Pún and tio̍h in Penang Hokkien

References

1. Abdul Rahim, Hajar
   2015 Bahasa Tanjong : The heritage language of the Jawi Peranakans of Penang. Kajian Malaysia33(2). 91–111.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bao, Zhiming & Lionel Wee
   1999 The passive in Singapore English. World Englishes18(1).1–11. 10.1111/1467‑971X.00117
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00117 [Google Scholar]
3. Baxter, Alan N. & Patrick de Silva
   2004 A dictionary of Kristang (Malacca Creole Portuguese) with an English-Kristang finderlist. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Benmamoun, Elabbas, Silvina Montrul & Maria Polinsky
   2013 Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics39(3–4). 129–181. 10.1515/tl‑2013‑0009
   https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2013-0009 [Google Scholar]
5. Campbell, Lawrence D.
   1806 The Asiatic annual register, or, view of the history of Hindustan, and of the politics, commerce, and literature of Asia, for the year 1804. London: East-India Company.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Sho, Cheng-Teh James Huang, Yen-Hui Audrey Li & Chih-Chen Jane Tang
   1999 Hoo, hoo, hoo: Syntax of the causative, dative, and passive constructions in Taiwanese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series141. 146–203.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Clammer, John R.
   1980 Straits Chinese Society. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Coope, A. E.
   1976 A Malay-English English-Malay dictionary (revised edition). London: Mac-millan.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cummins, Jim
   2005 A proposal for action: Strategies for recognizing heritage language competence as a learning resource within the mainstream classroom. The Modern Language Journal89(4). 585–592.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Douglas, Carstairs
    1873 Chinese-English dictionary of the vernacular or spoken language of Amoy, with the principal variations of the Chang-chew and Chin-chew dialects. London: Trübner & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Goddard, Cliff
    2001 The polyfunctional Malay focus particle pun. Multilingua201. 27–59. 10.1515/MULTI.2001.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2001.002 [Google Scholar]
12. Haji Omar, Asmah
    1980 Nahu Melayu Mutakhir. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hing, Jia Wen
    2019 A descriptive grammar of Penang Hokkien. Singapore: National University of Singapore dissertation.
14. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
15. Jones, Russell
    2009 The Chiangchew Hokkiens, the true pioneers in the Nanyang. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society82(2). 39–66.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Keenan, Edward
    1985 Passive in the world’s languages. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (Vol.11), 243–281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kuhn, Philip A.
    2008 Chinese among others: emigration in modern times. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Laleko, Oksana & Maria Polinsky
    2013 Marking topic or marking case? A comparative investigation of heritage Japanese and heritage Korean. Heritage Language Journal10(2). 40–64. 10.46538/hlj.10.2.3
    https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.10.2.3 [Google Scholar]
19. Laleko, Oksana & Maria Polinsky
    2016 Between syntax and discourse: Topic and case marking in heritage speakers and L2 learners of Japanese and Korean. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism61. 396–439. 10.1075/lab.14018.lal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.14018.lal [Google Scholar]
20. Li, Haixia 李海霞
    1994 Sichuan fangyan de beidongshi he ‘zhao’四川方言的被动式和‘着’ [The passive and ‘zhao’ in the Sichuan dialect]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (1). 87–90.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Li, Lan 李蓝
    2006 ‘Zhao’ zi shi beidongju de gongshi fenbu yu leixing chayi“着”字式被动句的共时分布与类型差异 [The synchronic distribution and typological differences of ‘zhao’-passives]. Journal of Chinese Dialects (1). 194–205.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lien, Chinfa
    2001 The semantic extension of Tioh8 in Taiwanese Southern Min: An interactive approach. Language and Linguistics2(2). 173–202.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lin, Baoqing 林宝卿
    2002 Minnan fangyan yu gu hanyu tongyuan cidian闽南方言与古汉语同源词典 [A cognate dictionary of the Southern Min dialect and Ancient Chinese]. Xiamen: Xiamen University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lin, Philip T.
