1887
image of The role of talker variability in the perceptual learning of Mandarin tones by American English
listeners
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN 2215-194X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Research on segmentals has suggested that a key component of High Variability Phonetic Training (HVPT) is high talker variability. However, the extent to which high talker variability improves perception of tones is unclear. This study examined the effects of high talker variability on the perception of Mandarin tones (Tones 1–4) by English-speaking listeners. A training paradigm that used multiple talkers (multitalker group) was compared with a paradigm that used one talker (single-talker group). The results showed that the multitalker group outperformed the single-talker group, and they retained their learning better than the single-talker group did for 6 months. Neither group, however, improved their perception of Tone 1 or generalized their learning of monosyllables to disyllables. The results suggest that although high talker variability can effectively improve tone perception, it does not improve the perception of more tone categories or yield generalization of learning to more contexts compared to low talker variability.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.19010.sil
2020-02-04
2020-04-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abramson, A.
    (1975) The Tones of Central Thai: Some Perceptual Experiments. InJ. G. Harris & J. R. Chamberlain (Eds.), Studies in Thai Linguistics in Honor of William J.Gedney (pp.1–16). Bangkok: Central Institute of English Language, Office of State Universities.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander, J. A., Wong, P. C. M., & Bradlow, A. R.
    (2005) Lexical tone perception in musicians and non-musicians. InNinth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D.
    (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege, 1334. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
  4. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2017) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.30, retrieved22 July 2017fromwww.praat.org/
  5. Chang, C. B., & Bowles, A. R.
    (2015) Context effects on second-language learning of tonal contrasts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(6), 3703–3716. 10.1121/1.4937612
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4937612 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chao, Y. R.
    (1965) A grammar of spoken Chinese. Univ of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Y., & Xu, Y.
    (2006) Production of Weak Elements in Speech--Evidence from F₀ Patterns of Neutral Tone in Standard Chinese. Phonetica, 63(1), 47–75. 10.1159/000091406
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000091406 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chuang, C. K., Hiki, S., Sone, T., & Nimura, T.
    (1972) The acoustical features and perceptual cues of the four tones of standard colloquial Chinese. InProceedings of the 7th International Congress of Acoustics, vol. 3 (pp.297–300). Budapest: Akademial Kiado.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Francis, A. L., Ciocca, V., Wong, N. K. Y., Leung, W. H. Y., & Chu, P. C. Y.
    (2006) Extrinsic context affects perceptual normalization of lexical tone. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1712–1726. 10.1121/1.2149768
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2149768 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gandour, J.
    (1983) Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30813‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30813-7 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gårding, E., Kratochvil, P., Svantesson, J.-O., & Zhang, J.
    (1986) Tone 4 and Tone 3 discrimination in modern standard Chinese. Language and Speech, 29(3), 281–293. 10.1177/002383098602900307
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098602900307 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gottfried, T. L., & Suiter, T. L.
    (1997) Effect of linguistic experience on the identification of Mandarin Chinese vowels and tones. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 207–231. 10.1006/jpho.1997.0042
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0042 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hao, Y.-C.
    (2012) Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 269–279. 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hockett, C. F.
    (1947) Peiping phonology. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 67(4), 253–267. 10.2307/596062
    https://doi.org/10.2307/596062 [Google Scholar]
  15. Howie, J. M.
    (1976) Acoustical studies of Mandarin vowels and tones (Vol.6). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G.
    (2009) Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers a. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(2), 866–877. 10.1121/1.3148196
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3148196 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuang, J.
    (2017) Covariation between voice quality and pitch: Revisiting the case of Mandarin creaky voice. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(3), 1693–1706. 10.1121/1.5003649
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5003649 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lehiste, I.
    (1970) Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Levis, J. M.
    (2016) Research into practice: How research appears in pronunciation teaching materials. Language Teaching, 49(3), 423–437. 10.1017/S0261444816000045
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000045 [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, C.
    (1987) Remarks on the Underlying Representations of Neutral-Tone Words in Mandarin Chinese. Stud. English Lit. Linguist, 189–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A.
    (1989) Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Univ of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin, M. C.
    (1965) The pitch indicator and the pitch characteristics of tones in Standard Chinese. Acta Acoustica (China), 2, 8–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, Y.
    (2008) Integrated Chinese: Simplified Characters Textbook, Level 1, Part 1 (English and Chinese Edition) (3rd ed.). Cheng & Tsui.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B.
