1887
image of Long-term effects of intensive instruction on fluency, comprehensibility and accentedness
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

We assessed the long-term effects of intensive instruction on different aspects of L2 oral production. Adopting the tridimensional model of oral production ( ), we compared high school learners who had received intensive ESL instruction ( = 42) with non-intensive learners ( = 39) on perceptual measures of L2 fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness 4 years after a 5-month intensive instruction period. After controlling for academic ability and L2 proficiency, listeners’ ratings of fluency and comprehensibility were significantly higher for the IG; however, there was no specific group advantage for accentedness, suggesting both groups exhibited similar L2 accents. This study provides new empirical evidence that the oral fluency and comprehensibility benefits of an intensive experience may be long lasting, even when learners’ subsequent classroom exposure to the language is much more limited.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20026.fre
2020-08-18
2020-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2012) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, version 5.3.53. www.praat.org/
  2. Collins, L., Lightbown, P. M., Halter, R. H., & Spada, N. M.
    (1999) Time and the distribution of time in L2 instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 33(4), 655–680. 10.2307/3587881
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587881 [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins, L., & Muñoz, C.
    (2016) The foreign language classroom: Current perspectives and future considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 133–147. doi:  10.1111/modl.12305
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12305 [Google Scholar]
  4. Collins, L., & White, J.
    (2011) An intensive look at intensity and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 107–133. 10.5054/tq.2011.240858
    https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240858 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2012) Closing the gap: Intensity and proficiency. InC. Munoz (Ed.), Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847698063‑006
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847698063-006 [Google Scholar]
  6. Crowther, D.
    (2020) Rating L2 speaker comprehensibility on monologic vs. interactive tasks: What is the effect of speaking task type?Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6(1), 96–121. 10.1075/jslp.19019.cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.19019.cro [Google Scholar]
  7. Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K.
    (2015) Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility?The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95. 10.1111/modl.12185
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12185 [Google Scholar]
  8. DeKeyser, R.
    (2007) Study abroad as foreign language practice. InR. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667275.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667275.012 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2015) Skill acquisition theory. InB. VanPatten & J. N. William (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction (pp.94–112). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (1997) Accent, intelligibility and comprehensibility. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(01), 1–16. 10.1017/S0272263197001010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2015) Pronunciation fundamentals. Evidenced-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/lllt.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2013) The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language Learning, 63(2), 163–185. 10.1111/lang.12000
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12000 [Google Scholar]
  13. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2008) A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 359–380. 10.1093/applin/amm041
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm041 [Google Scholar]
  14. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J.
    (2009) The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(04), 533–557. 10.1017/S0272263109990015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990015 [Google Scholar]
  15. Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, J. M., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2004) Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54, 655–679. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00282.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Derwing, T. M., Thomson, R. I., & Munro, J. M.
    (2006) English pronunciation and fluency development in Mandarin and Slavic speakers. System, 34, 183–193. 10.1016/j.system.2006.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  17. Freed, B. F.
    (1995) Language learning and study abroad. Second language acquisition in a study abroad context, 123–148. 10.1075/sibil.9.09fre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.9.09fre [Google Scholar]
  18. Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P.
    (2004) Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 275–301. 10.1017/S0272263104262064
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262064 [Google Scholar]
  19. French, L. M., & O’Brien, I.
    (2008) Phonological memory and children’s second language grammar learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(3), 463–487. 10.1017/S0142716408080211
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408080211 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ginther, A., Slobadanka, D., et Yang, R.
    (2010) Conceptual and empirical relationships between temporal measures of fluency and oral English proficiency with implications for automated scoring. Language Testing, 27(3), 379–399. 10.1177/0265532210364407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210364407 [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldman Eisler, F.
    (1968) Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. University of Michigan: Academic P.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hilton, H.
    (2008) The link between vocabulary knowledge and spoken L2 fluency. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 153–166. 10.1080/09571730802389983
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389983 [Google Scholar]
  23. Huensch, A., & Tracy-Ventura, N.
    (2017a) Understanding second language fluency behavior: The effects of individual differences in first language fluency, cross-linguistic differences, and proficiency over time. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38. doi:  10.1017/S0142716416000424
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716416000424 [Google Scholar]
  24. Huensch, A., Tracy-Ventura, N., Bridges, J., & Cuesta Medina, J. A.
    (2019) Variables affecting the maintenance of L2 proficiency and fluency four years post-study abroad. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 4(1), 96–125. doi:  10.1075/sar.17015.hue
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.17015.hue [Google Scholar]
  25. Huensch, A., & Tracy–Ventura, N.
    (2017b) L2 utterance fluency development before, during, and after residence abroad: A multidimensional investigation. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 275–293. doi:  10.1111/modl.12395
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12395 [Google Scholar]
  26. Institut de la statistique du Québec
    Institut de la statistique du Québec (2011) Population selon la langue maternelle, régions administratives et ensemble du Québec, 2011. Retrieved fromwww.stat.gouv.qc.ca/statistiques/recensement
  27. Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2012) Deconstructing comprehensibility identifying the linguistic influences on listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition34, 475–505. 10.1017/S0272263112000150
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000150 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kormos, J., & Dénes, M.
