1887
Volume 35, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0920-9034
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9870
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The use of the adverb in Colloquial Singapore English has long been known as one of the most readily recognizable features defining the contact dialect, marking aspectual nuances such as anterior, completive, inchoative and inceptive functions, as noted by Bao (20052015). Recent observations note that the uses of as an inchoative marker (distinguishing the adverb as an iamitive) are more frequently found than completive uses across a small, synchronic sample of speakers (Teo 2019). It is perhaps less often recognized, though, that the aspectual use of co-exists with the variable marking for past tense in Singlish (Ho & Platt 1993), and that both the aspectual adverb and the past tense may be seen to co-occur in the same construction. The frequency of in its various functions is examined across two corpora, and the relative frequency of completive vs. non-completive functions is quantified diachronically. It is hypothesized that, rather than grammaticalizing onwards to become a past tense marker, as is predictable for some Portuguese creole iamitives ( ‘already’) (Clements 2006), is becoming increasingly restricted in its functional range in today’s Singlish, and that its perfect and completive functions may be at a stage of selective renovation by the use of the past tense in Standard Singapore English.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.00062.zie
2020-10-01
2020-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alanne, Eero
    1972 Zur Rolle der syntaktischen Interferenz der verwandten und unverwandten Sprachen. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen73: 568–574.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alsagoff, Lubna
    2010 English in Singapore: culture, capital and identity in linguistic variation. World Englishes29. 336–348. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2010.01658.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2010.01658.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Alsagoff, Lubna & Chee Lick Ho
    1998 The grammar of Singapore English. InJoseph A. Foley, Thiru Kandiah, Zhi-Ming Bao, Anthea Fraser Gupta, Lubna Algasoff, Chee Lick Ho, Lionel Wee, Ismail S. Talib & Wendy Bokhorst-Heng, English in new cultural contexts. Reflections from Singapore, 127–151. Singapore: Oxford University Press [Singapore Institute of Management].
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bao, Zhiming
    1995Already in Singapore English. World Englishes14. 181–188. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1995.tb00348.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1995.tb00348.x [Google Scholar]
  5. 2001 The origins of empty categories in Singapore English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages16(2). 275–319. 10.1075/jpcl.16.2.03zhi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.16.2.03zhi [Google Scholar]
  6. 2005 The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substratist explanation. Journal of Linguistics41. 237–267. 10.1017/S0022226705003269
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226705003269 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2010 A usage-based approach to substratum transfer: the case of four unproductive features in Singapore English. Language86(4). 792–820. 10.1353/lan.2010.0036
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0036 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2015The making of vernacular Singapore English: System, transfer and filter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139135375
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139135375 [Google Scholar]
  9. Baxter, Alan
    1988A grammar of Kristang (Malacca Creole Portuguese). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics Series.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2018 Malacca Creole Portuguese in the 19th century: Evidence of a wider lectal range?Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages33(2). 247–279. doi:  10.1075/jpcl.00016.bax
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00016.bax [Google Scholar]
  11. Baxter, Alan, & Hugo C. Cardosa
    2017 Early notices regarding Creole Portuguese in former Portuguese Timor. Journal of Language Contact10. 264–317. 10.1163/19552629‑01002001
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01002001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bisang, Walter
    2004 Grammaticalization without coevolution of form and meaning: The case of tense-aspect-modality in East and mainland Southeast Asia. InWalter Bisang & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 109–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197440.2.109
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197440.2.109 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bybee, Joan, & Östen Dahl
    1989 The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language13(1). 51–103. 10.1075/sl.13.1.03byb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.1.03byb [Google Scholar]
  14. Bybee, Joan, Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1976Aspects of Chinese Sociolinguistics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chaudenson, Robert
    2001Creolization of language and culture. Translated from the French bySheri Pargman. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Clements, J. Clancy
    2003 The tense-aspect system in pidgins and naturalistically learned L2. Studies in Second language Acquisition25. 245–281. 10.1017/S0272263103000111
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000111 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2006 The lexicalization-grammaticalization continuum. InJ. Clancy Clements, Thomas A. Klingler, Deborah Piston-Hatlen & Kevin J. Rottet (eds.), History, society and variation. In honor of Albert Valdman, 77–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.28.06cle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.28.06cle [Google Scholar]
  19. 2011 Portugueses-based creoles in Africa and Asia. InCorey Yoquelet (ed.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Feb.14–17 2003 55–69. (Special session on Minority and Diasporic Languages of Europe).
