1887
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-3770
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3789
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Age is an under-analyzed variable in linguistic research concerning gender and sexuality. We consider these three constructs by examining diminutives as an index of gay sexuality in Madrid Spanish across two tasks. Although phonetic cues have received great attention, morphological features (e.g. diminutives) may also index gayness (Mendes 2014). Moreover, despite frequent usage across Spanish-speaking varieties, diminutives are primarily restricted to women and children in north-central Spain (Haensch 2002). In a diminutive reaction task, 53 Madrid residents indicated whether men, women, adults, or children were likely to have uttered diminutivized sentences. Mixed-effects models indicated that the number of diminutives and sentence theme significantly affected perception, and participants’ evaluations in a free response task corroborated that men using diminutives were considered effeminate, gay, and childish. Thus, even with sociophonetic cues removed, morphological phenomena create a gay percept. This study demonstrates how age ideologies inform indexicalization processes related to gender and sexuality.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jls.19013.had
2020-09-07
2020-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aleza-Izquierdo, Milagros
    2016 El diminutivo en el español de Santo Domingo. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación67: 3–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Badinter, Elisabeth
    1993XY La Identidad Masculina. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Black, Chad
    2009 De Marica a Maricón: Following Definitions of Marica, Maricon, and Sodomía with the Real Academia Española [Blog Post]. Retrieved from: https://parezcoydigo.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/de-marica-a-maricon-following-definitions-of-marica-maricon-and-sodomia/
  4. Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira
    2016 Embodied sociolinguistics. InSociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates, Nicholas Coupland (ed), 173–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107449787.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449787.009 [Google Scholar]
  5. Caravedo, Rocío
    2010 Perú. InManual de Dialectología Hispánica: El Español de América, Manuel Alvar (ed), 152–168. Barcelona: Ariel Lingüística.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Connell, Raewyn
    2005Masculinities (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Eckert, Penelope
    2014 The problem with binaries: Coding for gender and sexuality. Language and Linguistics Compass8(11): 529–535. 10.1111/lnc3.12113
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12113 [Google Scholar]
  8. Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally
    2013Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139245883
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139245883 [Google Scholar]
  9. Flores-Ferrán, Nydia
    2010 An examination of mitigation strategies used in Spanish psychotherapeutic discourse. Journal of Pragmatics42: 1964–1981. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gutiérrez, Manuel J.
    2013 Hablando en chiquito: -ito en el español de Houston. Bulletin of Spanish Studies15(3): 295–313. 10.1080/14753820.2013.784040
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14753820.2013.784040 [Google Scholar]
  11. Haensch, Günther
    2002 Español de América y español de Europa (2ª parte). Panace3(7): 37–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson, Daniel E.
    2009 Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass3(1): 359–383. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00108.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Jurafsky, Daniel
    1996 Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language72(3): 533–578. 10.2307/416278
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416278 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kanwit, Matthew
    2015 The role of discourse topic in evidentiality marking: Variable (de)queísmo in Caracas. eHumanista/IVITRA8: 446–470.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kiesling, Scott F.
    2002 Playing the straight man: Displaying and maintaining male heterosexuality in discourse. InLanguage and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 249–266. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kiesling, Scott. F.
    2018 Masculine stances and the linguistics of affect: On masculine ease. NORMA13(3–4): 191–212. 10.1080/18902138.2018.1431756
    https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2018.1431756 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kiesling, Scott F.
    forthcoming. Stances of the ‘gay voice’ and ‘brospeak’: Towards a systematic model of stancetaking. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Kira Hall & Rusty Barret eds Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kishi, Daisuke
    2003 Variación léxica según el sexo en el lenguaje hablado de los jóvenes tapatíos. México y La Cuenca del Pacífico6(20): 82–94. 10.32870/mycp.v6i20.213
    https://doi.org/10.32870/mycp.v6i20.213 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lakoff, Robin
    1973 Language and woman’s place. Language in Society2(1): 45–80. 10.1017/S0047404500000051
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051 [Google Scholar]
  20. Levon, Erez
    2006 Hearing “gay”: Prosody, interpretation and the affective judgments of men’s speech. American Speech81: 56–78. 10.1215/00031283‑2006‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2006-003 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lipski, John
    1994Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mendes, Ronald B.
    2007 What is “gay speech” in São Paulo, Brazil. InInternational Perspectives on Gender and Language, José Santaemilia, Patricia Bou, Sergio Maruenda & Gora Zaragoza (eds), 296–305. València: Universitat de València.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2014 Diminutives and masculinity. InLanguage and Masculinities: Performances, Intersections, Dislocations, Tommaso Milani (ed), 117–132. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Messerschmidt, James W.
    2012 Engendering gendered knowledge: Assessing the academic appropriation of hegemonic masculinity. Men and Masculinities15(1): 56–76. 10.1177/1097184X11428384
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X11428384 [Google Scholar]
  25. Milani, Tommaso
    2014 Theorizing language and masculinities. InLanguage and Masculinities: Performances, Intersections, Dislocations, Tommaso Milani (ed), 28–53. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315759357
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759357 [Google Scholar]
  26. Monsiváis, Carlos
    2002 Los gays en México: La función, la ampliación, la consolidación del ghetto. Debate Feminista26: 89–115. 10.22201/cieg.2594066xe.2002.26.737
    https://doi.org/10.22201/cieg.2594066xe.2002.26.737 [Google Scholar]
  27. Náñez Fernández, Emilio
    2006El Diminutivo: Historia y Funciones en el Español Clásico y Moderno. Madrid: UAM Ediciones.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ochs, Elinor
    1992 Indexing gender. InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds), 335–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Podesva, Robert J.
    2011 Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics39(3): 33–264. 10.1177/0075424211405161
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424211405161 [Google Scholar]
  30. Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sarah J. & Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn
    2002 Sharing resources and indexing meaning in the production of gay styles. InLanguage and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 175–189. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. RAE. n.d.
    RAE. n.d.Real Academia Española’s Diccionario de la lengua Española. Retrieved fromdle.rae.es/?id=OPMBIVV
  32. Regúnaga, Alejandra
    2005 Morfología derivativa: Consideraciones en torno al uso de diminutivos en la ciudad de Santa Rosa. Anclajes9: 251–262.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Román, Juan J. O.
    2007 Un territorio lingüístico en expansión geográfica: La jerga gay española. Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense27(1): 69–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sedano, Mercedes & Bentivoglio, Paola
    2010 Venezuela. InManual de Dialectología Hispánica: El Español de América, Manuel Alvar (ed), 116–133. Barcelona: Ariel Lingüística.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sifianou, Maria
    1992 The use of diminutives in expressing politeness: Modern Greek versus English. Journal of Pragmatics17(2): 155–173. 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90038‑D
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90038-D [Google Scholar]
  36. Silverstein, Michael
    2003 Indexical order and the dialects of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication23(3–4): 193–229. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jls.19013.had
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jls.19013.had
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): age , diminutives , gender , indexicality , Madrid Spanish , masculinity and sexuality
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error