    (2004) Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32, 145–164. 10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lightbown, P. M.
    (2014) Making the minutes count in L2 teaching. Language Awareness, 1–2(23), 3–23. 10.1080/09658416.2013.863903
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863903 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. M.
    (1987) Learning English in intensive programs in Quebec schools (1986–1987): Report of the first year of research. Montreal: Concordia University.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (1989) A secondary V follow-up study of learners from primary-level intensive ESL programs (research report). Montréal: Concordia University.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (1991) Étude des effets à long terme de l’apprentissage intensif de l’anglais, langue seconde, au primaire. La revue canadienne des langues vivantes(48), 90–117. 10.3138/cmlr.48.1.90
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.48.1.90 [Google Scholar]
  33. (1994) An innovative program for primary ESL students in Quebec. TESOL Quarterly, 28(3), 563–579. 10.2307/3587308
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587308 [Google Scholar]
  34. Llanes, A.
    (2012) The short- and long-term effects of a short study abroad experience: The case of children. System, 40(2), 179–190. 10.1016/j.system.2012.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mora, J. C., & Valls-Ferrer, M.
    (2012) Oral fluency, accuracy, and complexity in formal instruction and study abroad learning contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Muñoz, C.
    (2012) Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847698063
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847698063 [Google Scholar]
  37. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995a) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 49, 285–310. 10.1111/0023‑8333.49.s1.8
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.49.s1.8 [Google Scholar]
  38. (1995b) Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38(3), 289–306. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
  39. (1999) Foreign Accent, Comprehensibility, and Intelligibility in the Speech of Second Language Learners. Language Learning, 49(s1), 285–310. doi:  10.1111/0023‑8333.49.s1.8
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.49.s1.8 [Google Scholar]
  40. Préfontaine, Y., Kormos, J., & Johnson, D. E.
    (2016) How do utterance measures predict raters’ perceptions of fluency in French as a second language?Language Testing, 33(1), 53–73. doi:  10.1177/0265532215579530
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215579530 [Google Scholar]
  41. Regan, V.
    (2005) From speech community back to classroom: What variation analysis can tell us about the role of context in the acquisition of French as a foreign language. Focus on French as a foreign language: Multidisciplinary perspectives, 191–209. 10.21832/9781853597688‑010
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597688-010 [Google Scholar]
  42. Rossiter, M. J.
    (2009) Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(3), 395–412. 10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395 [Google Scholar]
  43. Rossiter, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Jones, V. M.
    (2008) Is a picture worth a thousand words?TESOL Quarterly, 42(2), 325–329. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00127.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00127.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Sato, T., & McNamara, T.
    (2018) What counts in second language oral communication ability? The perspective of linguistic laypersons. Applied Linguistics, 40(6), 894–916. doi:  10.1093/applin/amy032
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy032 [Google Scholar]
  45. Segalowitz, N.
    (2010) The cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203851357
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851357 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2016) Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 79–95. 10.1515/iral‑2016‑9991
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9991 [Google Scholar]
  47. Segalowitz, N., French, L., & Guay, J. -D.
    (2017) What features best characterize adult second language utterance fluency and what do they reveal about fluency gains in short-term immersion?Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20, 90–116. doi:  10.7202/1050813ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1050813ar [Google Scholar]
  48. Serrano, R.
    (2012) Is intensive learning effective? Reflecting on the results from cognitive psychology and the second language acquisition literature. InC. Muñoz (Ed.), Intensive Exposure Experiences in second language learning (pp.3–24). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847698063‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847698063-004 [Google Scholar]
  49. Serrano, R., Llanes, A., & Tragant, E.
    (2016) Examining L2 development in two short-term intensive programs for teenagers: Study abroad vs. “at home”. System, 57, 43–54. 10.1016/j.system.2016.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  50. Serrano, R., & Muñoz, C.
    (2007) Same hours, different time distribution: Any difference in EFL?System, 35, 305–321. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2007.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  51. Tavakoli, P.
    (2016) Fluency in monologic and dialogic task performance: Challenges in defining and measuring L2 fluency. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 133–150. 10.1515/iral‑2016‑9994
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9994 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E.
    (2014) The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in Sport Sciences, 1(21), 19–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N.
    (1996) The development of fluency in advanced of French. . Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119. 10.1093/applin/17.1.84
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.84 [Google Scholar]
  54. White, J. L., & Turner, C. E.
    (2005) Comparing children’s oral ability in two ESL programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(4), 491–517. 10.3138/cmlr.61.4.491
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.61.4.491 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20026.fre
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20026.fre
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error