More than the selfie

References

1. Anderson, Eric
   2012 The Monogamy Gap: Men, Love, and the Reality of Cheating. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199777921.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199777921.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
2. Armstrong, Elizabeth A., England, Paula & Fogarty, Alison C. K.
   2012 Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review77(3): 435–462. 10.1177/0003122412445802
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412445802 [Google Scholar]
3. Ault, Michael K. & Gilder, Bobbi Van
   2015 Polygamy in the United States: How marginalized religious communities cope with stigmatizing discourses surrounding plural marriage. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research44(4): 307–328. 10.1080/17475759.2015.1048702
   https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2015.1048702 [Google Scholar]
4. Barker, Meg
   2005 This is my partner, and this is my … partner’s partner: Constructing a polyamorous identity in a monogamous world. Journal of Constructivist Psychology18(1): 75–88. 10.1080/10720530590523107
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10720530590523107 [Google Scholar]
5. Bauer, Robin
   2010 Non-monogamy in queer BDSM communities: Putting the sex back into alternative relationship practices and discourse. InUnderstanding Non-Monogamies. Meg Barker & Darren Langdridge (eds), 142–153. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baym, Nancy
   2010 Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Berg, Alex
   2014 Why these queers are boycotting OkCupid – and you should, too. Huffington Post. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/these-queers-are-boycotti_b_5248971 (June29 2020).
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brown, Anna
   2020 Lesbian, gay and bisexual online daters report positive experiences – but also harassment. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/04/09/lesbian-gay-and-bisexual-online-daters-report-positive-experiences-but-also-harassment/ (August17 2020).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bucher, Taina & Helmond, Anne
   2017 The affordances of social media platforms. InThe SAGE Handbook of Social Media, Jean Burgess, Thomas Poell & Alice E. Marwick (eds) 233–253. London: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Callis, April Scarlette
    2014 Bisexual, pansexual, queer: Non-binary identities and the sexual borderlands. Sexualities17(1–2): 63–80. 10.1177/1363460713511094
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713511094 [Google Scholar]
11. Carlson, Bronwyn
    2019 Love and hate at the cultural interface: Indigenous Australians and dating apps: Journal of Sociology56(2): 133–150. 10.1177/1440783319833181
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783319833181 [Google Scholar]
12. Chapais, Bernard
    2013 Monogamy, strongly bonded groups, and the evolution of human social structure. Evolutionary Anthropology22(2): 52–65. 10.1002/evan.21345
    https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21345 [Google Scholar]
13. DeLamater, John & Rebecca F. Plante
    2015 Handbook of the Sociology of Sexualities. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑17341‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17341-2 [Google Scholar]
14. Dijck, Jose van
    2013 The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
15. Dimock, Michael
    2019 Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/ (May 30 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
16. Douglas, Susan J.
    2004 [1999] Listening In: Radio and the American Imagination. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Drouin, Michelle, Miller, Daniel, Wehle, Shaun M. J. & Hernandez, Elisa
    2016 Why do people lie online? “Because everyone lies on the internet.” Computers in Human Behavior64: 134–142. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.052
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.052 [Google Scholar]
18. Duguay, Stefanie
    2016 “He has a way gayer Facebook than I do”: Investigating sexual identity disclosure and context collapse on a social networking site. New Media & Society18(6): 891–907. 10.1177/1461444814549930
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814549930 [Google Scholar]
