1887
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-3770
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3789
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

We present a study of the online forum Reddit, specifically a sub-forum for (typically heterosexual) men who identify as or . Incels are an online imagined community/community of practice who wish to, but do not, have sexual relations with women. Owing to this identity, they view themselves as non-normative within broader society and see women and societal standards of masculinity as the cause of their problems. In this paper, we take a small corpus of 67,000 words generated from 50 threads created, and commented on, by incels. We analyse keywords, word frequencies, and concordance lines to explore the representation of gendered social actors. Keyword analysis reveals that references to gendered social actors are particularly salient within this community, leading to an analysis of all such social actors in the corpus. The findings suggest that incels position different groups of men in a hierarchy in which conventionally attractive men occupy the top position. Notably, we find that female social actors are not placed in a similar hierarchy. An additional appraisal analysis of the most frequently occurring male and female social actors shows that men are judged as incapacitated while women are seen as immoral, dishonest and capable of hurting men. Members of the online community also seem preoccupied with physical attractiveness. The study opens up a number of avenues for future research, especially into the complexities with which members of non-normative heterosexual groups simultaneously orient to and reject social norms.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jls.19014.her
2020-09-07
2020-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-ghamdi, Hanan Ali Kabbas & Al-ghamdi, Azzah Ali Kabbas
    2015 The role of virtual communities of practice in knowledge management using Web 2.0. Procedia Computer Science65: 406–411. 10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.102
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.102 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Benedict
    1983Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Paul
    2004 Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency, and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics32(4): 346–359. 10.1177/0075424204269894
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424204269894 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2011 Discourse and gender. InThe Bloomsbury Companion to Discourse Analysis, Ken Hyland & Brian Paltridge (eds), 199–212. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2012 Acceptable bias? Using corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies9(3): 247–256. 10.1080/17405904.2012.688297
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688297 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2014Using Corpora to Analyze Gender. London: Bloomsbury
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Banet-Weiser, Sarah & Miltner, Kate
    2016 #MasculinitySoFragile: Culture, structure, and networked misogyny. Feminist Media Studies16(1): 171–174. 10.1080/14680777.2016.1120490
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1120490 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bednarek, Monika
    2009 Language patterns and ATTITUDE. Functions of Language16(2): 165–192. 10.1075/fol.16.2.01bed
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.2.01bed [Google Scholar]
  9. Braincels
    Braincels 2019 r/braincels. Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/braincels (July 15, 2019)
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don
    2006 Heteronorms. InThe Language and Sexuality Reader, Deborah Cameron & Don Kulick (eds), 165–168. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203013373
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203013373 [Google Scholar]
  11. Coimbra-Gomes, Elvis & Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2019 Language, normativity, and sexual orientation obsessive-compulsive disorder (SO-OCD): A corpus-assisted discourse analysis. Language in Society48(4): 565–584. 10.1017/S0047404519000423
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000423 [Google Scholar]
  12. Davies, Mark
    2008–onwardsThe Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990-present. https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/ (September 29, 2019)
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2013Corpus of News on the Web (NOW): 3+ Billion Words from 20 Countries, Updated Every Day. https://www.english-corpora.org/now/ (September 29, 2019)
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Del-Teso-Craviotto, Marisol
    2008 Gender and sexual identity authentication in language use: The case of chat rooms. Discourse Studies10(2): 251–270. 10.1177/1461445607087011
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607087011 [Google Scholar]
  15. Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally
    2007 Putting communities of practice in their place. Gender & Language1(1): 27–37. 10.1558/genl.2007.1.1.27
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.2007.1.1.27 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ging, Deborah
    2017 Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities20(1): 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hall, Kira, Levon, Erez & Milani, Tommaso
    2019 Navigating normativities: Gender and sexuality in text and talk. Language in Society48(4): 481–489. 10.1017/S0047404519000447
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000447 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hardaker, Claire & McGlashan, Mark
    2016 “Real men don’t hate women”: Twitter rape threats and group identity. Journal of Pragmatics91(1): 80–93. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hawtin, Abigail
    2018 Construction of male and female identities in the ‘new misogyny’: A corpus-based discourse comparison of a misogynistic murderer’s manifesto and misogynistic online forums. (Paper presented atthe 4th Corpora and Discourse International Conference, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK).
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hinderliter, Andrew
    2016 The evolution of online asexual discourse. (Unpublished) PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaigne. hdl.handle.net/2142/95433 (October 1, 2019)
  21. Hughes, Jennifer
    2018 The psychological validity of collocation: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. (Unpublished) PhD thesis, Lancaster University.
