1887
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-3770
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3789
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Since their inception in the years following World War II, American puberty videos have discursively manufactured affective distress in several generations of on-screen children. The patterns of talk found in eight films from 1947 to 2016 demonstrate that affect may de-link itself from specific talk and diffuse into a broader discourse through the recirculation of parallel structures in new semiotic spaces. I use queer critical discourse analysis (Jones & Collins 2020) and language socialization theory (Ochs & Schieffelin 2011) to argue that puberty videos first manufacture distress in the on-screen child before swiftly introducing a trusted adult to mitigate and recast distress as a normal part of growing up. Further, puberty videos reify cis- / heteronormativity and reproductive futurity in adulthood as the necessary outcomes of development. This paper explores the connection between affect and temporality in talk by critically attending to the historical stability of American puberty video discourse.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jls.22005.non
2024-01-30
2024-10-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Human Growth
    Human Growth (1947): https://youtu.be/kh_vRiHfV58. AccessedNovember 8, 2019.
  2. Molly Grows Up
    Molly Grows Up (1953): https://youtu.be/ddqz43P5VsI. AccessedNovember 8, 2019.
  3. As Boys Grow
    As Boys Grow (1957): https://youtu.be/AMdY3mPngyg. AccessedNovember 8, 2019.
  4. Am I Normal?
    Am I Normal? (1979): https://youtu.be/TIX70xTMD2o. AccessedNovember 8, 2019.
  5. Dear Diary: A Film About Female Puberty
    Dear Diary: A Film About Female Puberty (1981): https://youtu.be/vUp2Byv-otY. AccessedNovember 8, 2019.
  6. P&G’s Always Changing, Always Growing
    P&G’s Always Changing, Always Growing (1997): https://youtu.be/r4qHUegNtPg. AccessedNovember 8, 2019.
  7. P&G’s Always Changing: About You
    P&G’s Always Changing: About You (2007): https://youtu.be/GhFUVxNkwTQ. AccessedNovember 8, 2019.
  8. P&G’s Always Changing and Growing Up
    P&G’s Always Changing and Growing Up (2016): https://youtu.be/tKfJ8w7XX6E. AccessedNovember 8, 2019.
  9. Agha, Asif
    2007 Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime. Language & Communication71: 320–335. 10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ahmed, Sara
    2015The Cultural Politics of Emotion (Second Edition). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bavin, Edith
    2009The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511576164
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576164 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bellafante, Gina
    2005 Facts of life, for their eyes only. New York Times. 〈https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/05/fashion/sundaystyles/facts-of-life-for-their-eyes-only.html〉 (October 12, 2023)
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bellinger, David C. & Gleason, Jean B.
    1982 Sex differences in parental directives to young children. Journal of Sex Roles81: 1123–1139. 10.1007/BF00290968
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290968 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1991Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don
    2003Language and Sexuality. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791178 [Google Scholar]
  16. Casasanto, Daniel & Dijkstra, Katinka
    2010 Motor action and emotional memory. Cognition1151: 179–185. 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  17. Castañeda, Claudia
    2002Figurations: Child, Bodies, Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chirrey, Deborah
    2011 Formulating dispositions in coming-out advice. Discourse Studies13(3): 283–298. 10.1177/1461445611400672
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611400672 [Google Scholar]
  19. Coleman, Lester & Coleman, John
    2002 The measurement of puberty: A review. Journal of Adolescence251: 535–550. 10.1006/jado.2002.0494
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2002.0494 [Google Scholar]
  20. Condry, John & Condry, Sandra
    1976 Sex differences: A study in the eye of the beholder. Child Development471: 812–819. 10.2307/1128199
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1128199 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cushman, Nicole, Kantor, Leslie M., Schroeder, Elizabeth, Eicher, Leslie & Gambone, Gina
    2014 Sexuality education: Findings and recommendations from an analysis of 10 United States Programmes. Sex Education14(5): 481–496. 10.1080/14681811.2014.918538
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2014.918538 [Google Scholar]
  22. Du Bois, John W. & Kärkkäinen, Elise
    2012 Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk32(4): 433–451. 10.1515/text‑2012‑0021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0021 [Google Scholar]
  23. Eckert, Penelope
    2000Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2019 The limits of meaning: Social indexicality, variation, and the cline of interiority. Language95(4): 1–26. 10.1353/lan.2019.0072
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0072 [Google Scholar]
  25. Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally
    2013Language and Gender (Second Edition). New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139245883
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139245883 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ehrlich, Susan
    2012 Text trajectories, legal discourse and gendered inequalities. Applied Linguistics Review3(1): 47–73. 10.1515/applirev‑2012‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2012-0003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ehrlich, Susan & Romaniuk, Tanya
    2016 Discourse analysis. InResearch Methods in Linguistics, Robert Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds), 460–493. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ELAN (Version 5.2) [Computer software]
    ELAN (Version 5.2) [Computer software]. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. 〈https://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan/〉 (April 04, 2018)
  29. Ely, Richard, Gleason, Jean B., Narasimhan, Bhuvaneswari & McCabe, Allyssa
    1995 Family talk about talk: Mothers lead the way. Discourse Processes9(2): 201–218. 10.1080/01638539509544914
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544914 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ericsson, Stina
    2018 The language of cisnormativity: Children and parents in interaction with a multimodal app. Gender and Language12(2): 139–167. 10.1558/genl.31827
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.31827 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fairclough, Norman
    1992 Intertextuality in critical discourse analysis. Linguistics & Education41: 269–293. 10.1016/0898‑5898(92)90004‑G
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(92)90004-G [Google Scholar]
  32. 2010Critical Discourse Analysis (Second Edition). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Foucault, Michel
