Analyzing acoustic correlates of gender presentation in the lesbian community

References

1. Barrett, Rusty
   2017 From Drag Queens to Leathermen: Language, Gender, and Gay Male Subcultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barron-Lutzross, Auburn
   2015 The Production and Perception of a Lesbian Speech Style. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley PhonLab. 〈https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7f6332bh〉 (May 20, 2025)
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barron-Lutzross, Auburn
   2018 Speech Stereotypes of Female Sexuality. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
4. Becker, Kara & Zimman, Lal
   2022 Beyond binary gender: Creaky voice, gender, and the variationist enterprise. Language Variation and Change34(2): 215–238. 10.1017/S0954394522000138
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394522000138 [Google Scholar]
5. Bergroth, Ona
   2020 ‘Delicate Connotations’: How Women-Loving Women Construct Their Identity Through Community-Specific Labels and Terminology. Master’s thesis, University of Helsinki.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Biemans, Monique
   1998 The effect of biological gender (sex) and social gender (gender identity) on three pitch measures. Linguistics in the Netherlands15(1): 41–52. 10.1075/avt.15.06bie
   https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.15.06bie [Google Scholar]
7. Boersma, Paul
   2001 Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International5(9): 341–345.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brend, Ruth M.
   1975 Male-female intonation patterns in American English. InLanguage and Sex: Difference and Dominance, Barrie Thorne & Nancy Henley (eds), 84–87. Rowley, MS: Newbury House.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira
   2010 Locating identity in language. Language and Identities18(1): 18–28. 10.1515/9780748635788‑006
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748635788-006 [Google Scholar]
10. Calder, Jeremy
    2019 The fierceness of fronted /s/: Linguistic rhematization through visual transformation. Language in Society48(1): 31–64. 10.1017/S004740451800115X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740451800115X [Google Scholar]
11. Calder, Jeremy
    2004 ‘Harsh’ SoMA vs ‘Beige’ Castro: The cross-modal construction of contrasting femininities in queer San Francisco. Language and Communication991: 107–128.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Camp, Margaret
    2009 Japanese Lesbian Speech: Sexuality, Gender Identity, and Language. PhD dissertation, The University of Arizona.
13. Cuddy, Salina
    2019 Can Women “Sound Gay”?: A Sociophonetic Study of /s/ and Pitch of Gay and Straight British-English Speaking Women. PhD dissertation, University of York.
14. Dallaston, Katherine & Docherty, Gerard
    2020 The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature. PloS One15(3): e0229960. 10.1371/journal.pone.0229960
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229960 [Google Scholar]
15. Drugman, Thomas, Kane, John & Gobl, Christer
    2012 Resonator-based creaky voice detection. Interspeech13(1): 1592–1595. 10.21437/Interspeech.2012‑438
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2012-438 [Google Scholar]
16. Drugman, Thomas, Kane, John & Gobl, Christer
    2014 Data-driven detection and analysis of the patterns of creaky voice. Computer Speech & Language28(5): 1233–1253. 10.1016/j.csl.2014.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2014.03.002 [Google Scholar]
17. Eckert, Penelope
    2000 Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Eckert, Penelope
    2003 The meaning of style. Texas Linguistic Forum471: 41–53.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Eckert, Penelope
    2006 Communities of practice. InConcise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics (2nd edition), Jacob L. Mey (ed), 109–111. Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/01276‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01276-1 [Google Scholar]
20. Eves, Alison
    2004 Queer theory, butch/femme identities and lesbian space. Sexualities7(4): 480–496. 10.1177/1363460704047064
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460704047064 [Google Scholar]
21. Farquhar, Clare
    2000 Lesbian in a post-lesbian world? Policing identity, sex and image. Sexualities3(2): 219–236. 10.1177/136346000003002007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136346000003002007 [Google Scholar]
22. Hazenberg, Evan
    2012 Language and Identity Practice: A Sociolinguistic Study of Gender in Ottawa, Ontario. PhD dissertation, Memorial University of Newfoundland.
