Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN: 2215-194X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



In pronunciation learning, there is a need for resources and tools that help students monitor their speech or provide feedback on errors. While researchers have seen ASR-based technologies as potential tools, little attention has been paid to dictation programs, which have been criticized for low levels of recognition, but offer advantages such as accessibility and flexibility. This study examines two groups of learners in a pronunciation workshop: CONV, which had fully face-to-face instruction, and HYBRID, which had half of the instruction face-to-face and half using the computer, practicing production using a dictation program, Windows Speech Recognition. Results show that both groups improved from pre- to post-test and that there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Results indicate that dictation programs may be useful as a complement to face-to-face pronunciation teaching, especially if in-class time for pronunciation teaching is limited.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Banafa, F. H.
    (2008) Effects of IT on pronunciation. LaVergne, TN: Lightning Source Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beddor, P. S. & Strange, W.
    (1982) Cross-language study of perception of the oral-nasal distinction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 1551–1561. 10.1121/1.387809
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.387809 [Google Scholar]
  3. Benson, P. & Voller, P.
    (1997) Introduction: Autonomy and independence in language learning. InP. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp.1–12). Edinburgh, UK: Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blankenship, B.
    (1991) Second language vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 2252–2252. 10.1121/1.401514
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.401514 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bouselmi, G., Fohr, D., & Illina, I.
    (2012) Multilingual recognition of non-native speech using acoustic model transformation and pronunciation modeling. International Journal of Speech Technology, 15, 203–213. 10.1007/s10772‑012‑9134‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-012-9134-8 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, A.
    (1988) Functional load and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 22 (4), 593–606. 10.2307/3587258
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587258 [Google Scholar]
  7. Burlington English: Meeting the challenges of adult language acquisition
    Burlington English: Meeting the challenges of adult language acquisition (2014) Retrieved fromwww.burlingtonenglish.com/about.aspx
  8. Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Goodwin, J.
    (2010) Teaching pronunciation (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang, C.
    (2012) Instruction on pronunciation learning strategies: Research findings and current pedagogical approaches (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from theUniversity of Texas Digital Repository. UT-Austin, Austin, TX.
  10. Cincarek, T., Gruhn, R., Hacker, C., Nöth, E., & Nakamura, S.
    (2008) Automatic pronunciation scoring of words and sentences independent from the non-native’s first language. Computer Speech and Language, 23, 65–88. 10.1016/j.csl.2008.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2008.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Coniam, D.
    (1999) Voice recognition software accuracy with second language speakers of English. System, 27, 49–64. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(98)00049‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00049-9 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cordier, D.
    (2009) Speech recognition software for language learning: Toward an evaluation of validity and student perceptions (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from: scholarcommons.usf.edu
  13. Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L.
    (2000) Different aspects of expert pronunciation quality ratings and their relation to scores produced by speech recognition algorithms. Speech Communication, 30, 109–119. 10.1016/S0167‑6393(99)00040‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(99)00040-0 [Google Scholar]
  14. Derwing, T., Munro, M., & Carbonaro, M.
    (2000) Does popular speech recognition software work with ESL speech?TESOL Quarterly, 34 (3), 592–603. 10.2307/3587748
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587748 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dickerson, W. B.
    (1994) Empowering students with predictive skills. InJ. Morley (Ed.), Pronunciation pedagogy and theory: New views, new directions (pp.17–35). Alexandria, VA: TESOL, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dickinson, L.
    (1995) Autonomy and motivation: a literature review. System, 23(2), 165–174. 10.1016/0346‑251X(95)00005‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00005-5 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dryer, M. S. & Haspelmath, M.
    (Eds.) (2013) The world atlas of language structures online. Retrieved fromwals.info
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Foote, J. A.
    (2010) Second language learners’ perceptions of their own recorded speech. PMC Working Paper Series W P10-02, 3–27. Edmonton, Alberta: Prairie Metropolis Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & Fox, R. A.
    (1993) Auditory and categorical effects on cross-language vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 3623–3641. 10.1121/1.409931
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.409931 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fraser, H.
    (2001) Teaching pronunciation: A handbook for teachers and trainers. Sydney, Australia: TAFE NSW.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Furtak, E. M. & Kunter, M.
    (2012) Effects of autonomy-supportive teaching on student learning and motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80, 284–316. 10.1080/00220973.2011.573019
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.573019 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hardison, D.
    (2003) Acquisition of second language speech: Effects of visual cues, context, and talker variability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 579–596.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hardison, D. M.
    (2004) Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning and Technology, 8 (1), 34–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hardison, D.
    (2005) Second language spoken word identification: Effects of training, visual cues, and phonetic environment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 579–596. 10.1017/S0142716405050319
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716405050319 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hincks, R.