19. Ferrer, Jorge N.
    2018 Mononormativity, polypride, and the “mono–poly wars.” Sexuality & Culture22(3): 817–836. 10.1007/s12119‑017‑9494‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9494-y [Google Scholar]
20. Flowerdew, John
    2017 Critical Discourse Studies in context. InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, John Flowerdew & John E. Richardson (eds), 165–179. New York: Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781315739342‑12
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-12 [Google Scholar]
21. Foucault, Michel
    1977 Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Foucault, Michel
    1988 Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fry, Richard
    2020 Millennials overtake Baby Boomers as America’s largest generation. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/04/28/millennials-overtake-baby-boomers-as-americas-largest-generation/ (May 30 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gahran, Amy
    2012 Riding the relationship escalator (or not). Solo Poly. https://solopoly.net/2012/11/29/riding-the-relationship-escalator-or-not/ (February5 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gahran, Amy
    2013 Couple privilege: Having it doesn’t necessarily make you an asshole (but it might). SoloPoly. https://solopoly.net/2013/02/05/couple-privilege-having-it-doesnt-necessarily-make-you-an-asshole-but-it-can/ (November13 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gibson, James J.
    2014 The theory of affordances. InThe People, Place, and Space Reader, Jen Jack Gieseking, William Mangold, Cindi Katz, Setha Low & Susan Saegert (eds), 56–60. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Giddens, Anthony
    1992 The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Goldhill, Olivia
    2018 Polyamorous sex is the most quietly revolutionary political weapon in the United States. Quartz. https://qz.com/1501725/polyamorous-sex-is-the-most-quietly-revolutionary-political-weapon-in-the-united-states/ (December21 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
29. Grinberg, Emanuella
    2016 OkCupid adds feature for polyamorous users. CNN Online, U.S. Edition. www.cnn.com/2016/01/08/living/okcupid-polyamorous-open-relationships-feat/index.html (October3 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Haritaworn, Jin, Lin, Chin-ju & Klesse, Christian
    2006 Poly/logue: A critical introduction to polyamory: Sexualities9(5): 515–529. 10.1177/1363460706069963
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706069963 [Google Scholar]
31. Haupert, Mara L., Gesselman, Amanda N., Moors, Amy C., Fisher, Helen E. & Garcia, Justin R.
    2017 Prevalence of experiences with consensual nonmonogamous relationships: Findings from two national samples of single Americans. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy43(5): 424–440. 10.1080/0092623X.2016.1178675
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2016.1178675 [Google Scholar]
32. Hogenboom, Melissa
    2016 Polyamorous relationships may be the future of love. BBC News, sec. Future. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160623-polyamorous-relationships-may-be-the-future-of-love (June6 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hyde, Janet S. & DeLamater, John
    2000 Understanding Human Sexuality. 7th edition. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Iedema, Rick
    2003 Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication2(1): 29–57. 10.1177/1470357203002001751
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751 [Google Scholar]
35. Jenks, Richard J.
    1998 Swinging: A review of the literature. Archives of Sexual Behavior27(5): 507–521. 10.1023/A:1018708730945
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018708730945 [Google Scholar]
36. Kale, Sirin
    2018 All you need is loves: The truth about polyamory. The Guardian, sec. Life and style. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/sep/25/truth-about-polyamory-monogamy-open-relationships (June6 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
37. Khazan, Olga
    2016 OkCupid adds a feature for the polyamorous. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/01/ok-cupid-is-opening-up-to-polyamorous-relationships/423162/ (October3 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
38. Klesse, Christian
    2006 Polyamory and its ‘others’: Contesting the terms of non-monogamy. Sexualities9(5): 565–583. 10.1177/1363460706069986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706069986 [Google Scholar]
39. Klesse, Christian
    2014 Polyamory: Intimate practice, identity or sexual orientation?Sexualities17(1–2): 81–99. 10.1177/1363460713511096
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713511096 [Google Scholar]
40. Kress, Gunther R. & van Leeuwen, Theo
    1998 Front pages: (The critical) analysis of newspaper layout. InApproaches to Media Discourse, Allan Bell & Peter Garrett (eds), 186–219. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kunst, Alexander
    2019 U.S. online dating by age 2017. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/706499/us-adults-online-dating-site-app-by-age/ (September 16 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
42. Laura
    Laura 2020 Polyamory glossary. Ready for polyamory. https://www.readyforpolyamory.com/polyamory-glossary. (October3 2020).