23. Hillenbrand, James, Getty, Laura, Clark, Michael & Wheeler, Kimberlee
    1995 Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America97(5): 3099–3111. 10.1121/1.411872
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411872 [Google Scholar]
24. Huang, Yaqian
    2023 Phonetics of Period Doubling. PhD dissertation, University of California San Diego.
25. Huxley, Caroline
    2013 Lesbian and bisexual women’s experiences of sexuality-based discrimination and their appearance concerns. Psychology & Sexuality4(1): 7–15. 10.1080/19419899.2013.748239
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2013.748239 [Google Scholar]
26. Keating, Patricia, Garellek, Marc & Kreiman, Jody
    2015 Acoustic properties of different kinds of creaky voice. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences18(1): 2–7.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kennedy, Elizabeth & Davis, Madeline
    2014 Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold: The History of a Lesbian Community. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315767611
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315767611 [Google Scholar]
28. Kerr, Danielle
    2013 Butch, Femme, Dyke, Or Lipstick, Aren’t All Lesbians The Same?: An Exploration Of Labels And “Looks” Among Lesbians In The US South. Master’s thesis, University of Mississippi.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lane-Steele, Laura
    2011 Studs and protest-hypermasculinity: The tomboyism within black lesbian female masculinity. Journal of Lesbian Studies15(4): 480–492. 10.1080/10894160.2011.532033
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2011.532033 [Google Scholar]
30. Lee, Kaitlyn
    2016 The Perception of Creaky Voice: Does Speaker Gender Affect our Judgments?Master’s thesis, University of Kentucky.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Levon, Erez
    2011 Teasing apart to bring together: Gender and sexuality in variationist research. American Speech86(1): 69–84. 10.1215/00031283‑1277519
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-1277519 [Google Scholar]
32. Levon, Erez
    2014 Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society43(5): 539–566. 10.1017/S0047404514000554
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000554 [Google Scholar]
33. Lewis, Julie Anne
    2002 Social Influences on Female Speakers’ Pitch. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
34. Linke, Charles
    1953 A Study of Pitch Characteristics of Female Voices and Their Relationship to Vocal Effectiveness. PhD dissertation, The University of Iowa.
35. Linville, Sue Ellen & Fisher, Hilda
    1985 Acoustic characteristics of perceived versus actual vocal age in controlled phonation by adult females. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America78(1): 40–48. 10.1121/1.392452
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392452 [Google Scholar]
36. McAuliffe, Michael, Socolof, Michaela, Mihuc, Sarah, Wagner, Michael & Sonderegger, Morgan
    2017 Montreal forced aligner: Trainable text-speech alignment using kaldi. Interspeech20171: 498–502. 10.21437/Interspeech.2017‑1386
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1386 [Google Scholar]
37. Mendoza-Denton, Norma
    2014 Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice Among Latina Youth Gangs. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Moonwomon-Baird, Birch
    1997 Toward a study of lesbian speech. InQueerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Anna Livia & Kira Hall (eds), 202–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195104707.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195104707.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
39. Morgan, Taralee
    2017 Lesbian Lingo: Slang Terminology in English and Spanish Spoken by Lesbian Communities in the United States. Master’s thesis, DePaul University.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Munson, Benjamin
    2007 The acoustic correlates of perceived masculinity, perceived femininity, and perceived sexual orientation. Language and Speech50(1): 125–142. 10.1177/00238309070500010601
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309070500010601 [Google Scholar]
41. Munson, Benjamin
    2011 The influence of actual and imputed talker gender on fricative perception, revisited (L). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America130(5): 2631–2634. 10.1121/1.3641410
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3641410 [Google Scholar]
42. Munson, Benjamin, McDonald, Elizabeth, DeBoe, Nancy & White, Aubrey
    2006 The acoustic and perceptual bases of judgments of women and men’s sexual orientation from read speech. Journal of Phonetics34(2): 202–240. 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.05.003 [Google Scholar]
