Nominalization in Wutun

References

1. Ansaldo, Umberto
   2015 Pidgins and creoles. InEncyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics Online, General EditorRint Sybesma. 10.1163/2210‑7363_ecll_COM_00000331 (18 May, 2022.)
   https://doi.org/10.1163/2210-7363_ecll_COM_00000331 [Google Scholar]
2. Bakker, Peter
   2003 Mixed languages as autonomous systems. InYaron Matras & Peter Bakker (eds.), The mixed language debate: Theoretical and empirical advances, 107–150. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brosig, Benjamin, Foong Ha Yap & Karen Ahrens
   2019 Assertion, presumption and presupposition: An account of the erstwhile nominalizer YUM in Khalkha Mongolian. Studies in Language43(4). 896–940.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chappell, Hilary
   2001 Language contact and areal diffusion in Sinitic languages. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, 328–357. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chen, Naixiong
   1982 Wutunhua Chutan五屯话初探 [A preliminary investigation on Wutun speech]. Minzu Yuwen11. 10–18. Beijing.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chen, Naixiong
   1986 Guanyu Wutunhua关于五屯话 [An outline of Wutun linguistic structure]. Journal of Asian and African Studies311. 33–52. Tokyo.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chen, Naixiong & Chinggeltei
   1986 Baoanyu he Mengguyu保安语和蒙古语 [The Bonan language and the Mongolian language]. (Menggu Yuzu Yuyan Fangyan Yanjiu Congshu 010). Hohhot: Nei Menggu Renmin Chubanshe.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Comrie, Bernard & Sandra A. Thompson
   1985 Lexical nominalization. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 349–396. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dede, Keith
   2015 Mixed languages. InEncyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics Online, General EditorRint Sybesma. 10.1163/2210‑7363_ecll_COM_00000271 (18 May, 2022.)
   https://doi.org/10.1163/2210-7363_ecll_COM_00000271 [Google Scholar]
10. Dixon, R. M. W.
    2006 Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Complementation: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. DuBois, John
    2007 The stance triangle. InEnglebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
12. Fried, Robert W.
    2010 A grammar of Bao’an Tu, a Mongolic language of Northwest China. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York dissertation.
13. Grunow-Hårsta, Karen
    2007 Evidentiality and mirativity in Magar. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area30(2). 151–194.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hashimoto, Mantaro
    1976 Language diffusion on the Asian continent: Problems of typological diversity in Sino-Tibetan. Computational Analysis of Asian and African Languages31. 49–63.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Janhunen, Juha
    2007 Typological interaction in the Qinghai linguistic complex. Studia Orientalia1011. 85–103.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Janhunen, Juha
    2012 On the hierarchy of structural convergence in the Amdo Sprachbund. InPirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie & P. Solovyev (eds.), Argument structure and grammatical relations: A cross-linguistic typology, 177–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s. 10.1075/slcs.126.08jan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.126.08jan [Google Scholar]
17. Janhunen, Juha, Marja Peltomaa, Erika Sandman & Xiawu Dongzhou
    2008 Wutun. (Languages of the World/Materials 466). Muenchen: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
    1993 Nominalizations. Oxford: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Longacre, Robert E.
    2007 Sentences as combinations of clauses. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, second edition, Vol II: Complex constructions, 372–420. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.007 [Google Scholar]
20. Lee-Smith, Mei W. & Stephen A. Wurm
    1996 The Wutun Language. InStephen A. Wurm, Peter Mühlhäusler & Darrell R. Tryon (eds.) Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia and the Americas. (Trends in Linguistics, Documentation 13, vol.II (2), 883–897. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110819724.3.883
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110819724.3.883 [Google Scholar]
21. Lü, Shuxiang
    1980 Xiandai Hanyu babai ci现代汉语八百词. [800 Modern Chinese words]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Meakins, Felicity
    2013 Mixed languages. InPeter Bakker & Yaron Matras (eds.), Contact languages: A comprehensive guide. (Language Contact and Bilingualism 6), 159–228. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614513711.159
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513711.159 [Google Scholar]
23. Sandman, Erika
    2016 A Grammar of Wutun. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.
24. Sandman, Erika
    2021 Wutun as a mixed language. InEeva Sippola & Maria Mazzoli (eds.) New Perspectives on Mixed Languages. From Core to Fringe. (Language Contact and Bilingualism 18), 325–359. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501511257‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511257-012 [Google Scholar]
25. Sandman, Erika & Camille Simon
    2016 Tibetan as a ”model language” in the Amdo Sprachbund: evidence from Salar and Wutun. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics (JSALL)3(1). 85–122. 10.1515/jsall‑2016‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2016-0003 [Google Scholar]
26. Sio, Joanna Ut-Seong
    2011 The Cantonese ge3. InFoong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives. (Typological Studies in Language 96), 125–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s. 10.1075/tsl.96.04sio
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96.04sio [Google Scholar]
27. Szeto, Pui Yiu, Umberto Ansaldo & Stephen Matthews
    2018 Typological variation across Mandarin dialects: An areal perspective with a quantitative approach. Linguistic Typology22(2). 233–275. 10.1515/lingty‑2018‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2018-0009 [Google Scholar]
28. Tribur, Zoe
    2019 Verbal morphology of Amdo Tibetan. Oregon: University of Oregon dissertation.
29. Wu, Hugjiltu
    2003 Bonan. InJuha Janhunen (ed.), The Mongolic languages. (Routledge Language Family Series 5), 325–345. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Xu, Dan
    2017 The Tangwang language. An interdisciplinary case study in Northwest China. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Yap, Foong Ha, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona
    2011 Introduction: Nominalization strategies in Asian languages. InFoong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives. (Typological Studies in Language 96), 1–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s. 10.1075/tsl.96.01yap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96.01yap [Google Scholar]
32. Yap, Foong Ha, Yi Deng & Marco Caboara
    2017 Attitudinal nominalizer(s) in Chinese: Evidence of recursive grammaticalization and pragmaticization. Lingua2001. 1–21. 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.07.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.07.011 [Google Scholar]
33. Yixiweisa Acuo
    Yixiweisa Acuo 2004 Daohua yanjiu倒话研究 [Research on Dao vernacular]. (Zhongguo Xin Faxian Yuyan Yanjiu Congshu). Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]