Effects of listeners’ dialectal variation on comprehensibility and accentedness judgements of second language speech

References

1. Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K.
   (2009) Age of acquisition and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception vs. linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 591, 249–306. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00507.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.x [Google Scholar]
2. Algethami, G., Ingram, J., & Nguyen, T.
   (2011) The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit: The case of Arabic accented English. In. J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Sept 2010 (pp.30–42), Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K.
   (2020) Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior research methods, 521, 388–407. 10.3758/s13428‑019‑01237‑x
   https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x [Google Scholar]
4. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
   (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
5. Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R.
   (2003) The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(3), 1600–1610. 10.1121/1.1603234
   https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1603234 [Google Scholar]
6. Bowden, H. W.
   (2016) Assessing second-language oral proficiency for research: The Spanish elicited imitation task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 381, 647–675. 10.1017/S0272263115000443
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000443 [Google Scholar]
7. Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T.
   (2015a) Second language comprehensibility revisited: Investigating the effects of learner background. TESOL quarterly, 49(4), 814–837. 10.1002/tesq.203
   https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.203 [Google Scholar]
8. Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., & Saito, K.
   (2015b) Does a speaking task affect second language comprehensibility?The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 80–95. 10.1111/modl.12185
   https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12185 [Google Scholar]
9. Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., Saito, K., & Isaacs, T.
   (2018) Linguistic dimensions of L2 accentedness and comprehensibility vary across speaking tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 443–457. 10.1017/S027226311700016X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311700016X [Google Scholar]
10. Crowther, D.
    (2020) Rating L2 speaker comprehensibility on monologic vs. interactive tasks: What is the effect of speaking task type?Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6(1), 96–121. 10.1075/jslp.19019.cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.19019.cro [Google Scholar]
11. Crowther, D., Holden, D., & Urada, K.
    (2022) Second language speech comprehensibility. Language Teaching, 55(4), 470–489. 10.1017/S0261444821000537
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000537 [Google Scholar]
12. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G.
    (1998) Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 481, 393–410. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00047
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00047 [Google Scholar]
13. Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2004) Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language learning, 54(4), 655–679. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00282.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x [Google Scholar]
14. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (2009) Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 421, 476–490. 10.1017/S026144480800551X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480800551X [Google Scholar]
15. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (2013) The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A 7-year study. Language learning, 63(2), 163–185. 10.1111/lang.12000
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12000 [Google Scholar]
16. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Foote, J. A., Waugh, E., & Fleming, J.
    (2014) Opening the window on comprehensible pronunciation after 19 years: A workplace training study. Language Learning, 64(3), 526–548. 10.1111/lang.12053
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12053 [Google Scholar]
17. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (2015) Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42 [Google Scholar]
18. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J.
    (2009) The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 533–557. 10.1017/S0272263109990015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990015 [Google Scholar]
19. Field, J.
    (2005) Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. 10.2307/3588487
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588487 [Google Scholar]
20. Flege, J., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A.
    (1995) Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 971, 3125–3134. 10.1121/1.413041
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413041 [Google Scholar]
21. Foote, J. A., & McDonough, K.
    (2017) Using shadowing with mobile technology to improve L2 pronunciation. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(1), 34–56. 10.1075/jslp.3.1.02foo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.1.02foo [Google Scholar]
22. Foote, J. A., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2018) Is it because of my language background? A study of language background influence on comprehensibility judgments. Canadian Modern Language Review, 74(2), 253–278. 10.3138/cmlr.2017‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2017-0011 [Google Scholar]
23. Gomez, P.
    (2009) British and American English pronunciation differences. Cambridge: Mayflower Press, (pp.3–8).
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hahn, L. D.
    (2004) Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL quarterly, 38(2), 201–223. 10.2307/3588378
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588378 [Google Scholar]
25. Hansen Edwards, J. G., Zampini, M. L., & Cunningham, C.
    (2018) The accentedness, comprehensibility, and intelligibility of Asian Englishes. World Englishes, 37(4), 538–557. 10.1111/weng.12344
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12344 [Google Scholar]
26. Hayes-Harb, R., Smith, B. L., Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R.
    (2008) The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for native speakers of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts. Journal of phonetics, 36(4), 664–679. 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.04.002 [Google Scholar]
