‘It runs in the family’

References

1. Abdurachman, Paramita R.
   2008 Bunga angin portugis di Nusantara: Jejak-jejak kebudayaan portugis di Indonesia. Jakarta: LIPI Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allen, Nicholas Justin
   1989 The evolution of kinship terminologies. Lingua. –. 10.1016/0024‑3841(89)90014‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(89)90014-4 [Google Scholar]
3. Alpher, Barry
   2013 Desertification of an Arandic dialect. InP. McConvell, I. Keen & R. Hendery (eds.), Kinship systems: Change and reconstruction, –. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alves, Herculano
   2006 A Bíblia de João Ferreira Annes d’Almeida. Revista Lusófona de Ciência das Religiões(). –.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ananta, Aris, Evi Nurvidya Arifin, M. Sairi Hasbullah, Nur Budi Handayani, & Agus Pramono
   2015 Demography of Indonesia’s ethnicity. Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. 10.1355/9789814519885
   https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814519885 [Google Scholar]
6. Avram, Andrei A.
   2013 The Dutch lexical contribution to three Asian Portuguese creoles. Papia: Revista Brasileira de Estudos do Contato Linguístico(). –.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bakker, Dik, André Müller, Viveka Velupillai, Søren Wichmann, Cecil H. Brown, Pamela Brown, Dmitry Egorov, Robert Mailhammer, Anthony Grant, & Eric W. Holman
   (2009) Adding typology to lexicostatistics: A combined approach to language classification. Linguistic Typology(). –.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Baldi, Philip
   1990 Introduction: The comparative method. InP. Baldi (ed.), Linguistic change and reconstruction methodology, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110886092.1
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886092.1 [Google Scholar]
9. Banks, David J.
   1974 Malay kinship terms and Morgan’s Malayan terminology: The complexity of simplicity. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde(). –. 10.1163/22134379‑90002706
   https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90002706 [Google Scholar]
10. Baxter, Alan N.
    2018 Malacca Portuguese in the 19th century: Evidence of a wider lectal range?Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(). –. 10.1075/jpcl.00016.bax
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00016.bax [Google Scholar]
11. Baxter, Alan N. & Patrick de Silva
    2004 A dictionary of Kristang. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Baxter, Alan N., & Hugo C. Cardoso
    2022 The ‘Panton Portugees’ of the Lisbon manuscript. InIvo Castro, Hugo C. Cardoso, Alan Baxter, Alexander Adelaar, & Gijs Koster (eds.), Livro de Pantuns: um Manuscrito Asiático do Museo Nacional de Arqueologia, Lisboa/Book of Pantuns: an Asian Manuscript of the National Museum of Archeology (pp. 115–129). Lisbon: Imprensa Nacional.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Benítez-Torres, Carlos M., & Anthony P. Grant
    2017 On the origin of some Northern Songhay mixed languages. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(). –. 10.1075/jpcl.32.2.03ben
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.32.2.03ben [Google Scholar]
14. Bergsland, Knut, & Hans Vogt
    1962 On the validity of glottochronology. Current Anthropology(). –. 10.1086/200264
    https://doi.org/10.1086/200264 [Google Scholar]
15. Borges, Robert
    2013 Linguistic archaeology, kinship terms, and language contact in Suriname. Anthropological Linguistics(). –. 10.1353/anl.2013.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2013.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. Byrne, John
    2011 The Luso-Asians and other Eurasians: Their domestic and diasporic identities. InLaura Jarnagin (ed.), Portuguese and Luso-Asian legacies in Southeast Asia, 1511–2011: The making of the Luso-Asian world, intricacies of engagement, –. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cardoso, Hugo C., Alan N. Baxter, & Mário Pinharanda Nunes
    (eds.) 2012 Ibero-Asian Creoles: Comparative perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.46
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.46 [Google Scholar]
18. Castles, Lance
    1967 The ethnic profile of Djakarta. Indonesia. –. 10.2307/3350726
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3350726 [Google Scholar]
19. Chaer, Abdul
    2012 Folklor Betawi: Kebudayaan dan kehidupan Orang Betawi. Depok: Masup Jakarta.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Choudhury, Manilata
    2014 The Mardijkers of Batavia: Construction of a colonial identity (1619–1650). Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. –.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Dalgado, Sebastião Rodolfo
    1919–1921 Glossário luso-asiático. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Daus, Ronald
    1989 Portuguese Eurasian communities in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
23. De Sousa, Silvio Moreira, & Tan Raan Hann
    (2022) ‘My brother from another mother’: Mapping the kinship terminology of Malacca Creole Portuguese. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(). –. 10.1075/jpcl.21008.sou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.21008.sou [Google Scholar]
24. Dousset, Laurent
    2012 Understanding human relations (kinship systems). InNicholas Thieberger (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic fieldwork, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Dyen, Isidore
    1956 The Ngaju-Dayak ‘Old Speech Stratum.’ Language. –. 10.2307/410657
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410657 [Google Scholar]
