Difficulties understanding L2 speech due to discourse- versus word-level elements

References

1. Alcón-Soler, E., & Guzman, J. R.
   (1995) The relationship between content knowledge and practise opportunities in non-native learners’ interaction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 19–32. 10.1075/aral.18.2.02alc
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.18.2.02alc [Google Scholar]
2. Bergeron, A., & Trofimovich, P.
   (2017) linguistic dimensions of accentedness and comprehensibility: Exploring task and listener effects in second language French. Foreign Language Annals, 50, 547–566. 10.1111/flan.12285
   https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12285 [Google Scholar]
3. Bansal, R. K.
   (1969) The intelligibility of Indian English: Measurements of the intelligibility of connected speech, and sentence and word material, presented to listeners of different nationalities. Central Institute of English [available fromOrient Longmans, Madras].
   [Google Scholar]
4. Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I.
   (1994) Narrative structure. InR. A. Berman & D. Slobin (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study (pp. 39–84). New York: Psychology Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Catford, J. C.
   (1950) Intelligibility. ELT Journal, (1), 7–15. 10.1093/elt/V.1.7
   https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/V.1.7 [Google Scholar]
6. Cool Edit [Computer software]
   Cool Edit [Computer software] (2000) Scottsdale, AZ: Syntrillium Software.
7. Cribb, M.
   (2012) Semantic and pragmatic miscues in non-native spoken extended discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(1), 71–82. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.10.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.10.005 [Google Scholar]
8. Dalton, C., & Seidlhofer, B.
   (1994) Pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
   (2015) Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research (Vol.42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.42.additional
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42.additional [Google Scholar]
10. Deterding, D.
    (2013) Misunderstandings in English as a lingua franca: An analysis of ELF interactions in South-East Asia (Vol.1). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110288599
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110288599 [Google Scholar]
11. Deterding, D., & Mohamad, N. R.
    (2016) The role of vowel quality in ELF misunderstandings. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 5, 291–307. 10.1515/jelf‑2016‑0021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2016-0021 [Google Scholar]
12. Field, John
    (2011) Special Issue: Listening in EAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 73–78. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.001 [Google Scholar]
13. Fontan, L., Tardieu, J., Gaillard, P., Woisard, V. & Ruiz, R.
    (2015) Relationship between speech intelligibility and speech comprehension in babble noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, 977–986. 10.1044/2015_JSLHR‑H‑13‑0335
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-13-0335 [Google Scholar]
14. Hayes-Harb, R., Smith, B. L., Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R.
    (2008) The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for native speakers of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, 36(4), 664–679. 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.04.002 [Google Scholar]
15. Henderson, A., Curnick, L., Frost, D., Kautzsch, A., Kirkova-Naskova, A., Levey, D., Tergujeff, E. H. & Waniek-Klimczak, E.
    (2015) The English pronunciation teaching in Europe survey: Factors inside and outside the classroom. InJ. A. Mompean & J. Fouz-Gonzalez (Eds.), Investigating English pronunciation trends and directions (pp. 260–291). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137509437_12
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509437_12 [Google Scholar]
16. Hustad, K. C.
    (2008) The relationship between listener comprehension and intelligibility scores for speakers with dysarthria. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 562–573. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2008/040)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/040) [Google Scholar]
17. Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2012) Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 475–505. 10.1017/S0272263112000150
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000150 [Google Scholar]
18. Jensen, C., & Thøgersen, J.
    (2017) Foreign accent, cognitive load and intelligibility of EMI lectures. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 16(3), 107–137. 10.35360/njes.414
    https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.414 [Google Scholar]
19. Kang, O., Thomson, R. I., & Moran, M.
    (2019) Which features of accent affect understanding? Exploring the intelligibility threshold of diverse accent varieties. Applied Linguistics, Online advance access. doi:  10.1093/applin/amy053
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy053 [Google Scholar]
20. Kennedy, S.
    (2008) Second language learner speech and intelligibility: Instruction and environment in a university setting (Doctoral dissertation, McGill University).
21. Kennedy, S.
    (2009) L2 proficiency: Measuring the intelligibility of words and extended speech. Issues in second language proficiency, 132–146.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kennedy, S.
    (2012) When non-native speakers misunderstand each other. Contact, 38(2), 49–62.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kennedy, S., Guénette, D., Murphy, J., & Allard, S.
    (2015) Le rôle de la prononciation dans intercompréhension entre locuteurs de français ingua franca [The role of pronunciation in intercomprehension among speakers of French as a lingua franca]. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 71(1), 1–25. 10.3138/cmlr.2139
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2139 [Google Scholar]
24. Kennedy, S.
    (2017) Using stimulated recall to explore the use of communication strategies in English lingua franca interactions. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 6(1), 1–27. 10.1515/jelf‑2017‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2017-0004 [Google Scholar]
25. Kwan, N., & Dunworth, K.
    (2016) English as a lingua franca communication between domestic helpers and employers in Hong Kong: A study of pragmatic strategies. English for specific purposes, 43, 13–24. 10.1016/j.esp.2016.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.02.001 [Google Scholar]
26. Labov, W.
    (1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular (Vol.3). University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L.