43. Munson, Benjamin, Ryherd, Kayleigh & Kemper, Sara
    2017 Implicit and explicit gender priming in English lingual sibilant fricative perception. Linguistics55(5): 1073–1107. 10.1515/ling‑2017‑0021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0021 [Google Scholar]
44. Murry, Thomas & Singh, Sadanand
    1980 Multidimensional analysis of male and female voices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America68(5): 1294–1300. 10.1121/1.385122
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.385122 [Google Scholar]
45. Podesva, Robert
    2007 Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics11(4): 478–504. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00334.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00334.x [Google Scholar]
46. Podesva, Robert
    2021 The role of the body in language change. InSocial Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, Lauren Hall-Lew, Emma Moore & Robert Podesva (eds), 363–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108578684.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108578684.016 [Google Scholar]
47. Podesva, Robert & Van Hofwegen, Janneke
    2014 How conservatism and normative gender constrain variation in Inland California: The case of /s/. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics20(2): 129–137.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Pratt, Teresa
    2020 Embodying “tech”: Articulatory setting, phonetic variation, and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics24(3): 328–349. 10.1111/josl.12369
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12369 [Google Scholar]
49. Pratt, Teresa
    2023 Affect in sociolinguistic style. Language in Society52(1): 1–26. 10.1017/S0047404521000774
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404521000774 [Google Scholar]
50. Queen, Robin
    1997 “I don’t speak spritch”: Locating lesbian language. InQueerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Anna Livia & Kira Hall (eds), 233–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195104707.003.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195104707.003.0014 [Google Scholar]
51. Sachs, Jacqueline
    1973 Anatomical and cultural determinants of male and female speech. InLanguage Attitudes: Current Trends and Prospects, Roger Shuy & Ralph Fasold (eds), 74–84. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Stuart-Smith, Jane
    2007 Empirical evidence for gendered speech production: /s/ in Glaswegian. Laboratory Phonology9(1): 65–86.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Suire, Alexandre, Tognetti, Arnaud, Durand, Valérie, Raymond, Michel & Barkat-Defradas, Melissa
    2020 Speech acoustic features: A comparison of gay men, heterosexual men, and heterosexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior49(1): 2575–2583. 10.1007/s10508‑020‑01665‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01665-3 [Google Scholar]
54. Van Bezooijen, Renée
    1995 Sociocultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women. Language and Speech38(3): 253–265. 10.1177/002383099503800303
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099503800303 [Google Scholar]
55. Van Borsel, John, Vandaele, Jana & Corthals, Paul
    2013 Pitch and pitch variation in lesbian women. Journal of Voice27(5): 656.e13–656e16. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.04.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.04.008 [Google Scholar]
56. Waksler, Rachelle
    2001 Pitch range and women’s sexual orientation. Word52(1): 69–77. 10.1080/00437956.2001.11432508
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2001.11432508 [Google Scholar]
57. Yoon, Tae-Jin
    2015 A corpus-based study on the effects of gender on voiceless fricatives in American English. Phonetics and Speech Sciences7(1): 117–124. 10.13064/KSSS.2015.7.1.117
    https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2015.7.1.117 [Google Scholar]
58. Yuasa, Ikuko
    2010 Creaky voice: A new feminine voice quality for young urban-oriented upwardly mobile American women?American Speech85(3): 315–337. 10.1215/00031283‑2010‑018
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2010-018 [Google Scholar]
59. Zimman, Lal
    2013 Hegemonic masculinity and the variability of gay-sounding speech: The perceived sexuality of transgender men. Journal of Language and Sexuality2(1): 1–39. 10.1075/jls.2.1.01zim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.2.1.01zim [Google Scholar]
60. Zimman, Lal
    2017 Gender as stylistic bricolage: Transmasculine voices and the relationship between fundamental frequency and /s/. Language in Society46(3): 339–370. 10.1017/S0047404517000070
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000070 [Google Scholar]