1887
image of Second language speakers’ awareness of their own comprehensibility
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN 2215-194X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigated whether second language (L2) speakers are aware of and can manipulate aspects of their speech contributing to comprehensibility. Forty Mandarin speakers of L2 English performed two versions of the same oral task. Before the second task, half of the speakers were asked to make their speech as easy for the interlocutor to understand as possible, while the other half received no additional prompt. Speakers self-assessed comprehensibility after each task and were interviewed about how they improved their comprehensibility. Native-speaking listeners evaluated speaker performances for five dimensions, rating speech similarly across groups and tasks. Overall, participants did not become more comprehensible from task 1 to task 2, whether prompted or not, nor did speakers’ self-assessments become more in line with raters’, indicating speakers may not be aware of their own comprehensibility. However, speakers who did demonstrate greater improvement in comprehensibility received higher ratings of flow, and speakers’ self-ratings of comprehensibility were aligned with listeners’ assessments only in the second task. When discussing comprehensibility, speakers commented more on task content than linguistic dimensions. Results highlight the roles of task repetition and self-assessment in speakers’ awareness of comprehensibility.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.18008.str
2019-03-14
2019-05-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M.
    (2011) The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 11, 35–59. 10.1177/1362168810383329
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383329 [Google Scholar]
  2. Association for Language Awareness
    Association for Language Awareness (2017) Retrieved15 September 2017fromwww.lexically.net/ala/la_defined.htm
  3. Babaii, E., Taghaddomi, S., & Pashmforoosh, R.
    (2016) Speaking self-assessment: Mismatches between learners’ and teachers’ criteria. Language Testing, 11, 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergeron, A., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2017) Linguistic dimensions of accentedness and comprehensibility: Exploring task and listener effects in second language French. Foreign Language Annals, 50(3), 547–566. 10.1111/flan.12285
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12285 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bygate, M.
    (2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. InM. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.23–48). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Castañeda, M., & Rodríguez-González, E.
    (2011) L2 speaking self-ability perceptions through multiple video speech drafts. Hispania, 11, 483–501.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Y. M.
    (2008) Learning to self-assess oral performance in English: A longitudinal case study. Language Teaching Research, 11, 235–262. 10.1177/1362168807086293
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086293 [Google Scholar]
  8. Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2016) Linguistic dimensions of second language accent and comprehensibility. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 11, 160–182. 10.1075/jslp.2.2.02cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.2.2.02cro [Google Scholar]
  9. Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K.
    (2015a) Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility?The Modern Language Journal, 11, 80–95. 10.1111/modl.12185
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12185 [Google Scholar]
  10. Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T.
    (2015b) Second language comprehensibility revisited: Investigating the effects of learner background. TESOL Quarterly, 11, 814–837. 10.1002/tesq.203
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.203 [Google Scholar]
  11. de Saint Léger, D.
    (2009) Self-assessment of speaking skills and participation in a foreign language class. Foreign Language Annals, 11, 158–178. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2009.01013.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01013.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Derwing, T.
    (2003) What do ESL students say about their accents?Canadian Modern Language Review, 11, 547–567. 10.3138/cmlr.59.4.547
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.4.547 [Google Scholar]
  13. Derwing, T. M., & Rossiter, M. J.
    (2002) ESL learners’ perceptions of their pronunciation needs and strategies. System, 11, 155–166. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(02)00012‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00012-X [Google Scholar]
  14. Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2004) Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 11, 655–679. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00282.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Dlaska, A., & Krekeler, C.
    (2008) Self-assessment of pronunciation. System, 11, 506–516. 10.1016/j.system.2008.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J.
    (2003) Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 83–87. 10.1111/1467‑8721.01235
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01235 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ellis, R.
    (2005) Principles of instructed language learning. System, 11, 209–224. 10.1016/j.system.2004.12.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  18. ETS
    ETS (2011) TOEFL iBT® research insight: TOEFL® program history. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gibson, W., & Brown, A.
    (2009) Working with qualitative data. London, UK: Sage. 10.4135/9780857029041
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857029041 [Google Scholar]
  20. Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2012) Deconstructing comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 475–505. 10.1017/S0272263112000150
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000150 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jułkowska, I. A., & Cebrian, J.
