1887
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN: 2215-194X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines the developmental patterns manifested in the intonational grammar of American English-speaking learners of Spanish based on their use of intonational features (e.g., [±delayed peak], [±deaccentuation], or [±compression]) involved in focus marking in three different discursive contexts (i.e., broad focus, informational subject focus and corrective subject focus). The data, collected through a Question & Answer pairs task performed by learners and native speakers, suggests that while development towards the target language is possible, it is constrained by markedness and learnability. The analysis of the results is framed within Mennen’s L2 Intonation Learning theory, which considers the multidimensionality that characterizes intonational grammars and the complexity of the acquisition process as a result of it. Individual factors related to the learners’ experience (i.e., experience abroad and hours of exposure) were examined and extended periods of immersion (i.e., more than 8 months) were found to have a positive effect.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20041.san
2022-07-11
2022-08-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aguilar, L., De-la-Mota, C., & Prieto, P.
    (2009) Sp_ToBI Training Materials. RetrievedJanuary 1, 2016, fromprosodia.upf.edu/sp_tobi/
  2. Archibald, J.
    (1997) The acquisition of second language phrasal stress: a pilot study. Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 16, 263–290.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Atterer, M., & Ladd, D. R.
    (2004) On the phonetics and phonology of “segmental anchoring” of F0: evidence from German. Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 177–197.   10.1016/S0095‑4470(03)00039‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00039-1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beckman, M. E., & Ayers, E. G.
    (1997) Guidelines for ToBI Labelling Preface What are the “ Guidelines for ToBI Labelling ”?, (March), 1–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beckman, M. E., Díaz-Campos, M., McGory, J. T., & Morgan, T. A.
    (2002) Intonation across Spanish, in the Tones and Break Indices framework. Probus, 14(1), 9–36.   10.1515/prbs.2002.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2002.008 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beckman, M. E., Hirschberg, J., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S.
    (2005) The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. InS.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing (pp.9–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Best, C.
    (1995) A direct Realist View of Cross-Language Speech Perception. InSpeech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.171–204). Baltimore: York Press. Retrieved fromwww.haskins.yale.edu/Reprints/HL0996.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D.
    (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. InLanguage experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp.13–34). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins Pub. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
  9. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2019) Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved fromwww.praat.org/
  10. Cohen, J.
    (1960) A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.   10.1177/001316446002000104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104 [Google Scholar]
  11. de Leeuw, E., Mennen, I., & Scobbie, J. M.
    (2012) Singing a different tune in your native language: first language attrition of prosody. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(1), 101–116.   10.1177/1367006911405576
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911405576 [Google Scholar]
  12. Domínguez, L., & Arche, M. J.
    (2010) L1 and L2 differences in the acquisition of information structure: examining an interface-based account, (February), 23–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Eckman, F. R.
    (1977) MARKEDNESS AND THE CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS HYPOTHESIS. Language Learning, 27(2), 315–330.   10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1977.tb00124.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00124.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Estebas-Vilaplana, E., & Prieto, P.
    (2009) La notación prosódica del español: una revisión del Sp_ToBI. Estudios de Fonética Experimental, 17, 264–283.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Face, T., & D’Imperio, M.
    (2005) Reconsidering a focal typology: Evidence from Spanish and Italian. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 17(2), 271–289.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Feldhausen, I., & Vanrell, M.
    (2014) Prosody, Focus and Word Order in Catalan and Spanish : An Optimality Theoretic Approach. InProceedings of the 10th International Seminar on Speech Production (ISSP) (pp.5–8).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Flege, J. E.
    (1987) The production of "new" and "similar" phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65. Retrieved fromwww.jimflege.com/files/Flege_new_similar_JP_1987.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gabriel, C.
    (2006) Focal pitch accents and subject positions in Spanish: Comparing close-to-standard varieties and Argentinean Porteño. InSpeech Prosody 2006. Dresden, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gorman, K., Howell, J., & Wagner, M.
