Exploring the effects of instruction on L2 French learner pronunciation, accentedness, comprehensibility, and fluency

References

1. Bergeron, A., & Trofimovich, P.
   (2017) Linguistic dimensions of accentedness and comprehensibility: Exploring task and listener effects in second language French. Foreign Language Annals, 50(3), 547–566. 10.1111/flan.12285
   https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12285 [Google Scholar]
2. Blake, R. J.
   (2013) Brave new digital classrooms: Technology and foreign-language learning (2nd ed.). Washington D.C: Georgetown University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
   (2011) Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.2.19) [Computer software]. Retrieved fromwww.praat.org.
4. Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E.
   (2002) Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84(1), 73–111. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00017‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3 [Google Scholar]
5. Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K.
   (2015) Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility?Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95. 10.1111/modl.12185
   https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12185 [Google Scholar]
6. Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T.
   (2018) Linguistic dimensions of L2 accentedness and comprehensibility vary across speaking tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 443–457. 10.1017/S027226311700016X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311700016X [Google Scholar]
7. Derwing, T. M.
   (2003) What do ESL students say about their accents?Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 547–567. 10.3138/cmlr.59.4.547
   https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.4.547 [Google Scholar]
8. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
   (1997) Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 1–16. 10.1017/S0272263197001010
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010 [Google Scholar]
9. Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I.
   (2004) Second language fluency: Judgements on different tasks. Language Learning, 54(4), 655–679. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00282.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x [Google Scholar]
10. Ducate, L., & Lomicka, L.
    (2013) Going mobile: Language learning with an iPod touch in intermediate French and German classes. Foreign Language Annals, 46(3), 445–468. 10.1111/flan.12043
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12043 [Google Scholar]
11. Ejzenberg, R.
    (2000) The juggling act of oral fluency: A psycho-sociolinguistic metaphor. InH. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp.287–313). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eskenazi, M.
    (1999) Using a computer in foreign language pronunciation training: What advantages?CALICO Journal, 16(3), 447–470.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A.
    (1995) Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125–3134. 10.1121/1.413041
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413041 [Google Scholar]
14. Freed, B. F.
    (1995) What makes us think that students who study abroad become fluent?InB. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp.123–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.9.09fre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.9.09fre [Google Scholar]
15. Goertler, S.
    (2011) Blended and open/online learning: Adapting to a changing world of language teaching. InN. Arnold & L. Ducate (Eds.), Present and future promises of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in language teaching (pp.471–502). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hardison, D. M.
    (2004) Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 34–52.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Harnois-Delpiano, M., Cavalla, C., & Chevrot, J. -P.
    (2012) L’acquisition de la liaison en L2 : Etude longitudinale chez des apprenants coréens de FLE et comparaison avec enfants francophones natifs. SHS Web of Conferences, 1, 1575–1589. 10.1051/shsconf/20120100150
    https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20120100150 [Google Scholar]
18. Hirata, Y.
    (2004) Computer assisted pronunciation training for native English speakers learning Japanese pitch and durational contrasts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17, 357–376.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Inceoglu, S.
    (2016) Effects of perceptual training on second language vowel perception and production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1175–1199. 10.1017/S0142716415000533
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000533 [Google Scholar]
20. Kahng, J.
    (2014) Exploring utterance and cognitive fluency of L1 and L2 English speakers: Temporal measures and stimulated recall. Language Learning, 64(4), 809–854. 10.1111/lang.12084
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12084 [Google Scholar]
21. Kennedy, S., Blanchet, J., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2014) Learner pronunciation, awareness, and instruction in French as a second language. Foreign Language Annals, 47(1), 79–96. 10.1111/flan.12066
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12066 [Google Scholar]
22. Knoerr, H.
    (2000) Pratique intonative et utilisation d’un logiciel de visualisation dans un cours de prononciation en français langue seconde : une étude descriptive. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3, 123–140.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kormos, J., & Dénes, M.
    (2004) Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 145–164. 10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 [Google Scholar]
24. Lappin-Fortin, K., & Rye, B. J.
    (2014) The use of pre-/posttest and self-assessment tools in a French pronunciation course. Foreign Language Annals, 47(2), 300–320. 10.1111/flan.12083
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12083 [Google Scholar]
25. Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L.
