1887
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN: 2215-194X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of teacher and peer corrective feedback on pronunciation development, with a special focus on whether providing or receiving peer feedback on pronunciation is more beneficial for L2 production skills. Participants included 96 L2 learners of German. They were assigned to one of three experimental groups or a control group. After general pronunciation training on a segmental and a suprasegmental feature, the teacher group received feedback from a teacher, the provider group gave feedback to peers, and the receiver group listened to feedback from peers. The control group received neither pronunciation training nor feedback. Results from native speaker comprehensibility ratings of learners’ productions indicated that while all groups outperformed the control group, both the teacher and the provider group improved more than the receiver group. In addition, the provider group had a slight edge over the teacher group. Theoretical and pedagogical implications of these findings are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20001.mar
2021-01-08
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bergeron, A. , & Trofimovich, P.
    (2017) Linguistic dimensions of accentedness and comprehensibility: Exploring task and listener effects in second language French. Foreign Language Annals, 50, 547–566. 10.1111/flan.12285
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12285 [Google Scholar]
  2. Boersma, P. , & Weenink, D.
    (2019) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1.05. Accessed22 July 2018fromwww.praat.org
  3. Brown, D.
    (2016) The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 20, 436–458. 10.1177/1362168814563200
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814563200 [Google Scholar]
  4. Carrell, P. L.
    (1989) Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 121–134. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1989.tb02534.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb02534.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Celce-Murcia, M. , Brinton, D. M. , Goodwin, J. M. , & Griner, B.
    (2010) Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chu, R.-X.
    (2013) Effects of peer feedback on Taiwanese adolescents’ English speaking practices and development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Couper, G.
    (2003) The value of an explicit pronunciation syllabus in ESOL teaching. Prospect, 18, 53–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Darcy, I.
    (2018) Powerful and effective pronunciation instruction: How can we achieve it?The CATESOL Journal, 30, 13–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Derwing, T. M.
    (2013) Pronunciation instruction. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp.1–9). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2019) Utopian goals for pronunciation research revisited. In J. Levis , C. Nagle , & E. Todey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching conference (pp.27–35). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Derwing, T. M. , & Munro, M. J.
    (2015) Pronunciation fundamentals: evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42 [Google Scholar]
  12. Derwing, T. M. , Munro, M. J. , & Wiebe, G.
    (1998) Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48, 393–410. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00047
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00047 [Google Scholar]
  13. Flavell, J. H.
    (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911. 10.1037/0003‑066X.34.10.906
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906 [Google Scholar]
  14. Foote, J. A. , Trofimovich, P. , Collins, L. & Soler Urzúa, F.
    (2016) Pronunciation teaching practices in communicative second language classes. The Language Learning Journal, 44, 181–196. 10.1080/09571736.2013.784345
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.784345 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fujii, A. , Ziegler, N. , & Mackey, A.
    (2016) Peer interaction and metacognitive instruction in the EFL classroom. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp.63–89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.45.03fuj
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.03fuj [Google Scholar]
  16. Goh, C.
    (2008) Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39, 188–213. 10.1177/0033688208092184
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208092184 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gordon, J. , & Darcy, I.
    (2016) The development of comprehensible speech in L2 learners: A classroom study on the effects of short-term pronunciation instruction. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 2, 56–92. 10.1075/jslp.2.1.03gor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.2.1.03gor [Google Scholar]
  18. Hall, C.
    (2003) Modern German pronunciation: An introduction for speakers of English. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hirata, Y.
    (2004) Computer assisted pronunciation training for native English speakers learning Japanese pitch and durational contrasts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17, 357–376. 10.1080/0958822042000319629
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0958822042000319629 [Google Scholar]
  20. Huensch, A.
    (2019a) Pronunciation in foreign language classrooms: Instructors’ training, classroom practices, and beliefs. Language Teaching Research, 23, 745–764. 10.1177/1362168818767182
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818767182 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2019b) The pronunciation teaching practices of university-level graduate teaching assistants of French and Spanish introductory language courses. Foreign Language Annals, 52, 13–31. 10.1111/flan.12372
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12372 [Google Scholar]
  22. Huensch, A. , & Thompson, A. S.
    (2017) Contextualizing attitudes toward pronunciation: Foreign Language Learners in the United States. Foreign Language Annals, 50, 410–432. 10.1111/flan.12259
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12259 [Google Scholar]
  23. Larson-Hall, J.
    (2016) A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R. (2nd ed.). New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee, J. , Jang, J. , & Plonsky, L.
    (2015) The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36, 345–366. 10.1093/applin/amu040
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu040 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lenhard, W. & Lenhard, A.
    (2016) Calculation of Effect Sizes. Retrieved from: https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lev-Ari, S. , & Keysar, B.
    (2012) Less-detailed representation of non-native language: Why non-native speakers’ stories seem more vague. Discourse Processes, 49, 523–538. 10.1080/0163853X.2012.698493
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.698493 [Google Scholar]
  27. Levelt, W. J. M.
    (1983) Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41–104. 10.1016/0010‑0277(83)90026‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90026-4 [Google Scholar]
  28. Levis, J. M.
    (2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 369–377. 10.2307/3588485
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485 [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, Q.