    (2011) Prosodylab-Aligner: A Tool for Forced Alignment of Laboratory Speech. Canadian Acoustics, 39(3), 192–193. Retrieved fromhttps://jcaa.caa-aca.ca/index.php/jcaa/article/view/2476
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Graham, C., & Post, B.
    (2018) Second language acquisition of intonation: Peak alignment in American English. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 1–14.   10.1016/j.wocn.2017.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  21. Grice, M., Ritter, S., Niemann, H., & Roettger, T. B.
    (2017a) Integrating the discreteness and continuity of intonational categories. Journal of Phonetics, 64, 90–107.   10.1016/j.wocn.2017.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gussenhoven, C.
    (2004) The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511616983
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616983 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2016) Analysis of Intonation: the Case of MAE_ToBI. Laboratory Phonology, 7(1).   10.5334/labphon.30
    https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.30 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gut, U., & Pillai, S.
    (2014a) Prosodic marking of information structure by Malaysian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(02), 283–302.   10.1017/S0272263113000739
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000739 [Google Scholar]
  25. Henriksen, N. C., Geeslin, K. L., & Willis, E. W.
    (2010) The development of L2 Spanish intonation during a study abroad immersion program in León, Spain: Global contours and final boundary movements. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 3(1), 113–162. 10.1515/shll‑2010‑1067
    https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2010-1067 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hertel, T. J.
    (2003) Lexical and discourse factors in the second language acquisition of Spanish word order. Second Language Research, 19(4), 273–304. 10.1191/0267658303sr224oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658303sr224oa [Google Scholar]
  27. Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., & Zeileis, A.
    (2012) Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework.   10.1198/106186006X133933
    https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X133933 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hothorn, T., & Zeileis, A.
    (2015) Partykit: A Modular Toolkit for Recursive Partytioning in R. Journal of Machine Learning Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hualde, J. I., & Prieto, P.
    (2015) Intonational Variation in Spanish: European and American varieties. InS. Frota & P. Prieto (Eds.), Intonational variation in Romance (pp.350–391). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685332.003.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685332.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jun, S.-A., & Oh, M.
    (2000) Acquisition of Second Language Intonation. InINTERSPEECH 2000 (pp.73–76). Retrieved fromlinguistics.ucla.edu/people/jun/ICSLP-L2intonation.pdf. 10.1121/1.429024
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.429024 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ladd, D. R.
    (1983) Phonological Features of Intonational Peaks. Language, 59(4), 721.   10.2307/413371
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413371 [Google Scholar]
  32. (1996) Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ladd, D. R., & Beckman, M. E.
    (1986) Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology, 3(1), 255–309. 10.1017/S095267570000066X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267570000066X [Google Scholar]
  34. Ladd, R.
    (2008) Intonational Phonology. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511808814
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808814 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lado, R.
    (1957) Linguistics Across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lafford, B. A., & Uscinski, I.
    (2014) Study Abroad and Second Language Spanish. InK. L. Geeslin (Ed.), The handbook of spanish second language acquisition. Chichester, West Susse: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, A., & Post, B.
    (2014) L2 acquisition of prosodic properties of speech rhythm. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(2), 223–255.   10.1017/S0272263113000752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000752 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mennen, I.
    (2004) Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics, 32(4), 543–563.   10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mennen, I., Chen, A., & Karlsson, F.
    (2010) Characterising the internal structure of learner intonation and its development over time. InProceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, New Sounds (pp.319–324).
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Nadeu, M., & Vanrell, M. del M.
    (2015) Postfocal material in sentences with contrastive focus in Catalan and Spanish. InPhonetics and Phonology in Europe. Cambridge, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Nava, E.
    (2008) Prosody in L2 acquisition. InProceedings of the 9th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2007), ed.Roumyana Slabakova (pp.155–164).
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Nguyen, T. A. T., Ingram, C. L. J., & Pensalfini, J. R.