    (2015) The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 345–366. 10.1093/applin/amu040
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu040 [Google Scholar]
26. Lennon, P.
    (1990) Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40, 387–417. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1990.tb00669.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x [Google Scholar]
27. Levis, J. M.
    (2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. 10.2307/3588485
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485 [Google Scholar]
28. Levy, E. S., & Law, F. F.
    (2010) Production of French vowels by American-English learners of French: Language experience, consonantal context, and the perception-production relationship. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(3), 1290–305. 10.1121/1.3466879
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3466879 [Google Scholar]
29. Liakin, D., Cardoso, W., & Liakina, N.
    (2015) Learning L2 pronunciation with a mobile speech recognizer: French /y/. CALICO Journal, 32(1), 1–25. 10.1558/cj.v32i1.25962
    https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i1.25962 [Google Scholar]
30. Liakin, D., Cardoso, W., & Liakina, N.
    (2017) The pedagogical use of mobile speech synthesis (TTS): Focus on French liaison. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 348–365.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lord, G.
    (2005) (How) Can we teach foreign language pronunciation? On the effects of a Spanish phonetics course. Hispania, 88(3), 557–567. 10.2307/20063159
    https://doi.org/10.2307/20063159 [Google Scholar]
32. Lord, G.
    (2008) Podcasting communities and second language pronunciation. Foreign Language Annals, 41(2), 364–379. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2008.tb03297.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03297.x [Google Scholar]
33. Miller, J. S.
    (2012) Teaching French pronunciation with phonetics in college-level beginner French course. The NECTFL Review, (69), 47–68.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
35. Neri, A., Mich, O., Gerosa, M., & Giuliani, D.
    (2008) The effectiveness of computer assisted pronunciation training for foreign language learning by children. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 393–408. 10.1080/09588220802447651
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802447651 [Google Scholar]
36. Online Learning Consortium
    Online Learning Consortium (2016) RetrievedDecember 21, 2017, fromhttps://onlinelearningconsortium.org/
37. Préfontaine, Y., & Kormos, J.
    (2015) The relationship between task difficulty and second language fluency in French: A mixed methods approach. Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 96–112. 10.1111/modl.12186
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12186 [Google Scholar]
38. Préfontaine, Y., Kormos, J., & Johnson, D. E.
    (2016) How do utterance measures predict raters’ perceptions of fluency in French as a second language?Language Testing, 33(1), 53–73. 10.1177/0265532215579530
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215579530 [Google Scholar]
39. Racine, I., & Detey, S.
    (2017) Pour un renouvellement de l’enseignement de la liaison en FLE au regard des corpus : Défis d’apprentissage et usages contemporains. Journal of French Language Studies, 27(01), 87–99. 10.1017/S0959269516000326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269516000326 [Google Scholar]
40. Révész, A., Ekiert, M., & Torgersen, E. N.
    (2014) The effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 828–848.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Riggenbach, H.
    (1991) Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of non-native speaker conversations. Discourse Processes, 14, 423–441. 10.1080/01638539109544795
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544795 [Google Scholar]
42. Rossiter, M. J.
    (2009) Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(3), 395–412. 10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395 [Google Scholar]
43. Saito, K.
    (2012) Effects of instruction on L2 pronunciation development: A synthesis of 15 quasi-experimental intervention studies. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 842–854. 10.1002/tesq.67
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.67 [Google Scholar]
44. Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2015) Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Sanders, R. F.
    (2005) Redesigning introductory Spanish: Increased enrollment, online management, cost reduction, and effects on student learning. Foreign Language Annals, 38(4), 523–532. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2005.tb02519.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02519.x [Google Scholar]
46. Sturm, J. L.
    (2013a) Explicit phonetics instruction in L2 French: A global analysis of improvement. System, 41(3), 654–662. 10.1016/j.system.2013.07.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.015 [Google Scholar]
47. Sturm, J. L.
    (2013b) Liaison in L2 French: The effects of instruction. InJ. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp.157–166). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Tanner, M. W., & Landon, M. M.
    (2009) The effects of computer-assisted pronunciation readings on ESL learners’ use of pausing, stress, intonation, and overall comprehensibility. Language Learning & Technology, 13(3), 51–65.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2015) The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344. 10.1093/applin/amu076
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu076 [Google Scholar]
50. Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N.
    (1996) The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17, 84–119. 10.1093/applin/17.1.84
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.84 [Google Scholar]
51. Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2012) Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(04), 905–916. 10.1017/S1366728912000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000168 [Google Scholar]
52. Trofimovich, P., Lightbown, P. M., Halter, R. H., & Song, H.
    (2009) Comprehension-based practice: The development of L2 pronunciation in a listening and reading program. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 609–639. 10.1017/S0272263109990040
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990040 [Google Scholar]
53. Violin-Wigent, A.
    (2014) Comparing online versus face-to-face classes: A case study of a French pronunciation class. InJ. Levis & S. McCrocklin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp.45–57). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
    [Google Scholar]