    (2014) The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36, 345–366. 10.1093/applin/amu040
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu040 [Google Scholar]
28. Lynch, T., & Maclean, J.
    (2003) Effects of feedback on performance: A study of advanced learners on an ESP speaking course. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 12, 19–44.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Major, R. C., Fitzmaurice, S. F., Bunta, F., & Balasubramanian, C.
    (2002) The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 173–190. 10.2307/3588329
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588329 [Google Scholar]
30. Matsumoto, Y.
    (2011) Successful ELF communications and implications for ELT: Sequential analysis of ELF pronunciation negotiation strategies. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 97–114. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01172.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01172.x [Google Scholar]
31. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73–97. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
32. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2008) Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58(3), 479–502. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00448.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00448.x [Google Scholar]
33. Nguyen, H. T.
    (2016) Interactional practices across settings: From classroom role-plays to workplace patient consultations. Applied Linguistics. 10.1093/applin/amw007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw007 [Google Scholar]
34. Pickering, L.
    (2019) The role of intonation in the production and perception of ITA discourse. InS. D. Looney & S. Bhalla (Eds.) A transdisciplinary approach to international teaching assistants (pp. 22–40). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788925556‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788925556-003 [Google Scholar]
35. Rossiter, M. J., Derwing, T. M., Manimtim, L. G., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2010) Oral fluency: The neglected component in the communicative language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 583–606. 10.3138/cmlr.66.4.583
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.4.583 [Google Scholar]
36. Saito, K., & Plonsky, L.
    (2019) Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning. 10.1111/lang.12345
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12345 [Google Scholar]
37. Smith, L. E.
    (1992) Spread of English and issues of intelligibility. InB. B. Kachru (Ed.). The other tongue: English across cultures, 2, 75–90. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Smith, L. E., & Bisazza, J. A.
    (1982) The comprehensibility of three varieties of English for college students in seven countries. Language Learning, 32, 259–269. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1982.tb00971.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1982.tb00971.x [Google Scholar]
39. Smith, L. E., & Nelson, C. L.
    (1985) International intelligibility of English: Directions and resources. World Englishes, 4, 333–342. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1985.tb00423.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1985.tb00423.x [Google Scholar]
40. Thomson, R.
    (2017) Measurement of accentedness, intelligibility and comprehensibility. InKang, O., & Ginther, A. (Eds.). Assessment in second language pronunciation (pp.11–29). Oxford, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315170756‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170756-2 [Google Scholar]
41. Trabasso, T., Van den Broek, P., & Suh, S. Y.
    (1989) Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1–25. 10.1080/01638538909544717
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538909544717 [Google Scholar]
42. Tsunemoto, A., Trofimovich, P., Blanchet, J., Bertrand, J., & Kennedy, S.
    (2021) Self-assessment and reflection in a French Second Language course. Foreign Language Annals. 10.1111/flan.12571
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12571 [Google Scholar]
43. Tyler, A.
    (1994) The role of repetition in perceptions of discourse coherence. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(6), 671–688. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90103‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90103-1 [Google Scholar]
44. Tyler, A., & Bro, J.
    (1992) Discourse structure in nonnative English discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 71–86. 10.1017/S0272263100010470
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010470 [Google Scholar]
45. Tyler, A., & Bro, J.
    (1993) Discourse processing effort and perceptions of comprehensibility in nonnative discourse: The effect of ordering and interpretive cues revisited. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 505–522. 10.1017/S0272263100012407
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012407 [Google Scholar]
46. Tyler, A. E., Jefferies, A. A., & Davies, C. E.
    (1988) The effect of discourse structuring devices on listener perceptions of coherence in non-native university teacher’s spoken discourse. World Englishes, 7, 101–110. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1988.tb00223.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1988.tb00223.x [Google Scholar]
47. Vandergrift, L.
    (2004) 1. Listening to Learn or Learning to Listen?Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3–25. 10.1017/S0267190504000017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000017 [Google Scholar]
48. Van Dijk, T. A.
    (1976) Philosophy of action and theory of narrative. Poetics, 5(4), 287–338. 10.1016/0304‑422X(76)90014‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(76)90014-0 [Google Scholar]
49. Visceglia, T., Tseng, C. Y., Su, Z. Y., & Huang, C. F.
    (2010) Discourse prosody planning in L1 and L2 English. InProceedings of Oriental COCOSDA International Conference on Speech Database and Assessments (6pages). www.ling.sinica.edu.tw/eip/FILES/publish/2010.12.10.889650.275202.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
50. Yorkston, K. M., Strand, E. A., & Kennedy, M. R. T.
    (1996) Comprehensibility of dysarthris speech: Implications for assessment and treatment planning. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 55–66. 10.1044/1058‑0360.0501.55
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0501.55 [Google Scholar]
51. Zielinski, B. W.
    (2008) The listener: No longer the silent partner in reduced intelligibility. System, 36(1), 69–84. 10.1016/j.system.2007.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.11.004 [Google Scholar]