1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Is variation a sign of decreolization?
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The sociolinguistic situation in Guyana is one in which Creolese has intensive contact with its lexifier language, English, creating a continuum of varieties in which the acrolect varieties behave much like Standard English (Rickford 1987a). The creole continuum has been associated with decreolization following the pidgin-creole lifecycle (Hall 1962). Decreolization is the theory of contact induced change wherein a creole becomes more similar to its lexifier language over time (Bickerton 1980). Many researchers (e.g. Mayeux 2019, Patrick 1999b) call into question the existence of decreolization as separate from regular language change. This study will add evidence to these critiques and challenge the association of the creole continuum with decreolization and thus language change. Using a meta-analysis of the habitual marker and singular pronouns in Guyanese Creolese over a nearly twenty-year period, this paper will investigate whether the linguistic variation observed on the creole continuum shows evidence of loss of creole variants. The findings of this paper help to support earlier critiques of decreolization, and arguments against its usefulness in describing diachronic change observed in creole languages.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.23008.kai
2024-11-21
2024-12-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.23008.kai
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aceto, Michael
    1999 Looking Beyond Decreolization as an Explanatory Model of Language Change in Creole-Speaking Communities. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages. –. 10.1075/jpcl.14.1.04ace
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.14.1.04ace [Google Scholar]
  2. Alleyne, Mervyn C.
    1980 Comparative Afro-American: An historical comparative study of English-based Afro-American dialects of the New World. Karoma Publishers
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall & Ingo Plag
    2011 Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages. –. 10.1075/jpcl.26.1.02bak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.26.1.02bak [Google Scholar]
  4. Bailly, Maxime
    2012 An Overview of Scotland’s Linguistic Situation. Grenoble, France: Université Stendhal thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bickerton, Derek
    1996 Origins of Variation in Guyanese. Towards a Social Science of Language: Papers in Honor of William Labov, Volume. –. 10.1075/cilt.127.20bic
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.127.20bic [Google Scholar]
  6. 1980 “Decreolization and the creole continuum.” InValdman, Albert and Arnold Highfield, (eds.), Theoretical Orientations in Creole Studies, –. New York: Academic Press
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 1975 Dynamics of a creole continuum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 1973 The nature of a creole continuum. Language(). –. 10.2307/412355
     https://doi.org/10.2307/412355 [Google Scholar]
  9. Carlin, Eithne. B.
    2006 Guyana: Language Situation. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (Second Edition) . 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/01861‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01861-7 [Google Scholar]
  10. DeCamp, David
    1971 Towards a generative analysis of a post-creole speech continuum. InDell Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages, –. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Deibel, Isabel
    2020 The contribution of grammar and lexicon to language switching costs: Examining contact-induced languages and their implications for theories of language representation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition(). –. 10.1017/S1366728919000865
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000865 [Google Scholar]
  12. DeGraff, Michel
    2005 Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of Creole Exceptionalism. Language in Society(). –. 10.1017/S0047404505050207
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050207 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2003 Against Creole Exceptionalism. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2003.0114
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0114 [Google Scholar]
  14. Devonish, Hubert
    1988 Language Variation Theory in the Light of Co-Occurrence Restriction Rules. In: York Papers in Linguistics 13. Selected Papers from the Sociolinguistics Symposium. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 2007 Language & liberation: Creole language politics in the Caribbean (2nd ed.). Kingston, Jamaica: Arawak.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Devonish, Hubert, & Thompson, Dahlia
    2013 Guyanese Creolese. InB. Kortmann & K. Lunkenheimer (eds.), The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English, –. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110280128.265
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110280128.265 [Google Scholar]
  17. Edwards, W. F.
    (1990) Morphosyntactic Acculturation at the Rural/Urban Interface in Guyana. American Speech(). –. 10.2307/455531
     https://doi.org/10.2307/455531 [Google Scholar]
  18. Escure, Geneviève
    1997 Creole and dialect continua. Creole Language Library, . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ferguson, Charles
    1959 Diglossia. WORD:. –. 10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gibson, Kean
    1983 Inherent variation or language change? A study of two verbs in Guyanese Creole. Lingua(). –. 10.1016/0024‑3841(83)90053‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(83)90053-0 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hall, Robert. A.
    1962 The life cycle of pidgin languages. Lingua. –. 10.1016/0024‑3841(62)90021‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(62)90021-9 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hinrichs, Lars & Farquharson, Joseph
    (eds.) 2011 Variation in the Caribbean: From Creole Continua to Individual Agency. Amsterdam/ Philadephia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.37
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.37 [Google Scholar]
  23. Irvine, Allison
    2004 A good command of the English language: Phonological variation in the Jamaican acrolect. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(). –. 10.1075/jpcl.19.1.03irv
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.19.1.03irv [Google Scholar]
  24. Knooihuizen, Remco, & Strik, Oscar
    2014 Relative productivity potentials of Dutch verbal inflection patterns. Folia Linguistica (). –. 10.1515/flih.2014.005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.2014.005 [Google Scholar]
  25. Labov, William
    2001 Principles of linguistic change. Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Léglise, Isabelle, & Chamoreau, Claudine
    2013 Variation and change in contact settings. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00800099. 10.1075/silv.12
     https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.12 [Google Scholar]
  27. LePage, Robert
    1977 Processes of Pidginization and Creolization”, In: Valdman, Albert (ed.), Pidgin and creole linguistics, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lipski, John M.
