1887
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN: 2215-194X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article is a critical research synthesis of 32 studies that used the High Variability Phonetic Training (HVPT) technique to teach learners to better perceive and produce L2 sounds. Taken together, the studies surveyed provide compelling evidence that HVPT is a very effective pronunciation training tool, and that resulting improvement is long-lasting. The analysis of this research also helps to explain why very few teachers have heard of this empirically-driven approach to pronunciation instruction: HVPT studies are largely published in technically oriented journals; few are accessible to language teachers. A variety of obstacles to the widespread use of HVPT are discussed, and some possible solutions are provided.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.17038.tho
2019-02-01
2019-09-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Avery, P., & Ehrlich, S.
    (1992) Teaching American English pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tohkura, Y. I.
    (1999) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 61(5), 977–985. 10.3758/BF03206911
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206911 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. I.
    (1997) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299–2310. 10.1121/1.418276
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418276 [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlet, A.
    (2017) L2 perception and production of English consonants and vowels by Catalan speakers: The effects of attention and training task in a cross-training study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
  5. Cebrian, J., & Carlet, A.
    (2014) Second-language learners’ identification of target-language phonemes: A short-term phonetic training study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(4), 474–499. 10.3138/cmlr.2318
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2318 [Google Scholar]
  6. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (2015) Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42 [Google Scholar]
  7. Flege, J. E.
    (1987) A critical period for learning to pronounce foreign languages?Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 162–177. 10.1093/applin/8.2.162
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/8.2.162 [Google Scholar]
  8. Flege, J.
    (1995a) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Flege, J. E.
    (1995b) Two procedures for training a novel second language phonetic contrast. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 425–442.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R.
    (1995) Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125–3134. 10.1121/1.413041
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413041 [Google Scholar]
  11. Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. S., & Jang, S.
    (1997) Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470. 10.1006/jpho.1997.0052
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0052 [Google Scholar]
  12. Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. C.
    (2000) An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107(5), 2711–2724. 10.1121/1.428657
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428657 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hazan, V., Sennema, A., Iba, M., & Faulkner, A.
    (2005) Effect of audiovisual perceptual training on the perception and production of consonants by Japanese learners of English. Speech Communication, 47(3), 360–378. 10.1016/j.specom.2005.04.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hirata, Y.
    (2004) Training native English speakers to perceive Japanese length contrasts in word versus sentence contexts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(4), 2384–2394. 10.1121/1.1783351
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1783351 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hwang, H., & Lee, H. Y.
    (2015) The effect of high variability phonetic training on the production of English vowels and consonants. In the Scottish Consortium for ICPhS (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Paper number 466. Glasgow, UK: Glasgow University.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Iverson, P., & Evans, G. B.
    (2009) Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 126(8), 866–877. 10.1121/1.3148196
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3148196 [Google Scholar]
  17. Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K.
    (2005) Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English/r/-/l/to Japanese adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(5), 3267–3278. 10.1121/1.2062307
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2062307 [Google Scholar]
  18. Iverson, P., Pinet, M., & Evans, B. G.
    (2012) Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(1), 145–160. 10.1017/S0142716411000300
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000300 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lambacher, S. G., Martens, W. L., Kakehi, K., Marasinghe, C. A., & Molholt, G.
    (2005) The effects of identification training on the identification and production of American English vowels by native speakers of Japanese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(2), 227–247. 10.1017/S0142716405050150
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716405050150 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lengeris, A., & Hazan, V.
    (2010) The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(6), 3757–3768. 10.1121/1.3506351
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3506351 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lenneberg, E. H.
    (1967) The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12), 59–67. 10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799 [Google Scholar]
  22. Liberman, M.
    (2008, July6). HVPT. [Blog post]. Retrieved from languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=328
  23. Lim, S. J., & Holt, L. L.
    (2011) Learning foreign sounds in an alien world: Videogame training improves non-native speech categorization. Cognitive Science, 35(7), 1390–1405. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2011.01192.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01192.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B.
    (1993) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(3), 1242–1255. 10.1121/1.408177
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408177 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y. I., & Yamada, T.
    (1994) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and/l/ III: Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(4), 2076–2087. 10.1121/1.410149
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.410149 [Google Scholar]
  26. Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B.
    (1991) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and/l/: A first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874–886. 10.1121/1.1894649
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1894649 [Google Scholar]
  27. Major, R. C.
    (1987) Foreign accent: Recent research and theory. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 25(4), 185–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Nishi, K., & Kewley-Port, D.
