1887
image of Comprehensibility andeveryday English use
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this longitudinal study we tracked change in comprehensibility and English use over a 10-month period in 14 L2 English learners (8 beginner, 6 intermediate) settling in Australia. They were interviewed 4 times during the 10 months as part of a larger longitudinal study. English use was reported at each interview using a language map and excerpts from recordings of Interviews 1 and 4 were rated for comprehensibility. Intermediate participants tended to be more comprehensible and maintain a higher level of English use over time than the beginners. Exploration of individual variation revealed a range of comprehensibility outcomes, the variable and non-linear nature of English use trajectories, and a possible relationship between comprehensibility change and English use for some participants. Important methodological implications for future studies relate to the measurement of comprehensibility and English use, the speech samples used for comprehensibility ratings, and the importance of individual variation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20011.zie
2020-08-04
2020-09-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Australian Council of TESOL Associations
    Australian Council of TESOL Associations (2019) Submission to the evaluation of the Adult Migrant English Program (AMEP) “new business model”. Retrieved from: https://tesol.org.au
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cerreta, S., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2018) Engaging the senses: A sensory-based approach to L2 pronunciation instruction for actors. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(1), 46–72. doi:  10.1075/jslp.00003.cer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.00003.cer [Google Scholar]
  3. Chick, A., Benson, P., & Moloney, R.
    (Eds.) (2019) Multilingual Sydney. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Crowther, D.
    (2020) Rating L2 speaker comprehensibility on monologic vs. interactive tasks. What is the effect of speaking task type?Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6(1), 96–121. doi:  10.1075/jslp.19019.cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.19019.cro [Google Scholar]
  5. Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K.
    (2015) Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility?The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95. doi:  10.1111/modl.12185
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12185 [Google Scholar]
  6. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (1997) Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 1–16. doi:  10.1017/S0272263197001010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2009) Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42(4), 476–490. doi:  10.1017/S026144480800551X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480800551X [Google Scholar]
  8. (2013) The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7‐year study. Language Learning, 63(2), 163–185. doi:  10.1111/lang.12000
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12000 [Google Scholar]
  9. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2008) A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 359–380. doi:  10.1093/applin/amm041
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm041 [Google Scholar]
  10. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G.
    (1998) Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410. doi:  10.1111/0023‑8333.00047
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00047 [Google Scholar]
  11. Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2004) Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54(4), 655–679. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00282.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Dewey, D. P.
    (2017) Measuring social interaction during study abroad: Quantitative methods and challenges. System, 71, 49–59. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2017.09.026
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.026 [Google Scholar]
  13. Galante, A., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2017) The effectiveness of drama as an instructional approach for the development of second language oral fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 115–142. doi:  10.1002/tesq.290
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.290 [Google Scholar]
  14. Isaacs, T., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2013) Rater experience, rating scale length, and judgments of L2 pronunciation: Revisiting research conventions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(2), 135–159. doi:  10.1080/15434303.2013.769545
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2013.769545 [Google Scholar]
  15. Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2012) Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 475–505. doi:  10.1017/S0272263112000150
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000150 [Google Scholar]
  16. Isaacs, T., Trofimovich, P., & Foote, J. A.
    (2018) Developing a user-oriented second language comprehensibility scale for English-medium universities. Language Testing, 35(2), 193–216. doi:  10.1177/0265532217703433
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217703433 [Google Scholar]
  17. Isaacs, T., Trofimovich, P., Yu, G., & Chereau, B. M.
    (2015) Examining the linguistic aspects of speech that most efficiently discriminate between upper levels of the revised IELTS pronunciation scale. IELTS Research Report Series, 4. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ielts.org/teaching-and-research/research-reports
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kang, O.
    (2010) Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301–315. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kennedy, S., Foote, J. A., & Buss, L. K.
    (2015) Second language speakers at university: Longitudinal development and rater behaviour. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 199–209. doi:  10.1002/tesq.212
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.212 [Google Scholar]
  20. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
    (2008) Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200–213. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2008.00714.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00714.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Munro, M. J.
    (2018) Dimensions of pronunciation. InO. Kang, R. I. Thomson, & J. M. Murphy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of contemporary English pronunciation. (pp.413–431). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
  23. (1998) The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning, 48(2), 159–182. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9922.00038
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00038 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2015) A prospectus for pronunciation research in the 21st century. A point of view. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1(1), 11–42. doi:  10.1075/jslp.1.1.01mun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.1.1.01mun [Google Scholar]
  25. Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Morton, S. L.
    (2006) The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 111–131. doi:  10.1017/S0272263106060049
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060049 [Google Scholar]
  26. Nagle, C., Trofimovich, P., & Bergeron, A.
    (2019) Toward a dynamic view of second language comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4), 647–672. doi:  10.1017/S0272263119000044
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000044 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G.
    (2005) Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 26–45. doi:  10.1017/S0267190505000024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000024 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ranta, L., & Meckelborg, A.
    (2013) How much exposure to English do international graduate students really get? Measuring language use in a naturalistic setting. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(1), 1–33. doi:  10.3138/cmlr.987
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.987 [Google Scholar]
  29. Saito, K., & Akiyama, Y.
    (2017) Video-based interaction, negotiation for comprehensibility, and second language speech learning: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 67(1), 43–74. doi:  10.1111/lang.12184
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12184 [Google Scholar]
  30. Saito, K., Dewaele, J. M., & Hanzawa, K.
    (2017) A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between motivation and late second language speech learning in classroom settings. Language and Speech, 60(4), 614–632. doi:  10.1177/0023830916687793
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830916687793 [Google Scholar]
  31. Saito, K., & Plonsky, L.
    (2019) Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69(3), 652–708. doi:  10.1111/lang.12345
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12345 [Google Scholar]
  32. Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2016) Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 217–240. doi:  10.1017/S0142716414000502
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000502 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2017) Using listener judgments to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 439–462. doi:  10.1093/applin/amv047
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv047 [Google Scholar]
  34. Saito, K., Webb, S., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2016) Lexical profiles of comprehensible second language speech. The role of appropriateness, fluency, variation, sophistication, abstractness, and sense relations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 677–701. doi:  10.1017/S0272263115000297
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000297 [Google Scholar]
  35. The State of Victoria Department of Premier and Cabinet
    The State of Victoria Department of Premier and Cabinet (2018) Population diversity in Victoria: 2016 census. Local government areas. Retrieved from: https://www.multicultural.vic.gov.au
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2015) The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344. doi:  10.1093/applin/amu076
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu076 [Google Scholar]
  37. Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2012) Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 905–916. doi:  10.1017/S1366728912000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000168 [Google Scholar]
  38. Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & Van Dijk, M.
    (2008) Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214–231. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2008.00715.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00715.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Yates, L., Terraschke, A., Zielinski, B., Pryor, E., Wang, J., Major, G., … Williams Tetteh, V.
    (2015) Adult Migrant English Program (AMEP) Longitudinal Study 2011–2014: Final report. Sydney: Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20011.zie
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20011.zie
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: individual variation; longitudinal; comprehensibility; English use
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error