Volume 7, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN: 2215-194X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This study examined perception of the American English (AE) /v/-/w/ consonant contrast by Hindi speakers of English as a second language (L2). A second aim was to determine whether residence in the US modulated perception of this difficult contrast for proficient bilingual Hindi-English listeners. Two groups of Hindi-English bilinguals (the first resided in the US for more than five years, the second lived in India) and a group of AE-speaking listeners participated in the study. Listeners’ identification and discrimination of nonsense words (e.g., “vagag” vs. “wagag”) were examined. Hindi listeners performed significantly less accurately than AE controls. Accuracy by Hindi listeners was near chance for identification and higher-than-chance for discrimination. Exposure to AE in the US did not improve performance. These results are consistent with previous studies of late L2 learners and extend findings to a population that was proficient in an L2 before arriving in the L2 environment.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Abbasi, A. M. , Pathan, H. , & Channa, M. A.
    (2018) Experimental phonetics and phonology in Indo-Aryan & European languages. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 6(3), 21–52. doi:  10.2478/jolace‑2018‑0023
    https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2018-0023 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aggarwal, K. S.
    (1988) English and India’s three-language formula: An empirical perspective. World Englishes, 7(3), 289–298. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1988.tb00238.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1988.tb00238.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Agresti, A.
    (2002) Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience. 10.1002/0471249688
    https://doi.org/10.1002/0471249688 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alam, F., Habib, S. M., & Khan, M.
    (2008) Acoustic analysis of Bangla consonants. Spoken Languages Technologies for Under-resourced Languages (SLTU-2008), 108–113. Retrieved fromhttps://isca-speech.org/archive/SLTU_2008/papers/su08_108.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baigorri, M. , Campanelli, L. , & Levy, E. S.
    (2018) Perception of American English vowels by early and late Spanish-English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 62(4), 681–700. doi:  10.1177/0023830918806933
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918806933 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barr, D. J. , Levy, R. , Scheepers, C. , & Tily, H. J.
    (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bates, D. , Mächler, M. , Bolker, B. , & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:  10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  8. Best, C. T.
    (1995) A direct realistic view of cross-language speech perception. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross language research (pp.171–204). Baltimore: York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Best, C. T. , & Tyler, M. D.
    (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In O.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Second Language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp.13–34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
  10. Bolinger, D.
    (1962) Forms of English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bradlow, A. R.
    (2008) Training non-native language sound patterns: lessons from training Japanese adults on English /ɹ/-/l/ contrast. In J. G. H. Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology of second language acquisition (pp.287–308). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.36.14bra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.36.14bra [Google Scholar]
  12. Brown, V. A. , Hedayati, M. , Zanger, A. , Mayn, S. , Ray, L. , Dillman-Hasso, N. , & Strand, J. F.
    (2018) What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect?PLOS ONE, 13(11), e0207160. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0207160
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207160 [Google Scholar]
  13. Buschfeld, S. , Hoffman, T. , Huber, M. , & Kautzsch, A.
    (Eds.) (2014) The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g49
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g49 [Google Scholar]
  14. Census of India
    Census of India (2011) Comparative Speaker’s strength of Scheduled Languages. Retrieved fromwww.censusindia.gov.in/2011Census/C-16_25062018_NEW.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chand, V.
    (2009) [V]at is going on? Local and global ideologies about Indian English. Language in Society, 38, 393–419. doi:  10.1017/S0047404509990200
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404509990200 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2009) Who Owns English? Political, Social and Linguistic Dimensions of Urban Indian English Language Practices (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Davis, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Datta, H., Hestvik, A., Vidal, N., Tessel, C., Hisagi, M., Wróblewski, M., & Shafer, V. L.
    (2020) Automaticity of speech processing in early bilingual adults and children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(2), 429–445. 10.1017/S1366728919000099
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000099 [Google Scholar]
  18. Flege, J. E.
    (1991) Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(1), 395–411. doi:  10.1121/1.400473
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.400473 [Google Scholar]
  19. (1995) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and language experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.233–277). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Flege, J. E. , & Eefting, W.
    (1987) Cross-Language Switching in Stop Consonant perception and Production by Dutch Speakers of English. Speech Communication, 6(3), 185–202. doi:  10.1016/0167‑6393(87)90025‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(87)90025-2 [Google Scholar]
  21. Flege, J. E. , & Fletcher, K. L.
    (1992) Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 91(1), 370–389. doi:  10.1121/1.402780
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402780 [Google Scholar]
  22. Flege, J. E. , MacKay, I. R. A. , & Meador, D.
    (1999) Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. The Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2973–2987. doi:  10.1121/1.428116
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428116 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fedorenko, E. , Gibson, E. , & Rohde, D.
    (2007) The nature of working memory in linguistic, arithmetic and spatial integration processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 246–269. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fuchs, R.
    (2019) Almost [w]anishing: The elusive /v/-/w/ contrast in Educated Indian English. In Sasha Calhoun , Paola Escudero , Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp.1382–1386). Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2016) Speech rhythm in varieties of English: Evidence from educated Indian English and British English. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑47818‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47818-9 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hisagi, M. , Shafer, V. L. , Strange, W. , & Sussman, E. S.
    (2010) Perception of a Japanese Vowel length contrast by Japanese and American English listeners: behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Brain Research, 1360, 89–105. doi:  10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.092
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.092 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hisagi, M. , & Strange, W.
    (2011) Perception of Japanese temporally-cued contrasts by American English listeners. Language and speech, 54, 241–64. doi:  10.1177/0023830910397499
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910397499 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hisagi, M. , Tajima, K. , & Kato, H.
