Provocative euphemism in pornographic film titles

References

1. Allan, Keith
   2016 Pragmatics in language change and creativity. SpringerPlus5(342). https://springerplus.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40064-016-1836-y (January 22, 2020)
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allan, Keith
   2019 Taboo words and language: An overview. InThe Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, Keith Allan (ed), 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Allan, Keith & Burridge, Kate
   2006 Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511617881
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881 [Google Scholar]
4. Attwood, Feona
   2002 Reading porn: The paradigm shift in pornography research. Sexualities5(1): 91–105. 10.1177/1363460702005001005
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460702005001005 [Google Scholar]
5. Attwood, Feona
   2004 Pornography and objectification: Re-reading “the picture that divided Britain”. Feminist Media Studies4(1): 7–19. 10.1080/14680770410001674617
   https://doi.org/10.1080/14680770410001674617 [Google Scholar]
6. Attwood, Feona & Smith, Clarissa
   2014 Porn studies: An introduction. Porn Studies11: 1–6. 10.1080/23268743.2014.887308
   https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2014.887308 [Google Scholar]
7. Attwood, Feona, Maina, Giovanna & Smith, Clarissa
   2018 Conceptualizing, researching and writing about pornography. Porn Studies5(1): 1–5. 10.1080/23268743.2018.1444008
   https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2018.1444008 [Google Scholar]
8. Barcelona, Antonio
   2003 Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. InMetaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds), 207–277. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bivona, Jenny & Critelli, Joseph
   2009 The nature of women’s rape fantasies: An analysis of prevalence, frequency, and contents. Journal of Sex Research46(1): 33–45. 10.1080/00224490802624406
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490802624406 [Google Scholar]
10. Brown, Peter & Levinson, Stephen C.
    1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
11. Brunskell-Evans, Heather
    2016 Introduction. InThe Sexualized Body and the Medical Authority of Pornography: Performing Sexual Liberation, Heather Brunskell-Evans (ed), 1–17. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Burridge, Kate
    2012 Euphemism and language change: The sixth and seventh ages. Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology71: 65–92. 10.4000/lexis.355
    https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.355 [Google Scholar]
13. Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don
    2006 Heteronorms. InThe Language and Sexuality Reader, Deborah Cameron & Don Kulick (eds), 165–168. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203013373
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203013373 [Google Scholar]
14. Casas Gómez, Miguel
    2012 The expressive creativity of euphemism and dysphemism. Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology71: 43–64. 10.4000/lexis.349
    https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.349 [Google Scholar]
15. Cawston, Amanda
    2019 The feminist case against pornography: A review and re-evaluation. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy621: 624–658. 10.1080/0020174X.2018.1487882
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2018.1487882 [Google Scholar]
16. Clark, Jodie
    2012 Language, Sex and Social Structure: Analysing Discourses of Sexuality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137283986
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283986 [Google Scholar]
17. Coates, Jennifer
    2007 ‘Everyone was convinced that we were closet fags’: The role of heterosexuality in the construction of hegemonic masculinity. InLanguage, Sexualities and Desires: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Helen Sauntson & Sakis Kyratzis (eds), 41–67. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230625136_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625136_3 [Google Scholar]
18. Coates, Jennifer
    2013 The discursive production of everyday heterosexualities. Discourse & Society24(5): 536–552. 10.1177/0957926513486070
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486070 [Google Scholar]
19. Connell, Raewyn W. & Messerschmidt, James W.
    2005 Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society19(6): 829–859. 10.1177/0891243205278639
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639 [Google Scholar]
20. Connell, Raewyn & Pearse, Rebecca
    2014 Gender in World Perspective. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Corcoran, Hannah & Smith, Kevin
    2016 Hate Crime, England and Wales, 2015/16. Home Office Statistical Bulletin11(16), 13 October 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
    2015 Sex in Language: Euphemistic and Dysphemistic Metaphors in Internet Forums. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
    2018 The axiological and communicative potential of homosexual-related metaphors. InLinguistic Taboo Revisited: Novel Insights from Cognitive Perspectives, Andrea Pizarro Pedraza (ed), 35–53. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110582758‑003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110582758-003 [Google Scholar]
24. Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
    2019 Taboos in speaking of sex and sexuality. InThe Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language, Keith Allan (ed), 41–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Downs, Donald Alexander
    1989 The New Politics of Pornography. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dworkin, Andrea
    1985 Against the male flood: Censorship, pornography and equality. Harvard Women’s Law Journal81: 69–98.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Fairclough, Norman
    2001 Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds), 121–138. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Fernández Smith, Gerard & Casas Gómez, Miguel
    2018 From lexicon to discourse in the linguistic expression of taboo: Configuring new social realities. InTaboo in Discourse: Studies on Attenuation and Offence in Communication, Eliecer Crespo-Fernández (ed), 25–52. Bern: Peter Lang. 10.3726/b13073
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b13073 [Google Scholar]
29. Gabriel, Karen
    2017 The subject of porn research: Inquiring bodies and lines of resistance. InBodies in Resistance: Gender and Sexual Politics in the Age of Neoliberalism, Wendy Harcourt (ed), 307–323. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑47780‑4_15
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47780-4_15 [Google Scholar]
30. Genette, Gérard
    1988 Structure and functions of the title in literature. Critical Inquiry14(4): 692–720. 10.1086/448462
    https://doi.org/10.1086/448462 [Google Scholar]
31. Hearn, Jeff & Hall, Matthew
    2019 “This is my cheating ex”: Gender and sexuality in revenge porn. Sexualities22(5–6): 860–882. 10.1177/1363460718779965
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460718779965 [Google Scholar]
32. Hines, Caitlin
    1999 Foxy chicks and playboy bunnies: A case study in metaphorical lexicalization. InCultural, Psychological and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics, Masako K. Hiraga, Chris Sinha & Sherman Wilcox (eds), 9–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.152.04hin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.152.04hin [Google Scholar]
