1887
Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2211-3770
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3789
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Pornography is commonly criticized for allegedly representing and promoting sexual dominance of men over women. Studies have shown varying results, with no scientific consensus reached on the matter. To contribute to the discussion with empirical discourse analysis evidence, I examine the linguistic choices reflected in a corpus of erotic novels to test whether there are gendered patterns of agency in the representation of sexual interactions. The construal of prominence is correlated to the notion of agency to find which participant specifies the trajector status and agent role in every relational expression. Results show that male participants take prominence over females in an overwhelming majority of the cases, while expressions with plural agency are marginal. The approach of this paper, combining cognitive grammar with linguistic participation roles, provides comprehensive and realistic results by attempting to operationalize agency as the linguistic expression of a particular cognitive pathway.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jls.21020.san
2023-07-13
2024-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amazon
  2. Amazon
  3. Attwood, Feona
    2010 Porn studies: From social problem to cultural practice. Inporn. com: Making Sense of Online Pornography, Feona Attwood (ed), 1–13. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Attwood, Feona, Barker, Meg-John, Boynton, Petra & Hancock, Justin
    2015 Sense about sex: Media, sex advice, education and learning. Sexuality, Society and Learning15(5): 528–539. 10.1080/14681811.2015.1057635
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2015.1057635 [Google Scholar]
  5. Aull, Laura L. & West Brown, David
    2013 Fighting words: A corpus analysis of gender representations in sports reportage. Corpora8(1): 27–52. 10.3366/cor.2013.0033
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0033 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, Paul
    2005Public Discourses of Gay Men. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2008 ‘Eligible’ bachelors and ‘frustrated’ spinsters: Corpus linguistics, gender and language. InGender and Language Research Methodologies, Kate Harrington, Lia Litosseliti, Helen Sauntson & Jane Sunderland (eds), 73–84. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2016 Gendered discourses. InTriangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research, Paul Baker & Jesse Egbert (eds), 138–151. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315724812
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315724812 [Google Scholar]
  9. Baldick, Chris
    2001The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Barker, Meg-John, Gill, Rosalind & Harvey, Laura
    2018 Mediated intimacy: Sex advice in media culture. Sexualities21(8): 1337–1345. 10.1177/1363460718781342
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460718781342 [Google Scholar]
  11. Barron, Martin & Kimmel, Michael
    2000 Sexual violence in three pornographic media: Toward a sociological explanation. Journal of Sex Research37(2): 161–168. 10.1080/00224490009552033
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490009552033 [Google Scholar]
  12. Biber, Douglas
    1990 Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analysis of linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing5(4): 257–269. 10.1093/llc/5.4.257
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/5.4.257 [Google Scholar]
  13. Biber, Douglas & Reppen, Randi
    (eds) 2015The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139764377
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139764377 [Google Scholar]
  14. BookBub
    BookBub 2021 21 of the sexiest books of all time, according to BookBub members. 〈https://www.bookbub.com/blog/best-erotic-romance-novels-according-to-readers〉 (May 15, 2021)
  15. Bridges, Ana J., Wosnitzer, Robert, Scharrer, Erica, Sun, Chyng & Liberman, Rachael
    2010 Aggression and sexual behavior in best-selling pornography videos: A content analysis update. Violence Against Women16(10): 1065–1085. 10.1177/1077801210382866
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210382866 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cameron, Deborah
    2019 Sex. InFeminism: A Brief Introduction to the Ideas, Debates, and Politics of the Movement, Deborah Cameron (ed), Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226620763.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226620763.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael
    1995 Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics16(2): 141–158. 10.1093/applin/16.2.141
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.2.141 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cocks, Harry
    2016 “The social picture of our own times”: Reading obscene magazines in mid-Twentieth-Century Britain: Table 1. Twentieth Century British History27(2): 171–194. 10.1093/tcbh/hww008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/tcbh/hww008 [Google Scholar]
  19. Crawford, Mary & Popp, Danielle
    2003 Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research40(1): 13–26. 10.1080/00224490309552163
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552163 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dill, Karen E. & Thill, Kathryn P.
