A thematic analysis of attitudes towards English nonbinary pronouns

References

1. Ackerman, Lauren
   2019 Syntactic and cognitive issues investigating gendered coreference. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics4(1): 1–27. 10.5334/gjgl.721
   https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.721 [Google Scholar]
2. American Dialect Society
   American Dialect Society 2020 2019 Word of the year is “(my) pronouns,” Word of the decade is singular “they”. https://www.americandialect.org/2019-word-of-the-year-is-my-pronouns-word-of-the-decade-is-singular-they (May31 2021)
3. American Psychological Association
   American Psychological Association 2019 Singular “they”. APA style. https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/grammar/singular-they (May31 2021)
   [Google Scholar]
4. Anthony, Laurence
   2018 AntConc. Version 3.5.7. Waseda University.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baron, Dennis
   1981 The epicene pronoun: The word that failed. American Speech56(2): 83–97. 10.2307/455007
   https://doi.org/10.2307/455007 [Google Scholar]
6. Bjorkman, Bronwyn
   2017 Singular they and the syntactic representation of gender in English. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics2(1): 1–13. 10.5334/gjgl.374
   https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.374 [Google Scholar]
7. Blaubergs, Maija
   1980 An analysis of classic arguments against changing sexist language. Women’s Studies International Quarterly3(2): 135–147. 10.1016/S0148‑0685(80)92071‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-0685(80)92071-0 [Google Scholar]
8. Bradley, Evan
   2020 The influence of linguistic and social attitudes on grammaticality judgments of singular ‘they’. Language Sciences78: 1–11. 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101272
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101272 [Google Scholar]
9. Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria
   2006 Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
10. Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria
    2016 (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology19(6): 739–743. 10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588 [Google Scholar]
11. Chak, Avinash
    2015 Beyond ‘he’ and ‘she’: The rise of non-binary pronouns. BBC News Online. www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34901704 (January14 2020)
    [Google Scholar]
12. Conrod, Kirby
    2019 Pronouns Raising and Emerging. (Unpublished) PhD dissertation, University of Washington.
13. Corwin, Anna
    2017 Emerging genders: Semiotic agency and the performance of gender among genderqueer individuals. Gender and Language11(2): 255–277. 10.1558/genl.27552
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.27552 [Google Scholar]
14. Curzan, Anne
    2014 Fixing English: Prescriptivism and Language History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139107327
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139107327 [Google Scholar]
15. Darwin, Helena
    2017 Doing gender beyond the binary: A virtual ethnography. Symbolic Interaction40(3): 317–334. 10.1002/symb.316
    https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.316 [Google Scholar]
16. Duggan, Maeve & Smith, Aaron
    2013 6% of Online Adults are Reddit Users. www.pewinternet.org/2013/07/03/6-of-online-adults-are-reddit-users/ (January14 2020)
17. Garrett, Peter
    2010 Attitudes to Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511844713
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844713 [Google Scholar]
18. Guest, Greg, MacQueen, Kathleen & Namey, Emily
    2014 Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gustafsson Sendén, Marie, Bäck, Emma & Lindqvist, Anna
    2015 Introducing a gender-neutral pronoun in a natural gender language: The influence of time on attitudes and behavior. Frontiers in Psychology6: 1–12. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00893
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00893 [Google Scholar]
20. Hekanaho, Laura
    2020 Generic and Nonbinary Pronouns: Usage, Acceptability and Attitudes. (Unpublished) PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/321581 (May31 2021)
21. Hernandez, Ellis
    2020 Pronouns, Prescriptivism, and Prejudice: Attitudes Toward the Singular ‘They’, Prescriptive Grammar, and Nonbinary Transgender People. (Unpublished) MA thesis, Purdue University.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Konnelly, Lex & Cowper, Elizabeth
    2020 Gender diversity and morphosyntax: An account of singular they. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics5(1): 1–19. 10.5334/gjgl.1000
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1000 [Google Scholar]
23. Lund Eide, Mari
    2018 Shaping the Discourse of Gender-Neutral Pronouns in English: A Study of Attitudes and use in Australia. (Unpublished) MA thesis, University of Bergen.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Marquis, Marriott
    2015 Word of the year is singular “they”. www.americandialect.org/2015-word-of-the-year-is-singular-they (January14 2020)
25. Martyna, Wendy
