oa #GaysForTrump

References

1. Adams, Maurianne & Bell, Lee Anne
   2016 Theoretical foundations for social justice education. InTeaching for Diversity and Social Justice, Maurianne Adams & Lee Anne Bell (eds), 3–26. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315775852‑8
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775852-8 [Google Scholar]
2. Alcoff, Linda
   1991 The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique201: 5–28. 10.2307/1354221
   https://doi.org/10.2307/1354221 [Google Scholar]
3. Aviles, Gwen
   2019 Inclusive or hypocritical? Mixed reviews for Trump campaign’s LGBTQ merchandise. NBC News. 〈https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/inclusive-%20or-hypocritical-mixed-reviews-trump-campaign-s-lgbtq-merchandise-n1097326?ex=digest〉 (September 10, 2021).
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich
   1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bawer, Bruce
   1993 A Place at the Table: The Gay Individual in American Society. New York: Poseidon Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blommaert, Jan & Bulcaen, Chris
   2000 Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology29(1): 447–466. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447 [Google Scholar]
7. Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo
   2006 Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Borba, Rodrigo
   2022 Enregistering “gender ideology”: The emergence and circulation of a transnational anti-gender language. Journal of Language and Sexuality11(1): 57–79. 10.1075/jls.21003.bor
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.21003.bor [Google Scholar]
9. Burnett, Scott
   2022 The battle for “NoFap”: Myths, masculinity, and the meaning of masturbation abstention. Men and Masculinities25(3): 477–496. 10.1177/1097184X211018256
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X211018256 [Google Scholar]
10. Burnett, Scott & Richardson, John E.
    2022 “Breeders for race and nation”: Gender, sexuality, and fecundity in post-war British fascist discourse. Patterns of Prejudice55(4): 331–356. 10.1080/0031322X.2021.2011088
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2021.2011088 [Google Scholar]
11. Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don
    2003 Language and Sexuality. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791178
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791178 [Google Scholar]
12. Carucci, John
    2017 Milo Yiannopoulos on Trump, Ariana Grande and Russia. The Seattle Times. 〈https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/milo-yiannopoulos-on-trump-ariana-grande-and-russia/〉 (September 10, 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chouinard, Michael Steven
    2015 He Leans to the Right: The Personal and Political Identities of Gay Republicans. PhD dissertation, Florida State University.
14. Cimino, Ken W.
    2007 Gay Conservatives: Group Consciousness and Assimilation. New York: Harrington Park Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Duggan, Lisa
    2003 The Twilight of Equality: Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Erel, Umut
    2018 Saving and reproducing the nation: Struggles around right-wing politics of social reproduction, gender and race in austerity Europe. Women’s Studies International Forum681: 173–182. 10.1016/j.wsif.2017.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2017.11.003 [Google Scholar]
17. Eyman, Douglas
    2015 Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fairclough, Norman & Wodak, Ruth
    1997 Critical discourse analysis. InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction – Volume 2: Discourse as Social Interaction, Teun A. van Dijk (ed), 258–284. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Franke, Katherine M.
    2012 Dating the state: The moral hazards of winning gay rights. Columbia Human Rights Law Review44(1): 1–46. 10.2139/ssrn.2014541
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2014541 [Google Scholar]
20. Gal, Susan
    2018 Registers in circulation: The social organization of interdiscursivity. Signs and Society6(1): 1–24. 10.1086/694551
    https://doi.org/10.1086/694551 [Google Scholar]
21. Gal, Susan
    2021 Gender and the discursive authority of far right politics. Gender and Language15(1): 96–103. 10.1558/genl.19526
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.19526 [Google Scholar]