    (2007) Training Japanese listeners to perceive American English vowels: Influence of training sets. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(6), 1496–1509. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2007/103)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/103) [Google Scholar]
  29. (2008) Nonnative speech perception training using vowel subsets: Effects of vowels in sets and order of training. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(6), 1480–1493. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2008/07‑0109)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0109) [Google Scholar]
  30. Perrachione, T. K., Lee, J., Ha, L. Y., & Wong, P. C.
    (2011) Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1), 461–472. 10.1121/1.3593366
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3593366 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pruitt, J. S., Jenkins, J. J., & Strange, W.
    (2006) Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of American English and Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1684–1696. 10.1121/1.2161427
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2161427 [Google Scholar]
  32. Qian, M., Chukharev-Hudilainen, E., & Levis, J.
    (2018) A system for adaptive high-variability segmental perceptual training: Implementation, effectiveness, transfer. Language Learning and Technology, 22(1), 69–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rato, A., Rauber, A. S., Kluge, D. C., & dos Santos, G. R.
    (2015) Designing speech perception tasks with TP. Investigating English pronunciation: Trends and directions. InJ. A. Mompean & J. Fouz-González, (Eds.), Investigating English pronunciation: Trends and directions. (pp. 295–313). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rato, A., & Rauber, A.
    (2015) The effects of perceptual training on the production of English vowel contrasts by Portuguese learners. In the Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Paper number 656. Glasgow, UK: Glasgow University.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Shin, D. J., & Iverson, P.
    (2013) Training Korean second language speakers on English vowels and prosody. InProceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA 2013, 19(1). Melville, NY: Acoustical Society of America. 10.1121/1.4801046
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4801046 [Google Scholar]
  36. Tajima, K., Kato, H., Rothwell, A., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Munhall, K. G.
    (2008) Training English listeners to perceive phonemic length contrasts in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(1), 397–413. 10.1121/1.2804942
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2804942 [Google Scholar]
  37. Thomson, R. I.
    (2007) Modeling L1/L2 interactions in the perception and production of English vowels by Mandarin L1 speakers: A training study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta.
  38. (2011) Computer assisted pronunciation training: Targeting second language vowel perception improves pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 28, 744–765. 10.11139/cj.28.3.744‑765
    https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.3.744-765 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2012a) Improving L2 listeners’ perception of English vowels: A computer-mediated approach. Language Learning, 62, 1231–1258. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00724.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00724.x [Google Scholar]
  40. (2012b) English Accent Coach: Not quite a fairy godmother for pronunciation instruction, but a step in the right direction. CONTACT, 38(1), 18–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (2013) ESL teachers’ beliefs and practices in pronunciation teaching: Confidently right or confidently wrong?InJ. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Aug. 2012 (pp. 224–233). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (2014) Myth 6: Accent reduction and pronunciation instruction are the same thing. InL. Grant (Ed.). Pronunciation myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. (pp.160–187). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2016a) Does training to perceive L2 English vowels in one phonetic context transfer to other phonetic contexts?Canadian Acoustics, 44(3), 198–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2016b) Learning to perceive English sounds using computer-assisted pronunciation training. AL Forum, November 2016 Alexandria, VA: TESOL International Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2018) English Accent Coach [Computer program]. Version 2.3. Retrieved from www.englishaccentcoach.com
  46. Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2015) The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344. 10.1093/applin/amu076
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu076 [Google Scholar]
  47. (2016) Is phonemic training using nonsense or real words more effective?InJ. Levis, H. Le, I. Lucic, E. Simpson, & S. Vo (Eds.). Proceedings of the 7th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference. Oct. 2015 (pp. 88–97). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang, X., & Munro, M. J.
    (2004) Computer-based training for learning English vowel contrasts. System, 32(4), 539–552. 10.1016/j.system.2004.09.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.09.011 [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A.
    (1999) Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(6), 3649–3658. 10.1121/1.428217
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428217 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wong, J. W. S.
    (2014) The effects of high and low variability phonetic training on the perception and production of English vowels/e/-/æ/by Cantonese ESL learners with high and low L2 proficiency levels. Inthe Fifteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Singapore, 14–18September.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Ylinen, S., Uther, M., Latvala, A., Vepsäläinen, S., Iverson, P., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Näätänen, R.
    (2010) Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: A study of Finnish second-language users of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1319–1332. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21272
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21272 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.17038.tho
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error