    2002The Archeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Freeman, Elizabeth
    2010Time Binds: Queer Temporalities, Queer Histories. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gill-Peterson, Jules
    2018Histories of the Transgender Child. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctv75d87g
    https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctv75d87g [Google Scholar]
  36. Gleason, Jean B., Perlmann, Rivka Y., Ely, Richard & Evans, David
    1994 The baby talk register: Parents’ use of diminutives. InHandbook of Research in Language Development Using CHILDES, Jeffrey L. Sokolov & Catherine E. Snow (eds), 50–76. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Goffman, Erving
    1986Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Gowen, L. Kris & Winges-Yanez, Nichole
    2014 Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning youths’ perspectives of inclusive school-based sexuality education. The Journal of Sex Research51(7): 788–800. 10.1080/00224499.2013.806648
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.806648 [Google Scholar]
  39. Greslé-Favier, Claire
    2010 The legacy of abstinence-only discourses and the place of pleasure in US discourses on teenage sexuality. Sex Education10(4): 413–422. 10.1080/14681811.2010.515098
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2010.515098 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hall, G. Stanley
    1904Adolescence: Its Psychology and its Relation to Physiology, Anthropology, Sociology, Sex, Crime, Religion, and Education (Vols. I & II). New York: D. Appleton & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hall, Kira, Levon, Eerez & Milani, Tommaso M.
    2019 Navigating normativities: Gender and sexuality in text and talk. Language in Society48(4): 481–489. 10.1017/S0047404519000447
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000447 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hill, Jane
    2005 Intertextuality as a source and evidence for indirect indexical meanings. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology15(1): 113–124. 10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.113
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.113 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hoyle, Susan M. & Temple Adger, Carolyn
    1998Kids Talk: Strategic Language Use in Later Childhood. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195098921.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195098921.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InConversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, Gene H. Lerner (ed), 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  45. Johnstone, Barbara
    2017Discourse Analysis (Second Edition). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Jones, Lucy & Collins, Luke
    2020 PrEP in the press: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of how users of HIV-prevention treatment are represented in British newspapers. Journal of Language & Sexuality9(2): 201–224. 10.1075/jls.20002.jon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20002.jon [Google Scholar]
  47. Kiesling, Scott
    2018 Masculine stances and the linguistics of affect: On masculine ease. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies13(3–4): 1–22. 10.1080/18902138.2018.1431756
    https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2018.1431756 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kiesling, Scott & Nonnenmacher, Sean
    2022 Reimagining affect in the linguistics of gender. InThe Routledge Companion to Gender and Affect, Todd W. Reeser (ed). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003045007‑22
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003045007-22 [Google Scholar]
  49. Leap, William
    2015 Queer linguistics as critical discourse analysis. InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds), 661–680. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch31
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch31 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lieberman, Philip
    1967Intonation, Perception and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Maccoby, Eleanor
    2002 Gender and social exchange: A developmental perspective. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development951: 87–106. 10.1002/cd.39
    https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.39 [Google Scholar]
  52. Milani, Tommaso M. & Richardson, John E.
    2021 Discourse and affect. Social Semiotics31(5): 671–676. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1810553
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1810553 [Google Scholar]
  53. Moran, Jeffrey
    2000Teaching Sex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2011 Taking Queer Linguistics further: Sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research. International Journal of the Sociology of Language2121: 149–179. 10.1515/ijsl.2011.050
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2011.050 [Google Scholar]
  55. Ochs, Elinor
    1992 Indexing gender. InRethinking Context, Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds), 335–358. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Ochs, Elinor & Schieffelin, Bambi
    2011 The theory of language socialization. InThe Handbook of Language Socialization, Alessandro Duranti, Elinor Ochs, & Bambi Schieffelin (eds), 1–21. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444342901.ch1
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342901.ch1 [Google Scholar]
  57. Ohala, John J.
    1994 The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. InSound Symbolism, Leanna Hinton, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala (eds), 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Roberts, Celia
    2015Puberty in Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316221853
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316221853 [Google Scholar]
  59. Rubin, Jeffrey Z., Provenzano, Frank J. & Luria, Zella
    1974 The eye of the beholder: Parents’ view on sex of newborns. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry441: 512–519. 10.1111/j.1939‑0025.1974.tb00905.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1974.tb00905.x [Google Scholar]
  60. Sauntson, Helen
    2013 Sexual diversity and illocutionary silencing in the English National Curriculum. Sex Education13(4): 395–408. 10.1080/14681811.2012.745809
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2012.745809 [Google Scholar]
  61. Silverstein, Michael & Urban, Greg
    1996Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Tannen, Deborah
    1993Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Thorne, Barry
    1993Gender Play. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Wetherell, Margaret
    2012Affect and Emotion. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Whiting, Beatrice B. & Edwards, Carolyn P.
    1988Children of Different Worlds: The Formation of Social Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jls.22005.non
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jls.22005.non
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error