1887
image of Second language comprehensibility as a dynamic construct
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examined longitudinal changes in second language (L2) interlocutors’ mutual comprehensibility ratings (perceived ease of understanding speech), targeting comprehensibility as a dynamic, time-varying, interaction-centered construct. In a repeated-measures, within-participants design, 20 pairs of L2 English university students from different language backgrounds engaged in three collaborative and interactive tasks over 17 minutes, rating their partner’s comprehensibility at 2–3 minute intervals using 100-millimeter scales (seven ratings per interlocutor). Mutual comprehensibility ratings followed a U-shaped function over time, with comprehensibility (initially perceived to be high) being affected by task complexity but then reaching high levels by the end of the interaction. The interlocutors’ ratings also became more similar to each other early on and remained aligned throughout the interaction. These findings demonstrate the dynamic nature of comprehensibility between L2 interlocutors and suggest the need for L2 comprehensibility research to account for the effects of interaction, task, and time on comprehensibility measurements.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20003.tro
2020-07-08
2020-08-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baese-Berk, M.
    (2018) Perceptual learning for native and non-native speech. InK. D. Federmeier & D. G. Watson (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Current topics in language (pp.1–29). Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi:  10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergeron, A., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2017) Linguistic dimensions of accentenedness and comprehensibility: Exploring task and listener effects in second language French. Foreign Language Annals, 50, 547–566. doi:  10.1111/flan.12285
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12285 [Google Scholar]
  4. Berry, G. M., & Ernestus, M.
    (2018) Phonetic alignment in English as a lingua franca: Coming together while splitting apart. Second Language Research, 34, 343–370. doi:  10.1177/0267658317737348
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317737348 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brennan, S. E., Kuhlen, A. K., & Charoy, J.
    (2018) Discourse and dialogue. InS. L. Thompson-Schill (Ed.), The Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience (pp.145–209). Wiley. 10.1002/9781119170174.epcn305
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn305 [Google Scholar]
  6. Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F.
    (2004) Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3647–3658. doi:  10.1121/1.1815131
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1815131 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cobb, T.
    (2019) VocabProfilers [computer program]. https://www.lextutor.ca/vp
  8. Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K.
    (2015b) Does speaking task affect second language comprehensibility?The Modern Language Journal, 99, 80–95. doi:  10.1111/modl.12185
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12185 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2018) Linguistic dimensions of L2 accentedness and comprehensibility vary across speaking tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 443–457. doi:  10.1017/S027226311700016X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311700016X [Google Scholar]
  10. Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T.
    (2015a) Second language comprehensibility revisited: Investigating the effects of learner background. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 814–837. doi:  10.1002/tesq.203
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.203 [Google Scholar]
  11. de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
    (2007) A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21. doi:  10.1017/S1366728906002732
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732 [Google Scholar]
  12. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (1997) Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 1–16. doi:  10.1017/S0272263197001010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2015) Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dragojevic, M., Giles, H., Beck, A.-C., & Tatum, N. T.
    (2017) The fluency principle: Why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitudes. Communication Monographs, 84, 385–405. doi:  10.1080/03637751.2017.1322213
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1322213 [Google Scholar]
  15. ETS
    ETS (2017) TOEFL iBT® and IELTS® academic module scores: Score comparison tool. www.ets.org/toefl/institutions/scores/compare
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Flege, J., & Fletcher, K.
    (1992) Talker and listener effects on the perception of degree of foreign accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 370–389. doi:  10.1121/1.402780
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402780 [Google Scholar]
  17. Galindo Ochoa, J. A.
    (2017) The effect of task repetition on Colombian EFL students’ accuracy and fluency (Unpublished master’s thesis). Concordia University, Montreal.
  18. Garrod, S., Tosi, A., & Pickering, M. J.
    (2018) Alignment during interaction. In. S.-A. Rueschemeyer & M. G. Gaskell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.575–593). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gibson, W., & Brown, A.
    (2009) Working with qualitative data. Sage. 10.4135/9780857029041
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857029041 [Google Scholar]
  20. Giles, H., & Ogay, T.
    (2007) Communication Accommodation Theory. InB. B. Whaley & W. Santer (eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp.293–309). Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Graf, L. K. M., Mayer, S., & Landwehr, J. R.
