1887
image of Investigating the relationship between comprehensibility and social evaluation
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The processing fluency hypothesis proposes that listeners’ perceived difficulty processing the speech of L2 speakers (called /) leads them to downgrade those speakers socially. In this paper, we investigate this relationship, focusing on context-specificity. L1-English listeners provided comprehensibility and social evaluation ratings of L1-Korean speakers speaking English, while an orthographic depiction of the speech either appeared alongside the audio or did not, a manipulation aiming to affect comprehensibility. Varying orthography between subjects, Experiment 1 found that orthography resulted in greater comprehensibility, but not more positive social evaluations. Experiment 2 manipulated orthography within subjects, varying context: orthography trials were presented first or last. Comprehensibility and social evaluation ratings were related only when orthography was first, suggesting a conditional, asymmetrical relationship where listeners more readily downgrade than upgrade the same speaker when orthography changes. Our results highlight the context-dependent nature of these constructs, limiting the generalizability of the processing fluency hypothesis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20022.vau
2020-09-10
2020-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M.
    (2009) Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235. 10.1177/1088868309341564
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradlow, A. R. & Alexander, J. A.
    (2007) Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4): 2339–2349. 10.1121/1.2642103
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2642103 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brennan, E. M. & Brennan, J. S.
    (1981) Accent scaling and language attitudes: Reactions to Mexican American English Speech, Language and Speech, 24(3), 207–221. 10.1177/002383098102400301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098102400301 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bresnahan, M. J., Ohashi, R., Nebashi, R., Liu, W. Y., & Shearman, S. M.
    (2002) Attitudinal and affective response toward accented English. Language and Communication, 22(2), 171–185. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(01)00025‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(01)00025-8 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cardoso, A., Levon, E., Sharma, D., Watt, D., & Ye, Y.
    (2019) Inter-speaker variation and the evaluation of British English accents in employment contexts. InCalhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (1615–1619). Melbourne, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. De Meo, A., Vitale, M., Pettorino, M. & Martin, P.
    (2011) Acoustic-perceptual credibility correlates of news reading by native and Chinese speakers of Italian. InW. Lee & E. Zee (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (1366–1369). Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (1997) Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 1–16. 10.1017/S0272263197001010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2009) Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42(4), 476–490. 10.1017/S026144480800551X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480800551X [Google Scholar]
  9. Dixon, J. A., & Mahoney, B.
    (2004) The effect of accent evaluation and evidence on a suspect’s perceived guilt and criminality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(1), 63–73. 10.3200/SOCP.144.1.63‑73
    https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.144.1.63-73 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dragojevic, M.
    (2020) Extending the fluency principle: Factors that increase listeners’ processing fluency positively bias their language attitudes. Communication Monographs, (87)2, 158–178. 10.1080/03637751.2019.1663543
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1663543 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dragojevic, M., & Giles, H.
    (2014) The reference frame effect: An intergroup perspective on language attitudes. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 91–111. 10.1111/hcre.12017
    https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12017 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2016) I don’t like you because you’re hard to understand: The role of processing fluency in the language attitudes process. Human Communication Research, 42(3), 396–420. 10.1111/hcre.12079
    https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12079 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dragojevic, M., Giles, H., Beck, A. C., & Tatum, N. T.
    (2017) The fluency principle: Why foreign accent strength negatively biases language attitudes. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 385–405. 10.1080/03637751.2017.1322213
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1322213 [Google Scholar]
  14. Giles, H., & Rakić, T.
    (2014) Language attitudes: Social determinants and consequences of language variation. InT. M. Holtgraves (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, 11–26. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. F.
    (2010) The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 214–237. 10.1177/1088868309359288
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309359288 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall-Lew, L., Paiva Couceiro, I., & Fairs, A.
    (2019) Credibility without intelligibility: Implications for hearing vernacular speakers. InR. Blake, & I. Buchstaller (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to the Work of John R. Rickford (220–230). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9780429427886‑23
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429427886-23 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hosoda, M., & Stone-Romero, E.
    (2010) The effects of foreign accents on employment-related decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(2), 113–132. 10.1108/02683941011019339
    https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011019339 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hu, G., & Lindemann, S.
    (2009) Stereotypes of Cantonese English, apparent native/non-native status, and their effect on non-native English speakers’ perception. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 30(3), 253–269. 10.1080/01434630802651677
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630802651677 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ingvalson, E. M., Lansford, K. L., Federova, V., & Fernandez, G.
    (2017a) Listeners’ attitudes toward accented talkers uniquely predicts accented speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(3), 234–238. 10.1121/1.4977583
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4977583 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ingvalson, E. M., Lansford, K. L., Fedorova, V., & Fernandez, G.
    (2017b) Cognitive factors as predictors of accented speech perception for younger and older adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(6), 4652–4659. 10.1121/1.4986930
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4986930 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kang, O., & Rubin, D. L.
    (2009) Reverse linguistic stereotyping: Measuring the effect of listener expectations on speech evaluation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28(4), 441–456. 10.1177/0261927X09341950
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09341950 [Google Scholar]
  22. Klein, N., & O’Brien, E.
    (2016) The tipping point of moral change: When do good and bad acts make good and bad actors?Social Cognition, 34(2), 149–166. 10.1521/soco.2016.34.2.149
    https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2016.34.2.149 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B.
