1887
Volume 2, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN: 2215-194X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Processing lexical tones is known to be difficult for non-native speakers from various language backgrounds. Perceptual accuracy of six Mandarin tone contrasts (T1–T2, T1–T3, T1–T4, T2–T3, T2–T4, T3–T4) of two groups of Japanese listeners (learners and non-learners) and a control group of Mandarin listeners were compared in Mandarin learning experience, phonetic context, and speaker gender. Both Japanese groups perceived T2–T3 poorly, but the learner group was significantly better than the non-learner group for this and the T1–T2 contrasts. The learners’ advantage was observed across various phonetic contexts (initial consonants and tone bearing vowels), suggesting that their tone perception was more stable and resistant to speaker variation. In regard to speaker gender, both Japanese groups perceived the T2–T3 contrast more poorly, and T1–T2 and T1–T4 contrasts more successfully, when produced by female speakers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.2.2.05tsu
2016-08-12
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adi-Bensaid, L. , & Most, T
    (2012) The effect of speaker’s gender and number of syllables on the perception of words by young children: A developmental study. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Applied Behavior Analysis, 5(3-4), 17–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Best, C.T
    (1995) A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 171–203). Timonium, MD: York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradlow, A.R. , Torretta, G.M. , & Pisoni, D.B
    (1996) Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication, 20(3-4), 255–272. doi: 10.1016/S0167‑6393(96)00063‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00063-5 [Google Scholar]
  4. Burnham, D. , Kasisopa, B. , Reid, A. , Luksaneeyanawin, S. , Lacerda, F. , Attina, V. , Xu Rattanasone, N. , Schwarz, I.-C. , & Webster, D
    (2015) Universality and language-specific experience in the perception of lexical tone and pitch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(6), 1459–1491. doi: 10.1017/S0142716414000496
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000496 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, G.T
    (1974) The pitch range of English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Chinese Linguisitics, 2, 159–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chuang, C.K. , Hiki, S. , Sone, T. , & Nimura, T
    (1975) Acoustical features of the four tones in monosyllabic utterances of standard Chinese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, 31(6), 369–380.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ding, H. , Jokisch, O. , & Hoffmann, R
    (2010) Perception and production of Mandarin tones by German speakers. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody (Speech Prosody 2010) , 100153, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ding, H. , Hoffmann, R. , & Jokisch, O
    (2011) An investigation of tone perception and production in German learners of Mandarin. Archives of Acoustics, 36(3), 509–518. doi: 10.2478/v10168‑011‑0036‑6
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10168-011-0036-6 [Google Scholar]
  9. Flege, J.E
    (1995) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language speech research (pp.233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2003a) Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In A. Meyer & N. Schiller (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production, differences and similarities (pp.319–355). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2003b) Methods for assessing the perception of vowels in a second language. In E. Fava & A. Mioni (Eds.), Issues in clinical linguistics (pp. 3–28). Padova: UniPress.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Flege, J.E. , MacKay, I.R.A. , & Meador, D
    (1999) Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987. doi: 10.1121/1.428116
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428116 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gårding, E. , Kratochvil, P. , Svantesson, J.-O. , & Zhang, J
    (1986) Tone 3 and tone 4 discrimination in modern standard Chinese. Language and Speech, 29(3), 281–293.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hallé, P. , Chang, Y.-C. , & Best, C.T
    (2004) Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32(3), 395–421. doi: 10.1016/S0095‑4470(03)00016‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00016-0 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hao, Y.-C
    (2012) Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 269–279. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hiki, S. , Imaizumi, K. , Sunaoka, K. , & Yang, L
    (2004) Teaching tonal discrimination based on statistical properties and acoustical characteristics of the Chinese four tones: With regard to the contrast between tone-2 and tone-3. Proceedings of the IWLeL 2004: An Interactive Workshop on Language e-Learning , 53–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang, T. , & Johnson, K
    (2010) Language specificity in speech perception: Perception of Mandarin tones by native and non-native listeners. Phonetica, 67(4), 243–267. doi: 10.1159/000327392
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000327392 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kiriloff, C
    (1969) On the auditory perception of tones in Mandarin. Phonetica, 20(2-4), 63–67. doi: 10.1159/000259274
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000259274 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuang, J
    (2013) The tonal space of contrastive five level tones. Phonetica, 70(1-2), 1–23. doi: 10.1159/000353853
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000353853 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee, Y.-S. , Vakoch, D.A. , & Wurm, L.H
    (1996) Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(5), 527–542. doi: 10.1007/BF01758181
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01758181 [Google Scholar]
  21. Levy, E
    (2009) Language experience and consonantal context effects on perceptual assimilation of French vowels by American-English learners of French. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(2), 1138–1152. doi: 10.1121/1.3050256
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3050256 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin, W.C.J
    (1985) Teaching Mandarin tones to adult English speakers: Analysis of difficulties with suggested remedies. RELC Journal, 16(2), 31–47. doi: 10.1177/003368828501600207
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828501600207 [Google Scholar]
  23. Markham, D. , & Hazan, V
    (2004) The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47(4), 725–737. doi: 10.1044/1092‑4388(2004/055)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/055) [Google Scholar]
  24. Miracle, W.C