26. Embleton, Sheila M.
    1985 Lexicostatistics applied to the Germanic, Romance, and Wakashan families. Word(). –. 10.1080/00437956.1985.11435862
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1985.11435862 [Google Scholar]
27. Estaji, Azam
    2015–2016 A diachronic study of kinship terms in Persian. Journal of Linguistics and Khorasan Dialects Biannual(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Ganap, Victor
    2011 Kroncong Toegoe. Yogyakarta: Badan Penelitian ISI Yogyakarta.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gilroy, Paul
    2000 Between camps: Nations, cultures and the allure of race. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Grant, Anthony P.
    2015 Lexical borrowing. InJ. R. Taylor (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1957 Essays in linguistics [Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, No. 24]. New York, NY: Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1978 Diachrony, synchrony and language universals. InJ. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson & E. A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language, Volume 1: Word structure, –. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Grijns, Cornelis Dirk
    1980 Some notes on Jakarta Malay kinship terms: The predictability of complexity. Archipel. –. 10.3406/arch.1980.1599
    https://doi.org/10.3406/arch.1980.1599 [Google Scholar]
34. Grijns, Cornelis Dirk
    1991 Jakarta Malay: A multidimensional approach to spatial variation. Leiden: Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde Press. 10.1163/9789004490932
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004490932 [Google Scholar]
35. Grimes, Barbara Dix
    1991 The development and use of Ambonese Malay. InHein Steinhauer (ed.), Papers in Austronesian linguistics, –. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Groeneboer, Kees
    1993 Weg tot het Westen. Leiden: Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde Uitgeverij.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hancock, Ian F.
    1975 Malacca Creole Portuguese: Asian, African or European?Anthropological Linguistics(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Haspelmath, Martin
    2009 Lexical borrowing: Concepts and issues. InMartin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110218442.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218442.35 [Google Scholar]
39. Heine, Bernd, & Tania Kuteva
    2008 Constraints on contact-induced linguistic change. Journal of Language Contact(). –. 10.1163/000000008792525363
    https://doi.org/10.1163/000000008792525363 [Google Scholar]
40. Heuken, Adolf
    1997 Tempat-tempat Bersejarah di Jakarta. Jakarta: Cipta Loka Caraka.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Hock, Hans Heinrich, & Brian D. Joseph
    1996 Language history, language change, and language relationship. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Hoenigswald, Henry M.
    1990 Is the “comparative” method general or family-specific?. InP. Baldi (ed.), Linguistic change and reconstruction methodology, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110886092.375
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886092.375 [Google Scholar]
43. Holm, John A.
    1989 Pidgins and creoles, vol. 2: Reference survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Hornborg, Alf
    2013 Kin terminologies as linguistic imprints of regional processes: The socioecological contexts of close versus distant marriage patterns in indigenous Amazonia. InP. McConvell, I. Keen & R. Hendery (ed), Kinship systems: Change and reconstruction, –. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Huet, Gédéon
    1909 La communauté portugaise de Batavia. Revista Lusitana(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Hymes, Dell Hathaway
    1960 Lexicostatistics so far. Current Anthropology(). –. 10.1086/200074
    https://doi.org/10.1086/200074 [Google Scholar]
47. Jamieson, Mark
    1998 Linguistic innovation and relationship terminology in the Pearl Lagoon Basin of Nicaragua. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute(). –. 10.2307/3034829
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3034829 [Google Scholar]