43. Leap, William L.
    2015 Queer linguistics as critical discourse analysis. InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds), 661–680. Chichester: John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Machin, David
    2007 Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Machin, David
    2013 What is multimodal critical discourse studies?Critical Discourse Studies10(4): 347–355. 10.1080/17405904.2013.813770
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.813770 [Google Scholar]
46. Machin, David
    2016 The need for a social and affordance-driven multimodal critical discourse studies. Discourse & Society27(3): 322–334. 10.1177/0957926516630903
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630903 [Google Scholar]
47. MacKenzie, Donald & Wajcman, Judy
    (eds) 1999 The Social Shaping of Technology. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: McGraw Hill Education / Open University.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Mahler, Jess
    2016 Kitchen table polyamory, parallel polyamory, and etiquette. Jess Mahler. https://jessmahler.com/kitchen-table-polyamory-parallel-polyamory-etiquette/ (January21 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
49. Matsick, Jes L., Conley, Terri D., Ziegler, Ali, Moors, Amy C. & Rubin, Jennifer D.
    2014 Love and sex: Polyamorous relationships are perceived more favourably than swinging and open relationships. Psychology & Sexuality5(4): 339–348. 10.1080/19419899.2013.832934
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2013.832934 [Google Scholar]
50. Milani, Tommaso M.
    2013 Expanding the Queer Linguistic scene: Multimodality, space and sexuality at a South African university. Journal of Language and Sexuality2(2): 206–234. 10.1075/jls.2.2.02mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.2.2.02mil [Google Scholar]
51. Milani, Tommaso M.
    2016 Straight-acting: Discursive negotiations of a homomasculine identity. InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity, Siân Preece (ed), 469–483. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Miller, Geoffrey
    2019 Polyamory is growing – and we need to get serious about it. Quillette. https://quillette.com/2019/10/29/polyamory-is-growing-and-we-need-to-get-serious-about-it/ (November3 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
53. Mortensen, Kristine Køhler
    2015 Informed consent in the field of language and sexuality: The case of online dating research. Journal of Language and Sexuality4(1): 1–29. 10.1075/jls.4.1.01mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.4.1.01mor [Google Scholar]
54. Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2017 Sexuality in critical discourse studies. InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, John Flowerdew & John E. Richardson (eds), 388–403. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315739342‑27
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342-27 [Google Scholar]
55. Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2019 Language and sexual normativity. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Myers, Greg
    2010 The Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Norman, Don
    2013 The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
58. O’Halloran, Kay
    2011 Multimodal discourse analysis. InBloomsbury Companion to Discourse Analysis. Ken Hyland & Brian Paltridge (eds), 120–137. London: A&C Black.
    [Google Scholar]
59. OkCupid
    OkCupid 2020 Non-monogamy on OkCupid – OkCupid help. https://help.okcupid.com/article/163-non-monogamy-on-okcupid (April1 2020).
60. Perez, Caroline Criado
    2019 Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. New York: Abrams Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Pogensky, Ryley
    2013 OkCupid petition: Extend the gender and sexuality options. Change.org. https://www.change.org/p/okcupid-extend-the-gender-and-sexuality-options (June29 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
62. Rich, Adrienne
    1980 Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society5(4): 631–660. 10.1086/493756
    https://doi.org/10.1086/493756 [Google Scholar]
63. Ritchie, Ani & Barker, Meg
    2006 ‘There aren’t words for what we do or how we feel so we have to make them up’: Constructing polyamorous languages in a culture of compulsory monogamy: Sexualities9(5): 584–601. 10.1177/1363460706069987
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706069987 [Google Scholar]
64. Rosenfeld, Michael J. & Thomas, Reuben J.
    2012 Searching for a mate: The rise of the internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review77(4): 523–547. 10.1177/0003122412448050
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412448050 [Google Scholar]
