1887
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2215-1931
  • E-ISSN: 2215-194X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present study investigated whether age of acquisition (AOA) is a significant predictor of the extent to which Korean learners of English perceive and produce two nonnative vowels and the extent to which their speech perception and production accuracy are linked. A total of 100 Korean learners of English with a varying range of AOA participated in the study by completing perception and production measurement tasks. Overall, there were significant AOA effects found in the case of Korean participants who moved to Canada before the age breakpoint range of 17.0 to 25.5, after which AOA failed to be a significant predictor of their perception and production accuracy. In addition, compared to late second language (L2) learners, early L2 learners more consistently demonstrated instances of significant perception-production correlation. This study concludes by highlighting the role of AOA in L2 speech acquisition, supporting the existence of a critical period for intelligible L2 pronunciation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.21026.lee
2022-08-12
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrahamsson, N.
    (2012) Age of onset and nativelike L2 ultimate attainment of morphosyntactic and phonetic intuition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(2), 187–214. 10.1017/S0272263112000022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000022 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K.
    (2009) Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00507.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Abutalebi, J., & Clahsen, H.
    (2018) Critical periods for language acquisition: New insights with particular reference to bilingualism research. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(5), 883–885. 10.1017/S1366728918001025
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001025 [Google Scholar]
  4. Adank, P., Smits, R., & van Hout, R.
    (2004) A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(5), 3099–3107. 10.1121/1.1795335
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1795335 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, W., Trofimovich, P., Flege, J. E., Mack, M., & Halter, R.
    (2008) Child-adult differences in second-language phonological learning: The role of cross-language similarity. Language and Speech, 51(4), 317–342. 10.1177/0023830908099068
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830908099068 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, W., Trofimovich, P., Mack, M., & Flege, J. E.
    (2002) The effect of perceived phonetic similarity on non-native sound learning by children and adults. InS. A. Fisch, B. Scarabela, & A.-H. Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol.261, pp.36–47). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ballard, K. J., Robin, D. A., Woodworth, G., & Zimba, L. D.
    (2001) Age-related changes in motor control during articulator visuomotor tracking. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(4), 763–777. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2001/060)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2001/060) [Google Scholar]
  8. Bent, T., Bradlow, A. R., & Smith, B. L.
    (2007) Phonemic errors in different word positions and their effects on intelligibility of non-native speech: All’s well that begins well. InO.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp.331–347). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.28ben
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.28ben [Google Scholar]
  9. Best, C. T.
    (1995) A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issue in cross-language research (pp.171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D.
    (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. InM. J. Munro & O.-S. Bohn (Eds.), Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp.13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
  11. Bialystok, E.
    (1997) The structure of age: In search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13(2), 116–137. 10.1191/026765897677670241
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897677670241 [Google Scholar]
  12. Birdsong, D.
    (2005) Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition. InJ. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp.109–127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2006) Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 56(s1), 9–49. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2006.00353.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00353.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Birdsong, D., & Molis, M.
    (2001) On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 235–249. 10.1006/jmla.2000.2750
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2750 [Google Scholar]
  15. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2021) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program] (Version 6.1.48). Retrieved fromwww.praat.org/
  16. Bylund, E., Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N.
    (2021) Age of acquisition-not bilingualism-is the primary determinant of less than nativelike L2 ultimate attainment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(1), 18–30. 10.1017/S1366728920000188
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728920000188 [Google Scholar]
  17. Davies, M.
    (2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 450 million words, 1990-present. Available online atcorpus.byu.edu/coca/
  18. de Jong, K., Hao, Y.-C., & Park, H.
    (2009) Evidence for featural units in the acquisition of speech production skills: Linguistic structure in foreign accent. Journal of Phonetics, 37(4), 357–373. 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2009.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  19. DeKeyser, R. M.