    (2015) Effects of listener factors and stimulus properties on the intelligibility, comprehensibility and accentedness of L2 speech. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 11, 211–237. 10.1075/jslp.1.2.04jul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.1.2.04jul [Google Scholar]
  22. Jung, Y., Kim, Y., & Murphy, J.
    (2017) The role of task repetition in learning word-stress patterns through auditory priming tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 319–346. 10.1017/S0272263117000031
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000031 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2010) Language awareness and second language pronunciation: A classroom study. Language Awareness, 11, 171–185. 10.1080/09658416.2010.486439
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.486439 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N.
    (2013) The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction?System, 11, 829–840. 10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kissling, E. M., & O’Donnell, M. E.
    (2015) Increasing language awareness and self-efficacy of FL students using self-assessment and the ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Language Awareness, 11, 283–302. 10.1080/09658416.2015.1099659
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1099659 [Google Scholar]
  26. Larson-Hall, J.
    (2009) A Guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203875964
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875964 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lappin-Fortin, K., & Rye, B. J.
    (2014) The use of pre-/posttest and self-assessment tools in a French pronunciation course. Foreign Language Annals, 11, 300–320. 10.1111/flan.12083
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12083 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee, S., & Chang, S.
    (2005) Learner involvement in self-and peer-assessment of task-based oral performance. Language Research, 11, 711–735.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lynch, T., & Maclean, J.
    (2000) Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 11, 221–250. 10.1177/136216880000400303
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400303 [Google Scholar]
  30. O’Brien, M. G.
    (2014) L2 learners’ assessments of accentedness, fluency, and comprehensibility of native and nonnative German speech. Language Learning, 11, 715–748. 10.1111/lang.12082
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12082 [Google Scholar]
  31. Papajohn, D.
    (2005) Toward Speaking Excellence: The Michigan Guide to maximizing your performance in the TSE ® test and other speaking tests. Ann Arbour, MI: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.93916
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.93916 [Google Scholar]
  32. Patri, M.
    (2002) The influence of peer feedback on self- and peer-assessment of oral skills. Language Testing, 11, 109–131. 10.1191/0265532202lt224oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt224oa [Google Scholar]
  33. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L.
    (1989) Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63–90. 10.1017/S027226310000783X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310000783X [Google Scholar]
  34. Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L.
    (2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. 10.1111/lang.12079
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079 [Google Scholar]
  35. Rajadurai, J.
    (2006) Pronunciation issues in non-native contexts: A Malaysian case study. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 11, 43–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ranta, E.
    (2010) English in the real world vs. English at school: Finnish English teachers’ and students’ views. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 156–177. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2009.00235.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00235.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Robinson, P.
    (2011) Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 11, 1–36. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00641.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Rossiter, M. J.
    (2009) Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 11, 395–412. 10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395 [Google Scholar]
  39. Saito, K., & Akiyama, Y.
    (2017) Video-based interaction, negotiation for comprehensibility, and second language speech learning: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 11, 43–74. 10.1111/lang.12184
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12184 [Google Scholar]
  40. Saito, K., & Shintani, N.
    (2016) Do native speakers of North American and Singapore English differentially perceive comprehensibility in second language speech?TESOL Quarterly, 11, 421–446. 10.1002/tesq.234
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.234 [Google Scholar]
  41. Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2016) Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 217–240. 10.1017/S0142716414000502
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000502 [Google Scholar]
  42. Skehan, P.
    (2015) Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical review. Applied Linguistics, 11, 367–384. 10.1093/applin/amu072
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu072 [Google Scholar]
  43. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S.
    (1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 371–391. 10.1093/applin/16.3.371
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.371 [Google Scholar]
  44. Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., Kennedy, S., Saito, K., & Crowther, D.
    (2016) Flawed self- assessment: Investigating self-and other-perception of second language speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 122–140. 10.1017/S1366728914000832
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000832 [Google Scholar]
  45. van den Branden, K.
    (1997) Effects of negotiation on language learners’ output. Language Learning, 11, 589–636. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00023
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00023 [Google Scholar]
  46. Venkatagiri, H. S., & Levis, J. M.
    (2007) Phonological awareness and speech comprehensibility: An exploratory study. Language Awareness, 11, 263–277. 10.2167/la417.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/la417.0 [Google Scholar]
  47. Zoss, J. M.
    (2015) Adult English learners’ perceptions of their pronunciation and linguistic self-confidence. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Hamline University, Saint Paul, Minnesota.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.18008.str
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.18008.str
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error