    (2014) The effect of language experience on the ability of non-native listeners to identify Japanese phonemic length contrasts. Proceedings of Meetings of Acoustics, 21, 060003; doi:  10.1121/1.4887491
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4887491 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hisagi, M. , Garrido-Nag, K. , Datta, H. , & Shafer, V. L.
    (2015) ERP indices of vowel processing in Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 18(2), 271–289. doi:  10.1017/S1366728914000170
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000170 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hurks, P. P. M. , Vles, J. S. H. , Hendriksen, J. G. M. , Kalff, A. C. , Feron, F. J. M. , Kroes, M. , … Jolles, J.
    (2006) Semantic category fluency versus initial letter fluency over 60 seconds as a measure of automatic and controlled processing in healthy school-aged children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(5), 684–695. doi:  10.1080/13803390590954191
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390590954191 [Google Scholar]
  31. Iverson, P. , Ekanayake, D. , Hamann, S. , Sennema, A. , & Evans, B. G.
    (2008) Category and perceptual interference in second-language phoneme learning: An examination of English /w/-/v/ learning by Sinhala, German, and Dutch speakers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1305–1316. doi:  10.1037/0096‑1523.34.5.1305
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1305 [Google Scholar]
  32. Iverson, P. , Wagner, A. , Pinet, M. , & Rosen, S.
    (2011) Cross-language specialization in phonetic processing: English and Hindi perception of /w/-/v/ speech and nonspeech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(5), 297–303. doi:  10.1121/1.3632048
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3632048 [Google Scholar]
  33. Jaeger, T. F.
    (2008) Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lenth, R. , Love, J. , & Herve, M.
    (2018) emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (Version 1.1). Retrieved fromhttps://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
  35. Levy, E. S.
    (2009) Language experience and consonantal context effects on perceptual assimilation of French vowels by American-English learners of French. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(2), 1138–1152. doi:  10.1121/1.3050256
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3050256 [Google Scholar]
  36. Levy, E. S. , & Strange, W.
    (2008) Perception of French vowels by American English adults with and without French language experience. Journal of Phonetics, 36(1), 141–157. doi:  10.1016/j.wocn.2007.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2007.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lewandowsky, S. , Oberauer, K. , Yang, L. X. , & Ecker, U. K. H.
    (2010) A working memory test battery for MATLAB. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 571–585. doi:  10.3758/BRM.42.2.571
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.571 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mackay, I. R. A. , & Flege, J. E.
    (2004) Effects of the age of second language learning on the duration of first and second language sentences: The role of suppression. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(3), 373–396. doi:  10.1017/S0142716404001171
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001171 [Google Scholar]
  39. Massaro, D. W.
    (1974) Perceptual units in speech recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102(2), 199–208. doi:  10.1037/h0035854
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035854 [Google Scholar]
  40. Melchers, G. , Shaw, P. , & Sundkvist, P.
    (2019) World Englishes (3rd ed.). Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9781351042581
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351042581 [Google Scholar]
  41. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K.
    (2007) The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clinical Neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(12), 2544–2590. 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026 [Google Scholar]
  42. Oberauer, K. , & Kliegl, R.
    (2006) A formal model of capacity limits in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(4), 601–626. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ohala, M.
    (1999) Hindi. InHandbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet (pp.100–103). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pierrehumbert, J. , & Nair, R.
    (1996) Implications of Hindi prosodic structure. In J. Durand & B. Laks (Eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and methods (pp.549–584). Salford, UK: University of Salford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Piller, B. , & Skillings, M. J.
    (2005) English language teaching strategies used by primary teachers in one New Delhi, India School. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 9(3). Retrieved fromwww.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume9/ej35/ej35cf/
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime]
    Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime] (2015) Retrieved fromwww.pstnet.com
  47. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.4.3). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved fromwww.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sahgal, A. , & Agnihotri, R.
    (1988) Indian English phonology: A sociolinguistic perspective. English World-Wide, 9(1), 51–64. doi:  10.1075/eww.9.1.04sah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.9.1.04sah [Google Scholar]
  49. Sahgal, A.
    (1991) Patterns of language use in a bilingual setting in India. InJ. Cheshire (Ed.), English around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives (pp.299–307). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611889.021
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611889.021 [Google Scholar]
  50. Schneider, E. W.
    (2007) Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618901
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901 [Google Scholar]
  51. Sebastian-Galles, N. , & Diaz, Begoña
    (2012) First and second language speech perception: Graded learning. Language Learning, 62(2), 131–147. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00709.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00709.x [Google Scholar]
  52. Sharma, M.
    (2006) Institutionalization of English in India-A Historical Background. South Asian Review, 27(2), 175–189. doi:  10.1080/02759527.2006.11932448
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02759527.2006.11932448 [Google Scholar]
  53. Smiljanić, R. , & Bradlow, A. R.
    (2005) Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 118(3), 1677–1688. doi:  10.1121/1.2000788
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2000788 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2008) Temporal organization of English clear and plain speech. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 124(5), 3171–3182. doi:  10.1121/1.2990712
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2990712 [Google Scholar]
  55. Strange, W.
    (2011) Automatic selective perception (ASP) of first and second language speech: A working model. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 456–466. doi:  10.1016/j.wocn.2010.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  56. United States Census Bureau
    United States Census Bureau (2015) Detailed languages spoken at home and ability to speak English for the population 5 years and over for United States: 2009–2013. [Data File]. Retrieved fromhttps://www.census.gov/data/tables/2013/demo/2009-2013-lang-tables.html
  57. Werker, J. F. , & Logan, J. S.
    (1985) Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 37(1), 35–44. doi:  10.3758/BF03207136
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207136 [Google Scholar]
  58. Whitney, W. D.
    (1896) Sanskrit grammar. Boston, MA: Ginn & Co.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Bilingualism; Hindi; length of residence; speech perception
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error