    (2000) The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–533. 10.1017/S0272263100004022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004022 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2012) Age effects in second language learning. InS. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp.442–460). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2013) Age effects in second language learning: Stepping stones toward better understanding. Language Learning, 63(s1), 52–67. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00737.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00737.x [Google Scholar]
  22. DeKeyser, R. M., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D.
    (2010) Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(3), 413–438. 10.1017/S0142716410000056
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000056 [Google Scholar]
  23. DeKeyser, R. M., & Larson-Hall, J.
    (2005) What does the critical period really mean?InJ. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp.88–108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (2005) Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397. 10.2307/3588486
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2009) Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42(4), 476–490. 10.1017/S026144480800551X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480800551X [Google Scholar]
  26. (2015) Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42 [Google Scholar]
  27. Field, J.
    (2005) Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. 10.2307/3588487
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588487 [Google Scholar]
  28. Flege, J. E.
    (1995) Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1999) Age of learning and second-language speech. InD. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp.101–132). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Flege, J. E., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., & Tsukada, K.
    (2006) Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics, 34(2), 153–175. 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S.
    (2021) The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). InR. Wayland (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp.3–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108886901.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.002 [Google Scholar]
  32. Flege, J. E., Bohn, O.-S., & Jang, S.
    (1997) Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470. 10.1006/jpho.1997.0052
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0052 [Google Scholar]
  33. Flege, J. E., Schirru, C., & MacKay, I. R. A.
    (2003) Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication, 40(4), 467–491. 10.1016/S0167‑6393(02)00128‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00128-0 [Google Scholar]
  34. Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S.
    (1999) Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(1), 78–104. 10.1006/jmla.1999.2638
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2638 [Google Scholar]
  35. Granena, G., & Long, M. H.
    (2013) Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), 311–343. 10.1177/0267658312461497
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461497 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E., & Wiley, E.
    (2003) Critical evidence: A test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 14(1), 31–38. 10.1111/1467‑9280.01415
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01415 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hardison, D. M.
    (2003) Acquisition of second-language speech: Effects of visual cues, context, and talker variability. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(4), 495–522. 10.1017/S0142716403000250
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000250 [Google Scholar]
  38. Huensch, A., & Tremblay, A.
    (2015) Effects of perceptual phonetic training on the perception and production of second language syllable structure. Journal of Phonetics, 521, 105–120. 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ingram, J. C., & Park, S.
    (1997) Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(3), 343–370. 10.1006/jpho.1997.0048
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0048 [Google Scholar]
  40. Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L.
    (1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60–99. 10.1016/0010‑0285(89)90003‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kim, D., Clayards, M., & Kong, E. J.
    (2020) Individual differences in perceptual adaptation to unfamiliar phonetic categories. Journal of Phonetics, 811, 100984. 10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100984
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100984 [Google Scholar]
  42. Klein, W.
    (1996) Language acquisition at different ages. InD. Magnusson (Ed.), The lifespan development of individuals: Behavioral, neurobiological, and psychosocial perspectives: A synthesis (pp.88–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kohler, U., & Kreuter, F.
    (2012) Data analysis using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Larson-Hall, J.
    (2010) A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Lee, A. H., & Lyster, R.
    (2016) Effects of different types of corrective feedback on receptive skills in a second language: A speech perception training study. Language Learning, 66(4), 809–833. 10.1111/lang.12167
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12167 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2017) Can corrective feedback on second language speech perception errors affect production accuracy?. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(2), 371–393. 10.1017/S0142716416000254
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716416000254 [Google Scholar]
  47. Lee, H.
    (1993) Korean. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 23(1), 28–31. 10.1017/S0025100300004758
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300004758 [Google Scholar]
  48. Levis, J. M.
    (2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. 10.2307/3588485
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lindblom, B.
    (1986) Phonetic universals in vowel systems. InJ. J. Ohala & J. Jaeger (Eds.), Experimental phonology (pp.13–44). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Lobanov, B. M.
    (1971) Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(2B), 606–608. 10.1121/1.1912396
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912396 [Google Scholar]
  51. Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L.
    (2016) An A-Z of applied linguistics research methods. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑40322‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-40322-3 [Google Scholar]
  52. Long, M. H.
    (1990) Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(3), 251–285. 10.1017/S0272263100009165
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009165 [Google Scholar]
  53. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D.
    (2005) Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Munro, M., & Mann, V.