27. Huensch, A., & Nagle, C.
    (2021) The effect of speaker proficiency on intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness in L2 Spanish: A conceptual replication and extension of Munro and Derwing (1995a). Language Learning, 71(3), 626–668. 10.1111/lang.12451
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12451 [Google Scholar]
28. Huensch, A., & Nagle, C.
    (2022) Revisiting the moderating effect of speaker proficiency on the relationships among intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 45(2), 571–585. 10.1017/S0272263122000213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000213 [Google Scholar]
29. Kang, O., Rubin, D. O. N., & Pickering, L.
    (2010) Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. The Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 554–566. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2010.01091.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x [Google Scholar]
30. Kang, O.
    (2012) Impact of rater characteristics and prosodic features of speaker accentedness on ratings of international teaching assistants’ oral performance. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(3), 249–269. 10.1080/15434303.2011.642631
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.642631 [Google Scholar]
31. Kang, O., Vo, S. T., & Moran, M. K.
    (2016) Perceptual judgments of accented speech by listeners from different first language backgrounds. TESL-EJ, 20(1), 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kostromitina, M., & Plonsky, L.
    (2022) Elicited imitation tasks as a measure of L2 proficiency: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(3), 886–911. 10.1017/S0272263121000395
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000395 [Google Scholar]
33. Leppänen, S., Pitkänen-Huhta, A., Nikula, T., Kytölä, S., Törmäkangas, T., Nissinen, K., Kääntä, L., Räisänen, T., Laitinen, M., Pahta, P., Koskela, H., Lähdesmäki, S., & Jousmäki, H.
    (2011) National survey on the English language in Finland: Uses, meanings and attitudes. Studies of Variation, Contacts and Change in English51. https://varieng.helsinki.fi/series/volumes/05/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
34. Levis, J. M.
    (2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 391, 369–377. 10.2307/3588485
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485 [Google Scholar]
35. Mackay, I. R., Flege, J. E., & Imai, S.
    (2006) Evaluating the effects of chronological age and sentence duration on degree of perceived foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(2), 157–183. 10.1017/S0142716406060231
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060231 [Google Scholar]
36. McManus, K., & Liu, Y.
    (2022) Using elicited imitation to measure global oral proficiency in SLA research: A close replication study. Language Teaching, 55(1), 116–135. 10.1017/S026144482000021X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482000021X [Google Scholar]
37. Morris-Wilson, I.
    (1999) Attitudes towards Finnish-accented English. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Stirling.
38. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (1999) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 491, 285–310. 10.1111/0023‑8333.49.s1.8
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.49.s1.8 [Google Scholar]
39. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2001) Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech the role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 451–468. 10.1017/S0272263101004016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101004016 [Google Scholar]
40. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2006) The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 34(4), 520–531. 10.1016/j.system.2006.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.09.004 [Google Scholar]
41. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2020) Foreign accent, comprehensibilityint and intelligibility, redux. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 6(3), 283–309. 10.1075/jslp.20038.mun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.20038.mun [Google Scholar]
42. Nagle, C.
    (2019) Developing and validating a methodology for crowdsourcing L2 speech ratings in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 5(2), 294–323. 10.1075/jslp.18016.nag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.18016.nag [Google Scholar]
43. Nagle, C. L., & Rehman, I.
    (2021) Doing L2 speech research online: Why and how to collect online ratings data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(4), 916–939. 10.1017/S0272263121000292
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000292 [Google Scholar]
44. Norris, J. M., Sasayama, S., & Kim, M.
    (2022) The relationship between poststimulus pause, learner proficiency, and working memory in an Elicited Imitation Task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(5), 1370–1387. 10.1017/S0272263122000274
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000274 [Google Scholar]
45. O’Brien, M. G.
    (2014) L2 learners’ assessments of accentedness, fluency, and comprehensibility of native and nonnative German speech. Language Learning, 64(4), 715–748. 10.1111/lang.12082
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12082 [Google Scholar]
46. Ockey, G. J., & French, R.
    (2016) From one to multiple accents on a test of L2 listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 693–715. 10.1093/applin/amu060
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu060 [Google Scholar]
47. Ortega, L., Iwashita, N., Norris, J. M., & Rabie, S.
    (2002) An investigation of elicited imitation tasks in crosslinguistic SLA research. Paper presented at the20th Second Language Research Forum, Toronto, October 3–6, 2002 [Unpublished handout retrieved from IRIS]
48. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URLhttps://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