    (2018) Measuring processing fluency: One versus five items. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28, 393–411. doi:  10.1002/jcpy.1021
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1021 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kang, O.
    (2012) Impact of rater characteristics and prosodic features of speaker accentedness on ratings of international teaching assistants’ oral performance. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9, 249–269. doi:  10.1080/15434303.2011.642631
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.642631 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kleinschmidt, D. F., & Jaeger, T. F.
    (2015) Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. Psychological Review, 122, 148–203. doi:  10.1037/a0038695
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038695 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F.
    (2016) What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 31, 32–59. doi:  10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299 [Google Scholar]
  25. Matsuura, H., Chiba, R., & Fujieda, M.
    (1999) Intelligibility and comprehensibility of American and Irish Englishes in Japan. World Englishes, 18, 49–62. doi:  10.1111/1467‑971X.00121
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00121 [Google Scholar]
  26. Munro, M. J.
    (2018) Dimensions of pronunciation. InO. Kang, R. I. Thomson, & J. M. Murphy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of contemporary English pronunciation (pp.413–431). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73–97. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Nagle, C., Trofimovich, P., & Bergeron, A.
    (2019) Toward a dynamic view of second language comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 647–672. doi:  10.1017/S0272263119000044
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000044 [Google Scholar]
  29. Newman, E. J., Sanson, M., Miller, E. K., Quigley-McBride, A., Foster, J. L., Bernstein, D. M., & Garry, M.
    (2014) People with easier to pronounce names promote truthiness of claims. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e88671. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0088671
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088671 [Google Scholar]
  30. O’Brien, M. G.
    (2014) L2 learners’ assessments of accentedness, fluency, and comprehensibility of native and nonnative German speech. Language Learning, 64, 715–748. doi:  10.1111/lang.12082
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12082 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pakhomov, S. V., Kaiser, E. A., Boley, D. L., Marino, S. E., Knopman, D. S., & Birnbaum, A. K.
    (2011) Effects of age and dementia on temporal cycles in spontaneous speech fluency. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 619–635. doi:  10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  32. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
  33. Reber, R., & Greifeneder, R.
    (2017) Processing fluency in education: How metacognitive feelings shape learning, belief formation, and affect. Educational Psychologist, 52, 84–103. doi:  10.1080/00461520.2016.1258173
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1258173 [Google Scholar]
  34. Robinson, P.
    (2005) Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 1–32. doi:  10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  35. Saito, K., & Shintani, N.
    (2016) Do native speakers of North American and Singapore English differentially perceive comprehensibility in second language speech?TESOL Quarterly, 50, 421–446. doi:  10.1002/tesq.234
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.234 [Google Scholar]
  36. Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2017) Using listener judgements to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 38, 439–462. doi:  10.1093/applin/amv047
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv047 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sanchez, C. A., & Jaeger, A. J.
    (2015) If it’s hard to read, it changes how long you do it: Reading time as an explanation for perceptual fluency effects on judgment. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 206–211. doi:  10.3758/s13423‑014‑0658‑6
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0658-6 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sanchez, C. A., & Khan, S.
    (2016) Instructor accents in online education and their effect on learning and attitudes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 494–502. doi:  10.1111/jcal.12149
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12149 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sheppard, B. E., Elliott, N. C., & Baese-Berk, M. M.
    (2017) Comprehensibility and intelligibility of international student speech: Comparing perceptions of university EAP instructors and content faculty. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 26, 42–51. doi:  10.1016/j.jeap.2017.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  40. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B.
    (2003) Applied longitudinal data analysis. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Song, H., & Schwarz, N.
    (2008) If it’s hard to read, it’s hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science, 19, 986–988. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02189.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2012) Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 905–916. doi:  10.1017/S1366728912000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000168 [Google Scholar]
  43. Xie, X., Weatherholtz, K., Bainton, L., Rowe, E., Burchill, Z., Liu, L., & Jaeger, T. F.
    (2018) Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented speech and its transfer to an unfamiliar talker. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143, 2013–2031. doi:  10.1121/1.5027410
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5027410 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20003.tro
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20003.tro
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error