    2007 Video game characters and the socialization of gender roles: Young people’s perceptions mirror sexist media depictions. Sex Roles571: 851–864. 10.1007/s11199‑007‑9278‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9278-1 [Google Scholar]
  21. Djikic, Maja, Oatley, Keith & Moldoveanu, Mihnea C.
    2013 Reading other minds: Effect of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature3(1): 28–47. 10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji [Google Scholar]
  22. Ehrlich, Susan
    2001Representing Rape: Language and Sexual Consent. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gârdan, Daiana
    2020 Cum iubim? Coduri de gen în romanul de dragoste românesc. Transilvania11–121: 109–112. 10.51391/trva.2020.12.14
    https://doi.org/10.51391/trva.2020.12.14 [Google Scholar]
  24. Goodreads
    Goodreads 2021 Most read this week in erotica. 〈https://www.goodreads.com/genres/most_read/erotica〉 (May 15, 2021)
  25. Gorman, Stacy, Monk-Turner, Elizabeth & Fish, Jennifer N.
    2010 Free adult internet web sites: How prevalent are degrading acts?Gender Issues27(3–4): 131–145. 10.1007/s12147‑010‑9095‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-010-9095-7 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hardy, Simon
    1998The Reader, the Author, His Woman and Her Lover: Soft-Core Pornography and Heterosexual Men. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Harvey, Karen
    2004Reading Sex in the Eighteenth Century: Bodies and Gender in English Erotic Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hester, Helen
    2014Beyond Explicit: Pornography and the Displacement of Sex. New York: State University of New York Press. 10.1353/book28516
    https://doi.org/10.1353/book28516 [Google Scholar]
  29. Horvath, Miranda A. H., Alys, Llian, Massey, Kristina, Pina, Afroditi, Scally, Mia & Adler, Joanna R.
    2013 A Rapid Evidence Assessment on the Effects that Access and Exposure to Pornography Has on Children and Young People. Office of the Children’s Commissioner for England. 〈https://core.ac.uk/display/17302511〉 (February 15, 2023)
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jeffries, Leslie
    2007Textual Construction of the Female Body: A Critical Discourse Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230593626
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593626 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jensen, Robert
    1993 Pornographic novels and the ideology of male supremacy. The Howard Journal of Communications5(1–2): 92–107. 10.1080/10646179309361653
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10646179309361653 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2007Getting off: Pornography and the End of Masculinity. Cambridge: South End Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jensen, Robert & Dines, Gail
    1998 The content of mass-marketed pornography. InPornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality, Gail Dines, Bob Jensen & Ann Russo (eds), 65–100. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kilgarriff, Alan, Baisa, Vít, Bušta, Jan, Jakubíček, Miloš, Kovář, Vojtěch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vít
    2014 The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography1(1): 7–36. 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  35. Klaassen, Marleen J. E. & Peter, Jochen
    2015 Gender (in)equality in Internet pornography: A content analysis of popular pornographic Internet videos. Journal of Sex Research (52)71: 721–735. 10.1080/00224499.2014.976781
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2014.976781 [Google Scholar]
  36. Koller, Veronika
    2015 Who’s really normal? Language and sexuality in public space. Journal of Language and Sexuality4(2): 254–271. 10.1075/jls.4.2.04kol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.4.2.04kol [Google Scholar]
  37. Koopman, Emy M. & Hakemulder, Frank
    2015 Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory9(1): 79–111. 10.1515/jlt‑2015‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2015-0005 [Google Scholar]
  38. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2013Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lischinsky, Alon
    2017 Doing the naughty or having it done to you? Agent roles in erotic writing. Porn Studies (5)21: 156–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Manning, Elizabeth
    1997 Kissing and cuddling: The reciprocity of romantic and sexual activity. InLanguage and Desire: Encoding Sex, Romance and Intimacy, Keith Harvey & Celia Shalom (eds), 43–59. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Marko, Georg
    2006 ‘… was an incredibly sexy Latin stud’: Critically analysing descriptors in a (pornography) corpus. InPlaning, Gluing and Painting Corpora: Inside the Applied Corpus Linguist’s Workshop, Bernhard Kettemann & Georg Marko (eds), 175–203. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2008Penetrating Language: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Pornography. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Mautner, Gerlinde
    2016 Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. InMethods of Critical Discourse Studies, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds), 154–179. Los Angeles: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. McCarry, Melanie
    2009 Becoming a ‘proper man’: Young people’s attitudes about interpersonal violence and perceptions of gender. Gender and Education22(1): 17–30. 10.1080/09540250902749083
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250902749083 [Google Scholar]
  45. McEnery, Tony & Hardie, Andrew
    2012Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. McKee, Alan
    2005 The objectification of women in mainstream pornographic videos in Australia. Journal of Sex Research42(4): 277–290. 10.1080/00224490509552283
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490509552283 [Google Scholar]
  47. Morrish, Liz & Sauntson, Helen
    2011 Gender, desire and identity in a corpus of lesbian erotica. InQueering Paradigms II: Interrogating Agendas, Burkhard Scherer & Matthew Ball (eds), 63–81. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2013 Gentlemen before ladies? A corpus-based study of conjunct order in personal binomials. Journal of English Linguistics41(3): 212–242. 10.1177/0075424213489993
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424213489993 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2014 Focusing on normativity in language and sexuality studies: Insights from conversations on objectophilia. Critical Discourse Studies11(1): 49–70. 10.1080/17405904.2013.836113
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.836113 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2018 Corpus linguistics in language and sexuality studies: Taking stock and looking ahead. Journal of Language and Sexuality7(2): 145–174. 10.1075/jls.17019.mot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17019.mot [Google Scholar]
  51. Paasonen, Susanna
    2007 Strange bedfellows: Pornography, affect and feminist reading. Feminist Theory8(1): 43–57. 10.1177/1464700107074195
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700107074195 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2010 Good amateurs: Erotica writing and notions of quality. Inporn.com: Making Sense of Online Pornography, Feona Attwood (ed), 138–154. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Penguin Random House
    Penguin Random House 2021 Seductive erotica books for mature audiences only. 〈https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/the-read-down/26-seductive-erotica-books-for-mature-audiences-only〉 (May 15, 2021)
