Moving towards a bilingual baseline in second language phonetic research

References

1. Birdsong, D. , & Gertken, L. M.
   (2013) In faint praise of folly: A critical review of native/non-native speaker comparisons, with examples from native and bilingual processing of French complex syntax. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 4(2), 107–133. doi: 10.1075/lia.4.2.01bir
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.4.2.01bir [Google Scholar]
2. Bley-Vroman, R.
   (1983) The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning, 33(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1983.tb00983.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00983.x [Google Scholar]
3. Braida, L. D. , Lim, J. S. , Berliner, J. E. , Durlach, N. I. , Rabinowitz, W. M. , & Purks, S. R.
   (1984) Intensity perception. XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76(3), 722–731. doi: 10.1121/1.391258
   https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391258 [Google Scholar]
4. Cebrian, J.
   (2006) Experience and the use of non-native duration in L2 vowel categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 34(3), 372–387. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.003 [Google Scholar]
5. Cenoz, J. , & García Lecumberri, L.
   (1999) The effect of training on the discrimination of English vowels. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 261–275. doi: 10.1515/iral.1999.37.4.261
   https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1999.37.4.261 [Google Scholar]
6. Cook, V. J.
   (1992) Evidence for multicompetence. Language Learning, 42(4), 557–591. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1992.tb01044.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01044.x [Google Scholar]
7. Cook, V. J.
   (1997) The consequences of bilingualism for cognitive processing. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp.279–299). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cook, V. J.
   (1999) Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185–209. doi: 10.2307/3587717
   https://doi.org/10.2307/3587717 [Google Scholar]
9. Cook, V. J.
   (2014) Learning the grammar of a second language. In V. J. Cook & D. Singleton (Eds.), Key topics in second language acquisition (pp.58–71). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Crowther, D. , Trofimovich, P. , Isaacs, T. , & Saito, K.
    (2015) Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility?The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95.10.1111/modl.12185
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12185 [Google Scholar]
11. Davies, M.
    (2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 520 million words, 1990-present. Available online at corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
12. Derwing, T. M. , & Munro, M. J.
    (1997) Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1017/S0272263197001010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010 [Google Scholar]
13. Derwing, T. M. , & Munro, M. J.
    (2005) Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397. doi: 10.2307/3588486
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486 [Google Scholar]
14. Dickerson, W. B.
    (1975) The WH question of pronunciation: An answer from spelling and generative phonology. TESOL Quarterly, 9(3), 299–309. doi: 10.2307/3585961
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3585961 [Google Scholar]
15. Escudero, P.
    (2001) The role of the input in the development of L1 and L2 sound contrasts: language-specific cue weighting for vowels. InProceedings of the 25th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp.250–261). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Flege, J. E. , Bohn, O. S. , & Jang, S.
    (1997) Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470. doi: 10.1006/jpho.1997.0052
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0052 [Google Scholar]
17. Garcia, P.
    (2014) Perception of American English vowels by adult Spanish-English bilingual listeners(Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (Order Number 3620218)
    [Google Scholar]
18. García Lecumberri, M. L. , & Cenoz, J.
    (1997) Identification by L2 learners of English vowels in different phonetic contexts. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech: New Sounds 97. Klagenfurt, Austria: University of Klagenfurt.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gnevsheva, K.
    (2015) Style-shifting and intra-speaker variation in the vowel production of nonnative speakers of New Zealand English. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1(2), 135–156. doi: 10.1075/jslp.1.2.01gne
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.1.2.01gne [Google Scholar]
20. Hansen Edwards, J. G.
    (2008) Social factors and variation in production in L2 phonology. In J. G. Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp.251–279). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.36.12han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.36.12han [Google Scholar]
21. Hillenbrand, J. M. , Clark, M. J. , & Houde, R. A.
    (2000) Some effects of duration on vowel recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(6), 3013–3022. doi: 10.1121/1.1323463
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1323463 [Google Scholar]
22. Iverson, P. , & Evans, B. G.
    (2009) Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(2), 866–877. doi: 10.1121/1.3148196
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3148196 [Google Scholar]
23. Iverson, P. , & Kuhl, P. K.
    (1995) Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 553–562. doi: 10.1121/1.412280
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.412280 [Google Scholar]
24. Jaeger, T. F. , & Tily, H.
    (2011) On language ‘utility’: Processing complexity and communicative efficiency. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(3), 323–335.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Johnson, D. E.
    (2015) Quantifying vowel overlap with Bhattacharyya’s affinity. New Ways of Analyzing Variation 44. Toronto, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kewley-Port, D. , & Watson, C. S.