49. Saito, K.
    (2021) What characterizes comprehensible and native-like pronunciation among English-as-a-second-language speakers? Meta-analyses of phonological, rater, and instructional factors. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 866–900. 10.1002/tesq.3027
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3027 [Google Scholar]
50. Saito, K., & Akiyama, Y.
    (2017) Linguistic correlates of comprehensibility in second language Japanese speech. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(2), 199–217. 10.1075/jslp.3.2.02sai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.2.02sai [Google Scholar]
51. Saito, K., & Liu, Y.
    (2022) Roles of collocation in L2 oral proficiency revisited: Different tasks, L1 vs. L2 raters, and cross-sectional vs. longitudinal analyses. Second Language Research, 38(3), 531–554. 10.1177/0267658320988055
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320988055 [Google Scholar]
52. Saito, K., & Shintani, N.
    (2016) Do native speakers of North American and Singapore English differentially perceive second language comprehensibility?TESOL Quarterly, 501, 421–446. 10.1002/tesq.234
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.234 [Google Scholar]
53. Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2016) Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 217–240. 10.1017/S0142716414000502
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000502 [Google Scholar]
54. Saito, K., Tran, M., Suzukida, Y., Sun, H., Magne, V., & Ilkan, M.
    (2019) How do second language listeners perceive the comprehensibility of foreign-accented speech?: Roles of first language profiles, second language proficiency, age, experience, familiarity, and metacognition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(5), 1133–1149. 10.1017/S0272263119000226
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000226 [Google Scholar]
55. Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2017) Using listener judgements to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 381, 439–462. 10.1093/applin/amv047
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv047 [Google Scholar]
56. Schmid, M. S., & Hopp, H.
    (2014) Comparing foreign accent in L1 attrition and L2 acquisition: Range and rater effects. Language Testing, 31(3), 367–388. 10.1177/0265532214526175
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214526175 [Google Scholar]
57. Smith, B., Bradlow, A. R., Bent, T., Solé, M. J., Recasens, D., & Romero, J.
    (2003) Production and perception of temporal contrasts in foreign-accented English. InProceedings of the XVth international congress of phonetic sciences, Barcelona, Spain (pp.519–522).
    [Google Scholar]
58. Stibbard, R. M., & Lee, J. I.
    (2006) Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(1), 433–442. 10.1121/1.2203595
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2203595 [Google Scholar]
59. Suzuki, S., & Kormos, J.
    (2020) Linguistic dimensions of comprehensibility and perceived fluency: An investigation of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language argumentative speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 143–167. 10.1017/S0272263119000421
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000421 [Google Scholar]
60. Suzukida, Y., & Saito, K.
    (2019) Which segmental features matter for successful L2 comprehensibility? Revisiting and generalizing the pedagogical value of the functional load principle. Language Teaching Research25(3), 431–450. 10.1177/1362168819858246
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819858246 [Google Scholar]
61. Tergujeff, E.
    (2021) Second language comprehensibility and accentedness across oral proficiency levels: A comparison of two L1s. System1001, 102567. 10.1016/j.system.2021.102567
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102567 [Google Scholar]
62. Trein, A. D., Alves, U. K., & Luchini, P. L.
    (2022) Comprehensibility ratings in non-native speaker-listener bibomials: Implications for NNL teaching. Perspectivas para o ensino de línguas61, 22–32.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2012) Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 151, 905–916. 10.1017/S1366728912000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000168 [Google Scholar]
64. Wu, S. L., Tio, Y. P., & Ortega, L.
    (2022) Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 proficiency: New insights from a comparison of two L2 English parallel forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(1), 271–300. 10.1017/S0272263121000103
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000103 [Google Scholar]
65. Xi, X., & Mollaun, P.
    (2009) How do raters from India perform in scoring the TOEFL iBT™ speaking section and what kind of training helps?ETS Research Report Series, 2009(2), i–37. 10.1002/j.2333‑8504.2009.tb02188.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2009.tb02188.x [Google Scholar]
66. Xie, X., & Fowler, C. A.
    (2013) Listening with a foreign-accent: The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit in Mandarin speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 41(5), 369–378. 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.06.003 [Google Scholar]
67. Yao, Z., Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
    (2013) Z-Lab [Computer software]. Retrieved fromhttps://github.com/ZeshanYao/Z-Lab