Volume 37, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0920-9034
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9870
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aboh, Enoch
    2016 Creole distinctiveness: A dead end. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages31.400–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aboh, Enoch & Michel DeGraff
    2016 A null theory of Creole formation based on Universal Grammar. The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar, ed. byI. Roberts, 401–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, Stephen
    1992A-Morphous MorphologyCambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511586262
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586262 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2015 Dimensions of morphological complexity. Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity, ed. byM. Baerman, D. Brown & G. Corbett, 11–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723769.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723769.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ansaldo, Umberto
    2017 Creole complexity in sociolinguistic perspective. Language Sciences60.26–35. 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.10.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.10.008 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ansaldo, Umberto & Stephen Matthews
    2007 Deconstructing creole: the rationale. Deconstructing Creole, ed. byU. Ansaldo, S. Matthews & L. Lim, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.73.02ans
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.73.02ans [Google Scholar]
  7. Ansaldo, Umberto, Stephen Matthews & Lisa Lim
    (eds) 2007Deconstructing Creole. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.73
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.73 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown & Greville Corbett
    2015 What is morphological complexity?Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity, ed. byM. Baerman, D. Brown & G. Corbett, 3–10. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723769.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723769.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bakker, Peter
    2014 Creolistics: Back to square one?Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages29.177–94. 10.1075/jpcl.29.1.08bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.29.1.08bak [Google Scholar]
  10. Bakker, Peter, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen & Eeva Sippola
    2017Creole Studies – Phylogenetic ApproachesAmsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.211
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall & Ingo Plag
    2011 Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages26.5–42. 10.1075/jpcl.26.1.02bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.26.1.02bak [Google Scholar]
  12. Bickerton, Derek
    1981Roots of Language Ann Arbor: Karoma.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1984 The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences7.173–221. 10.1017/S0140525X00044149
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044149 [Google Scholar]
  14. Blasi, DamiÁn, Susanne Michaelis & Martin Haspelmath
    2017 Grammars are robustly transmitted even during the emergence of creole languages. Nature Human Behaviour (Letters)1.723–29. 10.1038/s41562‑017‑0192‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0192-4 [Google Scholar]
  15. Booij, Geert
    1996 Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. Yearbook of Morphology 1995.1–16. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3716‑6_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_1 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bowern, Claire
    2010 Fieldwork in language contact situations. The Handbook of Language Contact, ed. byR. Hickey, 340–57. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444318159.ch17
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318159.ch17 [Google Scholar]
  17. Comrie, Bernard
    2009 Inflectional morphology and language contact, with special reference to mixed languages. Language Contact and Contact Languages, ed. byP. Siemund & N. Kintama, 15–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hsm.7.03com
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.7.03com [Google Scholar]
  18. Daval-Markussen, Aymeric
    2013 First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia45.274–95. 10.1080/03740463.2014.880606
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2014.880606 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2022Creoles, Typology and Phylogenetics: Reconstructing CreoleBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Daval-Markussen, Aymeric, Kristoffer Friis Bøegh & Peter Bakker
    2017 West African languages and creoles worldwide. Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, ed. byP. Bakker, F. Borchsenius, C. Levisen & E. Sippola, 141–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.211.07dav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211.07dav [Google Scholar]
  21. DeGraff, Michel
    2001a Morphology in creole genesis: Linguistics and ideology’. Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. byM. Kenstowicz, 53–121. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2001b On the origin of Creoles: A Cartesian critique of ‘neo’ Darwinian linguistics. Linguistic Typology2/3.213–310.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2003 Against Creole exceptionalism. Language79.391–410. 10.1353/lan.2003.0114
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0114 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2005 Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of Creole Exceptionalism. Language in Society34.533–91. 10.1017/S0047404505050207
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050207 [Google Scholar]
  25. DeGraff, Michel, Robert Berwick & Trevor Bass
    2013 Modern phylogenetics and Creole evolution: Creole family values.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Dench, Alan
    1998 Pidgin Ngurlama: An Indigenous contact language in north western Australia. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages13.1–61. 10.1075/jpcl.13.1.02den
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.13.1.02den [Google Scholar]
  27. Dunn, Michael, Angela Terrill, Ger Reesink, Robert A. Foley & Stephen C. Levinson
    2005 Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history. Science309.2072–75. 10.1126/science.1114615
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114615 [Google Scholar]