    (2008) Prosodic transfer in Vietnamese acquisition of English contrastive stress patterns. Journal of Phonetics, 36(1), 158–190.   10.1016/j.wocn.2007.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2007.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ortega-Llebaria, M., & Colantoni, L.
    (2014a) L2 English Intonation: Relations between Form-Meaning Associations, Access to Meaning, and L1 Transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(2), 331–353.   10.1017/S0272263114000011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000011 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2014b) L2 English Intonation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(02), 331–353.   10.1017/S0272263114000011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000011 [Google Scholar]
  45. Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J.
    (1990) The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. InP. R. Cohen, J. L. Morgan, & M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp.271–311). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Prieto, P., & Roseano, P.
    (2010) Transcription of Intonation of the Spanish Language. Munich: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Ramírez Verdugo, M. D.
    (2006) Prosodic realization of focus in the discourse of Spanish learners and English native speakers. Estudios Ingleses de La Universidad Complutense, 14, 9–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rasier, L., & Hiligsmann, P.
    (2007) Prosodic transfer from L1 to L2. Theoretical and methodological issues. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française, 28, 41–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. RStudio Team
    RStudio Team (2014) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc.Boston, MA. Retrieved fromwww.r-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tremblay, A., Broersma, M., Coughlin, C. E., & Choi, J.
    (2016) Effects of the Native Language on the Learning of Fundamental Frequency in Second-Language Speech Segmentation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(985).   10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00985
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00985 [Google Scholar]
  51. Trimble, J. C.
    (2013) Acquiring Variable L2 Spanish Intonation in a Study Abroad Context. University of MInnesota.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W.
    (2006) LEARNING SECOND LANGUAGE SUPRASEGMENTALS: Effect of L2 Experience on Prosody and Fluency Characteristics of L2 Speech. Second Language Acquisition (Vol.28). Retrieved fromhttps://about.jstor.org/terms
    [Google Scholar]
  53. (2007) Learning prosody and fluency characteristics of second language speech: The effect of experience on child learners’ acquisition of five suprasegmentals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 251–276.   10.1017/S0142716407070130
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070130 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ullakonoja, R.
    (2011) Prosodic development of Finnish students’ read-aloud Russian during Study in Russia. University of Jyväskylä.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Vallduví, E., & Engdahl, E.
    (1996) The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics, 34(3), 459–520. 10.1515/ling.1996.34.3.459
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1996.34.3.459 [Google Scholar]
  56. van Maastricht, L., Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M.
    (2016) Prominence Patterns in a Second Language: Intonational Transfer From Dutch to Spanish and Vice Versa. Language Learning, 66(1), 124–158.   10.1111/lang.12141
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12141 [Google Scholar]
  57. Vanrell, M. del M., & Fernández-Soriano, O.
    (2018) Language variation at the prosody-syntax interface: Focus in European Spanish. InM. Uth & M. García (Eds.), Focus Realization and Interpretation in Romance and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 [Google Scholar]
  58. White, L.
    (2000) Second Language Acquisition: From Initial to Final State. InJohn Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp.130–155). Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Willems, N. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110853469 [Google Scholar]
  60. Wood, F. S.
    (2018) Generalized Additive Mixed Models using “mgcv” and “lme4.” Retrieved fromhttps://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gamm4/gamm4.pdf
  61. Zárate-Sández, G. A.
    (2015) Perception and Production of Intonation among English-Spanish Bilingual Speakers at Different Proficiency Levels. Georgetown University.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Zerbian, S.
    (2015) Markedness Considerations in L2 Prosodic Focus and Givenness Marking. InE. Delais-Roussarie, M. Avanzi, & S. Herment (Eds.), Prosody and Language in Contact: L2 Acquisition, Attrition and Languages in Multilingual Situations (pp.7–27). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑45168‑7_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45168-7_2 [Google Scholar]
  63. Zubizarreta, M. L.
    (1998) Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20041.san
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.20041.san
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error