1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN: 2215-194X
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Although pronunciation is an integral part of speaking, the role pronunciation plays in determining speaking-proficiency levels is unclear ( Higgs & Clifford, 1982 ; Kang, 2013 ). To contribute to our understanding of this area, the research reported here investigated the relationship between English as a Second Language (ESL) learners’ pronunciation ability and their speaking-proficiency ratings. At an intensive English program (IEP) in the United States, a speaking test was administered to 223 ESL students. Their speaking proficiency was rated using an oral proficiency assessment based on standardized guidelines. In addition, their pronunciation was rated in six categories (vowels, consonants, word stress, sentence stress, intonation, and rhythm) by 11 raters using a rubric specifically developed and validated for this study. Many-Facet Rasch Measurement (MFRM) was used to estimate the students’ pronunciation ability, which was then compared to their speaking ability. The study found that sentence stress, rhythm, and intonation accounted for 41% of the variance in the speaking-proficiency test scores with sentence stress being the most powerful factor.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.00004.ma
2018-05-31
2018-09-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages
    American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (2012) ACTFL proficiency guidelines 2012. Retrieved from www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/public/​ACTFLProficiencyGuidelines2012_FINAL.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  2. British Council, IDP: IELTS Australia and Cambridge English Language Assessment. (n.d.)
    British Council, IDP: IELTS Australia and Cambridge English Language Assessment. (n.d.). IELTS speaking: Band descriptors(public version). Retrieved from https://www.ielts.org/~/media/pdfs/speaking-band-descriptors.ashx
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, A.
    (1988) Functional load and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 593–606. doi: 10.2307/3587258
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587258 [Google Scholar]
  4. Carey, M. D. , Mannell, R. H. , & Dunn, P. K.
    (2011) Does a rater’s familiarity with a candidate’s pronunciation affect the rating in oral proficiency interviews?Language Testing, 28, 201–219. doi: 10.1177/0265532210393704
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210393704 [Google Scholar]
  5. Catford, J. C.
    (1987) Phonetics and the teaching of pronunciation: A systemic description of English phonology. In J. Morley (Ed.), Current perspectives on pronunciation: Practices anchored in theory (pp.83–100). Washington, DC: TESOL.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dalton, P. , & Hardcastle, W. J.
    (1977) Disorders of fluency and their effects on communication. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Eckes, T.
    (2011) Introduction to Many-facet Rasch Measurement: Analyzing and evaluating rater-mediated assessments. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.10.3726/978‑3‑653‑04844‑5
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04844-5 [Google Scholar]
  8. Educational Testing Service
    Educational Testing Service (2006) Rubric for rubrics. Retrieved from https://www.mbaea.org/documents/filelibrary/pdf/csin/RubricforRubrics_77EAE6205D215.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Educational Testing Service
    Educational Testing Service (2014) TOEFL iBT Test. Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/s/toefl/pdf/toefl_speaking_rubrics.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hahn, L.
    (2004) Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 201–223. doi: 10.2307/3588378
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588378 [Google Scholar]
  11. Henrichsen, L. E. , Green, B. A. , Nishitani, A. , & Bagley, C. L.
    (1999) Pronunciation matters: Communicative, story-based activities for mastering the sounds of North American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (electronic version available at www.pronunciationmatters.com)
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Higgs, T. V. , & Clifford, R.
    (1982) The push toward communication. In T. V. Higgs (Ed.), Curriculum, competence and the foreign language teacher (pp.51–79). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Isaacs, T. , & Trofimovich, P.
    (2011) Phonological memory, attention control, and musical ability: Effects of individual differences on rater judgments of second language speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 113–140. doi: 10.1017/S0142716410000317
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000317 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2012) Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 475–505. doi: 10.1017/S0272263112000150
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000150 [Google Scholar]
  15. Jenkins, J.
    (2006) Current perspectives on teaching world Englishes and English as a lingua franca. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 157–181. doi: 10.2307/40264515
    https://doi.org/10.2307/40264515 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kang, O.
    (2013) Relative impact of pronunciation features on ratings of non-native speakers’ oral proficiency. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (Aug. 2012 pp.10–15). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kang, O. , Rubin, D. , & Pickering, L.
    (2010) Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. The Modern Language Journal, 94, 554–566. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/40959579
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Larson-Hall, J.
    (2010) A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, Y. J.
    (2012) Software to facilitate language assessment: Focus on Quest, Facets, and Turnitin. In C. Coombe , P. Davidson , B. O’Sullivan , & S. Stoynoff (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language assessment (pp.280–288). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Levis, J. M.
    (2006) Pronunciation and the assessment of spoken language. In R. Hughes (Ed.), Spoken English, TESOL and applied linguistics: Challenges for theory and practice (pp.245–270). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230584587_11
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584587_11 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lincare, J. M.
    (2004) Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. In E. V. Smith & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement (pp.258–278). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Munro, M. J. , & Derwing, T. M.
    (2006) The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 34, 520–531. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2006.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  23. Myford, C. M. , & Wolfe, E. W.
    (2003) Detecting and measuring rater effects using Many-Facet Rasch Measurement: Part I. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4(4), 386–422.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (2004) Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: Part II. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5(2), 189–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Nicolosi, L. , Harryman, E. , & Keresheck, J.
    (1989) Terminology of communication disorders. Baltimore, MD: William & Wilkins.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rose, M. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wennerstrom, A.
    (1997) Discourse intonation and second language acquisition: Three genre based studies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Winke, P. , Gass, S. , & Myford, C.
    (2012) Raters’ L2 background as a potential source of bias in rating oral performance. Language Testing, 30, 231–252. doi: 10.1177/0265532212456968
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212456968 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.00004.ma
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.00004.ma
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error