  28. Fisher, Roland A.
    1956The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fon Sing, Guillaume
    2017 Creoles are not typologically distinct from non-Creoles. Language Ecology1.44–74. 10.1075/le.1.1.04fon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/le.1.1.04fon [Google Scholar]
  30. Gardani, Francesco
    2008Borrowing of Inflectional Morphemes in Language ContactFrankfurt: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑04373‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04373-0 [Google Scholar]
  31. Gardani, Francesco, Peter Arkadiev & Nino Amiridze
    (eds) 2015Borrowed Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614513209
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513209 [Google Scholar]
  32. Garrett, Paul
    2009 Contact languages as “endangered languages”: What is there to lose?Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages21.175–90. 10.1075/jpcl.21.1.05gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.21.1.05gar [Google Scholar]
  33. Gil, David
    2014 Sign languages, creoles, and the development of predication. Measuring Grammatical Complexity, ed. byF. Newmeyer & L. Preston. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685301.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685301.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  34. Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie
    2005The World Atlas of Linguistic StructuresOxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hawkins, Julie, Colin Hughes & Robert Scotland
    1997 Primary homology assessment, characters and character states. Cladistics12.275–83. 10.1111/j.1096‑0031.1997.tb00320.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1997.tb00320.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Holm, John & Peter Patrick
    2007Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole GrammarsLondon: Battlebridge Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kihm, Alain
    2003 Inflectional categories in creole languages. Phonology and Morphology of Creole Languages, ed. byI. Plag, 333–64. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 10.1515/9783110929560.333
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110929560.333 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kouwenberg, Sylvia
    2010a Creole studies and linguistic typology: Part 1. Journal of Pidgin and Creole languages25.173–86. 10.1075/jpcl.25.1.07kou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.25.1.07kou [Google Scholar]
  39. 2010b Creole studies and linguistic typology: Part 2. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages25.359–80. 10.1075/jpcl.25.2.06kou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.25.2.06kou [Google Scholar]
  40. Lefebvre, Claire
    1998Creole Genesis and the Acquisition of grammar: The Case of Haitian CreoleCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lupyan, Gary & Rick Dale
    2010 Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008559
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008559 [Google Scholar]
  42. Markey, Thomas
    1982 Afrikaans: Creole or non-creole. Zeitschrift fuer Dialektogie und Linguistik2.169–207.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Matras, Yaron
    2001 Language Contact. Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byJ. Verschueren, J.-O. Ostman, J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen, 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hop.7.lan4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.7.lan4 [Google Scholar]
  44. Mcwhorter, John
    1998 Identifying the creole prototype: Vindicating a typological claim. Language74.788–818. 10.2307/417003
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417003 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2001 The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology5.125–66. 10.1515/lity.2001.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2001.001 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2018The Creole DebateCambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108553308
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553308 [Google Scholar]
  47. Meakins, Felicity
    2019 Morphology. Language Contact: An International Handbook, ed. byJ. Darquennes, J. Salmons & W. Vandenbussche, 63–75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Meakins, Felicity, Jennifer Green & Myfany Turpin
    2018Understanding Linguistic FieldworkLondon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203701294
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203701294 [Google Scholar]
  49. Meakins, Felicity, Xia Hua, Cassandra Algy & Lindell Bromham
    2019 The birth of a new language does not favour simplification. Language95.294–332. 10.1353/lan.2019.0032
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0032 [Google Scholar]
  50. Meakins, Felicity & Sasha Wilmoth
    2020 Overabundance resulting from language contact: Complex cell-mates in Gurindji Kriol. The Complexities of Morphology, ed. byP. Arkadiev & F. Gardani, 81–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198861287.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198861287.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  51. Meyerhoff, Miriam
    2008 Empirical problems with domain-based notions of “simple”. Social Lives in Language: Celebrating the Work of Gillian Sankoff, ed. byM. Meyerhoff & N. Nagy, 327–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.24.20mey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.24.20mey [Google Scholar]
  52. Miestamo, Matti, Kaius SinnemÄki & Faius Karlsson
    (eds) 2008Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.94
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94 [Google Scholar]
  53. Mufwene, Salikoko
    1997 Kitúba. Contact Languages: A Wider Perspective, ed. byS. G. Thomason, 173–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.17.09muf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.17.09muf [Google Scholar]
  54. 2000 Creolization is a social, not a structural, process. Degrees of Restructuring in Creole Languages, ed. byI. Neumann-Holzschuh & E. Schneider, 65–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.22.06muf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.22.06muf [Google Scholar]
  55. 2001The Ecology of Language EvolutionCambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612862
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612862 [Google Scholar]
  56. Muysken, Pieter
    1988 Are creoles are special type of language. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, ed. byF. Newmeyer, 285–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621055.017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621055.017 [Google Scholar]
  57. Myers-Scotton, Carol
    2002Contact Linguistics: Bilingual Encounters and Grammatical OutcomesOxford ; New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299530.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299530.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  58. Parkvall, Mikael
    2008 The simplicity of creoles in cross-linguistic perspective. Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change, ed. byM. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson, 265–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.94.17par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94.17par [Google Scholar]
  59. Parkvall, Mikael, Peter Bakker & John Mcwhorter
    2018 Creoles and sociolinguistic complexity: Response to Ansaldo. Language Sciences66.226–33. 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  60. Plag, Ingo
    2003a Introduction: The morphology of creole languages. Yearbook of Morphology 2002, ed. byG. Booij & J. van Marle, 1–2. Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer. 10.1007/0‑306‑48223‑1_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48223-1_1 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2003bYearbook of Morphology 2002Great Britain: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Reesink, Ger, Ruth Singer & Michael Dunn
    2009 Explaining the linguistic diversity of Sahul using population models. PLOS Biology7.e1000241. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000241
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000241 [Google Scholar]
  63. Roberts, Sarah & Joan Bresnan
    2008 Retained inflectional morphology in pidgins: A typological study. Linguistic Typology12.269–302. 10.1515/LITY.2008.039
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LITY.2008.039 [Google Scholar]
  64. Sapir, Edward
    1921Language: An Introduction to the Study of SpeechNew York: Harcourt Brace and company.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Siegel, Jeff
    2004 Morphological simplicity in Pidgins and Creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages19.139–62. 10.1075/jpcl.19.1.06sie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.19.1.06sie [Google Scholar]
  66. SkirgÅrd, Hedvig
    2020Multilevel Dynamics of Language Diversity in Oceania. PhD DissertationCanberra: Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Taylor, Douglas
    1971 Grammatical and lexical affinities of Creoles. Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, ed. byD. Hymes, 293–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Trudgill, Peter
    2001 Contact and simplification: Historical baggage and directionality in linguistic change. Linguistic Typology5.371–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Wright, Sewall
    1931 Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics16.97–159. 10.1093/genetics/16.2.97
    https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/16.2.97 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error