33. Jensen, Robert & Dines, Gail
    1998 The content of mass-marketed pornography. InPornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality, Gail Dines, Robert Jensen & Ann Ruso (eds), 65–100. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Koller, Veronika
    2015a The subversive potential of queer pornography: A systemic-functional analysis of a written online text. Journal of Language and Sexuality4(2): 254–271. 10.1075/jls.4.2.04kol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.4.2.04kol [Google Scholar]
35. Koller, Veronika
    2015b No ordinary boy: Language, masculinities and queer pornographies. InLanguage and Masculinities: Performances, Intersections, Dislocations, Tommaso M. Milani (ed), 156–173. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Koller, Veronika
    2019 Critical discourse studies of language and sexuality. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett (eds), https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com (September 11, 2020) 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.013.5
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.013.5 [Google Scholar]
37. Kövecses, Zoltán
    1988 The Language of Love: The Semantics of Passion in Conversational English. London: Bucknell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2002 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Krzyżanowski, Michal & Forchtner, Bernhard
    2016 Theories and concepts in Critical Discourse Studies: Facing challenges, moving beyond foundations. Discourse and Society7(3): 253–261. 10.1177/0957926516630900
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630900 [Google Scholar]
40. Lakoff, George
    1993 The contemporary theory of metaphor. InMetaphor and Thought, Andrew Ortony (ed), 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
41. Leap, William L. & Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2012 Launching a new phase in language and sexuality studies. Journal of Language and Sexuality1(1): 1–14. 10.1075/jls.1.1.01lea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.1.1.01lea [Google Scholar]
42. LeFranc, Ghislaine
    2017 Lust in Language: The Reading, Writing and Translation of Erotic Literature. (Unpublished) PhD Dissertation, Concordia University.
43. Lisková, Katerina
    2007 Pornography as language: From discourse of domination to heretical subversion. InSexual Politics of Desire and Belonging, Nick Rumens & Alejandro Cervantes-Carson (eds), 41–56. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
44. MacKinnon, Catharine
    1987 Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Marko, Georg
    2008 Penetrating Language: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Pornography. Tübingen: Gunther Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Martin, Karin A.
    2009 Normalizing heterosexuality. American Sociological Review741: 190–207. 10.1177/000312240907400202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400202 [Google Scholar]
47. Martin, James R. & White, Peter R. R.
    2005 Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
48. McKee, Alan, Byron, Paul, Litsou, Katerina & Ingham, Roger
    2019 An interdisciplinary definition of pornography: Results from a Global Delphi panel. Archives of Sexual Behaviour491: 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
49. McNamara, Tim
    2019 Language and Subjectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108639606
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108639606 [Google Scholar]
50. Mills, Sara
    2008 Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2014 Focusing on normativity in language and sexuality studies: Insights from conversations on objectophilia. Critical Discourse Studies11(1): 49–70. 10.1080/17405904.2013.836113
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.836113 [Google Scholar]
52. Mullholland, Monique
    2013 Young People and Pornography: Negotiating Pornification. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137326195
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326195 [Google Scholar]
53. Murphy, Peter F.
    2001 Studs, Tools, and the Family Jewels: Metaphors Men Live By. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Nissim, Mayer
    2018 Transvestite, transsexual, transgender: Here’s what you should actually call trans people. https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2018/03/19/transsexual-transgender-transvestite-what-should-you-call-trans-people/ (September 17, 2020)
55. Paasonen, Susana
    2006 Email from Nancy Nutsucker: Representation and gendered address in online pornography. European Journal of Cultural Studies9(4): 403–420. 10.1177/1367549406069065
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549406069065 [Google Scholar]
56. Penley, Constance
    2006 Crackers and whackers: The white trashing of porn. InPornography: Film and Culture, Peter Lehman (ed), 99–117. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Queen, Robin
    2014 Language and sexual identities. InThe Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality, Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes (eds), 209–219. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584248.ch10
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248.ch10 [Google Scholar]
58. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J.
    2000 The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. InMetaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads, Antonio Barcelona (ed), 109–132. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J. & Galera Masegosa, Alicia
    2014 Cognitive Modeling: A Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.45 [Google Scholar]
60. Sloan, Jennifer
    2017 Sex doesn’t matter? The problematic status of sex, misogyny and hate. Journal of Language Discrimination1(1): 61–83.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Smolak, Linda & Striegel-Moore, Ruth
    2002 Body image concerns. InEncyclopedia of Women and Gender, Edith Worrel (ed), 201–210. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Steen, Gerard
    2011 The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved!Review of Cognitive Linguistics9(1): 26–64. 10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste [Google Scholar]
63. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1997 The study of discourse. InDiscourse as Structure and Process: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Teun A. van Dijk (ed), 1–34. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446221884.n1
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884.n1 [Google Scholar]
64. van Dijk, Teun A.
    2016 Critical discourse analysis: A sociocognitive approach. InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds), 62–86. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Watts, Richard J.
    2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
66. Williams, Linda
    1999 Hard Core: Power, Pleasure, and the “Frenzy of the Visible.”Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Williams, Linda
    2004 Proliferating pornographies on/scene: An introduction. InPorn Studies, Linda Williams (ed), 1–23. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Wodak, Ruth & Meyer, Michael
    2016 Critical discourse studies: History, agenda, theory and methodology. InMethods of Critical Discourse Studies, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds), 1–22. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]