    (2011) Factors influencing pronunciation accuracy: L1 negative transfer, task variables and individual aptitude. English Language Teaching, 4, 115–120. 10.5539/elt.v4n4p115
    https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n4p115 [Google Scholar]
  30. Loewen, S. & Isbell, D. R.
    (2017) Pronunciation in face-to-face and audio-only synchronous computer-mediated learner interactions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 225–256. 10.1017/S0272263116000449
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000449 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lundstrom, K. , & Baker, W.
    (2009) To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30–43. 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  32. Luo, B.
    (2016) Evaluating a computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) technique for efficient classroom instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 451–476. 10.1080/09588221.2014.963123
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.963123 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lyster, R. , & Saito, K.
    (2010) Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302. 10.1017/S0272263109990520
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520 [Google Scholar]
  34. Martin, I. A.
    (2017) Teaching pronunciation through homework assignments: The method of iCPRs. In M. O’Brien & J. Levis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, (pp.216–223). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2018) Bridging the gap between L2 pronunciation research and teaching: Using iCPRs to improve novice German learners’ pronunciation in distance and face-to-face classrooms. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College of the Liberal Arts, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2020a) Pronunciation can be acquired outside the classroom: Design and assessment of homework-based training. The Modern Language Journal, 104, 457–479. doi:  10.1111/modl.12638
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12638 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2020b) Pronunciation development and instruction in distance language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 24, 86–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Martinez, M. E.
    (2006) What is metacognition?Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 696–699. 10.1177/003172170608700916
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170608700916 [Google Scholar]
  39. Miao, Y. , Badger, R. , & Zhen, Y.
    (2006) A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179–200. 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  40. Moranski, K. , & Ziegler, N.
    (2019, March). Multi-site studies in SLA research: Challenges, risks, and rewards. Paper presented at theconference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Atlanta, GA.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Munro, M. J. , & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73–97. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
  42. O’Brien, M. G.
    (2019) Investigating stress assignment. In J. Levis , C. Nagle , & E. Todey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp.70–81). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Peirce, J. W.
    (2019) PsychoPy. Psychology software in Python [Computer program]. Version 3.1.2. Accessed12 May 2019atwww.psychopy.org
  44. Philip, J. , Adams, R. , & Iwashita, N.
    (2014) Peer interaction and second language learning. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Plonsky, L. , & Oswald, F. L.
    (2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912. 10.1111/lang.12079
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079 [Google Scholar]
  46. Saeli, H.
    (2019) Correction timing: Does it affect teacher oral feedback?Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 5, 49–71. 10.1075/jslp.17004.sae
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.17004.sae [Google Scholar]
  47. Saito, K.
    (2012) Effects of instruction on L2 pronunciation development: a synthesis of 15 quasi-experimental intervention studies. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 842–854. 10.1002/tesq.67
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.67 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2015) Communicative focus on second language phonetic form: Teaching Japanese learners to perceive and produce English /ɹ/ without explicit instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 377–409. 10.1017/S0142716413000271
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000271 [Google Scholar]
  49. Saito, K. , & Lyster, R.
    (2012) Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62, 595–633. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00639.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00639.x [Google Scholar]
  50. Saito, K. , & Plonsky, L.
    (2019) Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69, 652–708. 10.1111/lang.12345
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12345 [Google Scholar]
  51. Saito, K. , Suzukida, Y. , & Sun, H.
    (2019) Aptitude, experience, and second language pronunciation proficiency development in classroom settings: A longitudinal study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 201–225. 10.1017/S0272263117000432
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000432 [Google Scholar]
  52. Sato, M.
    (2017) Oral peer corrective feedback. Multiple theoretical perspectives. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp.19–34). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315621432‑3
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621432-3 [Google Scholar]
  53. (2020) Metacognitive instruction for collaborative interaction: The process and product of self-regulated learning in the Chilean EFL context. In C. Lambert & R. Oliver (Eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts (pp.215–236). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sato, M. , & Ballinger, S.
    (2016) Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp.1–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.45.01int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.01int [Google Scholar]
  55. Sato, M. , & Loewen, S.
    (2018) Metacognitive instruction enhances the effectiveness of corrective feedback: Variable effects of feedback types and linguistic targets. Language Learning, 68, 507–545. 10.1111/lang.12283
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12283 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sato, M. , & Lyster, R.
    (2012) Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 591–626. 10.1017/S0272263112000356
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000356 [Google Scholar]
  57. Sheen, Y.
    (2010) Introduction: The role of oral and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 169–179. 10.1017/S0272263109990489
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990489 [Google Scholar]
  58. Sippel, L.
    (2019) The impact of peer corrective feedback on vocabulary development. Foreign Language Annals, 52, 595–611. 10.1111/flan.12416
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12416 [Google Scholar]
  59. Sippel, L. , & Jackson, C. N.
    (2015) Teacher vs. peer oral corrective feedback in the German language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 48, 688–705. 10.1111/flan.12164
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12164 [Google Scholar]
  60. Thomson, R. I. , & Derwing, T. M.
    (2015) The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36, 326–244. 10.1093/applin/amu076
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu076 [Google Scholar]
  61. Toth, P. D.
    (2008) Teacher- and learner-led discourse in task-based grammar instruction: Providing procedural assistance for L2 morphosyntactic development. Language Learning, 58, 237–283. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00441.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00441.x [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhang, R. , & Yuan, Z. M.
    (2020) Examining the effects of explicit pronunciation instruction on the development of L2 pronunciation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–14. 10.1017/S0272263120000121
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000121 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20001.mar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20001.mar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error