Stepping back to move forward

References

1. Aboh, Enoch
   2009 Competition and selection: That’s all!In Enoch Aboh & Norval Smith (eds.), Complex processes in new languages, 317–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cll.35.20abo
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.35.20abo [Google Scholar]
2. Arends, Jacques
   1996 The early stages of creolization. Edited by Jacques Arends . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cll.13
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.13 [Google Scholar]
3. Bakker, Peter , Aymeric Daval-Markussen , Mikael Parkvall , & Ingo Plag
   2011 Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages26(1). 5–42. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.26.1.02bak
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.26.1.02bak [Google Scholar]
4. Bakker, Peter
   2015 Creole languages have no… - but they do have …Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages30(1). 167–176. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.30.1.07bak
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.30.1.07bak [Google Scholar]
5. Bao, Zhiming & Lye Hui Min
   2005 Systemic transfer, topic prominence, and the bare conditional in Singapore English. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages20(2). 269–291. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.20.2.03zhi
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.20.2.03zhi [Google Scholar]
6. Baptista, Marlyse
   2007 On the three –ist theories in creolistics and why they should be put to rest: The case of Réunionnais Creole. In Patrice Brasseur & Georges Daniel Véronique (eds.), Mondes Créoles et Francophones [a Festschrift in honor of Robert Chaudenson], 53–60. Paris: L’Harmattan.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Baptista, Marlyse
   2012 On Universal grammar, the bioprogram hypothesis and Creole Genesis: An interview with Noam Chomsky. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages27(2). 351–376. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.27.2.06bap
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.27.2.06bap [Google Scholar]
8. Bickerton, Derek
   1984 The language bioprogram hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences7. 173–221. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00044149
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044149 [Google Scholar]
9. Bollée, Annegret
   2006 Every creole has its own history. Paper presented at the Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics . Held in Albuquerque, New Mexico. January 7, 2006.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bollée, Annegret
    2007 Every creole has its own history. In Ursula Reutner (ed.), Bollée, Annegret. Beiträge zur Kreo- listik, 173–187. Hamburg: Buske.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chaudenson, Robert
    1974 Le Lexique du Parler Créole de la Réunion, vol. 2. Paris: Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chaudenson, Robert
    2001 Creolization of language and culture. Revised in collaboration with Salikoko S. Mufwene . London and New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203440292
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203440292 [Google Scholar]
13. Chaudenson, Robert
    2007 Bare nouns in Réunionnais Creole. In Marlyse Baptista & Jacqueline Guéron (eds.), Noun phrases in Creole languages: A multifaceted approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cll.31.13cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.31.13cha [Google Scholar]
14. Coelho, Adolpho
    1880 Os dialectos românicos ou neolatinos na África, Ásia, e Ámerica. Bolletim da Sociedade de Geografia de Lisboa.
    [Google Scholar]
15. DeGraff, Michel
    1999 Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development. Edited by Michel DeGraff . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. DeGraff, Michel
    2004 Against Creole exceptionalism. Language80(4). 834–839. doi: 10.1353/lan.2004.0178
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0178 [Google Scholar]
17. DeGraff, Michel
    2005 Linguists’ most dangerous myth. The fallacy of Creole exceptionalism. Language in Society34(4). 533–591. doi: 10.1017/S0047404505050207
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050207 [Google Scholar]
18. DeGraff, Michel
    2009 Creole exceptionalism and the (mis)education of the Creole speaker. In Jo Anne Kleifgen & George Bond (eds.), The languages of Africa and the Diaspora: Educating for language awareness, 124–144. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Essegbey, James
    2005 The basic locative construction in Gbe languages and Surinamese creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages20(2). 229–267. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.20.2.02ess
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.20.2.02ess [Google Scholar]
20. Essegbey, James & Felix Ameka
    2007 “Cut” and “break” verbs in Gbe and Sranan. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages22(1). 37–55. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.22.1.04ess
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.22.1.04ess [Google Scholar]
21. Faraclas & Klein
    (eds.) 2009 Simplicity and complexity in Creoles and Pidgins. London: Battlebridge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fishman, Joshua
    1965 Yiddish in America: Socio-linguistic description and analysis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fishman, Joshua
    1968 Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague, Paris: Mouton doi: 10.1515/9783110805376
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805376 [Google Scholar]
24. Fishman, Joshua
    1970 Sociolinguistics: A brief introduction. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Fishman, Joshua
    1971 Bilingualism in the Barrio. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Foley, Willliam
    2006 Universal constraints and local conditions in Pidginization: Case studies from New Guinea. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages21(1). 1–44. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.21.1.01fol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.21.1.01fol [Google Scholar]
27. Gilbert, Glenn
    1980 Pidgin and Creole languages: Selected essays by Hugo Schuchardt. Edited and translated by Glenn Gilbert . London/New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gilbert, Glenn
    1985 Hugo Schuchardt and the Atlantic Creoles: A newly discovered manuscript « On the Negro English of West Africa ». American Speech60(1). 31–63. doi: 10.2307/454645
    https://doi.org/10.2307/454645 [Google Scholar]
29. Grant, Anthony & Diana Guillemin
