1887
image of On the etymology and distribution of verb forms in Arabic-based pidgins
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, we add to the body of existing literature on Arabic-based pidgins. We focus on the verbal system because the structure of this phrasal category and how it is used in discourse remain inconclusive. For instance, while some claim these speakers prefer the imperfective form which is marked for male third person singular (e.g. ‘3-come.’), others claim it is the imperative that is most preferred (e.g. ‘2.-go.’). Equally, while some argue the choice between either verb forms is pragmatically motivated, others claim it is phonologically motivated. To add to this mix, a third group claims there is a systematic division of labor in that non-state verbs usually follow the prefixed type while the state verbs follow the unprefixed type.

We evaluate these proposals. Analysis of ‘frog story’ narratives by 10 GPA speakers in the United Arab Emirates reveal the prefixed form to be the most preferred and this preference is influenced by the contriving of phonological, semantic, and pragmatic factors. Frequency as well as item-based analogy as understood within usage-based theories of learning provide a viable framework in which the apparent inconsistencies between the competing proposals are resolved.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.00120.lou
2023-10-03
2025-04-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al Ageel, Hessah
    2016Requesting behaviour of Saudi Arabian women in contemporary Arabic-speaking situations. Melbourne: RMIT University Ph.D. thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al Bakrawi, Hussein
    2012 The linguistic effect of foreign Asian workers on the Arabic pidgin in Saudi Arabia. Research on Humanities and Social(). –. Scienceswww.iiste.org
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Al Moaily, Mohammad
    2012 Language variation in Gulf Pidgin Arabic. Ph.D. Thesis. The School of English Literature, Language and Linguistics at Newcastle University.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Al-Zubeiry, Hameed Yahya A.
    2014 Linguistic analysis of Saudi pidginized Arabic as produced by Asian foreign expatriates. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Avram, Andrei A.
    2014 Immigrant workers and language formation: Gulf Pidgin Arabic. Lengua y Migración(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakir, Murtadha J.
    2010 Notes on the verbal system of Gulf Pidgin Arabic. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(): –. 10.1075/jpcl.25.2.01bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.25.2.01bak [Google Scholar]
  7. 2014 The multifuntionality of fii in Gulf Pidgin Arabic. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(). –. 10.1075/jpcl.29.2.08bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.29.2.08bak [Google Scholar]
  8. Berman, Ruth. A. & Dan Isaac Slobin
    (eds.) 1994Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Binnick, R. I.
    1991Time and the verb: A guide to tense and aspect. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bizri, F.
    (2005) Unity and diversity across Asian migrant Arabic pidgins in the Middle East. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(), –. 10.1075/jpcl.29.2.07biz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.29.2.07biz [Google Scholar]
  11. Bizri, Fida
    2014 Unity and diversity across Asian migrant Arabic pidgins in the Middle East. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(). –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. r10.1075/jpcl.29.2.07biz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.29.2.07biz [Google Scholar]
  12. 2009 Sinhala in contact with Arabic: The birth of a new pidgin in the Middle East. InRajendra Singh (ed.), Annual Review of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110225600.133
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110225600.133 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bybee, Joan. L.
    2013 Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. InThomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bybee, Joan L.
    2010 Analogy and similarity. InJoan L. Bybee (ed.), Language, usage and cognition, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526.004 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dashti, Abdulmohsen A.
    2013 “Interacting with Domestic Workers in Kuwait: Grammatical Features of Foreigner Talk. A Case Study”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gomaa, Yasser A.
    2007 Arabic pidginization: The case of pidgin in Saudi Arabia. Journal of the Faculty of Arts, Assiut University, Egypt, . –.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gumperz, John J. & Stephen C. Levinson
    1991Rethinking linguistic relativity. Current Anthropology. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Holm, John
    2004An introduction to pidgins and creoles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnstone, T. M.
    (1967) Eastern Arabian dialect studies. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Langacker, Ronald. W.
    1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Louhichi, I.
    (2019) Can advanced L2 speakers of English ‘unlearn’ their L1 thinking-for-speaking habits?International Journal of Language and Linguistics(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Louhichi, Imed
    2018 The description of motion events in Tunisian Arabic: A thinking-for-speaking approach. Sino-US English Teaching(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Luffin, Xavier
    2005Un créole arabe: le Kinubi de Mombasa, Kenya. München: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mayer, Mercer
    1969Frog, where are you?New York: Dial Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Michaelis, Laura A.
    2011 Stative by construction. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling.2011.038
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.038 [Google Scholar]
  26. Næss, Unn Gyda
    2008‘Gulf pidgin Arabic’: Individual strategies or a structured variety?Oslo: University of Oslo, MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sergej Je. Jaxontov
    1988 The typology of resultative constructions. InVladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions, –. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tsl.12.06ned
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.12.06ned [Google Scholar]
  28. Owens, Jonathan
    1985 The origins of East African Nubi. Anthropological Linguistics(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Reilly, Judy, Molly Losh, Ursula Bellugi, & Beverly Wulfeck
    2004 ““Frog, where are you?” narratives in children with specific language impairment, early focal brain injury and Williams Syndrome.” Brain and Language. –. 10.1016/S0093‑934X(03)00101‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00101-9 [Google Scholar]
  30. Roberts, Sarah J. & Joan Bresnan
    2008 Retained inflectional morphology in pidgins: A typological study. Linguistic Typology. –. 10.1515/LITY.2008.039
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LITY.2008.039 [Google Scholar]
  31. Romaine, Suzanne
    1988Pidgin and creole languages. London; New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Salem, M.
    (2013) Linguistic features of pidgin Arabic in Kuwaiti. English Language Teaching (). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Smart, John. R.
    1990 Pidginization in Gulf Arabic: A first report. Anthropological Linguistics. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Siegel, Jeff
    2004 Morphological elaboration. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(). –. 10.1075/jpcl.19.2.05sie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.19.2.05sie [Google Scholar]
  35. Slobin, Dan I.
    2004 The many ways to search for a frog. InSven Strömqvist and Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative, vol. 2: Typological and contextual perspectives, –. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Strömqvist, Sven & Ludo Verhoeven
    2004 Typological and contextual perspectives on narrative development. InSven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, –. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410609694
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609694 [Google Scholar]
  37. Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B.
    (2002) Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Vendler, Zeno
    1957 Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, (), –. 10.2307/2182371
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371 [Google Scholar]
  39. Versteegh, Kees
    2014a Pidgin verbs: Infinitives or imperatives?InIsabelle Buchstaller, Anders Holmberg & Mohammad Almoaily (eds.), Pidgins and creoles beyond Africa-Europe encounters, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/cll.47.07ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.47.07ver [Google Scholar]
  40. 2014b Speaking of the Past: The development of past time reference in Arabic pidgins. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(). –. 10.1075/jpcl.29.2.02ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.29.2.02ver [Google Scholar]
  41. Wiswall, A.
    2002Gulf Pidgin: An expanded analysis. On-line paper for the University of Ohio, Linguistic Department. oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~aw321500/
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.00120.lou
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.00120.lou
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: frequency ; Gulf ; verbs ; frog story ; exemplar ; discourse ; Pidgin Arabic
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error