  54. Peter, Jochen & Valkenburg, Patti M.
    2016 Adolescents and pornography: A review of 20 years of research. Journal of Sex Research53(4–5): 509–531. 10.1080/00224499.2016.1143441
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1143441 [Google Scholar]
  55. Prince, Stephen R.
    1987 Power, Pain, and Pleasure in Pornography: A Content Analysis of Pornographic Feature Films, 1972–1985. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
  56. Richardson, T. Wade
    2013 Paths of love: Age and gender dynamics in the erotic novel. InA companion to Greek and Roman Sexualities, Thomas K. Hubbard (ed). Malden: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118610657.ch29
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118610657.ch29 [Google Scholar]
  57. Salmon, Catherine & Diamond, Amy
    2012 Evolutionary perspectives on the content analysis of heterosexual and homosexual pornography. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology6(2): 193–202. 10.1037/h0099215
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099215 [Google Scholar]
  58. Sanga, Luciana
    2021 Tanabe Seiko, Feminism, and the making of a love novel. Journal of the American Association of Teachers of Japanese55(1): 35–63. 10.5195/jll.2021.191
    https://doi.org/10.5195/jll.2021.191 [Google Scholar]
  59. Schick, Irvin Cemil
    2004 Representation of gender and sexuality in Ottoman and Turkish erotic literature. Turkish Studies Association Journal28(1/2): 81–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Sinclair, John M.
    1995 Corpus typology: A framework for classification. InStudies in Anglistics, Gunnel Melcher & Beatrice Warren (eds), 17–34. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell International.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Smith, Clarissa
    2007One for the Girls! The Pleasures and Practices of Reading Women’s Porn. Bristol: Intellect. 10.2307/j.ctv36xvs9p
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xvs9p [Google Scholar]
  62. 2009 Pleasing intensities: Masochism and affective pleasures in porn short fictions. InMainstreaming Sex: The Sexualization of Western Culture, Feona Attwood (ed), 19–35. London: IB Tauris.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 2010 Pornographication: A discourse for all seasons. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics6(1): 103–108. 10.1386/macp.6.1.103/3
    https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.6.1.103/3 [Google Scholar]
  64. Smith, Don D.
    1976 The social content of pornography. Journal of Communication261: 16–24. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1976.tb01351.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01351.x [Google Scholar]
  65. Springate, Julia & Omar, Hatim A.
    2013 The impact of the Internet on the sexual health of adolescents: A brief review. International Journal of Child and Adolescent Health6(4): 469–471.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Strasburger, Victor C.
    2012 Adolescents, sex and the media. Adolescent Medicine State of the Art Reviews231: 15–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Taylor, Charlotte
    2013 Searching for similarity using corpus-assisted discourse studies. Corpora8(1): 81–113. 10.3366/cor.2013.0035
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0035 [Google Scholar]
  68. Ubilluz, Juan Carlos
    2006Sacred Erotism: Georges Bataille and Pierre Klossowski in the Latin American Erotic Novel. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Vannier, Sarah A., Currie, Anna B. & O’Sullivan, Lucia F.
    2014 Schoolgirls and soccer moms: A content analysis of free “teen” and “MILF” online pornography. Journal of Sex Research51(3): 253–264. 10.1080/00224499.2013.829795
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.829795 [Google Scholar]
  70. Wilson, Andrew
    2012 Using corpora in depth psychology: A trigram-based analysis of a corpus of fetish fantasies. Corpora7(1): 69–90. 10.3366/cor.2012.0018
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2012.0018 [Google Scholar]
  71. Young, James O.
    2017 Literary fiction and true beliefs. InArt and Belief, Ema Sullivan-Bissett, Helen Bradley & Paul Noordhof (eds), 85–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jls.21020.san
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jls.21020.san
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error