48. Jourdan, C.
    2001 Creolization: Sociocultural aspects. inNeil J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 2903-.2906). Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑043076‑7/00835‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/00835-4 [Google Scholar]
49. Kadir, Hatib Abdul
    2017 Gifts, belonging, and emerging realities among “other Molucans” during the aftermath of sectarian conflict. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California, Santa Cruz dissertation.
50. Kluge, Angela
    2017 A grammar of Papuan Malay. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Knörr, Jacqueline
    2014 Creole identity in postcolonial Indonesia. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Labov, William
    2001 Principles of linguistic change. Volume 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Lansing, J. Stephen, Cheryl Abundo, Guy S. Jacobs, Elsa G. Guillot, Stefan Thurner, Sean S. Downey, Lock Yue Chew, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Ning Ning Chung, Herawati Sudoyo, & Murray P. Cox
    2017 Kinship structures create persistent channels for language transmission. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(). –. 10.1073/pnas.1706416114
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706416114 [Google Scholar]
54. Lass, Roger
    1980 On explaining language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Le Page, Robert B.
    1986 Acts of identity. English Today. –. 10.1017/S0266078400002418
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400002418 [Google Scholar]
56. Le Page, Robert B. & Andrée Tabouret-Keller
    1985 Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Leaf, Murray J., & Dwight W. Read
    2020 Introduction to the science of kinship. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Lebel, Alexandre
    2021 Grammar of Macao Creole Portuguese with Typological and Semiotic Considerations. Macau: University of Saint Joseph dissertation.
59. Litamahuputty, Betty
    2012 Ternate Malay: Grammar and texts. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Lopes, David de Melo
    1936 A expansão da língua portuguesa no Oriente durante os séculos XVI, XVII e XVIII. Barcelos: Portucalense Editora.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Lyon, Stephen, Mark A. Jamieson, & Michael D. Fischer
    2015 Persistent cultures: Miskitu kinship terminological fluidity. Structure and Dynamics(). –. 10.5070/SD981027342
    https://doi.org/10.5070/SD981027342 [Google Scholar]
62. Manusama-Moniaga, Frieda
    1995 Ikatan Keluarga Besar Tugu: Sekelumit sejarah tengan Gereja Tugu, Keroncong Tugu, Orang-orang Tugu dan suplemen buku silsilah ‘Abad ke-17 s/d abad ke-20’. Jakarta: ms.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Malekandathil, Pius
    2001 The Portuguese casados and the Intra-Asian trade: 1500–1663. InThe Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, Part One: Millennium 2000–2001, –. Kolkata: Indian History Congress.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Matras, Yaron
    2009 Language Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511809873
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809873 [Google Scholar]
65. Maurer, Philippe
    2011 The former Portuguese creole of Batavia and Tugu (Indonesia). London: Battlebridge.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Mbeki, Linda, & Matthias van Rossum
    2017 Private slave trade in the Dutch Indian Ocean world: A study into the networks and backgrounds of the slavers and the enslaved in South Asia and South Africa. Slavery & Abolition – A Journal of Slave and Post-Slave Studies(). –. 10.1080/0144039X.2016.1159004
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0144039X.2016.1159004 [Google Scholar]
67. McConvell, Patrick
    2013 Introduction – Kinship change in Anthropology and Linguistics. InP. McConvell, I. Keen & R. Hendery (ed), Kinship systems: Change and reconstruction, –. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
    [Google Scholar]