    (2005) Age of immersion as a predictor of foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(3), 311–341. 10.1017/S0142716405050198
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716405050198 [Google Scholar]
  55. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2008) Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58(3), 479–502. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00448.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00448.x [Google Scholar]
  56. Munro, M. J., Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. R.
    (1996) The effects of age of second language learning on the production of English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17(3), 313–334. 10.1017/S0142716400007967
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400007967 [Google Scholar]
  57. Nagle, C. L.
    (2021) Revisiting perception-production relationships: Exploring a new approach to investigate perception as a time-varying predictor. Language Learning, 71(1), 243–279. 10.1111/lang.12431
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12431 [Google Scholar]
  58. Paradis, M.
    (2004) A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.18 [Google Scholar]
  59. (2009) Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.40
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.40 [Google Scholar]
  60. Peperkamp, S., & Bouchon, C.
    (2011) The relation between perception and production in L2 phonological processing. InProceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH 2011) (Vol.11, pp.168–171). Red Hook, NY: Curran. 10.21437/Interspeech.2011‑72
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2011-72 [Google Scholar]
  61. Plonsky, L.
    (2014) Study quality in quantitative L2 research (1990–2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform. Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 450–470. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2014.12058.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12058.x [Google Scholar]
  62. Pulvermüller, F., Huss, M., Kherif, F., del Prado Martin, F. M., Hauk, O., & Shtyrov, Y.
    (2006) Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(20), 7865–7870. 10.1073/pnas.0509989103
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509989103 [Google Scholar]
  63. Pulvermüller, F., & Schumann, J. H.
    (1994) Neurobiological mechanisms of language acquisition. Language Learning, 44(4), 681–734. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1994.tb00635.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb00635.x [Google Scholar]
  64. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved fromhttps://www.r-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Saito, K.
    (2015) The role of age of acquisition in late second language oral proficiency attainment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(4), 713–743. 10.1017/S0272263115000248
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000248 [Google Scholar]
  66. Sakai, M., & Moorman, C.
    (2018) Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 187–224. 10.1017/S0142716417000418
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000418 [Google Scholar]
  67. Setter, J., & Jenkins, J.
    (2005) State-of-the-art review article: Pronunciation. Language Teaching, 38(1), 1–17. 10.1017/S026144480500251X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480500251X [Google Scholar]
  68. Smith, A., & Goffman, L.
    (1998) Stability and patterning of speech movement sequences in children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(1), 18–30. 10.1044/jslhr.4101.18
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4101.18 [Google Scholar]
  69. Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N.
    (1999) Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(1), 137–149. 10.3758/BF03207704
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207704 [Google Scholar]
  70. Strange, W., & Shafer, V. L.
    (2008) Speech perception in second language learners: The re-education of selective perception. InJ. G. H. Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp.153–191). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.36.09str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.36.09str [Google Scholar]
  71. Thomson, R. I.
    (2011) Computer assisted pronunciation training: Targeting second language vowel perception improves pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 28(3), 744–765. 10.11139/cj.28.3.744‑765
    https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.3.744-765 [Google Scholar]
  72. (2022) The relationship between L2 speech perception and production. InT. M. Derwing, M. J. Munro, & R. I. Thomson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and speaking (pp.372–385). New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003022497‑32
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022497-32 [Google Scholar]
  73. Tsukada, K., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., & Flege, J. E.
    (2005) A developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native Korean adults and children. Journal of Phonetics, 33(3), 263–290. 10.1016/j.wocn.2004.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  74. Walley, A. C., & Flege, J. E.
    (1999) Effect of lexical status on children’s and adults’ perception of native and non-native vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 27(3), 307–332. 10.1006/jpho.1999.0098
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0098 [Google Scholar]
  75. Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A.
    (2003) Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2), 1033–1043. 10.1121/1.1531176
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1531176 [Google Scholar]
  76. Werker, J. F., & Logan, J. S.
    (1985) Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 37(1), 35–44. 10.3758/BF03207136
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207136 [Google Scholar]
  77. Yates, L., & Kozar, O.
    (2017) Expanding the horizons of age-related research: A response to the special issue ‘Complexities and interactions of age in second language learning: Broadening the research agenda’. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 258–262. 10.1093/applin/amv031
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv031 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.21026.lee
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jslp.21026.lee
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error