1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Empiricism against imperialism
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Large scale typological studies have been criticized for being unscientific, biased, methodologically unsound and as perpetrating neocolonial attitudes. echoes these views in her first JPCL column. The conclusions of studies using large typological datasets, however, point in the direction that creoles do have structural properties that distinguish them from their lexifiers and the languages of the world, including a dozen not mentioned in Meakins’ column. Opponents use data that are a factor of thousand less extensive, yet apparently more credible. Creoles developed in adverse circumstances, and the flexibility of human genius led to new structural properties, apparently shared across the world. The opposite view, that creoles are continuations of their lexifiers, runs the risk of justifying colonialism, as if forced deportation, blackbirding, slavery, imperialism and colonialism could not have had catastrophic consequences for the continuation of languages. Devastating sociohistorical circumstances led to the creation of new societies, and human ingenuity created their fully-fledged natural languages.

© 2023 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.00119.bak
2023-08-17
2025-06-21

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.00119.bak
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aboh, Enoch
    2016 Creole distinctiveness: A dead end. Journal of Pidgin and Creole languages. –. 10.1075/jpcl.31.2.07abo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.31.2.07abo [Google Scholar]
  2. Aboh, Enoch O. & Ansaldo, Umberto
    2006 The role of typology in language creation: A descriptive take. InUmberto Ansaldo, Stephen Matthews & Lisa Lim (eds.), Deconstructing Creole (Typological Studies in Language 73), –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.73.05abo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.73.05abo [Google Scholar]
  3. Ansaldo, Umberto
    2017 Creole complexity in sociolinguistic perspective. Language Sciences. –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.10.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.10.008 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ansaldo, Umberto and Stephen Matthews
    2007 Deconstructing creole: The rationaleInUmberto Ansaldo, Stephen Matthews & Lisa Lim (eds.), Deconstructing Creole (Typological Studies in Language 73), –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.73.02ans
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.73.02ans [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, Philip
    1990 Off Target?Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages (). –. 10.1075/jpcl.5.1.07bak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.5.1.07bak [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakker, Peter
    2008 Pidgins versus Creoles and Pidgincreoles. In: Silvia Kouwenberg & John Singler (eds.), Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies, –. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 2014 Creolistics: Back to square one?Journal of Pidgin and Creole languages. –. 10.1075/jpcl.29.1.08bak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.29.1.08bak [Google Scholar]
  8. 2015 Creole languages have no… – but they do have…. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(). –. 10.1075/jpcl.30.1.07bak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.30.1.07bak [Google Scholar]
  9. Bakker, Peter, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen & Eeva Sippola
    (eds.) 2017 Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.211
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall & Ingo Plag
    2011 Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole languages. –. 10.1075/jpcl.26.1.02bak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.26.1.02bak [Google Scholar]
  11. Blasi, Damián, Susanne Michaelis & Martin Haspelmath
    2017 Grammars are robustly transmitted even during the emergence of creole languages. Nature Human Behaviour (Letters).–. 10.1038/s41562‑017‑0192‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0192-4 [Google Scholar]
  12. Clements, J. Clancy, Michael Frisby, Dylan Jarrett & Fernando Melero-García
    2018 Language Features Used in Typological Relatedness. Paper presented at theannual meeting of the Associação de Crioulos de Base Portuguesa e Espanhola. Université Assane Seck de Ziguinchor, Ziguinchor, Senegal, 11–14 June.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cysouw, Michael
    2009 APiCS, WALS, and the creole typological profile (if any). Paper presented at the1st APiCS conference, Leipzig, 5–8 November.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Daval-Markussen, Aymeric, Kristoffer Friis Bøegh and Peter Bakker
    2017 West African languages and creoles worldwide. In: Peter Bakker, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen and Eeva Sippola (eds.), Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, –. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. 10.1075/z.211.07dav
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211.07dav [Google Scholar]
  15. Daval-Markussen, Aymeric
    2014 First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia. International Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1080/03740463.2014.880606
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2014.880606 [Google Scholar]
  16. DeGraff, Michel
    2001a Morphology in creole genesis: Linguistics and ideology. InM. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, –. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 2001b On the origin of Creoles: A Cartesian critique of ‘neo’ Darwinian linguistics. Linguistic Typology(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 2003 Against Creole exceptionalism. Language. –. 10.1353/lan.2003.0114
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0114 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2005 Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of Creole Exceptionalism. Language in Society. –. 10.1017/S0047404505050207
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050207 [Google Scholar]