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Clements, J. Clancy & Andrew Koontz-Garboden
    2002 Two Indo-Portuguese creoles in contrast. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages17(2). 191–236. 10.1075/jpcl.17.2.03cle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.17.2.03cle [Google Scholar]
  21. Dahl, Östen
    1985Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2006 Relativism and universalism from the perspective of areal typology and grammaticalization theory. Plenary talk presented atthe 39th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, University of Bremen, 30 August-2 September.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Dahl, Östen & Viveka Velupillai
    2013 The Perfect. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath, (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Accessed online atwals.info/chapter/68 (17 Sept. 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dahl, Östen & Bernhard Wälchli
    2016 Perfects and iamitives: two gram types in one grammatical space. Letras de Hoje51(3). 325–348. 10.15448/1984‑7726.2016.3.25454
    https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2016.3.25454 [Google Scholar]
  25. Dahl, Östen
    2019 Gram types as clusters in grammatical space. Paper presented atthe 52nd Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, 21–24 August, University of Leipzig.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Deuber, Dagmar, Jakob Leimgruber, & Andrea Sand
    2018 Singaporean internet chit chat compared to informal spoken language: linguistic variation and indexicality in a language contact situation. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages33(1). 48–91. doi:  10.1075/jpcl.00002.deu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00002.deu [Google Scholar]
  27. Eckert, Penelope
    2008 Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics12. 453–76. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00374.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Ferguson, Charles
    1959 Diglossia. Word15 (2). 325–340. 10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702 [Google Scholar]
  29. Fong, Vivienne
    2017 World Englishes and syntactic and semantic theory. InMarkku Filppula, Juhani Klemola & Devyani Sharma (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes, 84–102. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gupta, Anthea F.
    1991 Almost a creoloid: Singapore English. California Linguistic Notes23(1). 9–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 1994The step-tongue. Children’s English in Singapore. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Gupta, Anthea Fraser
    1998 The situation of English in Singapore. InJoe Foley, T. Kandiah, Zhiming Bao, Anthea Gupta, Lubna Alsagoff, Chee Lick Ho, Lionel Wee, IS. Talib, & Wendy Bokhorst-Heng, English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore, 106–126. Singapore: Singapore Institute of Management/Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hancock, Ian
    2009 The Portuguese creoles of Malacca. Revue Romaine de LinguistiqueLIV. 3–4. 295–306.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie
    (eds.) 2005World atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, & Bernard Comrie
    (eds.) 2008The world atlas of language structures online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. München: Max Planck Digital Library. wals.info/
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Heine, Bernd
    2012 Isomorphism and formulas of equivalence in language contact. InGuangshun, Cao, Hilary Chappell, Redouane Djamouri & Thekla Wiebusch (eds.), Breaking down the Barriers: Interdisciplinary Studies in Chinese Linguistics and Beyond” (Festschrift for Prof. Alain Peyraube). Taiwan: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica. (Pre-print version.)
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Heine, Bernd, & Tania Kuteva
    2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  38. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2003 On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language27. 529–572. 10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei [Google Scholar]
  39. 2005Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614132
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614132 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hiramoto, Mie
    2015 Sentence-final adverbs in Singapore English and Hong Kong English. World Englishes34(4). 636–653. 10.1111/weng.12157
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12157 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ho, Mian Lian & John T. Platt
    1993Dynamics of a contact continuum. Singaporean English. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hopper, Paul J.
    1991 On some principles of grammaticization. InElizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol.1, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  43. Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  44. The International Corpus of English
    The International Corpus of English: ice-corpora.net/ice/avail.htm
  45. Kuteva, Tania
    2017 Contact and borrowing. InAdam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of historical syntax, 163–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107279070.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279070.009 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
    2019World lexicon of grammaticalization. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316479704
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479704 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kuteva, Tania, Seongha Rhee, Debra Ziegeler, & Jessica Sabban
    2018 Are you the Queen of England, or what? On sentence-final what. Journal of Language Contact11. 32–70. 10.1163/19552629‑01101002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01101002 [Google Scholar]
  48. Lefebvre, Claire
    1998Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian Creole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Lehmann, Christian
    2015Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd edition. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_603353
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_603353 [Google Scholar]