    2015 Taiwanese grammar: A concise reference. CA: Greenhorn Media.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Low, Hui M., Howard Nicholas & Roger Wales
    2010 A sociolinguistic profile of 100 mothers from middle to upper-middle socio-economic backgrounds in Penang-Chinese community: what languages do they speak at home with their children?. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development31(6). 569–584. 10.1080/01434632.2010.527342
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2010.527342 [Google Scholar]
26. Mahmood, Abdul Hamid
    1992 Ayat pasif Bahasa Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Nevalainen, Terttu
    1991 But, only, just: Focusing adverbial change in Modern English 1500–1900. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Paauw, Scott
    2009 One land, one nation, one language: An analysis of Indonesia’s national language policy. InH. Lehnert-LeHouillier & A. B. Fine (eds.), University of Rochester Working Papers in the Language Sciences, 5(1), 2–16.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Polinsky, Maria and Geogory Scontras
    2020 Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition23(1). 4–20. 10.1017/S1366728919000245
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000245 [Google Scholar]
30. Rong, Jing 荣晶 and Chongming Ding 丁崇明
    2004 Kunminghua de ‘zhao’ zi jiqi yufahua guocheng zhong de lishi zeyi yu gongshi zhiheng wenti昆明话的“着”字及其语法化过程中的历时择一与共时制衡问题 [The diachronic specialization and synchronic balance of the grammaticalization of ‘zhao’ in the Kunming dialect]. Studies of the Chinese Language31. 247–252.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Rothman, Jason
    2009 Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages. International Journal of Bilingualism13(2). 155–163. 10.1177/1367006909339814
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339814 [Google Scholar]
32. Scontras, Gregory, Zuzanna Fuchs & Maria Polinsky
    2015 Heritage language and linguistic theory. Frontiers in Psychology61: 1545. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01545
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01545 [Google Scholar]
33. Scontras, Gregory, Maria Polinsky, Edwin C.-Y. Tsai & Kenneth Mai
    2017 Cross-linguistic scope ambiguity: When two systems meet. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics2(1). 1–28. 10.5334/gjgl.198
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.198 [Google Scholar]
34. Scontras, Gregory, Maria Polinsky, & Zuzanna Fuchs
    2018 In support of representational economy: Agreement in heritage Spanish. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics3(1). 1–29. 10.5334/gjgl.164
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.164 [Google Scholar]
35. Shellabear, W. G.
    1913 Baba Malay. An introduction to the language of the Straits-born Chinese. Journal of the Straits Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society651. 49–63.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sim, Tze W.
    2012 Why are the native languages of the Chinese Malaysians in decline?. Journal of the Taiwanese Vernacular4(1). 62–95.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Stoffel, Cornelis
    1901 Intensives and downtoners: A study in English adverbs. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Teoh, Boon Seong, Beng Soon Lim and Liang Hye Lee
    2003 A study of Penang Peranakan Hokkien. Journal of Modern Languages151. 169–190.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Teoh, Shiaw Kuan
    . 28June 2000 Shijiu shiji binghua wudaxing chutan十九世纪槟华五大姓初探 [A pilot study of the five big surnames in 19th century Penang Chinese community]. Oriental Daily News, A161.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ting, Su-Hie & Jonathan Zie-Ming Teng
    2021 Chinese teenagers’ perceptions of vitality of Hokkien Chinese in Penang, Malaysia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language2721. 185–217. 10.1515/ijsl‑2020‑0024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-0024 [Google Scholar]
41. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2006 The semantic development of scalar focus modifiers. InAns van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 335–359. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470757048.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757048.ch14 [Google Scholar]
42. Vaughan, J. D.
    1879 Manners and customs of the Chinese in the Straits Settlements. Singapore: The Mission Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Velupillai, Viveka L.
    2015 Pidgins, creoles and mixed languages: an introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cll.48
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.48 [Google Scholar]
44. Yang, Xiufang 杨秀芳
    1992 Cong lishi yufa de guandian lun Min-nan yu ‘zhao’ ji chixu mao从历史语法的观点论闽南语“着”及持续貌 [A historical linguistic discussion ‘zhao’ in the Southern Min dialect and the continuous aspect]. Chinese Studies101. 349–394.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Yuan, Jiahua 袁家骅等 et al
    1989 Hanyu fangyan gaiyao汉语方言概要 [An introduction to Chinese dialects]. Beijing: Language Reform Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Zhang, Zhenyu 张振羽
    2010 “Zhao” zi beidongju laiyuan de duoshijiao kaocha“着”字被动句来源的多视角考察 [A multi-perspective survey of the origin of “zhao”-passives]. Journal of Ningxia University (Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)32(1). 54–59.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Zhou, Changji 周长楫
    2006 Minnan fangyan da cidian闽南方言大词典 [A dictionary of Minnan dialect]. Fujian: Fujian Renmin Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]