  20. DeGraff, Michel, Robert Berwick & Trevor Bass
    2013 Modern phylogenetics and Creole evolution: Creole family values.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldshtein, Yonatan
    2017 The simple emerging from the complex. Nominal number in Juba Arabic creole. In: Peter Bakker, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen and Eeva Sippola (eds.), Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, –. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. 10.1075/z.211.09gol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211.09gol [Google Scholar]
  22. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1976 Anti-languages. American anthropologist(). –. 10.1525/aa.1976.78.3.02a00050
     https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1976.78.3.02a00050 [Google Scholar]
  23. Holm, John & Peter Patrick
    2007 Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars. London: Battlebridge Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Igartua, Iván
    2019 Loss of grammatical gender and language contact. Diachronica(). –. 10.1075/dia.17004.iga
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.17004.iga [Google Scholar]
  25. Kouwenberg, Silvia
    2010a Creole studies and linguistic typology: Part 1. Journal of Pidgin and Creole languages. –. 10.1075/jpcl.25.1.07kou
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.25.1.07kou [Google Scholar]
  26. 2010b Creole studies and linguistic typology: Part 2. Journal of Pidgin and Creole languages. –. 10.1075/jpcl.25.2.06kou
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.25.2.06kou [Google Scholar]
  27. Levisen, Carsten & Kristoffer Friis Bøegh
    2017 Cognitive creolistics and semantic primes. A phylogenetic network analysis. In: Peter Bakker, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen and Eeva Sippola (eds.), Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, –. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. 10.1075/z.211.13lev
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211.13lev [Google Scholar]
  28. Meakins, Felicity
    2022 Empiricism or imperialism. The science of Creole Exceptionalism. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(). –. 10.1075/jpcl.00092.mea
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00092.mea [Google Scholar]
  29. Meakins, Felicity, Hua, Xia, Algy, Cassandra, & Bromham, Lindell
    2019 The birth of a new language does not favour simplification. Language, (), –. 10.1353/lan.2019.0032
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0032 [Google Scholar]
  30. Meisel, Jürgen M.
    1975 Ausländerdeutsch und Deutsch ausländischer Arbeiter. Zur möglichen Entstehung eines Pidgin in der BRD. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Mufwene, Salikoko
    2000 Creolization is a social, not a structural, process. InIngrid Neumann-Holzschuh & Edgar W. Schneider (eds.), Degrees of restructuring in creole languages, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.22.06muf
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.22.06muf [Google Scholar]
  32. 2001 The ecology of language evolutionCambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612862
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612862 [Google Scholar]
  33. Muysken, Pieter C.
    2015 Conclusion: Feature distribution in the West Africa-Surinam Trans-Atlantic Sprachbund. InPieter C. Muysken, Norval Smith & Robert D. Borges (eds.), Surviving the Middle Passage. The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110343977.393
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110343977.393 [Google Scholar]
  34. Parkvall, Mikael
    2008 The simplicity of creoles in cross-linguistic perspective. InMatti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki & Fred Karlsson (eds.), Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.94.17par
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94.17par [Google Scholar]
  35. Parkvall, Mikael, Peter Bakker & John H. McWhorter
    2018 Creoles and sociolinguistic complexity: Response to Ansaldo. Language Sciences. –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.10.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Perez, Danae M., Sandro Sessarego and Eeva Sippola
    2017 Afro-Hispanic varieties in comparison. New light from phylogeny. In: Peter Bakker, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen and Eeva Sippola (eds.), Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, –. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. 10.1075/z.211.12per
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211.12per [Google Scholar]
  37. Sippola, Eeva
    2017 Similarities and differences among Iberian creoles. In: Peter Bakker, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen and Eeva Sippola (eds.), Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches, –. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. 10.1075/z.211.11sip
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211.11sip [Google Scholar]
  38. Smith, Hiram
    2021 Do Creoles conform to typological patterns? Habitual marking in Palenquero. Language Variation and Change(). –. 10.1017/S0954394521000053
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394521000053 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sylvain, Suzanne
    1936 Le Créole haïtien. Morphologie et Syntaxe. Wetteren (Belgique): Imprimerie De Meester/ Port-Au-Prince (Haïti): Chez L’auteur. [reprint 1979: Genève: Slatkine].
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Bernd Kortmann
    2009 The morphosyntax of varieties of English worldwide: A quantitative perspective. Lingua. –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.016 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.00119.bak
Loading
Empiricism against imperialism
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00119.bak
/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.00119.bak
/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.00119.bak
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: development ; typology ; methodology ; grammar ; dogmatism ; neocolonialism ; creole languages ; empiricism

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error