    2011 Decreolization as emergent grammar(s): Some Afro Bolivian data. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(). –. 10.1075/jpcl.26.2.03lip
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.26.2.03lip [Google Scholar]
  29. Matera, Michael, Sandin, Linnea, & Alvarez, Maripaz
    2020 An Assessment of the State of the Guyanese Diaspora (The Guyanese Diaspora, pp. 3–16). Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). –. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26538.4
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Mayeux, Oliver
    2019 Rethinking decreolization: Language contact and change in Louisiana Creole. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge dissertation. 10.17863/CAM.41629
     https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.41629
  31. McWhorter, John
    1998 Identifying the creole prototype: vindicating a typological class. Language.–. 10.2307/417003
     https://doi.org/10.2307/417003 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2018 The Creole Debate. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108553308
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553308 [Google Scholar]
  33. Meakins, Felicity
    2022 Empiricism or imperialism: The science of Creole Exceptionalism. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, (), –. 10.1075/jpcl.00092.mea
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00092.mea [Google Scholar]
  34. Migge, Bettina & Léglise, Isabelle
    2013 Exploring language in a multilingual context: variation, interaction and ideology in language documentation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 2011 On the emergence of new language varieties: The case of the Eastern Maroon Creole in French Guiana”, InHinrichs, L. & Farquharson, J. (eds), Variation in the Caribbean: From Creole Continua to Individual Agency, –. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.37.13mig
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.37.13mig [Google Scholar]
  36. Mufwene, Salikoko
    2001 The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612862
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612862 [Google Scholar]
  37. Patrick, Peter
    1999a Testing the Creole Continuum. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics (). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 1999b Urban Jamaican Creole: Variation in the Mesolect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g17
     https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g17 [Google Scholar]
  39. Rickford, John R.
    1979 Variation in a Creole Continuum: Quantitative and Implicational Approaches. Pennsylvania, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Rickford, John R.
    1991 Sociolinguistic variation in Cane Walk: A quantitative case study. InJ. Cheshire (ed.), English around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, –. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611889.041
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611889.041 [Google Scholar]
  41. 1987a Dimensions of a Creole Continuum. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 1987b Decreolization Paths for Guyanese Singular Pronouns. InGlenn G. Gilbert (ed.) Pidgin and Creole Languages, Essays in Memory of John E. Reinecke, –. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 1986 What happens in decreolization. InR. Andersen, (ed.) Pidginization and decreolization as language acquisition, –. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 1975 How does “doz” disappear? (Or: Where are the creolists when the creoles most need them?). Proceedings of the 1975 International Conference on Pidgins and Creoles, U. of Hawaii
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Russell, Eric
    2015 Competences in contact: Phonology and lexifier targeted change. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(). –. 10.1075/jpcl.30.1.04rus
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.30.1.04rus [Google Scholar]
  46. Satyanath, Shobha
    1991 Variation and change: (Daz) in GuyanesePennsylvania, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
  47. Siegel, Jeff
    2010 Decreolization: A Critical Review. Bloomington, IN: IULC Publications. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Sidnell, Jack
    2002 Habitual and imperfective in Guyanese Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages(). –. 10.1075/jpcl.17.2.02sid
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.17.2.02sid [Google Scholar]
  49. 1999 Gender and Pronominal Variation in an Indo-Guyanese Speaking Community. Language in SocietyVol. No.. –. 10.1017/S0047404599003036
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599003036 [Google Scholar]
  50. Sippola, Eeva
    2018 3. Collecting and analysing creole data. InW. Ayres-Bennett & J. Carruthers (eds.), Manual of Romance Sociolinguistics, –. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110365955‑004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110365955-004 [Google Scholar]
  51. Seymour, Chanti
    2017 Yesterday, today and tomorrow: Bahamian Creole English. InC. Cutler, Z. Vrzić, & P. Angermeyer (eds.), Language Contact in Africa and the African Diaspora in the Americas: In honor of John V. Singler, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.53.06sey
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.53.06sey [Google Scholar]
  52. Thomason, Sarah Grey. & Kaufman, Terrence
    1988 Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520912793
     https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520912793 [Google Scholar]
  53. Tsiplakou, Stavroula, Armostis, Spiros, & Evripidou, Dimitris
    2016 Coherence ‘in the mix’? Coherence in the face of language shift in Cypriot Greek. Lingua. –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.10.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.10.014 [Google Scholar]
  54. Winford, Donald
    1997 Re-examining Caribbean English Creole continua. World Englishes. –. 10.1111/1467‑971X.00061
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00061 [Google Scholar]
  55. Yakpo, Kofi
    2021 Two types of language contact involving English Creoles: Why Krio (Sierra Leone) has evolved more towards English than its relative Pichi (Equatorial Guinea) towards Spanish. English Today, –.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.23008.kai
Loading
Is variation a sign of decreolization?
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.23008.kai
/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.23008.kai
/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.23008.kai
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: creole continuum ; diachronic change ; creole languages ; decreolization

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error