65. Rubel, Alicia N. & Burleigh, Tyler J.
    2020 Counting polyamorists who count: Prevalence and definitions of an under-researched form of consensual nonmonogamy. Sexualities23(1–2): 3–27. 10.1177/1363460718779781
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460718779781 [Google Scholar]
66. Rubin, Jennifer, Moors, Amy, Matsick, Jes, Ziegler, Ali & Conley, Terri
    2014 On the margins: Considering diversity among consensually non-monogamous relationships. Journal für Psychologie22(1): 19–37.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Rudder, Christian
    2014 Dataclysm: Love, Sex, Race, and Identity – What Our Online Lives Tell Us About Our Offline Selves. London: Broadway Books.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Schippers, Mimi
    2016 Beyond Monogamy: Polyamory and the Future of Polyqueer Sexualities. Kindle Version. New York: NYU Press. 10.18574/nyu/9781479801596.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479801596.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
69. Sheff, Elisabeth
    2014 How many polyamorists are there in the U.S.?Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-polyamorists-next-door/201405/how-many-polyamorists-are-there-in-the-us (October3 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
70. Sheff, Elisabeth & Hammers, Corie
    2011 The privilege of perversities: Race, class and education among polyamorists and kinksters. Psychology & Sexuality2(3): 198–223. 10.1080/19419899.2010.537674
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2010.537674 [Google Scholar]
71. Sheff, Elisabeth & Tesene, Megan M.
    2015 Consensual non-monogamies in industrialized nations. InHandbook of the Sociology of Sexualities, John DeLamater & Rebecca F. Plante (eds), 223–241. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑17341‑2_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17341-2_13 [Google Scholar]
72. Shepherd, Dawn
    2016 Building Relationships: Online Dating and the New Logics of Internet Culture. Lanham: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Shucart, Brendan
    2016 Polyamory by the numbers. https://www.advocate.com/current-issue/2016/1/08/polyamory-numbers (January18 2020).
74. Smith, Aaron
    2016 15% of American adults have used online dating sites or mobile dating apps. Pew Research Center. www.pewinternet.org/2016/02/11/15-percent-of-american-adults-have-used-online-dating-sites-or-mobile-dating-apps/ (October10 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
75. Smith, Aaron & Duggan, Maeve
    2013 Part 2: Dating Apps and Online Dating Sites. Pew Research Center. www.pewinternet.org/2013/10/21/part-2-dating-apps-and-online-dating-sites/ (October10 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
76. Sun, Huatong
    2020 Global Social Media Design: Bridging Differences Across Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190845582.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190845582.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
77. treena_kravm
    [treena_kravm] 2018 Please stop using nesting partner when you really mean primary partner. reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/polyamory/comments/9gdzrn/please_stop_using_nesting_partner_when_you_really/ (August10 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
78. UsernameForSexStuff
    [UsernameForSexStuff] 2018 OkCupid making changes to non-monogamous profiles. reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/polyamory/comments/8n28i2/okcupid_making_changes_to_nonmonogamous_profiles/ (January31 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
79. Van Leeuwen, Theo
    2012 Critical analysis of multimodal discourse. InThe Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Carol Chapelle (ed), 1–6. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0269
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0269 [Google Scholar]
80. Wachter-Boettcher, Sara
    2017 Technically Wrong: Sexist Apps, Biased Algorithms, and Other Threats of Toxic Tech. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Webb, Stephanie
    2017 “There Will Be More Cookies”: A Discursive Exploration of Polyamorous Identity in a Monogamous World. (Unpublished) PhD dissertation, University of Denver.
82. Wolkomir, Michelle
    2019 Swingers and polyamorists: A comparative analysis of gendered power dynamics. Sexualities23(7): 1060–1079. 10.1177/1363460719876845
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460719876845 [Google Scholar]
83. Wong, Curtis M.
    2014 OkCupid begins rolling out new gender, sexuality options. Huffington Post. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/17/okcupid-new-gender-options_n_6172434.html (October3 2017).
    [Google Scholar]