    (1989) Tone production of American students of Chinese: A preliminary acoustic study. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 24(3), 49–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Reid, A. , Burnham, D. , Kasisopa, B. , Reilly, R. , Attina, V. , Xu Rattanasone, N. , & Best, C.T
    (2015) Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone: The roles of language experience and visual information. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 77, 571–591. doi: 10.3758/s13414‑014‑0791‑3
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0791-3 [Google Scholar]
  26. Shen, X.S
    (1989) Towards a register approach to teaching Mandarin tones. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 24, 27–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Shen, X.S. , & Lin, M
    (1991) A perceptual study of Mandarin tones 2 and 3. Language and Speech, 34(2), 145–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith, S
    (1997) User manual for UAB software. University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Department of Rehabilitation Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Snodgrass, J.G. , Levy-Berger, G. , & Haydon, M
    (1985) Human experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. So, C.K
    (2010) Categorizing Mandarin tones into Japanese pitch-accent categories: The role of phonetic properties. Proceedings of the Second Language Studies – Acquisition, Learning , Education and Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. So, C.K. , & Best, C.T
    (2010) Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273–293. doi: 10.1177/0023830909357156
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830909357156 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2011) Categorizing Mandarin tones into listeners’ native prosodic categories: The role of phonetic properties. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47(1), 133–145. doi: 10.2478/psicl‑2011‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.2478/psicl-2011-0011 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2014) Phonetic influences on English and French listeners’ assimilation of Mandarin tones to native prosodic categories. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 195–221. doi: 10.1017/S0272263114000047
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000047 [Google Scholar]
  34. Strange, W. , Bohn, O.-S. , Trent, S.A. , & Nishi, K
    (2004) Acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(4), 1791–1807. doi: 10.1121/1.1687832
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1687832 [Google Scholar]
  35. Strange, W. , Levy, E.S. , & Law, F.L
    (2009) Cross-language categorization of French and German vowels by naïve American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(3), 1461–1476. doi: 10.1121/1.3179666
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3179666 [Google Scholar]
  36. Strange, W. , & Shafer, V.L
    (2008) Speech perception in second language learners: The re-education of selective perception. In J.G. Hansen Edwards & M.L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 153–191). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.36.09str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.36.09str [Google Scholar]
  37. Sunaoka, K. , Sun, Q. , & Hiki, S
    (2009) Corpus-based Chinese language education: Development and assessment of Chinese tone discrimination CAI self-learning system based on learner corpus. Journal of Liberal Arts (The School of Political Science and Economics, Waseda University), 126, 79–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Tsukada, K. , Xu, H.L. , & Xu Rattanasone, N
    (2015) The perception of Mandarin lexical tones by listeners from different linguistic backgrounds. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 4(2), 141–161. doi: 10.1515/caslar‑2015‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2015-0009 [Google Scholar]
  39. Tu, J.-Y. , Hsiung, Y. , Wu, M.-D. , & Sung, Y.-T
    (2014) Error patterns of Mandarin disyllabic tones by Japanese learners. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2014) , 2558–2562.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, X
    (2013) Perception of Mandarin tones: The effect of L1 background and training. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 144–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.01386.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.01386.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, Y. , Spence, M.M. , Jongman, A. , & Sereno, J.A
    (1999) Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(6), 3649–3658. doi: 10.1121/1.428217
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428217 [Google Scholar]
  42. Wayland, R. , & Guion, S
    (2003) Perceptual discrimination of Thai tones by naïve and experienced learners of Thai. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 113–129. doi: 10.1017/S0142716403000067
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000067 [Google Scholar]
  43. Wayland, R. , & Susan, G.G
    (2004) Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54(4), 681–712. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00283.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00283.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Wong, P
    (2013) Perceptual evidence for protracted development in monosyllabic Mandarin lexical tone production in preschool children in Taiwan. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(1), 3649–3658.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wong, P. , Schwartz, R.G. , & Jenkins, J.J
    (2005) Perception and production of lexical tones by 3-year-old, Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 48(5), 1065–1079. doi: 10.1044/1092‑4388(2005/074)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/074) [Google Scholar]
  46. Wong, P.C.M. , & Perrachione, T.K
    (2007) Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 565–585. doi: 10.1017/S0142716407070312
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070312 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wu, X. , Munro, M.J. , & Wang, Y
    (2014) Tone assimilation by Mandarin and Thai listeners with and without L2 experience. Journal of Phonetics, 46, 86–100. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  48. Yu, K.M. , & Lam, H.W
    (2011) The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2011) , 2240–2243.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (2014) The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(3), 1320–1333. doi: 10.1121/1.4887462
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4887462 [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhu, S. , Wong, L.L.N. , & Chen, F
    (2014) Tone identification in Mandarin-speaking children with profound hearing impairment. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 78, 2292–2296. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.10.036
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.10.036 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.2.2.05tsu
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Japanese , lexical tones , Mandarin and perception
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error