  50. Leimgruber, Jacob R. E.
    2009 Modelling variation in Singapore English. PhD dissertation, University of Oxford.
  51. Leimgruber, Jakob
    2018 Ethnic and gender variation in the use of Colloquial Singapore English discourse particles. Paper presented atthe 5th Conference of the International Society for the Linguistics of English, University College London, July 17–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Li, Charles N., & Sandra A. Thompson
    1989 [1981]Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Lijun, Li & Peter Siemund
    2020 From phasal polarity expression to aspectual marker: grammaticalization of already in Asian and African varieties of English. InRaija Kramer (ed.), The expression of phasal polarity in African languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Lim, Lisa
    2007 Mergers and acquisitions: on the ages and origins of Singapore English particles. World Englishes26. 446–473. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2007.00522.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2007.00522.x [Google Scholar]
  55. Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip
    2009 Contact-induced grammaticalization: Evidence from bilingual acquisition. Studies in Language33. 366–395. 10.1075/sl.33.2.06mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.33.2.06mat [Google Scholar]
  56. Maurer, Philippe
    & the APiCS Consortium 2013 Tense-aspect systems (https://apics-online.info/parameters/49.chapter.html). InSusanne Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath, & Magnus Huber (eds.) 2013 The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://apics-online. (16 Sept. 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  57. McCawley, James
    1971 Tense and time reference in English. InCharles Fillmore & Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics, 96–113. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Michaelis, Susanne, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath, & Magnus Huber
    (eds.) 2013The atlas of pidgin and creole language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (https://apics-online.)
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Mufwene, Salikoko S.
    1990 Transfer and the substrate hypothesis in creolistics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition12. 1–23. 10.1017/S0272263100008718
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100008718 [Google Scholar]
  60. Mühlhäusler, Peter
    1986 Bonnet blanc and blanc bonnet: adjective-noun order, substratum and language universals. InPieter Muysken & Norvil Smith (eds.), Substrata vs. universals in creole genesis, 41–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.1.04muh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.1.04muh [Google Scholar]
  61. OED Online
    OED Online = Oxford English Dictionary Online, 3rd edition (updatedSeptember 2012) www.oed.com.ezproxy.univ-paris.fr (15 July 2019)
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Olsson, Bruno
    2013 Iamitives. Perfects in Southeast Asia and beyond. Masters thesis, University of Stockholm.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Pakir, Anne
    2019 English in Singapore: Achieving a new balance. Colloquium given at the SESYLIA research group meeting, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, 10May.
  64. Platt, John T.
    1975 The Singapore English speech continuum and its basilect ‘Singlish’ as a creoloid. Anthropological Linguistics17(7). 363–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Platt, John T., Heidi Weber & Mian Lian Ho
    1984The New Englishes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Reinöhl, Uta, & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann
    2017 Renewal: a figure of speech or a process sui generis?Language93(2). 381–413. 10.1353/lan.2017.0018
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0018 [Google Scholar]
  67. Siemund, Peter
    2013Varieties of English: A typological approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028240
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028240 [Google Scholar]
  68. Szeto, Pui Yiu, Stephen Matthews, & Virginia Yip
    2017 Multiple correspondence and typological convergence in contact-induced grammaticalization: Evidence from Cantonese-English bilingual development. Journal of Language Contact10(3). 485–518. 10.1163/19552629‑01002014
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01002014 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2019 Bilingual children as “laboratories” for studying contact outcomes: Development of perfective aspect. Linguistics57(3). 693–723. 10.1515/ling‑2019‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0012 [Google Scholar]
  70. Teo, Ming Chew
    2019 The role of parallel constructions in imposition. A synchronic study of already in Colloquial Singapore English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages34(2). 347–377. (doi:  10.1075/jpcl.00042.teo)
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00042.teo [Google Scholar]
  71. Tongue, Ray K.
    1979The English of Singapore and Malaysia. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1982 From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. InWinifred Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Perspective on historical linguistics, 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.24.09clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.24.09clo [Google Scholar]
  73. Winford, Donald
    2003An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Winford, Donald, & Bettina Migge
    2007 Substrate influence on the emergence of the TMA systems of the Surinamese creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages22(1). 73–99. 10.1075/jpcl.22.1.06win
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.22.1.06win [Google Scholar]
  75. Ziegeler, Debra
    1995 Diachronic factors in the grammaticalisation of counterfactual implicatures in Singaporean English. Language Sciences17(4). 305–328. 10.1016/0388‑0001(96)00002‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(96)00002-2 [Google Scholar]
  76. 2012 On the interaction of past tense and potentiality in Singaporean Colloquial English. Language Sciences34. 229–251. 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.08.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.08.007 [Google Scholar]
  77. 2015Converging grammars. Constructions in Singapore English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614514091
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514091 [Google Scholar]
  78. Ziegeler, Debra & Sarah Lee
    2019 Lexical retention in contact grammaticalisation : already in Southeast Asian Englishes. Journal of Language Contact12. 737–783. 10.1163/19552629‑01203006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01203006 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.00062.zie
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.00062.zie
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): already , contact grammaticalization , iamitives , past tense , renovation/renewal and Singlish
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error