    2012 The complex of creole typological features: The case of Mauritian Creole. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages27(1). 48–104. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.27.1.02gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.27.1.02gra [Google Scholar]
30. Hall, Robert
    1966 Pidgin and Creole languages.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hiramoto, Mie
    2010 Dialect contact and change of the northern Japanese plantation immigrants in Hawai‘i. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Language25(2). 229–262. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.25.2.02hir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.25.2.02hir [Google Scholar]
32. Holm, John
    1988 Pidgins and Creoles: Theory and structure, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Holm, John & Incanha Intumbo
    2009 Quantifying superstrate and substrate influence. Journal of Pidgins & Creole Languages24(2). 218–274. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.24.2.02hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.24.2.02hol [Google Scholar]
34. Hudson Kam, Carla
    2005 Where have all the children gone?Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages20(2) 345–351. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.20.2.09hud
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.20.2.09hud [Google Scholar]
35. Huttar, George , James Essegbey , & Felix Ameka
    2007 Gbe and other West African sources of suriname creole semantic structures: Implications for creole genesis. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages22(1). 57–72. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.22.1.05hut
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.22.1.05hut [Google Scholar]
36. Kouwenberg, Silvia
    2010a Creole studies and linguistic typology: Part 1. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages25(1). 173–186. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.25.1.07kou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.25.1.07kou [Google Scholar]
37. Kouwenberg, Silvia
    2010b Creole studies and linguistic typology: Part2. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages25(2). 359–380. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.25.2.06kou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.25.2.06kou [Google Scholar]
38. Kouwenberg, Silvia & Darlene LaCharité
    2011 The typology of Caribbean Creole reduplication. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages26(1). 194–218. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.26.1.07kou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.26.1.07kou [Google Scholar]
39. Lefebvre, Claire
    1999 Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar. (Cambridge studies in linguistics 88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511519826
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519826 [Google Scholar]
40. Lefebvre, Claire
    2004 Issues in the study of Pidgin and Creole languages. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.70
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.70 [Google Scholar]
41. Lefebvre, Claire & Virginie Loranger
    2006 On the properties of Saramaccan FU*: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages21(2). 275–335. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.21.2.02lef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.21.2.02lef [Google Scholar]
42. Lefebvre, Claire
    2011 Creoles, their substrates, and language typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.95
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.95 [Google Scholar]
43. Mather, Patrick-André
    2006 Second language acquisition and creolization: Same (i-) processes, different (e-) results. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages21(2). 231–274. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.21.2.01mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.21.2.01mat [Google Scholar]
44. Matras, Yaron
    2009 Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511809873
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809873 [Google Scholar]
45. McWhorter, John
    1998 Identifying the Creole prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language74(4). 788–818. doi: 10.2307/417003
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417003 [Google Scholar]
46. McWhorter, John
    2012a The nature of argument: Is the Creole exceptionalism hypothesis dead?Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages27(2). 377–387. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.27.2.07mcw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.27.2.07mcw [Google Scholar]
47. McWhorter, John
    2012b Case closed? Testing the feature pool hypothesis. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages27(1). 171–182. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.27.1.07mcw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.27.1.07mcw [Google Scholar]
48. Michaelis, Susanne , Philippe Maurer , Martin Haspelmath , & Magnus Huber
    2013 The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole language structures. (1st Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Migge, Bettina & Norval Smith
    2007 Introduction: Substrate influence in creole formation. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages22(1). 1–15. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.22.1.02mig
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.22.1.02mig [Google Scholar]
50. Mufwene, Salikoko
    1986 The universalist and substrate hypotheses complement one another. In Pieter Muysken & Norval Smith (eds.), Substrata Versus Universals in Creole Genesis, 129–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cll.1.08muf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.1.08muf [Google Scholar]
51. Mufwene, Salikoko
    2000 Creolization is a social, not a structural, process. In Ingrid Neumann-Holzschuh & Edgar Schneider (eds.), Degrees of restructuring in Creole languages,65–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cll.22.06muf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.22.06muf [Google Scholar]
52. Mufwene, Salikoko
    2001 The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511612862
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612862 [Google Scholar]
53. Mufwene, Salikoko
    2014 The case was never closed: McWhorter misinterprets the ecological approach to the emergence of creoles. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages29(1). 157–171. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.29.1.06muf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.29.1.06muf [Google Scholar]
54. Mühlhäusler, Peter