68. McGilvray, Dennis. B.
    1982 Dutch Burghers and Portuguese mechanics: Eurasian ethnicity in Sri Lanka. Comparative Studies in Society and History(). –. 10.1017/S0010417500009919
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500009919 [Google Scholar]
69. Meillet, Antoine
    1925 La méthode comparative en linguistique historique. Oslo: H. Aschehoug & Co.; Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz; Paris: Honoré Champion; London: Williams & Norgate; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Milroy, James
    2006 Language change and the speaker: On the discourse of historical linguistics. InT. D. Cravens (ed), Variation and Reconstruction, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.268.08mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.268.08mil [Google Scholar]
71. Morgan, Lewis Henry
    1871 Systems of consanguinity and affinity of the Human family. Washington: Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Nash, Catherine
    2002 Genealogical identities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. –. 10.1068/d314
    https://doi.org/10.1068/d314 [Google Scholar]
73. Ngo, Jenny
    2017 An exploration of kinship terms of Hokkien Chinese-Indonesians in Surabaya. InSelected Proceedings of the International Conference: Doing Research in Applied Linguistics 3 / 19th English in South-East Asia Conference, –. Bangkok: King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Niemeijer, Hendrik E.
    2012 Batavia: Masyarakat Kolonial Abad XVII. Depok: MASUP Jakarta.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Niepokuj, Mary K.
    2006 Variation and reconstruction – Introduction. InT. D. Cravens (ed), Variation and Reconstruction, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.268.01nie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.268.01nie [Google Scholar]
76. Oetomo, Dédé
    1989 The ethnic Chinese in Indonesia. InLeo Suryadinata (ed.), The Ethnic Chinese in the ASEAN states: Bibliographical essays, –. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Passmore, Sam, & Fiona M. Jordan
    2020 No universals in the cultural evolution of kinship terminology. Evolutionary Human Sciences(). –. 10.1017/ehs.2020.41
    https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2020.41 [Google Scholar]
78. Raben, Remco
    2020 Colonial shorthand and historical knowledge: Segregation and localisation in a Dutch colonial society. Journal of Modern European History(). –. 10.1177/1611894420910903
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1611894420910903 [Google Scholar]
79. Read, Dwight W.
    2013 Reconstructing the Proto-Polynesian Terminology: Kinship Terminologies as Evolving Logical Structures. InP. McConvell, I. Keen & R. Hendery (ed), Kinship systems: Change and reconstruction, –. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Ritsema, Alex
    2006 A Dutch castaway on Ascension Island in 1725. Deventer: Alex Ritsema.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Roberge, Paul T.
    2006 On reconstructing a linguistic continuum in Cape Dutch (1710–1840). InT. D. Cravens (ed), Variation and Reconstruction, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.268.10rob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.268.10rob [Google Scholar]
82. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1889 Beiträge zur Kenntnis des kreolischen Romanisch V. Allgemeineres über das Indoportugiesische (Asioportugiesische). Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie. –. 10.1515/zrph.1889.13.1‑4.463
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zrph.1889.13.1-4.463 [Google Scholar]
83. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1890 Kreolischen Studien IX: Ueber das Malaioportugiesische von Batavia und Tugu. Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Classe der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. –.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1891 H. Schuchardt, Kreolischen Studien IX: Ueber das Malaioportugiesische von Batavia und Tugu [Review]. Literaturblatt fuer germanische und romanische Philologie. –.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Shahab, Yasmine Zaki
    1994 The creation of ethnic tradition: The Betawi of Jakarta. London: University of London dissertation.
86. Simpson, Jane
    2013 Warumungu kinship over time. InP. McConvell, I. Keen & R. Hendery (ed), Kinship systems: Change and reconstruction, –. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Smith, Raymond T.
