1887
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN: 2215-194X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Second language pronunciation is undergoing dramatic changes in research visibility, in the intelligibility-centered goals that drive the field, and in the ways that technology is being deployed to address new needs. This plenary delineates problems that face the field as it has grown. I suggest the reasons that technology must be a critical part of the future of L2 pronunciation and the ways in which technology use can help to address problems facing future growth. These reasons include providing the support teachers need, individualizing instruction, providing ways to ensure that intelligibility-based instruction adheres to effective goals, combining information in unusual and innovative ways, taking advantage of multi-modality in instruction and delivering varied types of feedback, and researching pronunciation learning and teaching processes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.18025.lev
2019-02-01
2019-11-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alameen, G.
    (2014) The effectiveness of linking instruction on NNS speech perception and production. (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University.)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson-Hsieh, J.
    (1992) Using electronic feedback to teach suprasegmentals. System 20, 51–62. 10.1016/0346‑251X(92)90007‑P
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(92)90007-P [Google Scholar]
  3. Aryal, S., & Gutierrez-Osuna, R.
    (2014, May). Can voice conversion be used to reduce non-native accents?. InAcoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2014 IEEE International Conference on (pp.7879–7883). IEEE. 10.1109/ICASSP.2014.6855134
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2014.6855134 [Google Scholar]
  4. Avery, P. & Ehrlich, S.
    (1992) Teaching American English pronunciation. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barriuso, T. A., & Hayes-Harb, R.
    (2018) High Variability Phonetic Training as a bridge from research to practice. CATESOL Journal, 30(1), 177–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D.
    (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. InO. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp.1–47). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
  7. Bliss, H., Abel, J., & Gick, B.
    (2018) Computer-assisted visual articulation feedback in L2 pronunciation instruction. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(1), 129–153. 10.1075/jslp.00006.bli
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.00006.bli [Google Scholar]
  8. Bradlow, A. R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D. B., & Tohkura, Y. I.
    (1999) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(5), 977–985. 10.3758/BF03206911
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206911 [Google Scholar]
  9. Breitkreutz, J., Derwing, T. M., & Rossiter, M. J.
    (2001) Pronunciation teaching practices in Canada. TESL Canada Journal, 19(1), 51–61. 10.18806/tesl.v19i1.919
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v19i1.919 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, A.
    (1988) Functional load and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 22(4), 593–606. 10.2307/3587258
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587258 [Google Scholar]
  11. Burgess, J., & Spencer, S.
    (2000) Phonology and pronunciation in integrated language teaching and teacher education. System, 28(2), 191–215. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(00)00007‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00007-5 [Google Scholar]
  12. Burgos, P., Cucchiarini, C., van Hout, R. W. N. M., & Strik, H.
    (2013) Pronunciation errors by Spanish learners of Dutch: A data-driven study for ASR-based pronunciation training.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M.
    (1996) Teaching pronunciation: A reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chun, D. M.
    (1989) Teaching tone and intonation with microcomputers. CALICO Journal, 7(1), 21–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chun, D. M., Jiang, Y., Meyr, J., & Yang, R.
    (2015) Acquisition of L2 Mandarin Chinese tones with learner-created tone visualizations. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1(1), 86–114. 10.1075/jslp.1.1.04chu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.1.1.04chu [Google Scholar]
  16. Coniam, D.
    (2002) Technology as an awareness-raising tool for sensitising teachers to features of stress and rhythm in English. Language Awareness, 11(1), 30–42. 10.1080/09658410208667044
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410208667044 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dalton, C., & Seidlhofer, B.
    (1994) Pronunciation. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. De Bot, K.
    (1983) Visual feedback of intonation I: Effectiveness and induced practice behavior. Language and Speech, 26(4), 331–350. 10.1177/002383098302600402
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098302600402 [Google Scholar]
  19. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Carbonaro, M.
    (2000) Does popular speech recognition software work with ESL speech?. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 592–603. 10.2307/3587748
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587748 [Google Scholar]
  20. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Foote, J. A., Waugh, E., & Fleming, J.