    2008 Multifunctionality in Pitkern-Norf’k and Tok Pisin. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages23(1). 75–113. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.23.1.04muh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.23.1.04muh [Google Scholar]
55. Muysken, Pieter
    1981 Halfway between Quechua and Spanish: The case for relexification. In Arnold Highfield & Albert Valdman (eds.), Historicity and variation in creole studies, 52–78. Ann Arbor: Karoma.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Parkvall, Mikael
    2012 Papiamentu as one of the most complex languages in the world: A reply to Kouwenberg. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages27(1). 159–166. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.27.1.05par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.27.1.05par [Google Scholar]
57. Plag, Ingo
    2008a Creoles as interlanguages: Inflectional morphology. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages23(1). 114–135. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.23.1.06pla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.23.1.06pla [Google Scholar]
58. Plag, Ingo
    2008b Creoles as interlanguages: Syntactic structures. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages23(2). 307–328. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.23.2.06pla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.23.2.06pla [Google Scholar]
59. Plag, Ingo
    2009a Creoles as interlanguages: Phonology. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages24(1). 119–138. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.24.1.06pla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.24.1.06pla [Google Scholar]
60. Plag, Ingo
    2009b Creoles as interlanguages: Word-formation. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages24(2). 339–362. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.24.2.05pla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.24.2.05pla [Google Scholar]
61. Plag, Ingo
    2011 Creolization and admixture: Typology, feature pools, and second language acquisition. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages26(1). 89–110. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.26.1.04pla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.26.1.04pla [Google Scholar]
62. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1881 Anzeige von: C. Baissac, Étude sur le patois créole mauricien. In F. Adolpho Coelho (eds.), Os dialectos romanicos ou neo-latinos na Africa, Asia e America, Zeitschrift für rom. Philologie5. 580–581.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1883  Kreolische Studien IV. Über das Malaiospanische der Philippinen . SbW. 105. 111–150.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1909 Die Lingua franca, Zeitschrift für rom . Philologie33. 441–461.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Schuchardt, Hugo
    1914 Die Sprache der Saramakkaneger in Surinam. Amsterdam: Johannes Müller.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Sharma, Devyani & John Rickford
    2009 AAVE/creole copula absence: A critique of the imperfect learning hypothesis. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages24(1). 53–90. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.24.1.03sha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.24.1.03sha [Google Scholar]
67. Siegel, Jeff
    2003 Substrate influence in creoles and the role of transfer in second language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition25. 185–209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/S0272263103000093
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000093 [Google Scholar]
68. Siegel, Jeff
    2006 Links between SLA and Creole studies: Past and present. In Claire Lefebvre , Lydia White , & Christine Jourdan (eds.), L2 Acquisition and Creole Genesis: Dialogues, 15–46. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.42.03sie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.42.03sie [Google Scholar]
69. Siegel, Jeff
    2009 Pidgins/creoles and second language acquisition. The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Siegel, Jeff
    2012 Constraints on substrate transfer revisited. The Journal of Linguistics48(2). 473–478. doi: 10.1017/S0022226712000060
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000060 [Google Scholar]
71. Singler, John Victor
    2006 Children and creole genesis. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages21(1). 157–173. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.21.1.04sin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.21.1.04sin [Google Scholar]
72. Thomason, Sarah & Terrence Kaufman
    1988 Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Thomason, Sarah
    2001 Language contact: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Valli, André
    1994 A propos de l’emploi productif de la détermination zéro en moyen français et en créole réunionnais. In D. Véronique (ed.), Créolisation et Acquisition des Langues, 89–101. Aix-en-Provence: Presses de l’Université de Provence.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Véronique, Daniel
    1994 Naturalistic adult acquisition of French as L2 and French-based creole genesis compared: Insights into creolization and language change. In Dany Adone & Ingo Plag (Eds.), Creolization and Language Change, 117–137. Turbingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Weinreich, Uriel
    1953 Languages in contact: Findings and problems. New York.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Weinreich, Uriel
    2011 Languages in contact: French, German and Romansh in Twentieth-century Switzerland. Introduction and notes by Kim, Ronald and William Labov . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.166
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.166 [Google Scholar]
78. Wekker, Herman
    1996 Creolization and the acquisition of English as a second language. In Herman Wekker (ed.), Creole languages and language acquisition, 139–149. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110811049
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110811049 [Google Scholar]
79. Whinnom, Keith
    1967 Linguistics: Pidgin and Creole languages. Robert A. Hall. American Anthropologist69. 256–257. doi: 10.1525/aa.1967.69.2.02a00580
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1967.69.2.02a00580 [Google Scholar]
80. Winford, Donald
    2003 An introduction to contact linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell-Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Winford, Donald & Bettina Migge
    2007 Substrate influence on the emergence of the TMA systems of the Surinamese creoles. Journal of Pidgin & Creole Languages22(1). 73–99. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.22.1.06win
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.22.1.06win [Google Scholar]