1887
image of Eski fitir-la touzour insertin? Is the future still uncertain?

Abstract

Abstract

Most research regarding Mauritian Creole future marking was carried out in the 1990s and assumed differences in ‘certainty’ dictated the choice of future marker (Baker 1993; Hazaël-Massieux 1993; Touchard & Véronique 1993). The consensus was that the two main markers, and , were used for ‘definite’ and ‘indefinite’ future events respectively. However, this distinction was inadequately defined, and although intuitively solid, it could not account for many naturally occurring instances. Davidson (2021) quantified a range of features relevant for future expression and a new obligation meaning of was mentioned by some speakers. In this paper, we explore in more detail the opposition, considering contexts with different nuances of obligation/necessity and their compatibility with . Overall, is more acceptable in contexts which can be interpreted as obligation/necessity and it is now not only restricted to indefinite or ‘less certain’ contexts.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.24031.dav
2025-06-02
2025-06-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jpcl.24031.dav/jpcl.24031.dav.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.24031.dav&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baker, Philip
    1972Kreol: A Description of Mauritian Creole. London: C. Hurst & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 1993 Contribution à l’histoire du futur en créole mauricien. Etudes Créoles(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Philip & Guillaume Fon Sing
    2007The making of Mauritian Creole: analyses diachroniques à partir des textes anciens. London: Battlebridge Publications. concordancemmc.free.fr/Textes%20anciens.htm (26 July, 2020).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Battistella, Edwin L.
    1990Markedness: the evaluative superstructure of language. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, & William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, Eve V.
    1987 The Principle of Contrast: A Constraint on Language Acquisition. InBrian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition, –. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1993The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554377
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554377 [Google Scholar]
  8. Corbett, Greville G.
    2007 Canonical Typology, Suppletion, and Possible Words, Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2007.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0006 [Google Scholar]
  9. Croft, William
    1990Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Davidson, Hannah
    2021 The development of tense, mood and aspect markers in Mauritian Creole. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2022 The evolution of the (in)definite future markers POU and VA ni 20th century Mauritian Creole. Etudes Creoles(). Available at : https://journals.openedition.org/etudescreoles/831 (accessed06/05/25).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Devos, Maud & Jenneke van der Wal
    (eds.) 2014COME and GO off the beaten grammaticalization path. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110335989
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335989 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gabelentz, Georg von der
    [1891] 1901Die Sprachwissenshaft: Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse, Second Edition. Leipzig: Weigel (reprintTübingen: Narr 1972).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gelderen, Elly van
    (ed.) 2009Cyclical Change (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 146). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.146
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.146 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2016Cyclical Change Continued (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 227). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.227
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.227 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2017 Cyclicity. InAdam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107279070.023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107279070.023 [Google Scholar]
  17. Goorvadoo, Darshinee
    2024 Personal Communication. 18/10/24.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gougenheim, Georges
    1971Étude sur les périphrases verbales de la langue française. Paris: A.-G. Nizet.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hazaël-Massieux, Guy
    1993 L’expression du futur en créole mauricien, Etudes Creoles. (). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jespersen, Otto
    1917Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst and Søn.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lalit
    2019 Lalit Mauritius. Available at: https://www.lalitmauritius.org/ (accessed31/03/25).
  24. Le Juge de Segrais, X.
    (1976) Quarante zolies zistoires missié La fontaine. Port Louis: Mauritius Printing Cy.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Maiden, Martin
    2019 Personal Communication. 16/06/19.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nurse, Derek
    2008Tense and Aspect in Bantu. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199239290.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199239290.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Othello, Ludovic
    2020 Personal Communication. 25/11/20.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Schäfer-Prieß, Barbara
    1999 Lateinische und romanische Periphrasen mit ‘haben’ und Infinitiv: zwischen ‘Obligation’, ‘Futur’ und ‘Vermutung’. InJürgen Lang & Ingrid Neumann-Holzschuh (eds.), Reanalyse und Grammatikalisierung in den romanischen Sprachen, –. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110924824‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110924824-007 [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith, John Charles
    2006 How to do things without junk. The refunctionalization of a pronominal subsystem between Latin and Romance. InJean-Pierre Y. Montreuil (ed.), New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics: Vol. II: Phonetics, Phonology and Dialectology. Selected papers from the 35th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Austin, Texas, February 2005, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.276.14smi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.276.14smi [Google Scholar]
  30. Touchard, Yves & Daniel Véronique
    1993 À propos d’une enquête sur pu et va en mauricien. Etudes Creoles(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1989 On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change. Language. –. 10.2307/414841
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414841 [Google Scholar]
  32. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard Dasher
    2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.24031.dav
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jpcl.24031.dav
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error