22. Gallagher, Edward Sean
    2012 Refulgent Respectability: A Social Movement Analysis of Gay Conservatives. PhD dissertation, Fordham University.
23. Ganesh, Bharath
    2020 Weaponizing white thymos: Flows of rage in the online audiences of the alt‑right. Cultural Studies34(6): 892–924. 10.1080/09502386.2020.1714687
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2020.1714687 [Google Scholar]
24. Goldstein, Robert
    2003 Homocons: The Rise of the Gay Right. London: New York: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Goldstein, Donna Meryl & Hall, Kira
    2017 Postelection surrealism and nostalgic racism in the hands of Donald Trump. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory6(4): 397–406. 10.14318/hau7.1.026
    https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.026 [Google Scholar]
26. Goldstein, Donna Meryl, Hall, Kira & Ingram, Matthew Bruce
    2020 Trump’s comedic gestures as political weapon. InLanguage in the Trump Era: Scandals and Emergencies, Janet McIntosh & Norma Mendoza-Denton (eds), 97–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108887410.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108887410.007 [Google Scholar]
27. Hennig, Lauren C., Schaefer, Lee & Gleddie, Douglas
    2020 In(di)visable: Inquiring into being ‘othered’ as a means to teach social justice. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy25(6): 666–680. 10.1080/17408989.2020.1789573
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1789573 [Google Scholar]
28. Higginbotham, Evelyn Brooks
    1994 Righteous Discontent: The Women’s Movement in the Black Baptist Church, 1880–1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kehl, Katarina
    2018 “In Sweden, girls are allowed to kiss girls, and boys are allowed to kiss boys”: Pride Järva and the inclusion of the “LGBT other” in Swedish nationalist discourses. Sexualities21(4): 674–691.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kelly, Annie
    2017 The alt‑right: Reactionary rehabilitation for white masculinity: US alt‑right extremism is a logical consequence of mainstream neo-conservatism. Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture661: 68–78. 10.3898/136266217821733688
    https://doi.org/10.3898/136266217821733688 [Google Scholar]
31. Kelly, Casey Ryan
    2021 Whiteness, repressive victimhood, and the foil of the intolerant left. First Amendment Studies55(1): 59–76. 10.1080/21689725.2021.1895863
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21689725.2021.1895863 [Google Scholar]
32. Kim, Claire Jean
    2011 President Obama and the polymorphous other in U.S. political discourse. Asian American Law Journal181: 165–175.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kosse, Maureen
    2022 ‘Ted Cruz cucks again’: The insult term cuck as an alt‑right masculinist signifier. Gender and Language16(2): 99–124. 10.1558/genl.21079
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.21079 [Google Scholar]
34. Laclau, Ernesto
    2018 On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lakoff, George
    2006 Whose Freedom? The Battle Over America’s Most Important Idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lederman, Josh
    2019 Trump administration launches global effort to end criminalization of homosexuality. NBC News. 〈https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-administration-launches-global-effort-end-criminalization-homosexuality-%20n973081〉 (September 10, 2021)
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lentin, Alana
    2020 Why Race Still Matters. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lobban, Rosemary, Luyt, Russell, Martin, Sam, Brooks, Ashley, McDermott, Daragh & Zawisza-Riley, Magdalena
    2020 Right-wing populism and safe identities. NORMA15(1): 76–93. 10.1080/18902138.2019.1701795
    https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2019.1701795 [Google Scholar]
39. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria & Nouri, Lella
    2021 The discourse of the US alt‑right online – A case study of the Traditionalist Worker Party blog. Critical Discourse Studies18(4): 410–428. 10.1080/17405904.2019.1708763
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1708763 [Google Scholar]
40. Machin, David & Mayr, Andrea
    2012 How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Marwick, Alice E. & Caplan, Robyn
    2018 Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies18(4): 543–559. 10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568 [Google Scholar]
42. McEwen, Haley
    2016 Transatlantic knowledge politics of sexuality. Critical Philosophy of Race4(2): 239–262. 10.5325/critphilrace.4.2.0239
    https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.4.2.0239 [Google Scholar]