    (1994) Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 485–496. doi: 10.1121/1.410024
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.410024 [Google Scholar]
27. Kohler, K. J.
    (1990) Segmental reduction in connected speech in German: Phonological facts and phonetic explanations. Speech Production and Speech Modelling, 55, 69–92. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2037‑8_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_4 [Google Scholar]
28. Kondaurova, M. V. , & Francis, A. L.
    (2010) The role of selective attention in the acquisition of English tense and lax vowels by native Spanish listeners: Comparison of three training methods. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 569–587. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.08.003 [Google Scholar]
29. Konopka, K. , & Pierrehumbert, J.
    (2008) Vowels in contact: Mexican heritage English in Chicago. Proceedings fromThe Sixteenth Annual Symposium about Language and Society-Austin. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Levis, J. M.
    (2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. Tesol Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. doi: 10.2307/3588485
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485 [Google Scholar]
31. Levis, J. M. , & Moyer, A.
    (Eds.) (2014) Social dynamics in second language accent. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781614511762
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511762 [Google Scholar]
32. Lindblom, B.
    (1990) Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech production and speech modelling (pp.403–439). Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2037‑8_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16 [Google Scholar]
33. Lindemann, S. , Litzenberg, J. , & Subtirelu, N.
    (2014) Problematizing the dependence on L1 norms in pronunciation teaching: Attitudes toward second-language accents. In J. Levis & A. Moyer (Eds.), Social dynamics in second language accent (pp.171–194). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781614511762.171
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511762.171 [Google Scholar]
34. Linguistic Society of America
    Linguistic Society of America (1997) Resolution on the Oakland “Ebonics” issue. Retrieved from https://www.linguisticsociety.org/resource/lsa-resolution-oakland-ebonics-issue.
35. Macmillan, N. A. , & Creelman, C. D.
    (1991) Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. McCrocklin, S.
    (2012) Effect of audio vs. video on aural discrimination of vowels. TESL-EJ, 16(2).
    [Google Scholar]
37. Mora, J. C. , & Levkina, M.
    (2017) Task-based pronunciation teaching and research: Key issues and future directions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(2), 381–399.10.1017/S0272263117000183
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000183 [Google Scholar]
38. Morrison, G. S.
    (2008) Perception of synthetic vowels by monolingual Canadian-English, Mexican-Spanish, and Peninsular-Spanish listeners. Canadian Acoustics, 36(4), 17–23.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Munro, M. J. , & Derwing, T. M.
    (2008) Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58(3), 479–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00448.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00448.x [Google Scholar]
40. Ortega, L.
    (2014) Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education (pp.32–53). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Perkell, J. S. , Matthies, M. L. , Svirsky, M. A. , & Jordan, M. I.
    (1995) Goal-based speech motor control: A theoretical framework and some preliminary data. Journal of Phonetics, 23(1), 23–35. doi: 10.1016/S0095‑4470(95)80030‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(95)80030-1 [Google Scholar]
42. Piantadosi, S. T. , Tily, H. , & Gibson, E.
    (2012) The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cognition, 122(3), 280–291. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004 [Google Scholar]
43. Saito, K.
    (2011) Examining the role of explicit phonetic instruction in native-like and comprehensible pronunciation development: An instructed SLA approach to L2 phonology. Language Awareness, 20(1), 45–59. doi: 10.1080/09658416.2010.540326
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.540326 [Google Scholar]
44. Saito, K. , & Hanzawa, K.
    (2016) Developing second language oral ability in foreign language classrooms: The role of the length and focus of instruction and individual differences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 813–840.10.1017/S0142716415000259
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000259 [Google Scholar]
45. Salminen, N. H. , Tiitinen, H. , & May, P. J. C.
    (2009) Modeling the categorical perception of speech sounds: A step toward biological plausibility. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(3), 304–313. doi: 10.3758/CABN.9.3.304
    https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.3.304 [Google Scholar]
46. Tarone, E. , & Parrish, B.
    (1988) Task-related variation in interlanguage: The case of articles. Language learning, 38(1), 21–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1988.tb00400.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1988.tb00400.x [Google Scholar]
47. Thomson, R. I. , & Derwing, T. M.
    (2015) The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344. doi: 10.1093/applin/amu076
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu076 [Google Scholar]
48. Weinberger, Steven
    (2015) Speech Accent Archive. George Mason University. Retrieved from accent.gmu.edu.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Wolfram, W.
    (2015) Social varieties of American English. In C. A. Ferguson , E. Finegan , S. B. Heath , & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Language in the USA: Themes for the twenty-first century (pp.58–75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]