    (2003) Speech technologies for pronunciation feedback and evaluation. ReCALL. 15(1), 3–20. 10.1017/S0958344003000211
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344003000211 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2015) Technology and leaning pronunciation. InReed, M. and Levis, J. (Eds). The handbook of English pronunciation (pp.505–519). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Holec, H.
    (1981) Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ingels, S. A.
    (2011) The effects of self-monitoring strategy use on the pronunciation of learners of English (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
  29. Larson-Hall, J.
    (2010) A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Levis, J. & Pickering, L.
    (2004) Teaching intonation in discourse using speech visualization technology. System, 32, 505–524. 10.1016/j.system.2004.09.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.09.009 [Google Scholar]
  31. Levis, J. & Suvorov, R.
    (2013) Automated speech recognition. InC. Chapelle (Ed.) The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Retrieved fromonlinelibrary.wiley.com/
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lima, E.
    (2015) Development and evaluation of online pronunciation instruction for international teaching assistants’ comprehensibility (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from: hhtp://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd. 10.31274/etd‑180810‑4109
  33. McCrocklin, S.
    (2012) Effect of audio vs. video on aural discrimination of vowels. TESL-EJ, 16 (2), 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2016) Pronunciation learner autonomy: The potential of Automatic Speech Recognition. System, 57, 25–42. 10.1016/j.system.2015.12.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.12.013 [Google Scholar]
  35. Meisel, W.
    (2010) “Life on-the-go”: The role of speech technology in mobile applications. InA. Neustein (Ed.) Advances in speech recognition: Mobile environments, call centers, and clinics. New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4419‑5951‑5_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5951-5_1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Microsoft
    Microsoft (2014) Microsoft accessibility: Products: Windows Speech Recognition. Retrieved fromwww.microsoft.com/enable/products/windows8/default.aspx
  37. Moustroufas, N. & Digalakis, V.
    (2007) Automatic pronunciation evaluation of foreign speakers using unknown text. Computer Speech and Language, 21, 219–230. 10.1016/j.csl.2006.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2006.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Murray, G.
    (1999) Autonomy, technology, and language-learning in a sheltered ESL immersion program. TESL Canada Journal, 17 (1), 1–15. 10.18806/tesl.v17i1.877
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v17i1.877 [Google Scholar]
  39. Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H.
    (2006) ASR-based corrective feedback on pronunciation: does it really work?Proceedings of the ISCA Interspeech 2006, Pittsburgh, PA, 1982–1985.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Neri, A., Cucchiarini, H., Strik, L. & Boves, L.
    (2002) The pedagogy-technology interface in Computer-Assisted Pronunciation Teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 441–467. 10.1076/call.15.5.441.13473
    https://doi.org/10.1076/call.15.5.441.13473 [Google Scholar]
  41. Neri, A., Mich, O., Gerosa, M., & Giuliani, D.
    (2008) The effectiveness of computer assisted pronunciation training for foreign language learning by children. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 393–408. 10.1080/09588220802447651
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802447651 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nilsen, D. L. & Nilsen, A. P.
    (2002) Pronunciation contrasts in English. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Oxford, R. L.
    (1990) Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Rogerson-Revell, P.
    (2011) English phonology and pronunciation teaching. Broadway, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rosetta Stone: Cutting-edge technology
    Rosetta Stone: Cutting-edge technology (2015) Retrieved fromwww.rosettastone.com/features#link1
  46. Saito, K. & Lyster, R.
    (2012) Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595–633. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00639.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00639.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Saraçlar, M.
    (2000) Pronunciation modeling for conversational speech recognition (Doctoral dissertation). Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services.
  48. Sardegna, V.
    (2009) Improving English stress through pronunciation learning strategies. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. The Humanities and Social Sciences, 70(1), 0114.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Sardegna, V. G.
    (2012) Learner differences in strategy use, self-efficacy beliefs, and pronunciation improvement. In. J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.). Proceedings of the 3rd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Ames, IA: Iowa State University, 39–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Seferoğlu, G.
    (2005) Improving students’ pronunciation through accent reduction software. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36 (2), 303–316. 10.1111/j.1467‑8535.2005.00459.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00459.x [Google Scholar]
  51. Sheerin, S.
    (1997) An exploration of the relationship between self-access and independent learning. InP. Benson and P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp.54–65). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Strik, H., Neri, A., & Cucchiarini, C.
    (2008) Speech technology for language tutoring. Proceedings of Language and Speech Technology (LangTech ‘08) Conference, Rome, Italy, 73–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Tepperman, J.
    (2009) Hierarchical methods in automatic pronunciation evaluation. (Doctoral dissertation). Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services.
  54. Truong, K., Neri, A., de Wet, F., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H.
    (2005) Automatic detection of frequent pronunciation errors made by L2-learners. Proceedings from InterSpeech 2005 (IS2005), Lisbon, Portugal, 1345–1348.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error