43. Mepschen, Paul, Duyvendak, Jan Willem & Tonkens, Evelien H.
    2010 Sexual politics, orientalism and multicultural citizenship in the Netherlands. Sociology44(5): 962–979. 10.1177/0038038510375740
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510375740 [Google Scholar]
44. Milani, Tommaso M.
    2015 Sexual cityzenship: Discourses, spaces and bodies at Joburg Pride 2012. Journal of Language and Politics14(3): 431–454. 10.1075/jlp.14.3.06mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.3.06mil [Google Scholar]
45. Milani, Tommaso M. & Levon, Erez
    2019 Israel as homotopia: Language, space, and vicious belonging. Language in Society48(4): 607–628. 10.1017/S0047404519000356
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000356 [Google Scholar]
46. Mouffe, Chantal
    1998 The radical centre: A politics without adversary. Soundings 1998(9): 11–23.
    [Google Scholar]
47. NYT Editorial Board
    NYT Editorial Board 2017 Opinion: The L.G.B.T. Trump Fallacy. The New York Times. 〈https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/17/opinion/the-lgbt-trump-fallacy.html〉 (September 10, 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
48. Ott, Brian L.
    2017 The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication34(1): 59–68. 10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686 [Google Scholar]
49. Pitcan, Mikaela, Marwick, Alice E. & boyd, danah
    2018 Performing a vanilla self: Respectability politics, social class, and the digital world. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication23(3): 163–179. 10.1093/jcmc/zmy008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy008 [Google Scholar]
50. Puar, Jasbir K.
    2013 Rethinking homonationalism. International Journal of Middle East Studies45(2): 336–339. 10.1017/S002074381300007X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S002074381300007X [Google Scholar]
51. Puar, Jasbir K.
    2007 Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Robinson, Paul
    2005 Queer Wars: The New Gay Right and Its Critics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Sabsay, Leticia
    2012 The emergence of the other sexual citizen: Orientalism and the modernisation of sexuality. Citizenship Studies16(5–6): 605–623. 10.1080/13621025.2012.698484
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2012.698484 [Google Scholar]
54. Sauer, Birgit
    2020 Authoritarian right-wing populism as masculinist identity politics: The role of affects. InRight-Wing Populism and Gender: European Perspectives and Beyond, Gabriele Dietze & Julia Roth (eds), 23–40. Bielefeld: Transcript. 10.1515/9783839449806‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839449806-002 [Google Scholar]
55. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky
    1990 Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Slotta, James
    2020 The significance of Trump’s incoherence. InLanguage in the Trump Era: Scandals and Emergencies, Janet McIntosh & Norma Mendoza-Denton (eds), 52–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108887410.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108887410.003 [Google Scholar]
57. Stanley, Jason
    2020 How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them. New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
58. The Washington Post
    The Washington Post 2016 Trump in 2016: I ‘will do everything’ to protect LGBT communities. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/national/trump-says-he-will-protect-lgbt-communities/2016/07/22/c845e608-4fc1-11e6-bf27-405106836f96_video.html (September 10, 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
59. Theweleit, Klaus
    1987 Male Fantasies Volume 1: Women, Floods, Bodies, History. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Tobin, Robert
    2017 Gays for Trump? Homonationalism Has Deep Roots. The Gay & Lesbian Review. 〈https://glreview.org/article/gays-for-trump-homonationalism-has-deep-roots/〉 (December 13, 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
61. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1993 Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society4(2): 249–283. 10.1177/0957926593004002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 [Google Scholar]
62. van Dijk, Teun A.
    2001 Critical discourse analysis. InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds), 352–371. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Ward, Jane
    2008 Respectably queer: Diversity culture in LGBT activist organizations. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv16754qs
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv16754qs [Google Scholar]
64. Whitford, Margaret
    1986 Luce Irigaray and the female imaginary: Speaking as a woman. Radical Philosophy43(7): 3–8.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Winter, Aaron
    2019 Online hate: From the far-right to the alt‑right and from the margins to the mainstream. InOnline Othering, Karen Lumsden & Emily Harmer (eds), 39–63. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑12633‑9_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12633-9_2 [Google Scholar]