    (2014) Opening the window on comprehensible pronunciation after 19 years: A workplace training study. Language Learning, 64(3), 526–548. 10.1111/lang.12053
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12053 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dickerson, W. B.
    (2013) Prediction in teaching pronunciation. InC. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. doi:  10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0950
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0950 [Google Scholar]
  22. Echelberger, A., McCurdy, S. G., & Parrish, B.
    (2018) Using a study circle model to improve teacher confidence and proficiency in delivering pronunciation instruction in the classroom. CATESOL Journal, 30(1), 213–230.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Engwall, O.
    (2012) Analysis of and feedback on phonetic features in pronunciation training with a virtual teacher. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 37–64. 10.1080/09588221.2011.582845
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.582845 [Google Scholar]
  24. Felps, D., Bortfeld, H., & Gutierrez-Osuna, R.
    (2009) Foreign accent conversion in computer assisted pronunciation training. Speech communication, 51(10), 920–932. 10.1016/j.specom.2008.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2008.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  25. Field, J.
    (2005) Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. 10.2307/3588487
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588487 [Google Scholar]
  26. Flege, J. E.
    (1999) Age of learning and second language speech. InD. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp.111–142). Malway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Foote, J. A., Holtby, A. K., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2011) Survey of the teaching of pronunciation in adult ESL programs in Canada, 2010. TESL Canada journal, 29(1), 1–22. 10.18806/tesl.v29i1.1086
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v29i1.1086 [Google Scholar]
  28. Foote, J. A., & McDonough, K.
    (2017) Using shadowing with mobile technology to improve L2 pronunciation. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(1), 34–56. 10.1075/jslp.3.1.02foo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.1.02foo [Google Scholar]
  29. Gick, B., Bernhardt, B., Bacsfalvi, P., & Wilson, I.
    (2008) Ultrasound imaging applications in second language acquisition. InJ. H. Edwards & M. Zampini (Eds.). Phonology and second language acquisition, (pp.315–338). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gilbert, J. B.
    (2010) Pronunciation as orphan: What can be done?Speak Out, 43, 3–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hacking, J. F., Smith, B. L., & Johnson, E. M.
    (2017) Utilizing electropalatography to train palatalized versus unpalatalized consonant productions by native speakers of American English learning Russian. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(1), 9–33. 10.1075/jslp.3.1.01hac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.1.01hac [Google Scholar]
  32. Hahn, L. D.
    (2004) Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 201–223. 10.2307/3588378
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588378 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hahn, M. K.
    (2002) The persistence of learned primary phrase stress patterns among learners of English (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hardison, D. M.
    (2004) Generalization of computer assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning and Technology, 8(1), 34–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hardison, D.
    (2018) Visualizing the acoustic and gestural beats of emphasis in multimodal discourse: Theoretical and pedagogical implications. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 5(1), 231–258.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Henderson, A., Frost, D., Tergujeff, E., Kautzsch, A., Murphy, D., Kirkova-Naskova, A., Waniek-Klimczak, E., Levey, D., Cunningham, U., & Curnick, L.
    (2012) The English pronunciation teaching in Europe survey: Selected results. Research in Language, 10(1), 5–27. 10.2478/v10015‑011‑0047‑4
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-011-0047-4 [Google Scholar]
  37. Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G.
    (2009) Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(2), 866–877. 10.1121/1.3148196
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3148196 [Google Scholar]
  38. Jenkins, J.
    (2000) The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kelly, L. G.
    (1969) 25 centuries of language teaching: An inquiry into the science, art, and development of language teaching methodology, 500 B.C.- 1969. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L.
    (2015) The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 345–366. 10.1093/applin/amu040
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu040 [Google Scholar]
  41. Levis, J. M.
    (2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. 10.2307/3588485
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485 [Google Scholar]
  42. Levis, J.
    (2007) Computer technology in teaching and researching pronunciation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–19. 10.1017/S0267190508070098
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190508070098 [Google Scholar]
  43. Levis, J. M.
    (2016) Research into practice: How research appears in pronunciation teaching materials. Language Teaching, 49(3), 423–437. 10.1017/S0261444816000045
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000045 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2017) Evidence-based pronunciation teaching. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(1), 1–8. 10.1075/jslp.3.1.001evi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.1.001evi [Google Scholar]
  45. Levis, J.
    (2018) Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108241564
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241564 [Google Scholar]
  46. Levis, J., & Cortes, V.
    (2008) Minimal pairs in spoken corpora: Implications for pronunciation assessment and teaching. Towards adaptive CALL: Natural language processing for diagnostic language assessment, (pp.197–208). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Levis, J. & Muller Levis, G.
