1887
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN: 2215-194X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The current study set out to investigate the effects of oral corrective feedback (OCF) and examine the impact of correction timing on lexical stress and sentence intonation accuracy in a Persian context. The data was collected from a sample of upper-intermediate EFL students ( = 61). Immediate teacher-explicit OCF, delayed teacher-explicit OCF, and a control group were randomly assigned to three classes. A list of 50 new words, contextualized in 50 statements/questions, were utilized to measure any possible gains. Analysis of post-test results confirmed that the teacher immediate OCF ( = 20) and teacher delayed OCF ( = 20) classes outperformed the control group ( = 21). Post-hoc analysis revealed that the treatment groups were not significantly different in lexical stress accuracy gains. In contrast, the immediate group had significantly higher gains than the delayed one in sentence intonation accuracy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.17004.sae
2019-03-13
2019-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ammar, A., & Spada, N.
    (2006) One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 543–574. 10.1017/S0272263106060268
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060268 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L.
    (2006) The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlates. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(05), 920–948. 10.1080/02724980443000782
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000782 [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L.
    (2007) The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13(4), 273–281.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carroll, S. E.
    (2001) Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.25
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.25 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carroll, S., & Swain, M.
    (1993) Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(3), 357–366. 10.1017/S0272263100012158
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012158 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dalton, C., & Seidlhofer, B.
    (1994) Pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DeKeyser, R.
    (2003) Implicit and explicit learning. InC. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.313–348). Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch11
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch11 [Google Scholar]
  8. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (2005) Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397. 10.2307/3588486
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486 [Google Scholar]
  9. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2007) A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 359–380. 10.1093/applin/amm041
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm041 [Google Scholar]
  10. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G.
    (1997) Pronunciation instruction for fossilized learners: Can it help?Applied Language Learning, 8(1), 185–203.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (1998) Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00047
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00047 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dlaska, A., & Krekeler, C.
    (2013) The short-term effects of individual corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation. System, 41(1), 25–37. 10.1016/j.system.2013.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, R.
    (1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R.
    (2006) Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(02), 339–368. 10.1017/S0272263106060141
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060141 [Google Scholar]
  15. Field, J.
    (2005) Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. 10.2307/3588487
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588487 [Google Scholar]
  16. Flege, J. E., & Liu, S.
    (2001) The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 527–552.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hahn, L. D.
    (2004) Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 201–223. 10.2307/3588378
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588378 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H.
    (2007) The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. 10.3102/003465430298487
    https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487 [Google Scholar]
  19. Havranek, G.
    (2002) When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed?International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 255–270. 10.1016/S0883‑0355(03)00004‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00004-1 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hendrickson, J. M.
    (1978) Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 62(8), 387–398.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Horwitz, E. K.
    (1999) Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27(4), 557–576. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(99)00050‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00050-0 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jenkins, J.
    (2004) Research in teaching pronunciation and intonation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 109–125. 10.1017/S0267190504000054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000054 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kang, O.
    (2010) Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301–315. 10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Pickering, L.
    (2010) Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. The Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 554–566. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2010.01091.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Krashen, S., & Terrell, T.
    (1983) The natural approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Alemany Press, Regents/Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C.
    (1988) Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79–97. 10.3102/00346543058001079
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058001079 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee, A. H., & Lyster, R.
    (2015) The effects of corrective feedback on instructed L2 speech perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. 10.1017/S0272263115000194
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000194 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lesley, T., Sandy, C., Hansen, C., & Zukowski, J.
    (2005) Interchange Passages placement evaluation package (3rd edition). New York City, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Levis, J. M.
    (2002) Reconsidering low-rising intonation in American English. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 56–82. 10.1093/applin/23.1.56
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.1.56 [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, S.
    (2010) The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–65. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00561.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x [Google Scholar]
  31. (2013) Oral corrective feedback. ELT journal, 68(2), 196–198. 10.1093/elt/cct076
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct076 [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, S., Zhu, Y., & Ellis, R.
    (2016) The effects of the timing of corrective feedback on the acquisition of a new linguistic structure. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 276–295. 10.1111/modl.12315
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12315 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lochtman, K.
    (2002) Oral corrective feedback in the foreign language classroom: How it affects interaction in analytic foreign language teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 271–283. 10.1016/S0883‑0355(03)00005‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00005-3 [Google Scholar]
  34. Long, M.
    (1983) Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 359–382. 10.2307/3586253
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586253 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2006) Problems in SLA: Second language acquisition research series. Lawrence Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. The Longman dictionary of contemporary English
    The Longman dictionary of contemporary English (5th ed.) (2009) New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
  37. Lyster, R.
    (2004) Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 399–432. 10.1017/S0272263104263021
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104263021 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L.
    (1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. 10.1017/S0272263197001034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lyster, R., & Saito, K.
    (2010) Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. 10.1017/S0272263109990520
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M.
    (2013) Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(01), 1–40. 10.1017/S0261444812000365
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365 [Google Scholar]
  41. Mackey, A., & Goo, J.
    (2007) Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. InA. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in SLA: A collection of empirical studies (pp.408–452). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Mackey, A., & Philp, J.
    (1998) Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings?The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338–356. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01211.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Nakata, T.
    (2014) Effects of feedback timing on second language vocabulary learning: Does delaying feedback increase learning?Language Teaching Research, 19(4), 416–434. 10.1177/1362168814541721
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541721 [Google Scholar]
  44. Pickering, L.
    (2001) The role of tone choice in improving ITA communication in the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 233–255. 10.2307/3587647
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587647 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2006) Current research on intelligibility in English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 219–233. 10.1017/S0267190506000110
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190506000110 [Google Scholar]
  46. Richards, J. C., & Sandy, C.
    (2008) Passages: Students’ book 1 (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Russell, J., & Spada, N.
    (2006) The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. InJ. Norris & L. Ortega, Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching, (pp.133–164). Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Saito, K.
    (2013) Reexamining effects of form-focused instruction on L2 pronunciation development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 1–29. 10.1017/S0272263112000666
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000666 [Google Scholar]
  49. Saito, K., & Lyster, R.
    (2012) Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595–633. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00639.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00639.x [Google Scholar]
  50. Schmidt, R.
    (1993) Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226. 10.1017/S0267190500002476
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002476 [Google Scholar]
  51. Schulz, R. A.
    (1996) Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 343–364. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1996.tb01247.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01247.x [Google Scholar]
  52. Sheen, Y.
    (2006) Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 361–392. 10.1191/1362168806lr203oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr203oa [Google Scholar]
  53. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M.
    (2008) Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated?TESOL Quarterly, 42(2), 181–207. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00115.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00115.x [Google Scholar]
  54. Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W.
    (2006) Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 1–30. 10.1017/S0272263106060013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060013 [Google Scholar]
  55. Waniek-Klimczak, E.
    (2015) Factors affecting word stress recognition by advanced Polish learners of English. InE. Waniek-Klimczak & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Teaching and researching the pronunciation of English (pp.139–151). Springer International Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Willis, D., & Willis, J.
    (2008) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press: London, the UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Yilmaz, Y.
    (2012) The relative effects of explicit correction and recasts on two target structures via two communication modes. Language Learning, 62(4), 1134–1169. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00726.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00726.x [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.17004.sae
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.17004.sae
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error