  22. Incels.co.
    Incels.co. 2018 Introduction to incels. https://incels.co/threads/introduction-to-incels.15406/ (September 18, 2019)
  23. Jaki, Sylvia, De Smedt, Tom, Gwóźdź, Maja, Panchal, Rudresh, Rossa, Alexander & De Pauw, Guy
    2019 Online hatred of women in the Incels.me forum: Linguistic analysis and automatic detection. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict7(2): 240–268. 10.1075/jlac.00026.jak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00026.jak [Google Scholar]
  24. King, Brian
    2009 Building and analysing corpora of computer-mediated communication. InContemporary Corpus Linguistics, Paul Baker (ed), 301–320. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Koller, Veronika
    2014 Cognitive linguistics and ideology. InThe Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, Jeanette Littlemore & John R. Smith (eds), 234–252. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Koller, Veronika, McGlashan, Mark, Heritage, Frazer, Krendel, Alexandra & Aiston, Jessica
    2019 MANTRaP: Misogyny online ANd The Red Pill. (Paper presented atthe 12th BAAL LGaS SIG event: Intersections of language, gender and sexuality in media and technology, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Krendel, Alexandra
    2020 The men and women, guys and girls of the ‘manosphere’: A corpus-assisted discourse approach. Discourse & Society31(6): 607–630. doi:  10.1177/0957926520939690
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520939690 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lalor, Therese & Rendle-Short, Johanna
    2007 ‘That’s so gay’: A contemporary use of ‘gay’ in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics27(2): 147–173. 10.1080/07268600701522764
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600701522764 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lawson, Robert & McGlashan, Mark
    2017 Discourses of neoliberal masculinity: A corpus-based discourse study of an online ‘Pick Up Artist’ community. (Paper presented atLanguage, Gender and Sexuality meeting, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Martin, James & White, Peter
    2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  31. Milani, Tommaso M.
    2013 Are ‘queers’ really ‘queer’? Language, identity and same-sex desire in a South African online community. Discourse & Society24(5): 615–633. 10.1177/0957926513486168
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486168 [Google Scholar]
  32. Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2014 Focusing on normativity in language and sexuality studies: Insights from conversations on objectophilia. Critical Discourse Studies11(1): 49–70. 10.1080/17405904.2013.836113
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.836113 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2018 Corpus linguistics in language and sexuality studies: Taking stock and future directions. Journal of Language and Sexuality7(2): 145–174. 10.1075/jls.17019.mot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17019.mot [Google Scholar]
  34. Myketiak, Chrystie
    2015 The co-construction of cybersex narratives. Discourse & Society26(4): 464–479. 10.1177/0957926515579559
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515579559 [Google Scholar]
  35. Potts, Amanda
    2015 ‘LOVE YOU GUYS (NO HOMO)’: How gamers and fans play with sexuality, gender, and Minecraft on YouTube. Critical Discourse Studies12(2): 163–186. 10.1080/17405904.2014.974635
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2014.974635 [Google Scholar]
  36. Potts, Amanda & Baker, Paul
    2012 Does semantic tagging identify cultural change in British and American English?International Journal of Corpus Linguistics17(3): 295–324. 10.1075/ijcl.17.3.01pot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.3.01pot [Google Scholar]
  37. Rayson, Paul
    2019 Log-likelihood and effect size calculator. UCREL. ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/llwizard.html (September 18, 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Russell, Eric
    2019The Discursive Ecology of Homophobia: Unraveling Anti-LGBTQ Speech on the European Far Right. Bristol: Encounters. 10.21832/RUSSEL3453
    https://doi.org/10.21832/RUSSEL3453 [Google Scholar]
  39. Scott, Micheal
    2016WordSmith Tools Manual, Version 7. Lexical Analysis Software Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Srinivasan, Amia
    2018 Does anyone have the right to sex?The London Review of Books40(6): 5–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Tranchese, Alessia
    2019 Using corpus analysis to investigate ‘extreme’ Incel misogyny online. (Paper presented at12th BAAL LGaS SIG Event: Intersections of Language, Gender and Sexuality in Media and Technology, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK).
    [Google Scholar]
  42. van Dijk, Teun
    1993 Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society4(2): 249–283. 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
  43. van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Wirth-Koliba, Victoria
    2016 The diverse and dynamic world of’ ‘us’ and ‘them’ in political discourse. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines8(1): 23–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Woolley, Susan
    2013 Speech that silences, silences that speak: ‘That’s so gay’, ‘that’s so ghetto’, and safe space in High School. Journal of Language and Sexuality2(2): 292–319. 10.1075/jls.2.2.05woo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.2.2.05woo [Google Scholar]
  46. Wodak, Ruth, De Cillia, Rudolph, Reisigl, Martin & Liebhart, Karin
    2009The Discursive Construction of National Identities (2nd edition). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Wright, David
    2020 The discursive construction of resistance to sex in an online community. Discourse, Context & Media36: Article 100402. 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100402
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100402 [Google Scholar]
  48. Zappavigna, Michele
    2018Searchable Talk: Hashtags and Social Media Metadiscourse. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Zimmerman, Shannon, Ryan, Luisa & Duriesmith, David
    2018 Recognizing the violent extremist ideology of ‘Incels.’Women In International Security Policy Brief, September (1), 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jls.19014.her
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jls.19014.her
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error