    (nd). Pronunciation for a purpose.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Levis, J., & Pickering, L.
    (2004) Teaching intonation in discourse using speech visualization technology. System, 32(4), 505–524. 10.1016/j.system.2004.09.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.09.009 [Google Scholar]
  49. Levis, J., & Sonsaat, S.
    (2016) Pronunciation materials. InM. Azarnoosh, M. Zeraatpishe, A. Favani & H. R. Kargozari, Issues in materials development (pp.109–119). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑6300‑432‑9_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-432-9_10 [Google Scholar]
  50. Levis, J. M., Sonsaat, S., Link, S., & Barriuso, T. A.
    (2016) Native and nonnative teachers of L2 pronunciation: Effects on learner performance. TESOL Quarterly, 50(4), 894–931. 10.1002/tesq.272
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.272 [Google Scholar]
  51. Levis, J., & Suvorov, R.
    (2013) Automatic speech recognition. InC. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Levis, J. & Wu, A.
    (2018) Pronunciation-Research into practice and practice into research. CATESOL Journal30(1), 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Liakin, D., Cardoso, W., & Liakina, N.
    (2015) Learning L2 pronunciation with a mobile speech recognizer: French /y/. CALICO Journal, 32(1), 1–25. 10.1558/cj.v32i1.25962
    https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i1.25962 [Google Scholar]
  54. Lima, E.
    (2015) Development and evaluation of online pronunciation instruction for international teaching assistants’ comprehensibility. (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University.) 10.31274/etd‑180810‑4109
    https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-4109 [Google Scholar]
  55. Lybeck, K.
    (2002) Cultural identification and second language pronunciation of Americans in Norway. The Modern Language Journal, 86(2), 174–191. 10.1111/1540‑4781.00143
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00143 [Google Scholar]
  56. MacDonald, S.
    (2002) Pronunciation-views and practices of reluctant teachers. Prospect17(3), 3–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. McCrocklin, S. M.
    (2016) Pronunciation learner autonomy: The potential of automatic speech recognition. System, 57, 25–42. 10.1016/j.system.2015.12.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.12.013 [Google Scholar]
  58. Moyer, A.
    (2014) Exceptional outcomes in L2 phonology: The critical factors of learner engagement and self-regulation. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 418–440. 10.1093/applin/amu012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu012 [Google Scholar]
  59. Munro, M. J.
    (2018) How well can we predict second language learners’ pronunciation difficulties?CATESOL Journal, 30(1), 267–281.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
  61. (2006) The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 34(4), 520–531. 10.1016/j.system.2006.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  62. Nagle, C. L.
    (2017) Individual developmental trajectories in the L2 acquisition of Spanish spirantization. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(2), 218–241. 10.1075/jslp.3.2.03nag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.2.03nag [Google Scholar]
  63. Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H.
    (2001) Effective feedback on L2 pronunciation in ASR-based CALL. Retrieved fromhttps://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/​2066/76203/76203.pdf
  64. Niebuhr, O., Alm, M., Schümchen, N., & Fischer, K.
    (2017) Comparing visualization techniques for learning second language prosody. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 3(2), 250–277. 10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.07nie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.07nie [Google Scholar]
  65. O’Brien, M., Derwing, T., Cucchiarini, C., Hardison, D., Mixxdorff, H., Thomosn, R., Strik, H., Levis, J., Munro, M., Foote, J., & Muller Levis, G.
    (2018) Directions for the future of technology in pronunciation research and teaching. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 5(1), 182–206. 10.1075/jslp.17001.obr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.17001.obr [Google Scholar]
  66. O’Connor, J. D., & Arnold, G. F.
    (1961) Intonation of colloquial English. Bristol, UK: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Perrachione, T. K., Lee, J., Ha, L. Y., & Wong, P. C.