    1978 What does ‘he’ mean? Use of the generic masculine. Journal of Communication28(1): 131–138. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1978.tb01576.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01576.x [Google Scholar]
26. Matsuno, Emmie & Budge, Stephanie
    2017 Non-binary/genderqueer identities: A critical review of the literature. Current Sexual Health Reports9: 116–120. 10.1007/s11930‑017‑0111‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-017-0111-8 [Google Scholar]
27. Mauri, Michele, Tommaso, Elli, Caviglia, Giorgio, Uboldi, Giorgio & Azzi, Matteo
    2017 RAWGraphs: A Visualisation Platform to Create Open Outputs. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Merriam-Webster
    Merriam-Webster 2019 A note on the nonbinary ‘they’. https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/nonbinary-they-is-in-the-dictionary (January14 2020)
29. Milroy, James
    2001 Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics5(4): 530–555. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00163
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00163 [Google Scholar]
30. Milroy, Lesley
    2004 Language ideologies and linguistic change. InSociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections, Carmen Fought (ed), 308–342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Parker, Linden
    2017 An Exploration of Use of and Attitudes Towards Gender-Neutral Pronouns among the Non-Binary, Transgender and LGBT+ Communities in the United Kingdom. (Unpublished) MA thesis, University of Essex.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Parks, Janet & Roberton, Mary Ann
    1998 Contemporary arguments against nonsexist language: Blaubergs (1980) Revisited. Sex Roles39(5): 445–461. 10.1023/A:1018827227128
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018827227128 [Google Scholar]
33. Pauwels, Anne
    2010 Socially motivated language reform in a global lingua franca: The case of gender reform in English. InLanguage in its Socio-Cultural Context, Markus Bieswanger, Heiko Motschenbacher & Susanne Mühleisen (eds), 21–33. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Preston, Dennis
    2011 The power of language regard – Discrimination, classification, comprehension, and production. Dialectologia7(2): 9–33.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Rosa, Jonathan & Burdick, Christa
    2016 Language ideologies. InThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Society, Ofelia Garcia, Nelson Flores & Massimiliano Spotti (eds), 103–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sallabank, Julia
    2013 Attitudes to Endangered Languages: Identities and Policies. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139344166
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139344166 [Google Scholar]
37. Scelfo, Julie
    2015 A university recognizes a third gender: Neutral. New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/education/edlife/a-university-recognizes-a-third-gender-neutral.html (January14 2020)
    [Google Scholar]
38. Seargeant, Philip
    2007 Language ideology, language theory, and the regulation of linguistic behaviour. Language Sciences31: 345–359. 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.12.002 [Google Scholar]
39. Silverstein, Michael
    1979 Language structure and linguistic ideology. InThe Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, Paul Clyne, William F. Hanks & Carol L. Hofbauer (eds), 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Song, Hyunjin & Schwarz, Norbert
    2009 If it’s difficult to pronounce, it must be risky: Fluency, familiarity, and risk perception. Psychological Science20(2): 135–138. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02267.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02267.x [Google Scholar]
41. van Dijk, Teun A.
    2006 Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies11(2): 115–140. 10.1080/13569310600687908
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908 [Google Scholar]
42. Vergoossen, Hellen, Renström, Emma, Lindqvist, Anna & Gustafsson Sendén, Marie
    2020 Four dimensions of criticism against gender-fair language. Sex Roles83(4–5): 328–337. 10.1007/s11199‑019‑01108‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01108-x [Google Scholar]
43. Wales, Katie
    1996 Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Walsh, Olivia
    2016 Linguistic Purism: Language Attitudes in France and Quebec. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.41
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.41 [Google Scholar]
45. Zimman, Lal
    2017 Transgender language reform: Some challenges and strategies for promoting trans-affirming, gender-inclusive language. Journal of Language and Discrimination1(1): 84–105. 10.1558/jld.33139
    https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.33139 [Google Scholar]
46. Zimman, Lal
    2019 Trans self-identification and the language of neoliberal selfhood: Agency, power, and the limits of monologic discourse. International Journal of the Sociology of Language256: 147–175. 10.1515/ijsl‑2018‑2016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-2016 [Google Scholar]