    1963 Culture and social structure in the Caribbean: Some recent work on family and kinship studies. Comparative Studies in Society and History(). –. 10.1017/S0010417500001961
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500001961 [Google Scholar]
88. Stewart, Charles
    2007 Creolization: History, ethnography, theory. InCharles Stewart (ed.), Creolization: History, ethnography, theory (pp. 1–25). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Strathern, Marilyn
    1992 After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Strathern, Marilyn
    2005 Kinship, law and the unexpected – Relatives are always a surprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614514
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614514 [Google Scholar]
91. Suratminto, Lilie
    2011 Creole Portuguese of the Tugu village: Colonial heritage in Jakarta based on the historical and linguistic review. Tawarikh International Journal for Historical Studies(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Suratminto, Lilie, Benny Hoedoro Hoed, F. X. Rahyono, Triaswarin Sutananihesti, Agni Malagina, Arif Budiman, Budi Eko Pranoto, Febri Taufiqurrahman, & Venansia Ajeng S. A. Pedo
    2016 Kepunahan bahasa: Bahasa kreol Tugu yang Punah dalam pemertahanan budaya Tugu. Depok: Laboratorium Leksikologi dan Leksikografi/Universitas Indonesia.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Suryadinata, Leo
    1984 Dilema minoritas Tionghoa. Jakarta: Grafiti Pers.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Swellengrebel, Jan Lodewijk
    1972 A Portuguese Bible translator in Java. The Bible Translator(). –. 10.1177/026009357202300105
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026009357202300105 [Google Scholar]
95. Tabouret-Keller, Andrée
    1997 Language and identity. InFlorian Coulmas (ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics, –. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Tan, Raan Hann
    2016 Por-Tugu-Ese? The protestant Tugu community of Jakarta, Indonesia. Lisboa: Instituto Superior de Ciências do Trabalho e da Empresa – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa dissertation.
97. Tan, Raan Hann
    2019 Masyarakat Perkampungan Portugis di Jakarta: Persanakan, Petempatan dan Penamaan. Akademika(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
98. Taylor, Jean Gelman
    1983 [2009] The social world of Batavia: European and Eurasian in Dutch Asia. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
99. Thomason, Sarah G., & Terrence Kaufman
    1988 Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520912793
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520912793 [Google Scholar]
100. Thomason, Sarah G.
     2001 Language contact – An introduction. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Thomason, Sarah G.
     2008 Social and linguistic factors as predictors of contact-induced change. Journal of Language Contact(). –. 10.1163/000000008792525381
     https://doi.org/10.1163/000000008792525381 [Google Scholar]
102. Thurgood, Graham
     2006 Variation as a reflection of contact: Notes from Southeast Asia. InT. D. Cravens (ed), Variation and Reconstruction, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.268.12thu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.268.12thu [Google Scholar]
103. Tomás, Maria Isabel
     2009 The role of women in the cross-pollination process in the Asian-Portuguese varieties. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics(). –. 10.5334/jpl.118
     https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.118 [Google Scholar]
104. Trautmann, Thomas R.
     1981 Dravidian kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
105. Van Heuven, Vincent J., Roosman, Lilie, & Van Zanten, Ellen
     2008 Betawi Malay word prosody. Lingua, , –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.005 [Google Scholar]
106. Van Kessel, Ineke
     2009 ‘Courageous but insolent’: African soldiers in the Dutch East as seen by Dutch officials and Indonesian neighbours. Transforming Cultures eJournal(). –. 10.5130/tfc.v4i2.1387
     https://doi.org/10.5130/tfc.v4i2.1387 [Google Scholar]
107. Van Welie, Rik
     2008 Slave trading and slavery in the Dutch colonial empire: A global comparison. New West Indian Guide(). –. 10.1163/13822373‑90002465
     https://doi.org/10.1163/13822373-90002465 [Google Scholar]
108. Wade, Peter
     2005 Hybridity theory and kinship thinking. Cultural Studies(). –. 10.1080/09502380500365507
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380500365507 [Google Scholar]
109. Whitney, William Dwight
     1867 Language and the study of language. London: N. Trübner & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
110. Wilson, Robert A.
     2016 Kinship past, kinship present: Bio-essentialism in the study of kinship. American Anthropologist(). –. 10.1111/aman.12607
     https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12607 [Google Scholar]
111. Zomerdijk, Adriaan
     1780 Nieuwe woordenschat, uyt het Nederduitsch in het gemeene Maleidsch en Portugeesch, zeer gemakkelyk voor die eerst op Batavia komen. Batavia: Lodewyk Dominicus.
     [Google Scholar]