    (1993) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(3), 1242–1255. 10.1121/1.408177
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408177 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lively, S. E., Pisoni, D. B., Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y., & Yamada, T.
    (1994) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(4), 2076–2087. 10.1121/1.410149
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.410149 [Google Scholar]
  26. Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B.
    (1991) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874–886. 10.1121/1.1894649
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1894649 [Google Scholar]
  27. Moore, C. B., & Jongman, A.
    (1997) Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(3), 1864–1877. 10.1121/1.420092
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.420092 [Google Scholar]
  28. Niebuhr, O., Alm, M., Schümchen, N., & Fischer, K.
    (2017) Comparing visualization techniques for learning second language prosody. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 3(2), 250–277. 10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.07nie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.07nie [Google Scholar]
  29. Norman, J.
    (1988) Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Perrachione, T. K., Lee, J., Ha, L. Y. Y., & Wong, P. C. M.
    (2011) Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1), 461–472. 10.1121/1.3593366
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3593366 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pruitt, J. S., Jenkins, J. J., & Strange, W.
    (2006) Training the perception of Hindi dental and retroflex stops by native speakers of American English and Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1684–1696. 10.1121/1.2161427
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2161427 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sadakata, M., & McQueen, J. M.
    (2013) High stimulus variability in nonnative speech learning supports formation of abstract categories: Evidence from Japanese geminates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(2), 1324–1335. 10.1121/1.4812767
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4812767 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2014) Individual aptitude in Mandarin lexical tone perception predicts effectiveness of high-variability training. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01318
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01318 [Google Scholar]
  34. Shen, X. S.
    (1989) Toward a register approach in teaching Mandarin tones. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 24(3), 27–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Shen, X. S., & Lin, M.
    (1991) Concept of tone in Mandarin revisited: A perceptual study on tonal coarticulation. Language Sciences, 13(3–4), 421–432. 10.1016/0388‑0001(91)90025‑V
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(91)90025-V [Google Scholar]
  36. Shen, X. S., Lin, M., & Yan, J.
    (1993) F 0 turning point as an F 0 cue to tonal contrast: a case study of Mandarin tones 2 and 3. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(4), 2241–2243. 10.1121/1.406688
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.406688 [Google Scholar]
  37. So, C. K., & Best, C. T.
    (2010) Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273–293. 10.1177/0023830909357156
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830909357156 [Google Scholar]
  38. The MathWorks
    The MathWorks (2018) MATLAB (Version 9.5.0.944444) [Computer software]. Natick, MA: The MathWorks.
  39. Thomson, R. I.
    (2018) High Variability [Pronunciation] Training (HVPT). Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(2), 208–231. 10.1075/jslp.17038.tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.17038.tho [Google Scholar]
  40. Tseng, C.
    (1990) An Acoustic Phonetic Study on Tones in Mandarin Chinese. Nankang, Taipei: Institute of History & Philology, Academia Sinica. special publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, X.
    (2013) Perception of Mandarin tones: The effect of L1 background and training. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 144–160. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.01386.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.01386.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A.
    (1999) Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(6), 3649–3658. 10.1121/1.428217
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428217 [Google Scholar]
  43. Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. G.
    (2004) Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54(4), 681–712. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00283.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00283.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Whalen, D. H., & Xu, Y.
    (1992) Information for Mandarin tones in the amplitude contour and in brief segments. Phonetica, 49(1), 25–47. 10.1159/000261901
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000261901 [Google Scholar]
  45. White, C. M.
    (1981) Tonal perception errors and interference from English intonation. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 16(2), 27–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wong, P. C. M., & Perrachione, T. K.
    (2007) Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(04), 565–585. 10.1017/S0142716407070312
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070312 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wong, P. C. M., Skoe, E., Russo, N. M., Dees, T., & Kraus, N.
    (2007) Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 10(4), 420. 10.1038/nn1872
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1872 [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang, K., Peng, G., Li, Y., Minett, J. W., & Wang, W. S. Y.
    (2018) The effect of speech variability on tonal language speakers’ second language lexical tone learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 1982 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01982
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01982 [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhao, T. C., & Kuhl, P. K.
    (2015) Effect of musical experience on learning lexical tone categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(3), 1452–1463. 10.1121/1.4913457
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4913457 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.19010.sil
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.19010.sil
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error