    (2011) Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1), 461–472. 10.1121/1.3593366
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3593366 [Google Scholar]
  68. (2011) Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1), 461–472. 10.1121/1.3593366
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3593366 [Google Scholar]
  69. Pike, K. L.
    (1945) The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Probst, K., Ke, Y., & Eskenazi, M.
    (2002) Enhancing foreign language tutors – in search of the golden speaker. Speech Communication, 37(3–4), 161–173. 10.1016/S0167‑6393(01)00009‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(01)00009-7 [Google Scholar]
  71. Qian, M., Chukharev-Hudilainen, E., & Levis, J. M.
    (2018) A system for adaptive high-variability segmental-perceptual training: implementation, effectiveness, and transfer. Language Learning and Technology, 22(1), 69–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Quintana-Lara, M.
    (2014) Effect of acoustic spectrographic instruction on production of English /i/ and /I/ by Spanish pre-service English teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27 (3), 207–227. 10.1080/09588221.2012.724424
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.724424 [Google Scholar]
  73. Sakai, M., & Moorman, C.
    (2018) Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 187–224. 10.1017/S0142716417000418
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000418 [Google Scholar]
  74. Scovel, T.
    (1969) Foreign accents, language acquisition, and cerebral dominance 1. Language Learning, 19(3-4), 245–253. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1969.tb00466.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1969.tb00466.x [Google Scholar]
  75. Sonsaat, S.
    (2017) The influence of an online pronunciation teacher’s manual on teachers’ cognitions. (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University.) 10.31274/etd‑180810‑5849
    https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-5849 [Google Scholar]
  76. (2018) Native and nonnative English-speaking teachers’ expectations of teacher’s manuals accompanying general English and pronunciation skills books. CATESOL Journal, 30(1), 113–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Strik, H., Truong, K., De Wet, F., & Cucchiarini, C.
    (2009) Comparing different approaches for automatic pronunciation error detection. Speech Communication, 51(10), 845–852. 10.1016/j.specom.2009.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2009.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  78. Swan, M., & Smith, B.
    (2001) Learner English: a teacher’s guide to interference and other problems. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Thomson, R. I.
    (2011) Computer assisted pronunciation training: Targeting second language vowel perception improves pronunciation. Calico Journal, 28(3), 744. 10.11139/cj.28.3.744‑765
    https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.3.744-765 [Google Scholar]
  80. (2012) Improving L2 listeners’ perception of English vowels: A computer-​mediated approach. Language Learning, 62(4), 1231–1258. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00724.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00724.x [Google Scholar]
  81. (2018) High variability [pronunciation] training (HVPT): A proven technique about which every language teacher and learner ought to know. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 5(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Trofimovich, P.
    (2016) Interactive alignment: A teaching-friendly view of second language pronunciation learning. Language Teaching, 49, 411–422. doi:  10.1017/S0261444813000360
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000360 [Google Scholar]
  83. Underhill, A.
    (2010) Pronunciation is the Cinderella of language teaching. www.adrianunderhill.com/2010/09/22/pronunciation-the-cinderella-of-language-teaching/
  84. Wallace, L.
    (2016) Using Google web speech as a springboard for identifying personal pronunciation problems. InJ. Levis, H. Le, I. Lucic, E. Simpson, & S. Vo (Eds). Proceedings of the 7th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, 2380–9566, Dallas, TX, October 2015 (pp.180–186). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Wang, X., & Munro, M. J.
    (2004) Computer-based training for learning English vowel contrasts. System, 32(4), 539–552. 10.1016/j.system.2004.09.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.09.011 [Google Scholar]
  86. Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A.
    (1999) Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(6), 3649–3658. 10.1121/1.428217
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428217 [Google Scholar]
  87. Wong, J.
    (2012) Training the perception and production of English // and // of Cantonese ESL learners: A comparison of low vs. high variability phonetic training nProceedings of the 14th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Techniology. Sydney, Australia (pp.37–40). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4801/008dea208d4474c108157bedbd672ab2202c.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.18025.lev
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error