Variation in English gendered pronouns

References

1. Ackerman, Lauren
   2019 Syntactic and cognitive issues in investigating gendered coreference. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics4(1): 1–27. 10.5334/gjgl.721
   https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.721 [Google Scholar]
2. Bjorkman, Bronwyn M.
   2017 Singular they and the syntactic representation of gender in English. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics2(1): 1–13. 10.5334/gjgl.374
   https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.374 [Google Scholar]
3. Boyer, C. Reyn & Galupo, M. Paz
   2018 Transgender friendship profiles: Patterns across gender identity and LGBT affiliation. Gender Issues35(3): 236–253. 10.1007/s12147‑017‑9199‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-017-9199-4 [Google Scholar]
4. Butler, Judith
   1990 Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Butler, Judith
   1993 Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Conrod, Kirby
   2017 Names Before Pronouns: Variation in Pronominal Reference and Gender (Paper presented atNorthwest Linguistics Conference, University of British Columbia; May 6, 2017).
   [Google Scholar]
7. Conrod, Kirby
   2018 Pronouns and Misgendering (Paper presented atNew Ways of Analyzing Variation, New York University; October 18–22, 2018).
   [Google Scholar]
8. Conrod, Kirby
   2019 Pronouns Raising and Emerging. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
9. Curzan, Anne
   2003 Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486913
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486913 [Google Scholar]
10. Eckert, Penelope
    1996 Vowels and nail polish: The emergence of linguistic style in the preadolescent heterosexual marketplace. InGender and Belief Systems, Natasha Warner, Jocelyn Ahlers, Leela Bilmes, Monica Oliver, Suzanne Wertheim & Melinda Chen (eds), 183–190. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Eckert, Penelope
    2014 The problem with binaries: Coding for gender and sexuality. Language and Linguistics Compass8(11): 529–535. 10.1111/lnc3.12113
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12113 [Google Scholar]
12. Foertsch, Julie & Gernsbacher, Morton Ann
    1997 In search of gender neutrality: Is singular they a cognitively efficient substitute for generic he?Psychological Science8(2): 106–111. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.1997.tb00691.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00691.x [Google Scholar]
13. Herman, Jody L., Flores, Andrew R., Brown, Taylor N. T., Wilson, Bianca D. M. & Conron, Kerith J.
    2017 How Many Adults Identify as Transgender in the United States?Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hutton, Christopher
    2017 Legal sex, self-classification and gender self-determination. Law and Humanities11(1): 64–81. 10.1080/17521483.2017.1320037
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17521483.2017.1320037 [Google Scholar]
15. James, Sandy E., Herman, Jody L., Rankin, Susan, Kiesling, Mara, Mottet, Lisa & Anafi, Ma’ayan
    2016 The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Konnelly, Lex & Cowper, Elizabeth
    2020 Gender diversity and morphosyntax: An account of singular they. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics5(1): 1–19. 10.5334/gjgl.1000
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1000 [Google Scholar]
17. McConnell-Ginet, Sally
    2013 Gender and its relation to sex: The myth of ‘natural’ gender. InThe Expression of Gender, Greville Corbett (ed), 3–38. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110307337.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110307337.3 [Google Scholar]
18. Muysken, Pieter
    2008 Functional Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511755026
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755026 [Google Scholar]
19. Pullum, Geoff
    2003 Postcard from Vegas, 2: Syntactic data collection on the strip. Language Log (blog). itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000172.html (January31 2022)
    [Google Scholar]
20. Pullum, Geoff
    2017 A letter saying they won. Language Log (blog). https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=35641 (January31 2022)
    [Google Scholar]
21. Sanford, Anthony J. & Filik, Rurth
    2007 “They” as a gender-unspecified singular pronoun: Eye tracking reveals a processing cost. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60(2): 171–178. 10.1080/17470210600973390
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600973390 [Google Scholar]
22. Sprouse, Jon, Schütze, Carson & Almeida, Diogo
    2013 Assessing the reliability of journal data in syntax: Linguistic inquiry 2001–2010. Lingua134: 219–248. 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002 [Google Scholar]
23. Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin
    1968 Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]