    (2010) Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1093–1096. 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2012) Less-detailed representation of non-native language: Why non-native speakers’ stories seem more vague. Discourse Processes, 49(7), 523–538. 10.1080/0163853X.2012.698493
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.698493 [Google Scholar]
  26. Levis, J.
    (2018) Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108241564
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241564 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L.
    (2015) The interpersonal consequences of processing ease: Fluency as a metacognitive foundation for prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 143–148. 10.1177/0963721414558116
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414558116 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lindemann, S.
    (2003) Koreans, Chinese or Indians? Attitudes and ideologies about non-native English speakers in the United States. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(3), 348–364. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00228
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00228 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lindemann, S., & Subtirelu, N.
    (2013) Reliably biased: The role of listener expectation in the perception of second language speech. Language Learning, 63(3), 567–594. 10.1111/lang.12014
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12014 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lippi-Green, R.
    (2012) English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed). London, England: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203348802
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203348802 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lüdecke, D.
    (2018) sjPlot: Data Visualization for Statistics in Social Science. R package version 2.4.1.9000.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McGowan, K. B.
    (2015) Social expectation improves speech perception in noise. Language and Speech, 58(4), 502–521. 10.1177/0023830914565191
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830914565191 [Google Scholar]
  33. McLaughlin, D. J., Baese-Berk, M. M., Bent, T., Borrie, S. A., & Van Engen, K. J.
    (2018) Coping with adversity: Individual differences in the perception of noisy and accented speech. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(6), 1559–1570. 10.3758/s13414‑018‑1537‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1537-4 [Google Scholar]
  34. McLaughlin, D. J., & Van Engen, K. J.
    (2020) Task-evoked pupil response for accurately recognized accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(2), 151–156. 10.1121/10.0000718
    https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000718 [Google Scholar]
  35. Munro, M. J.
    (2018) Dimensions of pronunciation. InO. Kang, R. Thomson, & J. Murphy (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary English Pronunciation (413–431). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Munro, M. J. & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995a) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995b) Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language & Speech, 38(3), 289–306. 10.1177/002383099503800305
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099503800305 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nagle, C., Trofimovich, P., & Bergeron, A.
    (2019) Toward a dynamic view of second language comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4), 647–672. 10.1017/S0272263119000044
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000044 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ogden, D.
    (2019) Processing fluency, perceptual adaptation, and language attitudes: Does adaptation improve comprehension ease and attitudes toward speakers with non-native accents? [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Michigan.
  40. Ryan, E. B., Carranza, M. A. and Moffie, R. W.
    (1977) Reactions toward varying degrees of accentedness in the speech of Spanish-English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 20, 267–273. 10.1177/002383097702000308
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097702000308 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ryan, E. B., Giles, H., & Sebastian, R. J.
    (1982) An integrative perspective for the study of attitudes toward language variation. InE. B. Ryan & H. Giles (Eds.), Attitudes Towards Language Variation: Social and Applied Contexts (1–19). London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Souza, A. L., & Markman, A. B.
    (2013) Foreign accent does not influence cognitive judgments. InProceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society35(35) 1360–1365.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Sparks, J., & Ledgerwood, A.
    (2017) When good is stickier than bad: Understanding gain/loss asymmetries in sequential framing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(8), 1086–1105. 10.1037/xge0000311
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000311 [Google Scholar]
  44. Stocker, L.
    (2017) The Impact of Foreign Accent on Credibility: An Analysis of Cognitive Statement Ratings in a Swiss Context. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(3), 617–628. 10.1007/s10936‑016‑9455‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9455-x [Google Scholar]
  45. Sumner, M. and Kataoka, R.
    (2013) Effects of phonetically-cued talker variation on semantic-encoding. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(6), EL485–EL491. 10.1121/1.4826151
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4826151 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sumner, M., Kim, S. K., King, E., & McGowan, K. B.
    (2014) The socially-weighted encoding of spoken words: A dual-route approach to speech perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(1015) 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Taylor Reid, K., Trofimovich, P., & O’Brien, M. G.
    (2019) Social attitudes and speech ratings: Effects of positive and negative bias on multiage listeners’ judgments of second language speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(2), 419–442. 10.1017/S0272263118000244
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000244 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tzeng, C. Y., Alexander, J. E., Sidaras, S. K., Nygaard, L. C.
    (2016) The role of training structure in perceptual learning of accented speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(11), 1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M. M., Baker, R. E., Choi, A., Kim, M., & Bradlow, A. R.
    (2010) The Wildcat Corpus of native-and foreign-accented English: Communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Language & Speech, 53(4), 510–540. 10.1177/0023830910372495
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910372495 [Google Scholar]
  50. Vaughn, C.
    (2019) Expectations about the source of a speaker’s accent affect accent adaptation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(5), 3218–3232. 10.1121/1.5108831
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5108831 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vaughn, C., & Baese-Berk, M.
    (2019) Effects of talker order on accent ratings. InS. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain, & P. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Melbourne, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Zuengler, J., & Bent, B.
    (1991) Relative knowledge of content domain: An influence on native-non-native conversations. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 397–415. 10.1093/applin/12.4.397
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.397 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20022.vau
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20022.vau
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: comprehensibility; processing fluency; status; social evaluation; solidarity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error