionaries. Critical Discourse Studies5(2): 107–132. 10.1080/17405900801990066
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900801990066 [Google Scholar]
  49. Iedema, Rick
    2003 Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication2(1): 29–57. 10.1177/1470357203002001751
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751 [Google Scholar]
  50. Irvine, Judith T. & Gal, Susan
    2000 Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. InRegimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, Identities, Paul V. Kroskrity (ed), 35–83. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Jagose, Annamarie
    1996Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2015 The trouble with antinormativity. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies26(1): 26–47. 10.1215/10407391‑2880591
    https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2880591 [Google Scholar]
  53. Johnson, Sally
    2001 Who’s misunderstanding whom? Sociolinguistics, public debate and the media. Journal of Sociolinguistics5(4): 591–610. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00168
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00168 [Google Scholar]
  54. Kramarae, Cheris
    1992 Punctuating the dictionary. International Journal of the Sociology of Language94: 135–154. 10.1515/ijsl.1992.94.135
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1992.94.135 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kulick, Don
    2000 Gay and lesbian language. Annual Review of Anthropology29: 243–285. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.243
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.243 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2014 Language and desire. InThe Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 2nd edn, Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes (eds), 68–84. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118584248.ch3
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248.ch3 [Google Scholar]
  57. Leap, William L.
    2012 Queer linguistics, sexuality, and discourse analysis. InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, James Paul Gee & Michael Handford (eds), 558–572. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 2020Language Before Stonewall: Language, Sexuality, History. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑33516‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33516-8 [Google Scholar]
  59. Leap, William L. & Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2012 Launching a new phase in language and sexuality studies. Journal of Language and Sexuality1(1): 1–14. 10.1075/jls.1.1.01lea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.1.1.01lea [Google Scholar]
  60. Lexico
    Lexico 2019 Retrieved fromhttps://www.lexico.com/enon9 June 2019.
  61. Livia, Anna & Hall, Kira
    (eds) 1997Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. McCormick, Tracey Lee
    2009 A Queer analysis of the discursive construction of gay identity in Gayle: The Language of Kinks and Queens: A History and Dictionary of Gay Language in South Africa (2003) Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies27(2): 149–161. 10.2989/SALALS.2009.27.2.3.866
    https://doi.org/10.2989/SALALS.2009.27.2.3.866 [Google Scholar]
  63. McCracken, Allison
    2017 Tumblr youth subcultures and media engagement. Cinema Journal57(1): 151–161. 10.1353/cj.2017.0061
    https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2017.0061 [Google Scholar]
  64. Merriam-Webster. [@MerriamWebster]
    Merriam-Webster. [@MerriamWebster] 2016a April25. People keep 1) saying they don’t know what ‘genderqueer’ means then 2) asking why we added it to the dictionary. Retrieved fromhttps://twitter.com/MerriamWebster/status/724645568014868480on26 May 2019.
  65. Merriam-Webster. [@MerriamWebster]
    Merriam-Webster. [@MerriamWebster] 2016b April25. Nomophobia: fear of being without access to a working cell phoneow.ly/4n2K4D. Retrieved fromhttps://twitter.com/MerriamWebster/status/724524665788616705on26 May 2019.
  66. Merriam-Webster
    Merriam-Webster 2019 Retrieved fromhttps://www.merriam-webster.com/on11 June 2019.
  67. Milani, Tommaso M.
    forthcoming. Queer performativity. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett eds New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley
    1985 Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics21(2): 339–384. 10.1017/S0022226700010306
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010306 [Google Scholar]
  69. Mock, Janet
    2014Redefining Realness: My Path to Womanhood, Identity, Love & So Much More. New York: Atria.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Moon, Rosamund
    1989 Objective or objectionable? Ideological aspects of dictionaries. ELR Journal3: 59–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 2014 Meanings, ideologies, and learners’ dictionaries. InProceedings of the XVI EURALEX International Congress: The User in Focus, 15–19 July 2014, Andrea Abel, Chiara Vettori & Natascia Ralli (eds), 85–105. Bolzano: Institute for Specialised Communication and Multilingualism.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2010Language, Gender and Sexual Identity: Poststructuralist Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.29
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.29 [Google Scholar]
  73. 2011 Taking Queer Linguistics further: Sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research. International Journal of the Sociology of Language212: 149–179.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. . forthcoming. Language and sexual normativity. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett eds New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Mugglestone, Lynda
    2016 Description and prescription in dictionaries. InThe Oxford Handbook of Lexicography, Philip Durkin (ed), 546–560. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Nossem, Eva
    2018 Queering lexicography: Balancing power relations in dictionaries. InQueering Translation, Translating the Queer: Theory, Practice, Activism, Brian James Baer & Klaus Kaindl (eds), 172–187. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Nunn, Gary
    2015 February 23. Clarity about ‘the gay thing’. Oxford Dictionaries Online. [Internet Archive]. Retrieved fromhttps://web.archive.org/web/*/blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2015/02/clarity-gay-thing/on6 June 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Oxford Dictionaries Online. [@OxfordWords]
    Oxford Dictionaries Online. [@OxfordWords] 2016 March19. @garynunn1 on why it’s so important to use neutral language when writing about gay people: oxford.ly/1BFDCkq. Retrieved fromhttps://twitter.com/OxfordWords/status/711266363952787458on12 June 2019.
  79. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky
    1990Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Siegal, Allan M., Connolly, William G., Corbett, Philip B., Taylor, Jill, LaForge, Patrick & Wessling, Susan
    2015The New York Times Manual of Style and Usage, 5th edn.New York: Three Rivers Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Simpson, John
    2000 Preface to the Third Edition of the OED. Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved frompublic.oed.com/the-oed-today/preface-to-the-third-edition-of-the-oed/on21 May 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Taylor, Talbot J.
    1990 Which is to be master? The institutionalization of authority in the science of language. InIdeologies of Language, John E. Joseph & Talbot J. Taylor (eds), 9–26. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Turton, Stephen
    2019a “Improper words”: Silencing same-sex desire in eighteenth-century general English dictionaries. Oxford Research in English8: 9–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. 2019b Unlawful entries: Buggery, sodomy, and the construction of sexual normativity in early English dictionaries. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America40(1): 81–112. 10.1353/dic.2019.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1353/dic.2019.0009 [Google Scholar]
  85. . forthcoming. Deadnaming as disformative utterance: The redefinition of trans womanhood on Urban Dictionary. Gender and Language14(4).
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Zimman, Lal, Davis, Jenny L. & Raclaw, Joshua
    (eds) 2014Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender, and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937295.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  87. Zimman, Lal
    2015 Transmasculinity and the voice: Gender assignment, identity, and presentation. InLanguage and Masculinities: Performance, Intersections, Dislocations, Tommaso M. Milani (ed), 197–219. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jls.19012.tur
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jls.19012.tur
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cisnormativity , dictionaries , genderqueer , heteronormativity , language ideology , lexicography and performativity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error