1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Language and Sexuality
  4. Volume 6, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2211-3770
  • E-ISSN: 2211-3789
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The traditional family has always been the preserve of heterosexual couples based on and reinforced by a series of (hetero)normative behaviours. The context of same-gender adoption allows for a reworking of the construct of the modern family and the negotiation of parenting identities moving beyond the traditional system based on gender binarism ( Wagner 2014 ). However, despite legal equality in the areas of adoption and marriage, LGBT people continue to face moral judgement about whether they are suitable parents. Using the insights and methods of membership categorisation analysis ( Sacks 1992 , Stokoe 2003a , 2003b , 2012 ), this paper unpacks the ways in which the more conservative parts of the UK’s society construct same-gender parenting as a transgression of the established norms while relying on heteronormative assumptions about categories within the membership categorisation device ‘family’ ( Sacks 1992 ). The paper shows that the gendered meaning ‘locked into place’ ( Baker 2000 ) in those categories is a source of prejudice and a tool to maintain the established heteronormative order.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jls.6.1.03sok
2017-06-17
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jls.6.1.03sok
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adoption and Children Act
    Adoption and Children Act 2002 <www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/38/contents (March 10, 2014)
  2. Averett, Paige , Strong-Blakeney, Amy , Nalavany, Blace & Scott, Ryan
    2011 Adoptive parents’ attitudes towards gay and lesbian adoption. Journal of GLBT Family Studies7(1–2): 30–48. doi: 10.1080/1550428X.2011.537211
     https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2011.537211 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baiocco, Roberto , Nardelli, Nicola , Pezzuti, Lina & Lingiardi, Vittorio
    2013 Attitudes of Italian heterosexual older adults towards lesbian and gay parenting. Sexuality Research and Social Policy10(4): 285–292. doi: 10.1007/s13178‑013‑0129‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-013-0129-2 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Carolyn
    2000 Locating culture in action: Membership categorization in texts and talk. InCulture and Text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies, Alison Lee & Cate Poynton Cate (eds), 99–113. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 2004 Membership categorisation and interview accounts. InQualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, David Silverman (ed), 130–143. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Barnardo’s
    Barnardo’s 2011 Gay adoption in the UK. www.barnardos.org.uk (March 11, 2014)
  7. Barton, Ellen , Aldridge, Matthew , Trimble, Thomas & Vidovic, Justin
    2005 Structure and variation in end-of-life discussions in the surgical intensive care unit. Communication & Medicine2(1): 3–20. doi: 10.1515/come.2005.2.1.3
     https://doi.org/10.1515/come.2005.2.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ben-Ari, Adital & Tali, Livni
    2006 Motherhood is not a given thing: Experiences and constructed meanings of biological and nonbiological mothers. Sex Roles54: 521–531. doi: 10.1007/s11199‑006‑9016‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9016-0 [Google Scholar]
  9. Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria
    2006 Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
  10. Butler, Judith
    1990 Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don
    2006 Heteronorms. InThe Language and Sexuality Reader, Cameron Deborah & Kulick Don (eds), 165–168. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Civil Partnership Act.
    Civil Partnership Act. 2004 <www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/33/contents (March 10, 2014)
  13. Coates, Jennifer
    2013 The discursive production of everyday heterosexualities. Discourse & Society24(5): 536–552. doi: 10.1177/0957926513486070
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486070 [Google Scholar]
  14. Daily Mail
    Daily Mail 2014 House rules. Mail Online. www.dailymail.co.uk/home/house_rules.html (September 11, 2014)
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Ellen, Thomas
    2009 New legislation sees gay Scottish couples win right to adopt children. The Herald. www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/new-legislation-sees-gay-scottish-couples-win-right-to-adopt-children–1.921121 (March 10, 2014)
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Freiberg, Jill & Freebody, Peter
    2009 Applying membership categorization analysis to discourse: When ‘tripwire critique’ is not enough. InCritical Discourse Analysis: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Thao Lê & Megan Short (eds), 49–64. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gabb, Jacqui
    2005 Lesbian m/otherhood: Strategies of familial-linguistic management in lesbian parent families. Sociology39(4): 585–603. doi: 10.1177/0038038505056025
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505056025 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hall, Matthew & Gough, Brendan
    2011 Magazine and reader constructions of ‘metrosexuality’ and masculinity: A membership categorisation analysis. Journal of Gender Studies20(1): 67–86. doi: 10.1080/09589236.2011.542023
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2011.542023 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hester, Stephen
    1998 Describing “deviance” in school: Recognisably educational psychological problems. InIdentities in Talk, Charles Antaki & Sue Widdicombe (eds), 133–150. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hester, Stephen & Eglin, Peter
    (eds) 1997 Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hicks, Stephen
    2005 Lesbian and gay foster care and adoption: A brief UK history. Adoption & Fostering29(3): 42–56. doi: 10.1177/030857590502900306
     https://doi.org/10.1177/030857590502900306 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hill, Alexandra Merley
    2011 Motherhood as performance: (Re)Negotiations of motherhood in contemporary German literature. Studies in 20th & 21st Literature35(1): 74–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hughey, Matthew W. & Daniels, Jessie
    2013 Racist comments at online news sites: A methodological dilemma for discourse analysis. Media, Culture and Society35(3): 332–347. doi: 10.1177/0163443712472089
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712472089 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jayyusi, Lena
    1984 Categorization and the Moral Order. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Johnson, Rebecca
    2007 The co-construction of roles and patterns of interaction in family discourse. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics7(2): 1–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kitzinger, Celia
    2000 Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism and Psychology10(2): 163–193. doi: 10.1177/0959353500010002001
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353500010002001 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2005 ‘Speaking as a heterosexual’: (How) Does sexuality matter for talk-in-interaction?Research on Language and Social Interaction38(3): 221–265. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3803_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3803_2 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kranz, Karen & Judith Daniluk
    2006 Living outside of the box: Lesbian couples with children conceived through the use of anonymous donor insemination. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy18: 1–33. doi: 10.1300/J086v18n01_01
     https://doi.org/10.1300/J086v18n01_01 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lepper, Georgia
    2000 Categories in Text and Talk: A Practical Introduction to Categorization Analysis. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781849208727
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208727 [Google Scholar]
  30. Marriage (Same-Sex Couples) Act.
    Marriage (Same-Sex Couples) Act. 2013 <www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/30/contents/enacted/data.htm (September 18, 2014)
  31. McCutcheon, Jessica & Morrison, Melanie Ann
    2015 The effect of parental gender roles on students’ attitudes toward lesbian, gay, and heterosexual adoptive couples. Adoption Quarterly18(2): 138–167. doi: 10.1080/10926755.2014.945702
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2014.945702 [Google Scholar]
  32. Motschenbacher, Heiko
    2011 Taking Queer Linguistics further: Sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research. International Journal of the Sociology of Language212: 149–179.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Motschenbacher, Heiko & Stegu, Martin
    2013 Queer Lingustic approaches to discourse. Discourse & Society24(5): 519–535. doi: 10.1177/0957926513486069
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486069 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mullany, Louise
    2007 Gendered Discourse in the Professional Workplace. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230592902
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230592902 [Google Scholar]
  35. Nentwich, Julia C.
    2008 New fathers and mothers as gender trouble makers? Exploring discursive constructions of heterosexual parenthood and their subversive potential. Feminism and Psychology18(2): 207–230. doi: 10.1177/0959353507088591
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507088591 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nilan, Pam
    1995 Membership categorization devices under construction: Social identity boundary maintenance in everyday discourse. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics18(1): 69–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Pawelczyk, Joanna
    2013 Coping online with loss: Implications for offline clinical contexts. Language@Internet 10: article 8 [1–21].
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Pettigrew, Thomas & Meertens, Roel
    1995 Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology25: 57–75. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420250106
     https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250106 [Google Scholar]
  39. Populus
    Populus 2012 Gay Couples’ Rights Survey. Populus. www.populus.co.uk (March 20, 2014)
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Rolfe, Alison & Peel, Elizabeth
    2011 ‘It’s a double edged thing’: The paradox of civil partnership and why some couples are choosing not to have one. Feminism and Psychology21(3): 317–335. doi: 10.1177/0959353511408059
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353511408059 [Google Scholar]
  41. Rye, B. J. & Meaney, Glenn J.
    2010 Self-defense, sexism, and etiological beliefs: Predictors of attitudes toward gay and lesbian adoption. Journal of GLBT Family Studies6(1): 1–24. doi: 10.1080/15504280903472485
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15504280903472485 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Schegloff, Emanuel
    2007 A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics39(3): 462–482. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  44. Schlenker, Barry
    1980 Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity and Interpersonal Relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Schneider, Britta
    2013 Heteronormativity and queerness in transnational heterosexual Salsa. Discourse & Society24: 553–571. doi: 10.1177/0957926513486071
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486071 [Google Scholar]
  46. Speer, Susan
    2005 Gender Talk: Feminism, Discourse and Conversation Analysis. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203321447
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203321447 [Google Scholar]
  47. Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2003a Doing gender, doing categorization: Recent developments in language and gender research. International Sociolinguistics2(1): 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 2003b Mothers, single women and sluts: Gender, morality and membership categorisation in neighbour disputes. Feminism and Psychology13: 317–344. doi: 10.1177/0959353503013003006
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353503013003006 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2012 Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies4(3): 277–303. doi: 10.1177/1461445612441534
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441534 [Google Scholar]
  50. Sunderland, Jane
    2000 Baby entertainer, bumbling assistant and line manager: Discourses of fatherhood in parentcraft texts. Discourse & Society11(2): 249–274. doi: 10.1177/0957926500011002006
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011002006 [Google Scholar]
  51. Telegraph
    Telegraph 2010 Moderation FAQs. The Daily Telegraph. my.telegraph.co.uk/aboutus/mytelegraph/12/moderation-faqs/ (September 11, 2014)
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Tracy, Karen
    2002 Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. New York: Guilford.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Wagner, Sarah
    2014 Negotiating a contested identity: Lesbian and gay parents’ definitions of family. PhD dissertation. The University of Texas, Austin.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jls.6.1.03sok
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): family; gender; heteronormativity; membership categorisation analysis; same-gender parenting; sexuality

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error